What does the literature say about the use of personal voice assistants in older adults? A scoping review

References1

• World Health Organization. Decade of healthy ageing 2020–2030. 2017 [cited 2021 Apr 13];1–26. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/decade-of-healthy-ageing/final-decade-proposal/decade-proposal-final-apr2020-en.pdf?sfvrsn=b4b75ebc_5
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World report on ageing and health [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jun 7]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/186463/9789240694811_eng.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2021 Apr 17]. Available from: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/classification/icf/icfbeginnersguide.pdf?sfvrsn=eead63d3_4
   Google Scholar
• Freeman T, Gesesew HA, Bambra C, et al. Why do some countries do better or worse in life expectancy relative to income? An analysis of Brazil, Ethiopia, and the United States of America. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19(1):202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Life expectancy at birth, total years. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom DE, Canning D. Commentary: the Preston curve 30 years on: still sparking fires. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(3):498–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles JL, Leibing A, Guberman N, et al. The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. Gerontologist. 2012;52:5–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charness N. A framework for choosing technology interventions to promote successful longevity: Prevent, rehabilitate, augment, substitute (PRAS). Gerontology. 2020;66(2):169–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirhonen J, Lolich L, Tuominen K, et al. These devices have not been made for older people’s needs – older adults’ perceptions of digital technologies in Finland and Ireland. Technol Soc. 2020;62:1–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miguel Cruz A, Daum C, Comeau A, et al. Acceptance, adoption, and usability of information and communication technologies for people living with dementia and their care partners: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho D. Voice-controlled virtual assistants for the older people with visual impairment. Eye. 2018;32(1):53–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezgin E, Huang Y, Ramtekkar U, et al. Readiness for voice assistants to support healthcare delivery during a health crisis and pandemic. NPJ Digit Med. 2020:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Hoy MB. Alexa, siri, cortana, and more: an introduction to voice assistants. Med Ref Serv Q. 2018;37(1):81–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noda K. Google home: smart speaker as environmental control unit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(7):674–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith E, Sumner P, Hedge C, et al. Smart-speaker technology and intellectual disabilities: agency and wellbeing. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih W, Rivero E. Virtual voice assistants; 2020:5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Future Today Institute. Tech trends report 2021; 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 12]. Available from: https://futuretodayinstitute.com/trends
   Google Scholar
• Statista. Voice technology. 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 17];1–86. Available from: https://www.statista.com/study/75652/voice-technology
   Google Scholar
• Seifert A. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-perception of aging among older adults. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2021;7:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krendl AC, Perry BL. The impact of sheltering in place during the COVID-19 pandemic on older adults’ social and mental well-being. J Gerontol Ser B. 2021;76:E53–E58.
   Google Scholar
• van Tilburg TG, Steinmetz S, Stolte E, et al. Loneliness and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a study among Dutch older adults. J Gerontol Ser B. 2020;76(7):E249–E255.
   Google Scholar
• Sheerman L, Marston HR, Musselwhite C, et al. COVID-19 and the secret virtual assistants: the social weapons for a state of emergency. Emerald Open Res. 2020;2:19.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail HO, Moses AR, Tadrus M, et al. Feasibility of use of a smart speaker to administer Snellen visual acuity examinations in a clinical setting. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(8):e2013908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip P, Micoulaud-Franchi J-A, Sagaspe P, et al. Virtual human as a new diagnostic tool, a proof of concept study in the field of major depressive disorders. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka H, Adachi H, Ukita N, et al. Detecting dementia through interactive computer avatars. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2017;5:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Rehman UU, Chang DJ, Jung Y, et al. Medical instructed real-time assistant for patient with glaucoma and diabetic conditions. Appl Sci. 2020;10:1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Maharjan R, Baekgaard P, Bardram JE. Hear me out. Adjun Proc 2019 ACM Int Jt Conf Pervasive Ubiquitous Comput Proc 2019 ACM Int Symp Wearable Comput. New York (NY): ACM; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Vora J, Tanwar S, Tyagi S, et al. Home-based exercise system for patients using IoT enabled smart speaker. 2017 IEEE 19th Int Conf e-Health Networking, Appl Serv. IEEE; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng A, Raghavaraju V, Kanugo J, et al. Development and evaluation of a healthy coping voice interface application using the Google home for elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. 2018 15th IEEE Annu Consum Commun Netw Conf. IEEE; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bérubé C, Schachner T, Keller R, et al. Voice-based conversational agents for the prevention and management of chronic and mental health conditions: systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(3):e25933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumah-Crystal Y, Pirtle C, Whyte H, et al. Electronic health record interactions through voice: a review. Appl Clin Inform. 2018;9(3):541–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laranjo L, Dunn AG, Tong HL, et al. Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2018;25:1248–1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provoost S, Lau HM, Ruwaard J, et al. Embodied conversational agents in clinical psychology: a scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(5):e151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezgin E, Militello LK, Huang Y, et al. A scoping review of patient-facing, behavioral health interventions with voice assistant technology targeting self-management and healthy lifestyle behaviors. Transl Behav Med. 2020;10:606–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoli S, Sutton S, Kassavou A. Interactive voice response interventions targeting behaviour change: a systematic literature review with Meta-analysis and Meta-regression. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e018974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Systematic reviews: identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. Br Med J. 1994;309(6964):1286–1291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc. 1994;272(2):158–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light RJ, Pillemer DB. Summing up: the science of reviewing research. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Dickersin K, Min YI, Meinert CL. Factors influencing publication of research results: follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. J Am Med Assoc. 1992;267(3):374–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Indicators for the minimum data set project on ageing: a critical review in sub-Saharan Africa. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Energy. U.S. Department of Energy: technology readiness assessment guide [Internet]. Washington; 2009 [cited 2021 May 28]. Available from: https://www.directives.doe.gov/directives-documents/400-series/0413.3-EGuide-04/@@images/file
   Google Scholar
• Teasell R, Cullen N, Marshall S, et al. Introduction and methodology. Evid Based Rev Mod Sev Acquir Brain Inj. 2019:1–6. [cited 2021 May 28]. Available from: https://erabi.ca/modules/module-1/
   Google Scholar
• Scimago G. SCImago journal & country rank: Un nuevo portal, dos nuevos rankings. EL Prof la Inf. 2007;16(6):645–646.
   Google Scholar
• *Shalini S, Levins T, Robinson EL, et al. Development and comparison of customized voice-assistant systems for independent living older adults. Lect Notes Comput Sci (including Subser Lect Notes Artif Intell Lect Notes Bioinformatics) [Internet]; 2019. p. 464–479. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85069854449&doi=10.1007%2F978-3-030-22015-0_36&partnerID=40&md5=fa875a25e5f387a5b49d9b977dd13bb7
   Google Scholar
• Human and Robot Language Interaction Experiment (Harlie). Univ. Queensl. Aust.; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• *Ireland D, Atay C, Liddle J, et al. Hello Harlie: Enabling speech monitoring through chat-bot conversations. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;227:55–60. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84982175123&doi=10.3233%2F978-1-61499-666-8-55&partnerID=40&md5=5b176a32bddb70ec2810ab38bb7e1649
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CaMeLi. Univ. Genève; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• *Tsiourti C, Quintas J, Ben-Moussa M, et al. The CaMeLi framework—a multimodal virtual companion for older adults. Stud Comput Intell. 2018:2018;196–217. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85040234165&doi=10.1007%2F978-3-319-69266-1_10&partnerID=40&md5=d8496eaa3b28ee5703510371b2a17548
   Google Scholar
• *Tsiourti C, Ben Moussa M, Quintas J, et al. A virtual assistive companion for older adults: design implications for a real-world application. Lect Notes Networks Syst; 2018. p. 1014–1033. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85062900411&doi=10.1007%2F978-3-319-56994-9_69&partnerID=40&md5=b718d9fd615440a2e42ada6a84578ec2
   Google Scholar
• *Choi YK, Thompson HJ, Demiris G. Use of an internet-of-things smart home system for healthy aging in older adults in residential settings: pilot feasibility study. JMIR Aging. 2020;3(2):e21964. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85096698550&doi=10.2196%2F21964&partnerID=40&md5=e9fd2089bdf664505dc43303517b66ff
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Koon LM, McGlynn SA, Blocker KA, et al. Perceptions of digital assistants from early adopters aged 55+. Ergon Des. 2020;28:16–23. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85064906409&doi=10.1177%2F1064804619842501&partnerID=40&md5=e2ba51dc08502c07934aac77aded834d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lopatovska I, Rink K, Knight I, et al. Talk to me: exploring user interactions with the Amazon Alexa. J Librariansh Inf Sci. 2019;51(4):984–997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *O'Brien K, Liggett A, Ramirez‐Zohfeld V, et al. Voice‐controlled intelligent personal assistants to support aging in place. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(1):176–179. Available from: https://login.ezproxy.library.ualberta.ca/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=141130849&site=ehost-live&scope=site
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Pradhan A, Lazar A, Findlater L. Use of intelligent voice assistants by older adults with low technology use. ACM Trans Comput Interact; 2020. p. 27. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85092497903&doi=10.1145%2F3373759&partnerID=40&md5=eb3bdcaf44547e584f6fde9b20785e1a
   Google Scholar
• *Pradhan A, Findlater L, Lazar A. “Phantom friend” or “just a box with information”: personification and ontological categorization of smart speaker-based voice assistants by older adults. Proc ACM Human-Computer Interact; 2019. p. 3. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075064253&doi=10.1145%2F3359316&partnerID=40&md5=2ed58181e20fbeefb72cddd8d6ac4043
   Google Scholar
• *Purao S, Meng C. Data capture and analyses from conversational devices in the homes of the elderly. Lect Notes Comput Sci (including Subser Lect Notes Artif Intell Lect Notes Bioinformatics) [Internet]; 2019. p. 157–166. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85077694325&doi=10.1007%2F978-3-030-34146-6_14&partnerID=40&md5=45c2c7b39ff546bf03579568df544520
   Google Scholar
• *Trajkova M, Martin-Hammond A. “Alexa is a toy”: exploring older adults’ reasons for using, limiting, and abandoning echo. Conf Hum Factors Comput Syst – Proc [Internet]; 2020. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85091134895&doi=10.1145%2F3313831.3376760&partnerID=40&md5=f66e35a4e0f80ec840cd854d49caedbf
   Google Scholar
• *Yamada S, Kitakoshi D, Yamashita A, et al. Development of an intelligent dialogue agent with smart devices for older adults: a preliminary study. Proc – 2018 Conf Technol Appl Artif Intell TAAI 2018 [Internet]; 2018. p 50–53. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85061430302&doi=10.1109%2FTAAI.2018.00020&partnerID=40&md5=08b4983278e8012607e1cdb2a720ade8
   Google Scholar
• *Kowalski J, Skorupska K, Kopeć W, et al. Older adults and voice interaction: A pilot study with google home. Conf Hum Factors Comput Syst – Proc [Internet]; 2019. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85067279042&doi=10.1145%2F3290607.3312973&partnerID=40&md5=b8d4661371c26b13201a9ffeb483de2c
   Google Scholar
• *Shade MY, Rector K, Soumana R, et al. Voice assistant reminders for pain self-management tasks in aging adults. J Gerontol Nurs. 2020;46:27–33. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85091808478&doi=10.3928%2F00989134-20200820-03&partnerID=40&md5=e1aa9b5e3f1ca8fad00e6137cb9e6857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chiaradia TS, Seabra RD, Mattedi AP. Evaluating the usability of the Siri virtual assistant on mobile devices with emphasis on Brazilian elderly users. Adv Intell Syst Comput [Internet]; 2019. 800 Part F. p. 437–441. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85085727300&doi=10.1007%2F978-3-030-14070-0_60&partnerID=40&md5=53d71fa0a7d9cdeb9bd2f24c3e276e2a
   Google Scholar
• *Chung K Oh YH, Ju DY. Elderly users’ interaction with conversational agent. HAI 2019 – Proc 7th Int Conf Human-Agent Interact [Internet]; 2019. p. 277–279. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85077122926&doi=10.1145%2F3349537.3352791&partnerID=40&md5=d2c7389ebcd7e0b06f7be901a6305652
   Google Scholar
• *Oh YH, Chung K, Ju DY. Differences in interactions with a conversational agent. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:3189. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85084334782&doi=10.3390%2Fijerph17093189&partnerID=40&md5=3c4542a413bf7d23004e5916c4b011be
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Barros TCGM, Seabra RD. Usability assessment of google assistant and Siri virtual assistants focusing on elderly users. Adv Intell Syst Comput. 2020:1134;653–657. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85085729467&doi=10.1007%2F978-3-030-43020-7_88&partnerID=40&md5=da500f793b1dc7b3395b7293ba7fcee3
   Google Scholar
• *Bickmore TW, Trinh H, Olafsson S, et al. Patient and consumer safety risks when using conversational assistants for medical information: an observational study of Siri, Alexa, and Google Assistant. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Blair J A, bdullah S. Understanding the needs and challenges of using conversational agents for deaf older adults. Proc ACM Conf Comput Support Coop Work CSCW [Internet]; 2019. p. 161–165. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85076082898&doi=10.1145%2F3311957.3359487&partnerID=40&md5=896bfc2e86e9ae6b7dd74d878dca264b
   Google Scholar
• *Pradhan A, Mehta K, Findlater L. “Accessibility came by accident”: use of voice-controlled intelligent personal assistants by people with disabilities. Proc 2018 Chi Conf Hum Factors Comput Syst [Internet]; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Mlekus L, Bentler D, Paruzel A, et al. How to raise technology acceptance: user experience characteristics as technology-inherent determinants. Grup Interakt Organ Zeitschrift Angew Organ. 2020;51:273–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Japan]LINE Launches Smart Speaker ‘Clova WAVE.’ LINE; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kang I. Clova. 41st Int ACM SIGIR Conf Res Dev Inf Retr. New York (NY): ACM; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Smith AL, Chaparro BS. Smartphone text input method performance, usability, and preference with younger and older adults. Hum Factors. 2015;57(6):1015–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderberg P, Barnestein-Fonseca P, Guzman-Parra J, et al. The effects of the digital platform support monitoring and reminder technology for mild dementia (SMART4MD) for people with mild cognitive impairment and their informal carers: protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019;8(6):e13711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster A, Gardner J. Aligning technology and institutional readiness: the adoption of innovation. Technol Anal Strateg Manag. 2019;31:1229–1241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns PB, Rohrich RJ, Chung KC. The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:305–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry LA, Nembhard IM, Bradley EH. Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation. 2009;119(10):1442–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabisch M, Ruckes C, Seibert-Grafe M, et al. Randomized controlled trials. Dtsch Aerzteblatt Online; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Peek STM, Wouters EJM, van Hoof J, et al. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83:235–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar