What works and why in the implementation of eRehabilitation after stroke – a process evaluation

References

• Brochard S, Robertson J, Médée B, et al. What’s new in new technologies for upper extremity rehabilitation? Curr Opin Neurol. 2010;23(6):683–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galea MD. Telemedicine in rehabilitation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2019;30(2):473–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Abel KT, Janecek JT, et al. Home-based technologies for stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2019;123:11–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver KE, Schoene D, Crotty M, et al. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;16(12):Cd010255.
   Google Scholar
• Schwamm LH, Chumbler N, Brown E, et al. Recommendations for the implementation of telehealth in cardiovascular and stroke care: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(7):e24–e44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster D, Celik O. Systematic review of kinect applications in elderly care and stroke rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krpič A, Savanović A, Cikajlo I. Telerehabilitation: remote multimedia-supported assistance and mobile monitoring of balance training outcomes can facilitate the clinical staff’s effort. Int J Rehabil Res. 2013;36(2):162–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver KE, Adey-Wakeling Z, Crotty M, et al. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;1(1):CD010255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2197–2223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbetta D, Sirtori V, Moja L, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;46(4):537–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson T, Wild C. Telerehabilitation in stroke care-a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(1):1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarfo FS, Ulasavets U, Opare-Sem OK, et al. Tele-Rehabilitation after stroke: an updated systematic review of the literature. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(9):2306–2318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam HS, Park E, Heo JH. Facilitating stroke management using modern information technology. J Stroke. 2013;15(3):135–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standing C, Standing S, McDermott M, et al. The paradoxes of telehealth: a review of the literature 2000–2015. Syst Res. 2018;35(1):90–101.
   Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(5):587–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation in complex public health intervention studies: the need for guidance. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(2):101–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teriö M, Eriksson G, Kamwesiga JT, et al. What’s in it for me? A process evaluation of the implementation of a mobile phone-supported intervention after stroke in Uganda. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):562.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions. UK Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance; MRC Population Health Science Research Network, London; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Brouns B, Bodegom-Vos L, Kloet A, et al. Effect of a comprehensive eRehabilitation intervention alongside conventional stroke rehabilitation on disability and health-related quality of life: a pre-post comparison. J Rehabil Med. 2020;53(3):0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limburg M, Tuut MK. [CBO guideline ‘stroke’ (revision) Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000;144(22):1058–1062.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Groeneveld IF, Goossens PH, van Meijeren-Pont W, et al. Value-Based stroke rehabilitation: feasibility and results of Patient-Reported outcome measures in the first year after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;28(2):499–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouns B, Meesters JJL, Wentink MM, et al. Factors associated with willingness to use eRehabilitation after stroke: a cross-sectional study among patients, informal caregivers and healthcare professionals. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(9):665–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouns B, Meesters JJL, Wentink MM, et al. Why the uptake of eRehabilitation programs in stroke care is so difficult-a focus group study in the Netherlands. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, et al. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health. 2010;25(10):1229–1245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust. 2004;180(S6):S57–S60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, et al. Standards for reporting implementation studies (StaRI) statement. BMJ. 2017;356:i6795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoody N, Hägglund M. Care professionals’ perceived usefulness of eHealth for post-discharge stroke patients. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;228:589–593.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hochstenbach-Waelen A, Seelen HA. Embracing change: practical and theoretical considerations for successful implementation of technology assisting upper limb training in stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012;9:52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz BJ, Chumbler NR, Roland K. Care coordination/home-telehealth for veterans with stroke and their caregivers: addressing an unmet need. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14(2):32–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughlin S, Mehta S, Corriveau H, et al. Implementing telerehabilitation after stroke: lessons learned from Canadian trials. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26(6):710–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szturm T, Imran Z, Pooyania S, et al. Evaluation of a game based tele rehabilitation platform for in-home therapy of hand-arm function post stroke: feasibility study. Pm R. 2021;13(1):45–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White J, Janssen H, Jordan L, et al. Tablet technology during stroke recovery: a survivor’s perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(13):1186–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Jin W, Dong WS, et al. Effects of home-based telesupervising rehabilitation on physical function for stroke survivors with hemiplegia: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96(3):152–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi YH, Ku J, Lim H, et al. Mobile game-based virtual reality rehabilitation program for upper limb dysfunction after ischemic stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016;34(3):455–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karasu AU, Batur EB, Karataş GK. Effectiveness of Wii-based rehabilitation in stroke: a randomized controlled study. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(5):406–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GC, Egbert N, Dellman-Jenkins M, et al. Reducing depression in stroke survivors and their informal caregivers: a randomized clinical trial of a web-based intervention. Rehabil Psychol. 2012;57(3):196–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg M, Crotty MP, Liu E, et al. Early supported discharge by caregiver-mediated exercises and e-Health support after stroke: a proof-of-concept trial. Stroke. 2016;47(7):1885–1892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugliese M, Ramsay T, Shamloul R, et al. RecoverNow: a mobile tablet-based therapy platform for early stroke rehabilitation. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0210725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blacquiere D, Lindsay MP, Foley N, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: telestroke best practice guidelines update 2017. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(8):886–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar