Advanced search
Publication Cover
Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology Volume 18, 2023 - Issue 6
Submit an article Journal homepage
299
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Bridge or barrier: technology, well-being, and blindness

Belinda RudingerTexas A&M University-Commerce, Commerce, TX, USACorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5253-0391
ORCID Icon
Pages 904-912 | Received 28 Dec 2020, Accepted 27 May 2021, Published online: 13 Jul 2021

References

  • Augusto CR. Critical issues confronting the blindness field: can providers and consumers agree? J Visual Impair Blin. 2008;102(8):453–457.
  • Godfrey AJR, Loots MT. Advice from blind teachers on how to teach statistics to blind students. J Stat Educ. 2015;23(4):1–28.
  • Riva G, Chirico A, Serino S, et al. Positive technology: from communication to positive experience. In: Muñiz-Velázquez JA, Pulido CM, editors. The Routledge handbook of positive communication: contributions of an emerging community of research on communication for happiness and social change. 1st ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2019 [cited 2020 Dec 24]. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351801607.
  • Gaggioli A, Riva G, Peters D, et al. Positive technology, computing, and design: shaping a future in which technology promotes psychological well-being. In Emotions and affect in human factors and human-computer interaction. Elsevier; 2017 [cited 2020 Dec 24]. p. 477–502. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780128018514000185.
  • Verbeek PP. Toward a theory of technological mediation: a program for post phenomenological research. In: Berg JK, Friis O, Crease RC, editors. Technoscience and post phenomenology: the Manhattan papers. London: Lexington Books; 2016. p. 189–204.
  • Smedema SM, McKenzie AR. The relationship among frequency and type of internet use, perceived social support, and sense of well-being in individuals with visual impairments. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(4):317–325.
  • Pfeiffer JP, Pinquart M. Computer use of adolescents with and without visual impairment. TAD. 2013;25(2):99–106.
  • Della Líbera B, Jurberg C. Teenagers with visual impairment and new media: a world without barriers. Br J Vis Impair. 2017;35(3):247–256.
  • Shinohara K, Tenenberg J. A blind person’s interactions with technology. Commun Acm. 2009;52(8):58–66.
  • Shinohara K, Wobbrock JO. In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems—CHI ’11 [Internet]. Vancouver, BC, Canada: ACM Press; 2011 [cited 2020 Dec 24]. p. 705. Available from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1978942.1979044.
  • Rudinger B. Non-visual access to print and its barriers. Forum Pedagogiczne. 2020;10(2):29–43.
  • Peters D, Calvo RA, Ryan RM. Designing for motivation, engagement and wellbeing in digital experience. Front Psychol. 2018;9:797.
  • Pinquart M, Pfeiffer JP. Psychological well-being in visually impaired and unimpaired individuals: a meta-analysis. Br J Vis Impair. 2011;29(1):27–45.
  • Bennett CL, Rosner DK, Taylor AS. The care work of access. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems [Internet]. Honolulu, HI, USA: ACM; 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 25]. p. 1–15. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3313831.3376568.
  • Blythe M, Monk A, Park J. Technology biogarphies: field study techinques for home use product development. Proceedings of the CHI ’02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems—CHI ’02 [Internet]. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA: ACM Press; 2002 [cited 2020 Dec 24]. p. 658. Available from: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=506443.506532.
  • George D, Mallery P. Using SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. 16th ed. New York and London: Routledge; 2019.
  • Park J. Improving user interaction in interactive TV based on ethnographic insights from real-life problems. Int J Hum-Comput Int. 2015;31(1):17–32.
  • Mitchell V, Mackley KL, Pink S, et al. Situating digital interventions: mixed methods for HCI research in the home. Interact Comput. 2015;27(1):3–12.
  • Burrows A, Mitchell V, Nicolle C. Let’s spend some time together: exploring the out-of-box experience of technology for older adults. Int J Mob Hum Comp Interact. 2016;8(2):69–82.
  • Martiniello N, Wittich W, Jarry A. The perception and use of technology within braille instruction: a preliminary study of braille teaching professionals. Br J Vis Impair. 2018;36(2):195–206.
  • Cook AM. Assistive technologies: principles and practice. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2019.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.