The perspectives of older adults with mild cognitive impairment and their caregivers on the use of socially assistive robots in healthcare: exploring factors that influence attitude in a pre-implementation stage

References

• United Nations. World population prospects 2019: Highlights. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). World report on ageing and health. Geneva: WHO; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Franceschi C, Garagnani P, Morsiani C, et al. The continuum of aging and Age-Related diseases: common mechanisms but different rates. Front Med. 2018;5:61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaul E, Barron J. Age-related diseases and clinical and public health implications for the 85 years old and over population. Front Public Health. 2017;5:335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Sutherland C, Ahn HS, et al. Developing assistive robots for people with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia: a qualitative study with older adults and experts in aged care. BMJ Open. 2019;9(9):e031937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedaf S, Draper H, Gelderblom G-J, et al. Can a service Robot which supports independent living of older people disobey a command? The views of older people, informal carers and professional caregivers on the acceptability of Robots. Int J of Soc Robotics. 2016;8(3):409–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldy D, Grenade L, Lewin G, et al. Older people’s decisions regarding ‘ageing in place’: a Western Australian case study. Australas J Ageing. 2011;30(3):136–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto H, Naruse T, Sakai M, et al. Who prefers to age in place? Cross-sectional survey of Middle-aged people in Japan. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016;16(5):631–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Span M, Hettinga M, Vernooij-Dassen M, et al. Involving people with dementia in the development of supportive IT applications: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. 2013;12(2):535–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdi J, Al-Hindawi A, Ng T, et al. Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e018815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med. 2004;256(3):183–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts RO, Knopman DS, Mielke MM, et al. Higher risk of progression to dementia in mild cognitive impairment cases who revert to normal. Neurology. 2014;82(4):317–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: APA; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: APA; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson ND. State of the science on mild cognitive impairment (MCI). CNS Spectr. 2019;24(1):78–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans-Lacko S, Bhatt J, Comas-Herrera A, et al. World Alzheimer report 2019. London: Attitudes to Dementia. Alzheimer's Disease International; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Li JQ, Tan L, Wang HF, et al. Risk factors for predicting progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(5):476–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Marco M, Shanks MF, Venneri A. Cognitive stimulation: the evidence base for its application in neurodegenerative disease. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2014;11(5):469–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foubert-Samier A, Le Goff M, Helmer C, et al. Change in leisure and social activities and risk of dementia in elderly cohort. J Nutr Health Aging. 2014;18(10):876–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law CK, Lam FM, Chung RC, et al. Physical exercise attenuates cognitive decline and reduces behavioural problems in people with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2020;66(1):9–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu YH, Cristancho-Lacroix V, Fassert C, et al. The attitudes and perceptions of older adults with mild cognitive impairment toward an assistive Robot. J Appl Gerontol. 2016;35(1):3–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu YH, Wrobel J, Cornuet M, et al. Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human-robot interaction over a 1-month period in the living lab setting. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:801–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pino M, Boulay M, Jouen F, et al. Are we ready for robots that care for us? Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015;7(141):141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Special invited paper: continuities, contradictions, and critical inquiry in grounded theory. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):160940691771935. 1609406917719350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger KL. Discriminating among grounded theory approaches. Nurs Inq. 2019;26(1):e12261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards L. Handling qualitative data: a practical guide. London: Sage Publications; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Mitzner TL, Tiberio L, Kemp CC, et al. Understanding healthcare providers’ perceptions of a personal assistant robot. Gerontechnology. 2018;17(1):48–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang RH, Sudhama A, Begum M, et al. Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer’s disease and their caregivers. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017;29(1):67–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkey A, Sharkey N. Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf Technol. 2012;14(1):27–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peek ST, Wouters EJ, van Hoof J, et al. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(4):235–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusif S, Soar J, Hafeez-Baig A. Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2016;94:112–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Bolling K, Mao W, et al. Technology to support aging in place: older adults’ perspectives. Healthcare. 2019;7(2):60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele R, Lo A, Secombe C, et al. Elderly persons’ perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78(12):788–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caleb-Solly P, Dogramadzi S, Ellender D, et al. A mixed-method approach to evoke creative and holistic thinking about robots in a home environment. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction; Bielefeld, Germany: Association for Computing Machinery; 2014. p. 374–81.
   Google Scholar
• Courtney KL, Demiris G, Rantz M, et al. Needing smart home technologies: the perspectives of older adults in continuing care retirement communities. Inform Prim Care. 2008;16(3):195–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peek ST, Luijkx KG, Rijnaard MD, et al. Older adults’ reasons for using technology while aging in place. Gerontology. 2016;62(2):226–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent E, Stafford R, MacDonald B. Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: Review and future directions. Int J of Soc Robotics. 2009;1(4):319–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedaf S, Marti P, Amirabdollahian F, et al. A multi-perspective evaluation of a service robot for seniors: the voice of different stakeholders. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(6):592–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner K, Oberzaucher J, Werner F. Evaluation of human robot interaction factors of a socially assistive Robot together with older people. Proceedings of the 2012 Sixth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS): IEEE Computer Society; 2012. p. 455–60.
   Google Scholar
• Van Assche M, Moreels T, Petrovic M, et al. The role of a socially assistive robot in enabling older adults with mild cognitive impairment to cope with the measures of the COVID-19 lockdown: a qualitative study. Scand J Occup Ther. 2021;2021:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Jecker NS. You’ve got a friend in me: sociable robots for older adults in an age of global pandemics. Ethics Inf Technol. 2021;23(S1):35–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Renaud K, Biljon J. Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: a qualitative study. Proceedings of the 2008 annual research conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT research in developing countries: riding the wave of technology; Wilderness, South Africa. 1456684: ACM; 2008. p. 210–219.
   Google Scholar
• Chu L, Chen HW, Cheng PY, et al. Identifying features that enhance older adults’ acceptance of robots: a mixed methods study. Gerontology. 2019;65(4):441–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breton A, Casey D, Arnaoutoglou NA. Cognitive tests for the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the prodromal stage of dementia: meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019;34(2):233–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelis E, Gorus E, Beyer I, et al. Early diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia through basic and instrumental activities of daily living: Development of a new evaluation tool. PLoS Med. 2017;14(3):e1002250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar