Exploring environmental factors affecting assistive technology strategies in mathematics learning for students with physical disabilities

References

• United Nations General Assembly. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, art. 24, A/RES/61/106, Dec. 13, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson L. Participation and disability: a study of participation in school for children and youth with disabilities [dissertation thesis]. Stockholm (Sweden): Karolinska Institutet; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Reys R, Lindquist M, Lambdin D, et al. Helping children learn mathematics, 11th ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Jenks KM, De Moor J, Van Lieshout E. Arithmetic difficulties in children with cerebral palsy are related to executive function and working memory. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009;50(7):824–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman MB. Successful implementation of assistive technology to promote access to curriculum and instruction for students with physical disabilities. Phys Disabil Educ Relat Serv. 2011;30(2):2–22.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rooijen M, Verhoeven L, Steenbergen B. Early numeracy in cerebral palsy: review and future research. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(3):202–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams K, Cook A. Access to hands-on mathematics measurement activities using robots controlled via speech generating devices: three case studies. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9(4):286–298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adams K, Cook A. Using robots in “hands-on” academic activities: a case study examining speech-generating device use and required skills. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;31(7):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Encarnação P, Leite T, Nunes C, et al. Using assistive robots to promote inclusive education. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(4):352–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang TH, Liu YC, Chang HC. Learning achievement in solving Word-based mathematical questions through a computer-assisted learning system. J Educ Technol Soc. 2012;15(1):248–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson-Walker NJ, Doabler CT, Fien H, et al. 2013. Instructional gaming: using technology to support early mathematical proficiency. Society for research on educational effectiveness. Paper presented at: Interdisciplinary Synthesis in Advancing Education Science. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness Fall Conference; 2013 Sept 26-28; Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Adams K, Alvarez L, Rios-Rincon A. Robotic systems for augmentative manipulation to promote cognitive development, play, and education. In: Cook A, Encarnação P, editors. Principles and practice of rehabilitation robots. Novato (CA): CRC Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Bouck EC, Working C, Bone E. Manipulative apps to support students with disabilities in mathematics. Interv Sch Clin. 2018;53(3):177–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pape T, Kim J, Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(1–3):5–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugawara A, Ramos V, Alfieri F, et al. Abandonment of assistive products: assessing abandonment levels and factors that impact on it. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(7):716–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang IC, Sugden D, Beveridge S. Assistive devices and cerebral palsy: the use of assistive devices at school by children with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev. 2009;35(5):698–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RO. Measuring assistive technology outcomes in education. Diagnostique. 2000;25(4):273–290.
   Google Scholar
• World health organization. How to use the ICF: a practical manual for using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Exposure draft for comment. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Martiniello N, Spence S, Rousseau L, et al. Student perspectives on access to technology In: Jorgensen M, Fichten C, King L, et al. editors. Proceedings of the Ed-ICT International Network Montreal Symposium: Stakeholder Perspectives; 2017 May 30–Jun 1; Montreal, (QC). Montreal: Dawson College; 2018. p. 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Oladejo MA, Adetoro JA, Oyebade SA, et al. Learning on the move: the behavioural intentions of nigerian students with disabilities. Malays Online J Edu. Sci. 2018;6(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Copley J, Ziviani J. Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occup Ther Int. 2004;11(4):229–243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Egilson ST, Traustadottir R. Participation of students with physical disabilities in the school environment. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63(3):264–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murchland S, Parkyn H. Using assistive technology for schoolwork: the experience of children with physical disabilities. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(6):438–447.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bouck EC, Flanagan S. Assistive technology and mathematics: What is there and where can we go in special education. J Spec Educ Technol. 2009;24(2):17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez-Beleño GE, López-Muñoz JS. Tecnología de asistencia Para la inclusión educativa de personas con parálisis cerebral: una revisión crítica de la literature [assistive technology for educational inclusion of people with cerebral palsy: a critical review of the literature]. Rehabilitación. 2016;50(2):87–94. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson P, Johnston C, Barker K. Influences on students' assistive technology use at school: the views of classroom teachers, allied health professionals, students with cerebral palsy and their parents. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(8):763–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin R. Case study research: design and methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications Inc.; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Given L. The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications Inc.; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell R, Barteaux L, Holden J. Maximizing kindergarten math. Edmonton (AB): Edmonton Public Schools; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Zabala J. Ready, sett, go! getting started with the sett framework. Closing the Gap. 2005;23(6):1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrer M, Jutai J, Scherer M, et al. A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(22):1243–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills A, Durepos G, Wiebe E. Encyclopedia of case study research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage publications Inc.; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh H, Shannon S. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook A, Encarnaçao P, Adams K. Robots: assistive technologies for play, learning and cognitive development. Technol Disabil. 2010;22(3):127–145.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson GM. Using tablet computers with elementary school students with special needs: the practices and perceptions of special education teachers and teacher assistants. Canadian J Learn Technol. 2013;39(4):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Case D, Davidson R. Accessible online learning. New Dir Stud Serv. 2011;2011(134):47–58.
   Google Scholar
• McCarty E, Morress C. Establishing access to technology: an evaluation and intervention model to increase the participation of children with cerebral palsy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2009;20(3):523–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz AR, Rincón AM, Dueñas, R, et al. What does the literature say about using robots on children with disabilities? Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;31(7):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Reed P, Bowser G, Korsten J. How do you know it? How can you show it?. Oshkosh (WI): Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Adams K, David BL. Making hands-on activities for everyone: Math and the lego mindstorms robot. Edmonton (AB): Alberta Teacher’s Association Library; 2013.
   Google Scholar