Effectiveness of task-specific training using assistive devices and task-specific usual care on upper limb performance after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, et al. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(4):394–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly-Hayes M, Robertson JT, Broderick JP, et al. The American Heart Association Stroke outcome classification. Stroke. 1998;29(6):1274–1280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French B, Thomas L, Leathley M, et al. Does repetitive task training improve functional activity after stroke? A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(1):9–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard IJ, Parsons MW, Neilson C, et al. Task-specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. Occup Ther Int. 2009;16(3-4):175–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayona NA, Bitensky J, Salter K, et al. The role of task-specific training in rehabilitation therapies. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005;12(3):58–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Platz T, Van Kaick S, Möller L, et al. Impairment-oriented training and adaptive motor cortex reorganisation after stroke: a fTMS study. J Neurol. 2005;252(11):1363–1371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung C-S, Hsieh Y-W, Wu C-Y, et al. The effects of combination of robot-assisted therapy with task-specific or impairment-oriented training on motor function and quality of life in chronic stroke. Pm R. 2016;8(8):721–729.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schweighofer N, Choi Y, Winstein C, et al. Task-oriented rehabilitation robotics. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91(11 Suppl 3):S270–S279.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Peppen R, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(8):833–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(2):111–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norouzi-Gheidari N, Archambault PS, Fung J. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(4):479–496.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Veerbeek JM, Langbroek-Amersfoort AC, Van Wegen EEH, et al. Effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31(2):107–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertani R, Melegari C, De Cola MC, et al. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2017;38(9):1561–1569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). 10th revis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Loureiro RV, Harwin WS, Nagai K, et al. Advances in upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a technology push. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011;49(10):1103–1118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basteris A, Nijenhuis SM, Stienen AHA, et al. Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: a framework for classification based on a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2014;11:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finley MA, Fasoli SE, Dipietro L, et al. Short-duration robotic therapy in stroke patients with severe upper-limb motor impairment. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(5):683–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, et al. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(4):477–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macclellan LR, Bradham DD, Whitall J, et al. Robotic upper-limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(6):717–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pila O, Duret C, Laborne FX, et al. Pattern of improvement in upper limb pointing task kinematics after a 3-month training program with robotic assistance in stroke. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2017;14:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(19):1772–1783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart NA, Waldron M, Ismail H, et al. Validation of a new tool for the assessment of study quality and reporting in exercise training studies: TESTEX. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(1):9–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, et al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003;83(8):713–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Sherrington C, et al. Evidence for physiotherapy practice: a survey of the physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro). Aust J Physiother. 2002;48(1):43–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Computer program] The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Center, The Cochrane Collaboration;2011.
   Google Scholar
• van der Lee Johanna H, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, et al. The responsiveness of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33(3):110–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arya KN, Verma R, Garg RK, et al. Meaningful task-specific training (MTST) for stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19(3):193–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Fulk GD, Boyne P. Clinically important differences for the Upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Phys Ther. 2012;92(6):791–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yozbatiran N, Der-Yeghiaian L, Cramer SC. A standardized approach to performing the action research arm test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(1):78–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin J-H, Hsu M-J, Sheu C-F, et al. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2009;89(8):840–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, et al. Assessing wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(7):1635–1639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Knol DL, et al. Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 2004;35(6):1410–1414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.0. John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Krebs HI, Mernoff S, Fasoli SE, et al. A comparison of functional and impairment-based robotic training in severe to moderate chronic stroke: a pilot study. Neurorehabilitation. 2008;23(1):81–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolo M, Nunzio AD, Sebastiano F, et al. Arm weight support training improves functional motor outcome and movement smoothness after. Funct Neurol. 2012;29:15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Byl NN, Abrams GM, Pitsch E, et al. Chronic stroke survivors achieve comparable outcomes following virtual task specific repetitive training guided by a wearable robotic orthosis (UL-EXO7) and actual task specific repetitive training guided by a physical therapist. J Hand Ther. 2013;26(4):343–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casadio M, Giannoni P, Morasso P, et al. A proof of concept study for the integration of robot therapy with physiotherapy in the treatment of stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(3):217–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo R, Pisano F, Micera S, et al. Assessing mechanisms of recovery during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper limb. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(1):50–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly L, Jia Y, Toro ML, et al. A pneumatic glove and immersive virtual reality environment for hand rehabilitative training after stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2010;18(5):551–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daunoraviciene K, Adomaviciene A, Grigonyte A, et al. Effects of robot-assisted training on upper limb functional recovery during the rehabilitation of poststroke patients. Technol Health Care. 2018;26:533–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomić TJD, Savić AM, Vidaković AS, et al. ArmAssist robotic system versus matched conventional therapy for poststroke upper limb rehabilitation: a randomized clinical trial. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7659893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer HC, Triandafilou KM, Thielbar KO, et al. Use of a portable assistive glove to facilitate rehabilitation in stroke survivors with severe hand impairment. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2016;24(3):344–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fluet GG, Merians AS, Qiu Q, et al. Does training with traditionally presented and virtually simulated tasks elicit differing changes in object interaction kinematics in persons with upper extremity hemiparesis? Top Stroke Rehabil. 2015;22(3):176–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housman SJ, Scott KM, Reinkensmeyer DJ. A randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(5):505–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang T-Y, Pan L-L, Yang W-W, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of Three-Dimensional printed dynamic hand device for patients with chronic stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019;27(6):1246–1252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klamroth-Marganska V, Blanco J, Campen K, et al. Three-dimensional, task-specific robot therapy of the arm after stroke: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(2):159–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambercy O, Dovat L, Yun H, et al. Effects of a robot-assisted training of grasp and pronation/supination in chronic stroke: a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011;8:63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page S, Hill V, White S. Portable upper extremity robotics is as efficacious as upper extremity rehabilitative therapy: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(10):e21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Page S, Griffin C, White S. Efficacy of myoelectric bracing in moderately impaired stroke survivors: a randomized, controlled trial. J Rehabil Med. 2020;52:rm00017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi CD, Der-Yeghiaian L, Le V, et al. Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. Brain. 2008;131(2):425–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thielbar KO, Triandafilou KM, Fischer HC, et al. Benefits of using a voice and EMG-driven actuated glove to support occupational therapy for stroke survivors. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017;25(3):297–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans AAA, Lemmens RJM, Monfrance M, et al. Effects of task-oriented robot training on arm function, activity, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:45–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2004;35(11):2529–2539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oujamaa L, Relave I, Froger J, et al. Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke. Literature review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2009;52(3):269–293.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Timmermans AAA, Seelen HAM, Willmann RD, et al. Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1693–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starkey ML, Schwab ME. How plastic is the brain after a stroke? Neuroscientist. 2014;20(4):359–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer SC. Repairing the human brain after stroke: I. Mechanisms of spontaneous recovery. Ann Neurol. 2008;63(3):272–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreisel SH, Hennerici MG, Bäzner H. Pathophysiology of stroke rehabilitation: the natural course of clinical recovery, use-dependent plasticity and rehabilitative outcome. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;23(4):243–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasell R, Mehta S, Pereira S, et al. Time to rethink long-term rehabilitation management of stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19(6):457–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woytowicz EJ, Rietschel JC, Goodman RN, et al. Determining levels of upper extremity movement impairment by applying a cluster analysis to the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(3):456–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein J, Krebs HI, Frontera WR, et al. Comparison of two techniques of robot-aided upper limb exercise training after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83(9):720–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijenhuis SM, Prange GB, Amirabdollahian F, et al. Feasibility study into self-administered training at home using an arm and hand device with motivational gaming environment in chronic stroke. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2015;12:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buurke JH, Nene AV, Kwakkel G, et al. Recovery of gait after stroke: what changes? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(6):676–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farina D, Zennaro D, Pozzo M, et al. Single motor unit and spectral surface EMG analysis during low-force, sustained contractions of the upper trapezius muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;96(2):157–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buma F, Kwakkel G, Ramsey N. Understanding upper limb recovery after stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2013;31(6):707–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(3-5):281–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szaflarski JP, Page SJ, Kissela BM, et al. Cortical reorganization following modified constraint-induced movement therapy: a study of 4 patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(8):1052–1058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liepert J, Bauder H, Miltner WHR, et al. Treatment-Induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke. 2000;31(6):1210–1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hluštík P, Mayer M. Paretic hand in stroke: from motor cortical plasticity research to rehabilitation. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2006;19:34–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thirumala P, Hier DB, Patel P, et al. Motor recovery after stroke: lessons from functional brain imaging. Neurol Res. 2002;24(5):453–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Lannin NA, Borschmann K, et al. Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: consensus-based core recommendations from the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(5):451–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar