Collaborative co-design and evaluation of an immersive virtual reality application prototype for communication rehabilitation (DISCOVR prototype)

References

• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• O'Halloran R, Worrall L, Hickson L. The number of patients with communication related impairments in acute hospital stroke units. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009;11(6):438–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris SH, Farlow M. Language impairment in alzheimer's disease and benefits of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2013;8:1007–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel J, Ferguson A, Spencer E, et al. Language and cognitive communication during post-traumatic amnesia: a critical synthesis. NRE. 2015;37(2):221–234.
   Google Scholar
• Radclife J, Cranshaw M, Grant R, et al. Prevalence of different types of speech, language and communication disorders and speech pathology services in Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Des Roches CA, Kiran S. Technology-based rehabilitation to improve communication after acquired brain injury. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manheim LM, Halper AS, Cherney L. Patient-reported changes in communication after computer-based script training for aphasia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(4):623–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle P, McNeil M, Hula W, et al. The burden of stroke scale (BOSS): validating patient-reported communication difficulty and associated psychological distress in stroke survivors. Aphasiology. 2003;17(3):291–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilda K. Video-based conversational script training for aphasia: a therapy study. Aphasiology. 2011;25(2):191–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade J, Mortley J, Enderby P. Talk about IT: Views of people with aphasia and their partners on receiving remotely monitored computer-based word finding therapy. Aphasiology. 2003;17(11):1031–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer R, Dimairo M, Cooper C, et al. Self-managed, computerised speech and language therapy for patients with chronic aphasia post-stroke compared with usual care or attention control (big CACTUS): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(9):821–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdett A, Bowen D. BCS glossary of computing and ICT. Swindon, UK: BCS Learning and Development Limited; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons TD, Gaggioli A, Riva G. Virtual reality for research in social neuroscience. Brain Sci. 2017;7(12):42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bryant L, Brunner M, Hemsley B. A review of virtual reality technologies in the field of communication disability: Implications for practice and research. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2020;15(4):365–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia LJ, Rebolledo M, Metth’e L, et al. The potential of virtual reality to assess functional communication in aphasia. Topics in Language Disorders. 2007;27(3):272–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slobounov SM, Ray W, Johnson B, et al. Modulation of cortical activity in 2D versus 3D virtual reality environments: an EEG study. Int J Psychophysiol. 2015;95(3):254–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard MC. A Meta-analysis and systematic literature review of virtual reality rehabilitation programs. Comput Hum Behav. 2017;70:317–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones MB, Kennedy RS, Stanney KM. Toward systematic control of cybersickness. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments. 2004;13(5):589–600.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall J, Booth T, Devane N, et al. Evaluating the benefits of aphasia intervention delivered in virtual reality: Results of a quasi-randomised study. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0160381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall J, Wilson S, Cruice M, et al. EVA Park City University, London; 2021 [cited 3rd Mar 2021]. https://evapark.city.ac.uk
   Google Scholar
• Giachero A, Calati M, Pia L, et al. Conversational therapy through semi-immersive virtual reality environments for language recovery and psychological well-being in post-stroke aphasia., 2020. Behav Neurol. 2020;2020:2846046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baniasadi T, Ayyoubzadeh SM, Mohammadzadeh N. Challenges and practical considerations in applying virtual reality in medical education and treatment. Oman Med J. 2020;35(3):e125–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slattery P, Saeri AK, Bragge P. Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18(1):17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkett I. An introduction to co-design. Sydney, NSW: UNSW Centre for Social Impact; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ventola CL. Virtual reality in pharmacy: Opportunities for clinical, research, and educational applications. P T. 2019;44(5):267–276.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bryant L, Hemsley B, Bailey B, et al. Opportunities for immersive virtual reality in rehabilitation: Focus on communication disability. IT Adoption, Diffusion and Evaluation in Healthcare. Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science; 7-10 Jan; Maui, HI 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hexler Limited. TouchOSC 2019. [v1.4.0.150]. Available from: https://hexler.net/products/touchosc.
   Google Scholar
• Martin B, Harrington B. Universal methods of design. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Booth A, Hannes K, Harden A, et al. COREQ (conslidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies). In: Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, et al. editors. Guidelines for reporting health research: a user’s manual. Cchichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders EB, Stappers PJ. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-Design. 2008;4(1):5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, et al. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42(5):533–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liamputtong P, Anderson K, Bondas T. Research methods in health. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Wall K, Cumming T, Koenig S, et al. Using a non-immersive virtual reality approach to assess cognition in post-stroke aphasia: validating the cognitive assessment for aphasia app (C3A). Aphasiology. 2018; 32(sup1):54–55.
   Google Scholar
• Brundage SB, Hancock AB. Real enough: using virtual public speaking environments to evoke feelings and behaviors targeted in stuttering assessment and treatment. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015; 24(2):139–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezipour A, Aldridge D, Koenig S, et al. It's really exciting to think where it could go": a mixed-method investigation of clinician acceptance, barriers and enablers of virtual reality technology in communication rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2021:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner E, Gordon J, Rudy S, et al. Expanding virtual reality to teach ultrasound skills to nurse practitioner students. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;264:893–897.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar