Are individuals with disabilities using wearable devices? A secondary data analysis of 2017 BRFSS

References

• Omura JD, Carlson SA, Paul P, et al. National physical activity surveillance: users of wearable activity monitors as a potential data source. Prev Med Rep. 2017;5:124–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hyde ET, Omura JD, Fulton JE, et al. Physical activity surveillance using wearable activity monitors: are US adults willing to share their data? Am J Health Promot. 2020;34(6):672–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickwood K-J, Watson G, O'Brien J, et al. Consumer-based wearable activity trackers increase physical activity participation: systematic review and meta-Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(4):e11819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen A, Haugen Mikalsen M, Woldaregay AZ, et al. Using fitness trackers and smartwatches to measure physical activity in research: analysis of consumer Wrist-Worn wearables. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(3):e110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Düking P, Fuss FK, Holmberg H-C, et al. Recommendations for assessment of the reliability, sensitivity, and validity of data provided by wearable sensors designed for monitoring physical activity. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(4):e102. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952119/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaewkannate K, Kim S. A comparison of wearable fitness devices. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):433.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu H, Liu M. A survey on universal design for fitness wearable devices. ArXiv. 2020; abs/2006.00823.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer K, Li M, Giangregorio L, et al. Behavior change techniques present in wearable activity trackers: a critical analysis. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2016;4(2):e40. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4917727/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel MS, Asch D, Volpp KG. Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. JAMA. 2015;313(5):459–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringeval M, Wagner G, Denford J, et al. Fitbit-based interventions for healthy lifestyle outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(10):e23954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley O, Pugliese L, Kachnowski S. The impact of wearable device enabled health initiative on physical activity and sleep. Cureus. 2016;8(10):e825. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5106347/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakicic JM, Davis KK, Rogers RJ, et al. Effect of wearable technology combined with a lifestyle intervention on long-term weight loss: the IDEA randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316(11):1161–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller TW, Kraus RF, Burton D, et al. Effectiveness of a wearable fitness tracker: practice implications in allied health - a single case study. IJAHSP. 2017;15(1):Article 3.
   Google Scholar
• Ptomey LT, Szabo AN, Willis EA, et al. Remote exercise for adults with down syndrome. Transl J Am Coll Sports Med. 2019;3(8):60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Ye H, Malu M, Oh U, et al. Current and future mobile and wearable device use by people with visual impairments. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems - CHI ’14. Toronto (Canada): ACM Press; 2014. p. 3123–3132. [cited 2020 Jun 27]. Available from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2556288.2557085
   Google Scholar
• DasMahapatra P, Chiauzzi E, Bhalerao R, et al. Free-Living physical activity monitoring in adult US patients with multiple sclerosis using a consumer wearable device. Digit Biomark. 2018;2(1):47–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• “Data request” (T. Garner, persoanl communication, May 13, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Strain T, Wijndaele K, Brage S. Physical activity surveillance through smartphone apps and wearable trackers: examining the UK potential for nationally representative sampling. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(1):e11898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Isa AN, Campbell J, Desapriya E, et al. Social and health factors associated with physical activity among Kuwaiti College Students. J Obesity. 2011;2011:e512363. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jobe/2011/512363/
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asiamah N. Socio-demographic determinants of physical activity (PA): a working class perspective. Cogent Med. 2016;3(1):1276037.
   Google Scholar
• Cheah YK. Influence of socio-demographic factors on physical activity participation in a sample of adults in Penang, Malaysia. Malays J Nutr. 2011;17(3):385–391.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lämmle L, Worth A, Bös K. Socio-demographic correlates of physical activity and physical fitness in German children and adolescents. Eur J Public Health. 2012;22(6):880–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim K, Taylor L. Factors associated with physical activity among older people-a population-based study. Prev Med. 2005;40(1):33–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malu M, Findlater L. Toward accessible health and fitness tracking for people with mobility impairments. In: Proceedings of the 10th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare [Internet]. Cancun (Mexico): ACM; 2016. [cited 2020 Jun 25]. Available from: 10.4108/eai.16-5-2016.2263329.
   Google Scholar
• Queirós FC, Wehby GL, Halpern CT. Developmental disabilities and socioeconomic outcomes in young adulthood. Public Health Rep. 2015;130(3):213–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye HS, Jans LH, Jones EC. Why don’t employers hire and retain workers with disabilities? J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(4):526–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S-S, Salole E. Medical device reimbursement coverage and pricing rules in Korea: current practice and issues with access to innovation. Value Health. 2014;17(4):476–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdmier C, Hatcher J, Lee M. Wearable device implications in the healthcare industry. J Med Eng Technol. 2016;40(4):141–148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emiliani PL, Stephanidis C. Universal access to ambient intelligence environments: opportunities and challenges for people with disabilities. IBM Syst J. 2005;44(3):605–619.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson WR. World survey of fitness trends for 2020. Health Fitness J. 2019;23(6):9.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear VA, Kerner C, Quennerstedt M. Young people’s uses of wearable healthy lifestyle technologies; surveillance, self-surveillance and resistance. Sport Educ Soc. 2019;24(3):212–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraudel R. Valencell - national wearables survey reveals accuracy is top priority among consumers; lack of continually interesting insights among top reasons for discontinued use [Internet]. Valencell. 2016. [cited 2020 Jun 27]. Available from: https://valencell.com/press/2016/06/national-wearables-survey-reveals-accuracy-is-top-priority-among-consumers-lack-of-continually-interesting-insights-among-top-reasons-for-discontinued-use/.
   Google Scholar
• Leung W, Case L, Jung J, et al. Factors associated with validity of consumer-oriented wearable physical activity trackers: a meta-analysis. J Med Eng Technol. 2021;45(3):223–236.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Floegel TA, Florez-Pregonero A, Hekler EB, et al. Validation of Consumer-Based hip and wrist activity monitors in older adults with varied ambulatory abilities. GERONA. 2017;72(2):229–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie MA, Pliner EM, Ho A, et al. Big data vs accurate data in health research: Large-scale physical activity monitoring, smartphones, wearable devices and risk of unconscious bias. Med Hypotheses. 2018;119:32–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrington P, Chang K, Mentis H, et al. “But, I don’t take steps”: examining the inaccessibility of fitness trackers for wheelchair athletes. In: Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (ASSETS ’15). New York (NY): Association for Computing Machinery; 2015. [cited 2020 Aug 18]. p. 193–201.
   Google Scholar