Using welfare technology for individuals with intellectual disabilities. Expectations, experiences, and challenges of intellectual disability nursing students during clinical placement

References

• Oude Weernink C, Sweegers L, Relou L, et al. Lost and misplaced items and assistive devices in nursing homes: identifying problems and technological opportunities through participatory design research. Technol Disabil. 2018;29(3):129–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zander V, Gustafsson C, Landerdahl Stridsberg S, et al. Implementation of welfare technology: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021:1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frennert S, Baudin K. The concept of welfare technology in Swedish municipal eldercare. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(9):1220–1227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann B. Ethical challenges with welfare technology: a review of the literature. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013;19(2):389–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamp A, Obstfelder A, Andersson K. Welfare technologies in care work. NJWLS. 2019;9:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen K. Innovation in the care services. Norwegian ministry of health and care services (ed). Official Norwegian Reports NOU. 2011;11:181s.
   Google Scholar
• Smith RO, Scherer MJ, Cooper R, et al. Assistive technology products: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(5):473–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaaraoui A, Florez-Revuelta F. Technologies and applications for active and assisted living. Curr Situation. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Boot FH, Owuor J, Dinsmore J, et al. Access to assistive technology for people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018;62(10):900–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wass S, Moeb CE, Thygesenc E, et al. editors. Use of welfare technology to increase employment of individuals with intellectual disabilities. The 16th Scandinavian Conference on Health Informatics. Aalborg: Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings Universitet; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Jamwal R, Jarman HK, Roseingrave E, et al. Smart home and communication technology for people with disability: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;12:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez VG, Anker-Hansen C, Taylor I, et al. Older people's attitudes and perspectives of welfare technology in Norway. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019;12:841–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasouli O, Kvam L, Husby VS, et al. Understanding the possibilities and limitations of assistive technology in health and welfare services for people with intellectual disabilities, staff perspectives. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scior K, Addai-Davis J, Kenyon M, et al. Stigma, public awareness about intellectual disability and attitudes to inclusion among different ethnic groups. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013;57(11):1014–1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knarvik U, Rotvold GH, Bjørvig S, et al. Kunnskapsoppsummering: Velferdsteknologi. Nasjonalt Senter for e-Helseforskning; 2017. p. 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• NBHW. E-hälsa och välfärdsteknik i kommunerna [Ehealth and welfare technology in the municipalities]. National Board of Health and Welfare 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreras A, Poveda R, Quílez M, et al. Improving the quality of life of persons with intellectual disabilities through ICTs. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017:257–264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ørvig K, Claussen T. Welfare technology dilemmas facing young people with intellectual impairment – some illustrated theoretical explorations. Nordic Soc Work Res. 2018;8(3):235–248.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford Simplican S, Shivers C, Chen J, et al. “With a touch of a button”: staff perceptions on integrating technology in an Irish service provider for people with intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018;31(1):e130–e139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick DD, Fullwood C. An online life like any other: identity, self-determination, and social networking among adults with intellectual disabilities. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018;21(1):56–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderstrom S, Ostby M, Bakken H, et al. How using assistive technology for cognitive impairments improves the participation and self-determination of young adults with intellectual developmental disabilities. J Intellect Disabil. 2021;25(2):168–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsten C, Martin L, Dag M, et al. A balance of social inclusion and risks: staff perceptions of information and communication technology in the daily life of young adults with mild to moderate intellectual disability in a social care context. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2019;16(3):171–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinders HS, Schalock RL. How organizations can enhance the quality of life of their clients and assess their results: the concept of QOL enhancement. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014;119(4):291–302.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kersten MCO, Taminiau EF, Schuurman MIM, et al. How to improve sharing and application of knowledge in care and support for people with intellectual disabilities? A systematic review. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018;62(6):496–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr O, Gates B. Education for the future: the changing nature of education for staff in learning disability services. Tizard Learn Disabil Rev. 2008;13(1):18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Helsedirektoratet. Velferdsteknologi fagrapport om implementering av velferdsteknologi i de kommunale helse-og omsorgstjenestene 2013–2030. Oslo: Helsedirektoratet; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Sage Publications; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen D. Understanding, description and explanation: introduction to the method of health and social studies. Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Gates B. Chapter twenty-one. In: Learning disabilities: toward inclusion; 2007. p. 445.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths P, Bennett J, Smith E. The research base for learning disability nursing: a rapid scoping review. London: Nursing Research Unit, King’s College London; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Doody O, Slevin E, Taggart L. Intellectual disability nursing in Ireland: identifying its development and future. J Intellect Disabil. 2012;16(1):7–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Welfare NBoHa. Ehealth and welfare technology in the municipalities. National Board of Health and Welfare 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Dyzel V, Oosterom-Calo R, Worm M, et al. Assistive technology to promote communication and social interaction for people with deafblindness: a systematic review. Front Educ. 2020;5(164).
   Google Scholar
• Ramsten C, Martin L, Dag M, et al. Information and communication technology use in daily life among young adults with mild-to-moderate intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil. 2020;24(3):289–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woensdregt G, D’Addabbo G, Scholten H, et al. Sensors in the care of persons with visual- or visual-and-intellectual disabilities: Use, needs, practical issues, and ethical concerns. TAD. 2020;32(1):15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Owuor J, Larkan F. Assistive technology for an inclusive society for people with intellectual disability. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;242:805–812.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wehmeyer ML, Smith SJ, Palmer SB, et al. Technology use and people with mental retardation. In: Glidden LM, editor. International review of research in mental retardation. Vol. 29. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 2004. p. 293–337.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen ER, Dugstad J, Eide H, et al. Exploring resistance to implementation of welfare technology in municipal healthcare services – a longitudinal case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirza M, Hammel J. Consumer-Directed goal planning in the delivery of assistive technology services for people who are ageing with intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect. 2009;22(5):445–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger CA, Morbey ML, Lotherington H, et al. Factors contributing to teachers' successful implementation of IT. J Comp Assist Learn. 2002;18(4):480–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson E, Hastings R, McGill P. Values, attitudes and service ideology. In: Severe learning disabilities and challenging behaviours: designing high quality services. Springer; 1994. p. 209–231.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez VG, Taylor I, Bing-Jonsson PC. Ethics of smart house welfare technology for older adults: a systematic literature review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017;33(6):691–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Ameen M, Liu J, Kwak K. Security and privacy issues in wireless sensor networks for healthcare applications. J Med Syst. 2012;36(1):93–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolbring G, Leopatra V. Sensors: views of staff of a disability service organization. J Pers Med. 2013;3(1):23–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hegarty JR, Aspinall A. The use of personal computers with adults who have developmental disability: outcomes of an organisation-wide initiative. Br J Dev Disabil. 2006;52(103):133–150.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons S, Daniels H, Porter J, et al. Resources, staff beliefs and organizational culture: factors in the use of information and communication technology for adults with intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Int Dis. 2008:21:19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons S, Daniels H, Porter J, et al. The use of ICT by adults with learning disabilities in day and residential services. Br J Educ Technol. 2006;37(1):31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons S, Daniels H, Porter J, et al. Organisational factors in the use and implementation of ICT in day services for adults with learning disabilities. Br J Dev Disabil. 2006;52(103):117–132.
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall A, Hegarty JR. ICT for adults with learning disabilities: an organisation‐wide audit. Br J Educ Technol. 2001;32(3):365–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsten C, Marmstal Hammar L, Martin L, et al. ICT and intellectual disability: a survey of organizational support at the municipal level in Sweden. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2017;30(4):705–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaen J. Competing concerns in welfare technology innovation: a systematic literature review. In: Proceedings of the 10th Scandinavian Conference on Information Systems (SCIS2019). Association for Information Systems; 2019.
   Google Scholar