Understanding the possibilities and limitations of assistive technology in health and welfare services for people with intellectual disabilities, staff perspectives

References

• Oude Weernink C, Sweegers L, Relou L, et al. Lost and misplaced items and assistive devices in nursing homes: identifying problems and technological opportunities through participatory design research. Technol Disabil. 2018;29(3):129–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WHO. Assistive technology; 2018. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology.
   Google Scholar
• Smith RO, Scherer MJ, Cooper R, et al. Assistive technology products: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(5):473–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamp A, Obstfelder A, Andersson K. Welfare technologies in care work. NJWLS. 2019;9:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Zander V, Gustafsson C, Landerdahl Stridsberg S, et al. Implementation of welfare technology: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021:1–16. DOI:10.1080/17483107.2021.1938707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frennert S, Baudin K. The concept of welfare technology in Swedish municipal eldercare. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(9):1220–1227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann B. Ethical challenges with welfare technology: a review of the literature. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013;19(2):389–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen K. Innovation in the care services. Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services (Ed.). Official Norwegian Reports NOU. 2011;11:181s.
   Google Scholar
• Boot FH, Owuor J, Dinsmore J, et al. Access to assistive technology for people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018;62(10):900–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wass S, Moeb CE, Thygesenc E, et al., editors. Use of welfare technology to increase employment of individuals with intellectual disabilities. The 16th Scandinavian conference on health informatics. Aalborg (Denmark): Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Jamwal R, Jarman HK, Roseingrave E, et al. Smart home and communication technology for people with disability: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020:1–21. DOI:10.1080/17483107.2020.1818138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford Simplican S, Shivers C, Chen J, et al. "With a touch of a button": staff perceptions on integrating technology in an Irish service provider for people with intellectual disabilities”. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018;31(1):e130–e139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braddock D, Rizzolo MC, Thompson M, et al. Emerging technologies and cognitive disability. J Spec Educ Technol. 2004;19(4):49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez VG, Anker-Hansen C, Taylor I, et al. Older people's attitudes and perspectives of welfare technology in Norway. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019;12:841–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith E, Sumner P, Hedge C, et al. Smart-speaker technology and intellectual disabilities: agency and wellbeing. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020:1–11. DOI:10.1080/17483107.2020.1864670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsten C, Martin L, Dag M, et al. Information and communication technology use in daily life among young adults with mild-to-moderate intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil. 2020;24(3):289–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owuor J, Larkan F. Assistive technology for an inclusive society for people with intellectual disability. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;242:805–812.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wehmeyer ML, Smith SJ, Palmer SB, et al. Technology use and people with mental retardation. In: Glidden LM, editor. International review of research in mental retardation. Vol. 29. San Diego: Academic Press; 2004. p. 293–337.
   Google Scholar
• NBoHa W. Ehealth and welfare technology in the municipalities. Sweden: National Board of Health and Welfare; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Lidström H, Hemmingsson H. Benefits of the use of ICT in school activities by students with motor, speech, visual, and hearing impairment: a literature review. Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21(4):251–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner S, Shpigelman CN. Information and communication technologies: where are persons with intellectual disabilities? Isr J Health Policy Res. 2019;8(1):6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Neill SJ, Smyth S, Smeaton A, et al. Assistive technology: understanding the needs and experiences of individuals with autism spectrum disorder and/or intellectual disability in Ireland and the UK. Assist Technol. 2020;32(5):251–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreras A, Poveda R, Quílez M, et al. Improving the quality of life of persons with intellectual disabilities through ICTs. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;242:257–264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ørvig K, Claussen T. Welfare technology dilemmas facing young people with intellectual impairment – some illustrated theoretical explorations. Nordic Soc Work Res. 2018;8(3):235–248.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick DD, Fullwood C. An online life like any other: identity, self-determination, and social networking among adults with intellectual disabilities. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018;21(1):56–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsten C, Martin L, Dag M, et al. A balance of social inclusion and risks: Staff perceptions of information and communication technology in the daily life of young adults with mild to moderate intellectual disability in a social care context. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2019;16(3):171–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirza M, Hammel J. Consumer-Directed goal planning in the delivery of assistive technology services for people who are ageing with intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect. 2009;22(5):445–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. London; Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanoff SD, Hultberg J. Understanding the multiple realities of everyday life: basic assumptions in focus-group methodology. Scand J Occup Ther. 2006;13(2):125–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London; Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen ER, Dugstad J, Eide H, et al. Exploring resistance to implementation of welfare technology in municipal healthcare services – a longitudinal case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaen J. Competing concerns in welfare technology innovation: a systematic literature review. 10th Scandinavian conference on information systems; 2019. https://aisel.aisnet.org/scis2019/3
   Google Scholar
• Woensdregt G, D’Addabbo G, Scholten H, et al. Sensors in the care of persons with visual- or visual-and-intellectual disabilities: Use, needs, practical issues, and ethical concerns. TAD. 2020;32(1):15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Wolbring G, Leopatra V. Sensors: views of staff of a disability service organization. J Pers Med. 2013;3(1):23–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanchez VG, Taylor I, Bing-Jonsson PC. Ethics of smart house welfare technology for older adults: a systematic literature review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017;33(6):691–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Ameen M, Liu J, Kwak K. Security and privacy issues in wireless sensor networks for healthcare applications. J Med Syst. 2012;36(1):93–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyzel V, Oosterom-Calo R, Worm M, et al. Assistive technology to promote communication and social interaction for people with deafblindness: a systematic review [systematic review]. Front Educ. 2020;5:164.
   Google Scholar
• Owuor J, Larkan F, MacLachlan M. Leaving no-one behind: using assistive technology to enhance community living for people with intellectual disability. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(5):426–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bygstad B, Lanestedt G. Expectations and realities in welfare technologies a comparative study of Japan and Norway. TG. 2017;11(2):286–303.
   Google Scholar
• Boot FH, Dinsmore J, Khasnabis C, et al. Intellectual disability and assistive technology: Opening the GATE wider. Front Public Health. 2017;5:10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger CA, Morbey ML, Lotherington H, et al. Factors contributing to teachers' successful implementation of IT. J Comp Assist Learn. 2002;18(4):480–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersten MCO, Taminiau EF, Schuurman MIM, et al. How to improve sharing and application of knowledge in care and support for people with intellectual disabilities? A systematic review. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018;62(6):496–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall SA. Community involvement of young adults with intellectual disabilities: their experiences and perspectives on inclusion. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2017;30(5):859–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knarvik U, Rotvold GH, Bjørvig S, et al. Kunnskapsoppsummering: Velferdsteknologi. Nasjonalt Senter for e-Helseforskning; 2017. p. 1–43. https://ehealthresearch.no/rapporter/kunnskapsoppsummering-velferdsteknologi.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsten C, Marmstal Hammar L, Martin L, et al. ICT and intellectual disability: a survey of organizational support at the municipal level in Sweden. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2017;30(4):705–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspinall A, Hegarty JR. ICT for adults with learning disabilities: an organisation‐wide audit. Br J Educ Technol. 2001;32(3):365–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IoMCoDi A. Assistive and mainstream technologies for people with disabilities. The future of disability in America. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2007. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11418.
   Google Scholar
• Smith E, Sumner P, Hedge C, et al. Smart speaker devices can improve speech intelligibility in adults with intellectual disability. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021;56(3):583–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar