Low vision devices for age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review

References

• Wong WL, Su X, Li X, et al. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(2):e106-16–e116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas JB, Cheung CMG, Panda-Jonas S. Updates on the epidemiology of age-related macular degeneration. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2017;6(6):493–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong B, Duff D, Mullen G, et al. A snapshot of blindness and low vision services in Australia 2020 [cited 2019 Dec12]. Available from: https://www.vision2020australia.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/A-snapshot-of-blindness-and-low-vision-services-in-Australia-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Spooner KL, Mhlanga CT, Hong TH, et al. The burden of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a patient's perspective. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:2483–2491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim LS, Mitchell P, Seddon JM, et al. Age-related macular degeneration. Lancet. 2012;379(9827):1728–1738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor DJ, Hobby AE, Binns AM, et al. How does age-related macular degeneration affect real-world visual ability and quality of life? A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016;6(12):e011504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane J, Rohan EMF, Sabeti F, et al. Impacts of impaired face perception on social interactions and quality of life in age-related macular degeneration: a qualitative study and new community resources. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0209218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen NX, Weismann M, Trauzettel-Klosinski S. Improvement of reading speed after providing of low vision aids in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;87(8):849–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Lacherez P, Black AA, et al. Risk of falls, injurious falls, and other injuries resulting from visual impairment among older adults with age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(8):5088–5092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman K, Brodaty H. Psychosocial effects of age-related macular degeneration. Int Psychogeriatr. 2006;18(3):415–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimarolli VR, Casten RJ, Rovner BW, et al. Anxiety and depression in patients with advanced macular degeneration: current perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:55–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams RA, Brody BL, Thomas RG, et al. The psychosocial impact of macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(4):514–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuzawa M, Fujita K, Tanaka E, et al. Assessing quality of life in the treatment of patients with age-related macular degeneration: clinical research findings and recommendations for clinical practice. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1325–1332.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poley PR, Stapleton WM, Qui F, et al. Age-related macular degeneration: review of current treatments. Expert Review of Ophthalmology. 2011;6(2):195–201.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell J, Bradley C. Quality of life in age-related macular degeneration: a review of the literature. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vision Australia. Vision Australia shop. 2020. [cited 2020 May 20]. Available from: https://shop.visionaustralia.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Brunnstrom G, Sorensen S, Alsterstad K, et al. Quality of light and quality of life-the effect of lighting adaptation among people with low vision. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004;24(4):274–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minto H, Butt IA. Low vision devices and training. Community Eye Health. 2004;17(49):6–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moshtael H, Aslam T, Underwood I, et al. High tech aids low vision: a review of image processing for the visually impaired. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2015;4(4):6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deemer AD, Bradley CK, Ross NC, et al. Low vision enhancement with head-mounted video display systems: Are we there yet? Optom Vis Sci. 2018;95(9):694–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Peterson RC. A review of current knowledge on electronic vision enhancement systems for the visually impaired. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2003;23(1):35–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juan M-C, García-García I, Mollá R, et al. Users’ perceptions using low-end and high-end mobile-rendered HMDs: a comparative study. Computers. 2018;7(1):15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassell JB, Lamoureux EL, Keeffe JE. Impact of age related macular degeneration on quality of life. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(5):593–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper P, Jutai JW, Strong G, et al. Age-related macular degeneration and low-vision rehabilitation: a systematic review. Can J Ophthalmol. 2008;43(2):180–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virgili G, Acosta R, Bentley SA, et al. Reading aids for adults with low vision. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;4:CD003303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamade N, Hodge WG, Rakibuz-Zaman M, et al. The effects of low-vision rehabilitation on reading speed and depression in age related macular degeneration: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0159254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heravian Shandiz J, Heydarian S, Mahjoob M, et al. Using low vision aids in improving the quality of life in patients with age related macular degeneration: a review of the literature. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2016;25:376–392.
   Google Scholar
• Binns AM, Bunce C, Dickinson C, et al. How effective is low vision service provision? A systematic review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2012;57(1):34–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, et al. Chapter 3: systematic reviews of effectiveness. 2017. Joanna Briggs institute reviewer's manual [Internet]. The Joanna Briggs institute. Available from: https://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 2012;22(3):276–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, et al. An algorithm was developed to assign GRADE levels of evidence to comparisons within systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;70:106–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund K, Dahlin-Ivanoff S. Low vision, ADL and hearing assistive device use among older persons with visual impairments. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2(6):326–334.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leat SJ, Si FF, Gold D, et al. The experience of a randomized clinical trial of closed-circuit television versus eccentric viewing training for people with age-related macular degeneration. J Visual Impairment Blind. 2017;111(4):354–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson UL. Visual rehabilitation with and without educational training in the use of optical aids and residual vision. A prospective study of patients with advanced age-related macular degeneration. Clin Vis Sci. 1990;6:3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves BC, Harper RA, Russell WB. Enhanced low vision rehabilitation for people with age related macular degeneration: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(11):1443–1449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris FL, 3rd, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, et al. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94(1):91–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey IL, Lovie JE. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1976;53(11):740–745.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mansfield JS, Ahn SJ, Legge GE, et al. A new reading-acuity chart for normal and low vision. Ophthal Visual Opt Noninvasive Assess Visual Syst Tech Dig. 1993;3:232–235.
   Google Scholar
• Frennesson C, Jakobsson P, Nilsson UL. A computer and video display based system for training eccentric viewing in macular degeneration with an absolute central scotoma. Doc Ophthalmol. 1995;91(1):9–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snellen H. Probebuchstaben zur bestimmung der sehschärfe (sample letters to determine visual acuity). Van de Weijer: Utrecht; 1862.
   Google Scholar
• Hyvarinen L, Nasanen R, Laurinen P. New visual acuity test for pre-school children. Acta Ophthalmol. 1980;58(4):507–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monoyer F. Monoyer chart [Vision chart]. Ferdinand Monoyer; 1872.
   Google Scholar
• Topcon. ACP-8EM, chart projector. Tokyo: Topcon; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Dietz K, Group IRS. Standardized standardized assessment of reading performance: the new international reading speed texts IReST. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(9):5452–5461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstone B, Lane MA, Rosenthal B, et al. The lighthouse handbook on vision impairment and vision rehabilitation: two volume set. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey IL, Lovie JE. The design and use of a new near-vision chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980;57(6):378–387.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jaeger E. Schrift-scalen (font scales). Victor Masson (Paris): Seidel und Sohn Wien; 1856.
   Google Scholar
• Maclure GM. Reading type for children. Br J Ophthalmol. 1980;64(6):461–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford University Press. Oxford progressive English readers. 2020. [cited 2020 May 21]. Available from: https://oup.com.pk/school-textbooks/english/english-reader/oxford-progressive-english-readers.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan LL, Brown DJ. Reading cards for selection of optical aids for the partially sighted. Am J Ophthalmol. 1963;55(6):1187–1199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sussex Vision. Vocational near vision test type. 2020. [cited 2020 May 26]. Available from: https://www.sussex-vision.co.uk/vocational-near-vision-test-type.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey IL, editor. Prescribing magnification: strategies for improving accuracy and consistency. Proceedings of the international symposium on low vision. Low vision. Principles and application, University of Waterloo, June 25–27; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Wu DZ, Chang FX, Wu L, et al. Visual rehabilitation in low vision patients with age-related macular degeneration. Yan Ke Xue Bao. 1991;7(3):143–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Radner W, Willinger U, Obermayer W, et al. A new reading chart for simultaneous determination of reading vision and reading speed. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1998;213(3):174–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wierderholt JL, Bryant BR. Gray oral reading tests. 4th ed. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Watson GR, Wright V. The Morgan low vision reading comprehension assessment. Lilburn: Bear Consultants; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Neale MD, McKay MF, Barnard J. Neale analysis of reading ability. 3rd ed. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1975;23(10):433–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh JI, Yesavage JA. Geriatric depression scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontol. 1986;5(1–2):165–173.
   Google Scholar
• Radloff LS, The CES. D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Measur. 1977;1(3):385–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owsley C, Stalvey B, Wells J, et al. Older drivers and cataract: driving habits and crash risk. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999;54(4):M203–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Jr., Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, et al. Development of the 25-item national eye institute visual function questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(7):1050–1058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds AG, Flannigan H, Ng L. The Nottingham Adjustment Scale: a validation study. Int J Rehabil Res. 1993;16(3):177–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Day H, Jutai J. Measuring the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: the PIADS. Canadian J Rehabil. 1996;9(2):159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Harper R, Doorduyn K, Reeves B, et al. Evaluating the outcomes of low vision rehabilitation. Oph Phys Optics. 1999;19(1):3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crichton N. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). J Clin Nurs. 2001;10(5):706–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massof RW, Ahmadian L, Grover LL, et al. The activity inventory: an adaptive visual function questionnaire. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(8):763–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost NA, Sparrow JM, Durant JS, et al. Development of a questionnaire for measurement of vision-related quality of life. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1998;5(4):185–210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hart PM, Chakravarthy U, Stevenson MR, et al. A vision specific functional index for use in patients with age related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83(10):1115–1120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodrich GL, Kirby J. A comparison of patient reading performance and preference: optical devices, handheld CCTV (Innoventions Magni-Cam), or stand-mounted CCTV (Optelec Clearview or TSI genie). Optometry. 2001;72(8):519–528.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tejeria L, Harper RA, Artes PH, et al. Face recognition in age related macular degeneration: perceived disability, measured disability, and performance with a bioptic device. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(9):1019–1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker R, Bryan L, Harvey H, et al. The value of tablets as reading aids for individuals with Central visual field loss: an evaluation of eccentric reading with static and scrolling text. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016;36(4):459–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong AC, Lovie-Kitchin JE, Bowers AR. Determining magnification for reading with low vision. Clin Exp Optom. 2002;85(4):229–237.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowers A, Cheong AM, Lovie-Kitchin JE. Reading with optical magnifiers: page navigation strategies and difficulties. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(1):9–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson LM, Strang NC, Scobie F, et al. Image jitter enhances visual performance when spatial resolution is impaired. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(10):6004–6010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese A, Aguilar C, Faure G, et al. A vision enhancement system to improve face recognition with central vision loss. Optom Vis Sci. 2018;95(9):738–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rishi P, Rishi E, Maitray A, et al. Hospital anxiety and depression scale assessment of 100 patients before and after using low vision care: a prospective study in a tertiary eye-care setting. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017;65(11):1203–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber JG, Jutai JW, Strong JG, et al. The psychosocial impact of closed-circuit televisions on persons with age-related macular degeneration. J Visual Impairment Blind. 2008;102(11):690–701.
   Google Scholar
• Decarlo DK, McGwin G, Jr., Searcey K, et al. Use of prescribed optical devices in age-related macular degeneration. Optom Visual Sci. 2012;89(9):1336–1342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshtael H, Tooth C, Nuthmann A, et al. Dynamic text presentation on smart glasses: a pilot evaluation in age-related macular degeneration. Br J Visual Impairment. 2020;38(1):24–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill K, Mao A, Powell AM, et al. Digital reader vs print media: the role of digital technology in reading accuracy in age-related macular degeneration. Eye. 2013;27(5):639–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson UL, Nilsson SE. Rehabilitation of the visually handicapped with advanced macular degeneration. A follow-up study at the low vision clinic, department of ophthalmology, university of linköping. Doc Ophthalmol. 1986;62(4):345–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan SA, Das T, Kumar SM, et al. Low vision rehabilitation in patients with age-related macular degeneration at a tertiary eye care Centre in Southern India. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;30(6):404–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong AM, Lovie-Kitchin JE, Bowers AR, et al. Short-term in-office practice improves reading performance with stand magnifiers for people with AMD. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82(2):114–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen NX, Trauzettel-Klosinski S. Effectiveness of magnifying low vision aids in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Neuro-Ophthalmol. 2009;33(3):115–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballinger R, Lalle P, Maino J, et al. Veterans affairs multicenter low vision enhancement system (LVES) study: clinical results. Report 1: effects of manual-focus LVES on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. Optometry. 2000;71(12):764–774.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Culham LE, Chabra A, Rubin GS. Clinical performance of electronic, head-mounted, low-vision devices. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004;24(4):281–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrice E, Johnson AP, Marinier JA, et al. Assessment of the apple iPad as a low-vision reading aid. Eye. 2017;31(6):865–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amore FM, Silvestri V, Turco S, et al. Rehabilitative approach in patients with ring scotoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 2013;48(5):420–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtanen P, Laatikainen L. Primary success with low vision aids in age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol. 1991;69(4):484–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong AM, Bowers AR, Lovie-Kitchin JE. Does a line guide improve reading performance with stand magnifiers? Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(9):E1078–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson GR, Ramsey V, De l'Aune W, et al. Ergonomic enhancement for older readers with low vision. J Visual Impairment Blind. 2004;98(4):228–240.
   Google Scholar
• Wittich W, Lorenzini MC, Markowitz SN, et al. The effect of a head-mounted low vision device on visual function. Optom Vis Sci. 2018;95(9):774–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartong DT, Berson EL, Dryja TP. Retinitis pigmentosa. Lancet. 2006;368(9549):1795–1809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancil RM, Mancil GL, King E, et al. Improving nighttime mobility in persons with night blindness caused by retinitis pigmentosa: a comparison of two low-vision mobility devices. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(4):471–486.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malik UT. 3 Retinitis pigmentosa glasses 2020. [cited 2020 April 2]. Available from: https://irisvision.com/top-retinitis-pigmentosa-glasses/.
   Google Scholar
• Moss JD, Muth ER. Characteristics of head-mounted displays and their effects on simulator sickness. Hum Factors. 2011;53(3):308–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzini MC, Hämäläinen AM, Wittich W. Factors related to the use of a head-mounted display for individuals with low vision. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;28:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Brohl C, Rasche P, Jablonski J, et al. Desktop pc, tablet pc, or smartphone? An analysis of use preferences in daily activities for different technology generations of a worldwide sample. In: Zhou J, Salvendy G, editors. Human aspects of IT for the aged population. Acceptance, communication and participation. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes A. Screen time and kids: what’s happening in our homes? 2017. [cited 2020 April 2]. Available from: https://www.rchpoll.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/ACHP-Poll7_Detailed-Report-June21.
   Google Scholar
• Haymes SA, Johnston AW, Heyes AD. The development of the Melbourne Low-Vision ADL index: a measure of vision disability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(6):1215–1225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finger RP, McSweeney SC, Deverell L, et al. Developing an instrumental activities of daily living tool as part of the low vision assessment of daily activities protocol. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(12):8458–8466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang J, King KM, Inzlicht M. Why are self-report and behavioral measures weakly correlated? Trends Cogn Sci. 2020;24(4):267–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman SM, Munoz B, Rubin GS, et al. Characteristics of discrepancies between self-reported visual function and measured reading speed. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project Team. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(5):858–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson L, Lind C, Worrall L, et al. Hearing and vision in healthy older Australians: Objective and self-report measures. Advances in Speech Language Pathology. 1999;1(2):95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Clark VLP, et al. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. 2011. https://www2.jabsom.hawaii.edu/native/docs/tsudocs/Best_Practices_for_Mixed_Methods_Research_Aug2011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hayano J, Tanabiki T, Iwata S, et al. editors. Estimation of emotions by wearable biometric sensors under daily activities. 2018 IEEE 7th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE); 2018, 9–12 October. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Grzybowski A, Wang J, Mao F, et al. Intraocular vision-improving devices in age-related macular degeneration. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(22):1549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson HL, Lane SS, Heier JS, et al. Implantable miniature telescope for the treatment of visual acuity loss resulting from end-stage age-related macular degeneration: 1-year results. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(11):1987–2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansingh VC, Eckert KA, Strauss G. Benefits and risks of immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery: a literature review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;43(7):666–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar