Outcomes of a novel single case study incorporating Rapid Syllable Transition treatment, AAC and blended intervention in children with cerebral palsy: a pilot study

References

• Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007;109:8–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cockerill H, Elbourne D, Allen E, et al. Speech, communication and use of augmentative communication in young people with cerebral palsy: the SH&PE population study. Child Care Health Dev. 2014;40(2):149–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei C, Reilly S, Reddihough D, et al. Motor speech impairment, activity, and participation in children with cerebral palsy. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16(4):427–2345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei C, Reilly S, Bickerton M, et al. Speech in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62(12):1347–1382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Oskoui M, Shevell M. A population-based study of communication impairment in cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol. 2015;30(3):277–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordberg A, Miniscalco C, Lohmander A. Consonant production and overall speech characteristics in school-aged children with cerebral palsy and speech impairment. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16(4):386–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington L, Goldbart J, Marshall J. Direct speech and language therapy for children with cerebral palsy: findings from a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47(1):57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington L, Miller N, Robson S, et al. Intensive speech and language therapy for older children with cerebral palsy: a systems approach. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(4):337–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman DR, Light JC. Augmentative & alternative communication. Baltimore (MD): Brookes Publishing; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke M, Price K. Augmentative and alternative communication for children with cerebral palsy. Paediatr Child Health. 2012;22(9):367–371.
   Google Scholar
• Light J, McNaughton D. Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: a new definition for a new era of communication? Augment Altern Commun. 2014;30(1):1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh J, Binger C, Hasham Z. Effects of parent instruction on the symbolic communication of children using augmentative and alternative communication during storybook reading. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010;19(2):97–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennott SC, Light JC, McNaughton D. AAC modeling intervention research review. Res Pract Persons Severe Disabl. 2016;41(2):101–115.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson K, Balandin S, Stancliffe RJ, et al. Parents' perspectives on tele-AAC support for families with a new speech generating device: results from an australian pilot study. Perspect Telepract. 2014;4(2):52–60.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson JM, Inglebret E, Jones C, et al. Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2006;22(2):85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorcroft A, Allum J, Scarinci N. Speech language pathologists’ responses to the rejection or abandonment of AAC systems. Disabil. Rehabil. 2021;21:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• LSVT Global [Internet]. [cited 2021. May 14]. Available from https://www.lsvtglobal.com/.
   Google Scholar
• The PROMPT Institute [Internet]. Santa Fe (NM); [cited 2021. May 14]. Available from: https://promptinstitute.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy JR. Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis and management. St. Louis (MI): Elsevier; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ward R, Strauss G, Leitao S. Kinematic changes in jaw and lip control of children with cerebral palsy following participation in a motor-speech (PROMPT) intervention. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;15(2):136–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox CM, Boliek CA. Intensive voice treatment (LSVT LOUD) for children with spastic cerebral palsy and dysarthria. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012;55(3):930–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard KJ, Robin DA, McCabe P, et al. A treatment for dysprosody in childhood apraxia of speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;53(5):1227–1245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe P, Thomas D, Murray E. Rapid syllale transition treatment: a treatment for childhood apraxia of speech and other pediatric motor speech disorders. Perspect ASHA SIGs. 2020;5(4):821–830.
   Google Scholar
• Schölderle T, Staiger A, Lampe R, et al. Dysarthria in adults with cerebral palsy: Clinical presentation and impacts on communication. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016;59(2):216–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray E, McCabe P, Ballard KJ. A randomized controlled trial for children with childhood apraxia of speech comparing rapid syllable transition treatment and the Nuffield dyspraxia programme-third edition. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015;58(3):669–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel R, Hustad K, Connaghan K, et al. Relationship between prosody and intelligibility in children with dysarthria. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;20(4):95–99.
   Google Scholar
• King G, Chiarello L. Family-centered care for children with cerebral palsy: conceptual and practical considerations to advance care and practice. J Child Neurol. 2014;29(8):1046–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oommen ER, McCarthy JW. Simultaneous natural speech and AAC interventions for children with childhood apraxia of speech: lessons from a speech-language pathologist focus group. Augment Altern Commun. 2015;31(1):63–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidecker MJC, Paneth N, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Developing and validating the Communication Function Classification System for individuals with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neur. 2011:53(8):704–710. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03996.x
   Google Scholar
• Semel E, Wiig E, Secord W. CELF3: Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals. San Antonio (TX): Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney E, Granata F, Yunusova Y, et al. Outcome measures in developmental speech sound disorders with a motor basis. Curr Dev Disord Rep. 2015;2(3):253–272.
   Google Scholar
• Miller J, Chapman R. The relation between age and mean length of utterance in morphemes. J Speech Hear Res. 1981;24(2):154–161.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rice ML, Smolik F, Perpich D, et al. Mean length of utterance levels in 6-month intervals for children 3 to 9 years with and without language impairments. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;53(2):333–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs T, Hill K. Language samples from children who use speech-generating devices: Making sense of small samples and utterance length. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;26(3):939–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shriberg L, Austin D, Lewis B, et al. The percentage of consonants correct (PCC) metric: Extensions and reliability data. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40(4):708–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill TR, Hitchcock JH, Horner RH, et al. Single-case intervention research standards. Remedial Spec Educ. 2013;34(1):26–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger C, Maguire-Marshall M, Kent-Walsh J. Using aided AAC models, recasts, and contrastive targets to teach grammatical morphemes to children who use AAC. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54(1):160–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger C, Light J. The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: Research review and implications for effective practice. Augment Altern Commun. 2008;24(2):123–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simacek J, Pennington B, Reichle J, et al. Aided AAC for people with severe to profound and multiple disabilities: a systematic review of interventions and treatment intensity. Adv Neurodev Disord. 2018;2(1):100–115.
   Google Scholar
• Gage NA, Lewis TJ. Analysis of effect for single-case design research. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 2013;25(1):46–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrugg T, Mastropieri A. How to summarize single-participant research: Ideas and applications. Exceptionality. 2001;9(4):227–224.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas-Stonell N, Robertson B, Oddson B, et al. Communicative participation changes in pre-school children receiving augmentative and alternative communication intervention. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016;18(1):32–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drager K, Light J, McNaughton D. Effects of AAC interventions on communication and language for young children with complex communication needs. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2010;3(4):303–310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Millar D, Light J, Schlosser R. The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: a reseacrh review. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006;49(2):248–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid SM, McCutcheon J, Reddihough D, et al. Prevalence and predictors of drooling in 7‐to 14‐year‐old children with cerebral palsy: a population study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54(11):1032–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas E, Gildersleeve-Neumann CE, Jakielski KJ, et al. Motor-based intervention protocols in treatment of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Curr Dev Disord Rep. 2014;1(3):197–206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ripat J, Verdonck M, Gacek C, et al. A qualitative metasynthesis of the meaning of speech-generating devices for people with complex communication needs. Augment Altern Commun. 2019;35(2):69–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington L, Roelant E, Thompson V, et al. Intensive dysarthria therapy for younger children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55(5):464–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar