Utilising interactive technology for stroke patient education: a systematic review

References

• Avan A, Digaleh H, di Napoli M, et al. Socioeconomic status and stroke incidence, prevalence, mortality, and worldwide burden: an ecological analysis from the global burden of disease study 2017. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch E, Minchell E, Cameron A, et al. What do stroke survivors want in stroke education and information provision in Australia? Health Social Care Comm. 2022;30(6):e4864–4872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron JI, O'Connell C, Foley N, Heart and Stroke Foundation Canadian Stroke Best Practice Committees, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: managing transitions of care following stroke, guidelines update 2016. Int J Stroke. 2016;11(7):807–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke management, Melbourne, Australia; 2020 [cited 2021 Sep 19]. Available from: https://informme.org.au/en/Guidelines/Clinical-Guidelines-for-Stroke-Management.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, A., James, M., & Young, G., Royal College of Physicians 2016 National clinical guidelines for stroke. 5th ed. United Kingdom: Royal College of Physicians; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Stroke Foundation. National stroke audit – rehabilitation services report 2020; 2020. Available from: https://informme.org.au/stroke-data/Rehabilitation-audits.
   Google Scholar
• Eames S, Hoffmann T, Worrall L, et al. Delivery styles and formats for different stroke information topics: patient and carer preferences. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(2):e18–e23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finch E, Minchell E, Cameron A, et al. The use of augmented reality for patient and significant other stroke education: a feasibility study. Brain Impair. 2022;1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eames S, Hoffmann T, McKenna K, et al. Community-based stroke information for clients with stroke and their carers: is there congruency between actual and recommended practice? Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15(4):295–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White CL, Cantu A, Motz D, et al. Opportunities and challenges in secondary stroke prevention: a mixed methods study. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(26):3192–3197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick T, Burrill G. Design and implementation principles for dynamic interactive mathematics technologies. In: Niess M, Driskell S, Hollebrands K, editors. Handbook of research on transforming mathematics teacher education in the digital age. 1st Edition. United States of America: IGI Global; 2016. p. 23–51.
   Google Scholar
• Forster A, Brown L, Smith J, Cochrane Stroke Group, et al. Information provision for stroke patients and their caregivers. Coch Database System Rev. 2012;(11): Art. No. CD001919. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001919.pub3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moro C, Smith J, Finch E. Improving stroke education with augmented reality: a randomised control trial. Comput Educ Open. 2021;2:100032.
   Google Scholar
• van der Linde-van den Bor M, Slond F, Liesdek OCD, et al. The use of virtual reality in patient education related to medical somatic treatment: a scoping review. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(7):1828–1841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez YA, Cumming S, Wang W, et al. Patient education using virtual reality increases knowledge and positive experience for breast cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(8):2879–2888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd T, Trinder M, Theophilus M. Does virtual reality in the perioperative setting for patient education improve understanding? A scoping review. Surg Pract Sci. 2022;10(September):100101.
   Google Scholar
• van der Kruk SR, Zielinski R, MacDougall H, et al. Virtual reality as a patient education tool in healthcare: a scoping review. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(7):1928–1942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urlings J, Sezer S, Ter Laan M, et al. The role and effectiveness of augmented reality in patient education: a systematic review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(7):1917–1927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adapa K, Jain S, Kanwar R, et al. Augmented reality in patient education and health literacy: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2020;10(9):e038416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;10(1):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hong QN, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, et al. The mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. EFI. 2018;34(4):285–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JI, Lee S, Kim JH. Effects of a web-based stroke education program on recurrence prevention behaviors among stroke patients: a pilot study. Health Educ Res. 2013;28(3):488–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider MA, Howard KA. Using technology to enhance discharge teaching and improve coping for patients after stroke. J Neurosci Nurs. 2017;49(3):152–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prick JCM, van Schaik SM, Deijle IA, On behalf of the Santeon VBHC STROKE group, et al. Development of a patient decision aid for discharge planning of hospitalized patients with stroke. BMC Neurol. 2022;22(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu YM, Choi KS. Effectiveness of patient education in acute stroke: a comparison between a customised computer system and a pictorial information booklet. BMJ Health Care Informat. 2020;27(3):00144.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Chen Y, Zheng K, et al. A qualitative study on user acceptance of a home-based stroke telerehabilitation system. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2020;27(2):81–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Requena M, Montiel E, Baladas M, et al. FARMALARM: application for mobile devices improves risk factor control after stroke. Stroke. 2019;50(7):1819–1824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson-Butel AG, Shiner CT, McGhee J, et al. The role of personalized virtual reality in education for patients post stroke—a qualitative case series. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;28(2):450–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan X, Liu Z, Guo ZN, et al. Positive influence of stroke health manager on risk factors control and medication adherence after ischemic stroke. Front Neurol. 2020;11:168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velez JA, Keene JR, Corwin M, et al. A visual interactive narrative intervention (VINI) for aphasia education: can digital applications administer augmented input to educate stroke survivors with aphasia? Patient Educ Couns. 2021;104(10):2536–2543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman C, Gustafsson L. The use of augmented reality for rehabilitation after stroke: a narrative review. Disabil Rehab. 2022;17(4):409–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George MG. Risk factors for ischemic stroke in younger adults. Stroke. 2020;51(3):729–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar