The impact of assistive living technology on perceived independence of people with a physical disability in executing daily activities: a systematic literature review

References

• United Nations [Convention]. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2006. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/convtexte.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Ells C. Lessons about autonomy from the experience of disability. Soc Theory Pract. 2001;27(4):599–615.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade VS, Faleiros F, Balestrero LM, et al. Social participation and personal autonomy of individuals with spinal cord injury. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019;72(1):241–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall J, Baldwin P, Evans J, et al. Quality of life and self-determination: youth with chronic health conditions make the connection. Appl Res Qual Life. 2016;11(2):571–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nota L, Soresi S, Ferrari L, et al. A multivariate analysis of the self-determination of adolescents. J Happiness Stud. 2011;12(2):245–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandjojo J, Zedlitz A, Gebhardt WA, et al. Training staff to promote self-management in people with intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018;31(5):840–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reindal SM. Independence, dependence, interdependence: some reflections on the subject and personal autonomy. Disabil Soc. 1999;14(3):353–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forber-Pratt AJ. (Re)defining disability culture: perspectives from the americans with disabilities act generation. Cult Psychol. 2019;25(2):241–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khasnabis C, Mirza Z, MacLachlan M. Opening the GATE to inclusion for people with disabilities. Lancet. 2015;386(10010):2229–2230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Assistive technology; 2018. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology
   Google Scholar
• Gentry T. Smart homes for people with neurological disability: state of the art. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;25(3):209–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krantz O. Social construction of technical Aids-Personal meaning and interactional effects of disability and assistive devices in everyday life [thesis]. Lund: Lund University; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Brose SW, Weber DJ, Salatin BA, et al. The role of assistive robotics in the lives of persons with disability. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89(6):509–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, van der Cammen TJM. Electronic assistive technology for community-dwelling solo-living older adults: a systematic review. Maturitas. 2019;125:50–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly Lynn J, Rondón-Sulbarán J, Quinn E, et al. A systematic review of electronic assistive technology within supporting living environments for people with dementia. Dementia. 2019;18(7-8):2371–2435.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang T, Zhang B, Liu C, et al. A review on the rehabilitation exoskeletons for the lower limbs of the elderly and the disabled. Electronics. 2022;11(3):388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalid S, Alnajjar F, Gochoo M, et al. Robotic assistive and rehabilitation devices leading to motor recovery in upper limb: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;16:1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Page JM, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CASP Programme [Internet]. 10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research; 2006. https://casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-2018_fillable_form.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pace R, Pluye P, Bartlett G, et al. Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(1):47–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeije HR, van Wesel F, Alisic E. Making a difference: towards a method for weighing the evidence in a qualitative synthesis. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(4):657–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdonck MC, Chard G, Nolan M. Electronic aids to daily living: be able to do what you want. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(3):268–281.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blach Rossen C, Sørensen B, Würtz Jochumsen B, et al. Everyday life for users of electric wheelchairs–a qualitative interview study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(5):399–407.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Folan A, Barclay L, Cooper C, et al. Exploring the experience of clients with tetraplegia utilizing assistive technology for computer access. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(1):46–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamwal R, Callaway L, Ackerl J, et al. Electronic assistive technology used by people with acquired brain injury in shared supported accommodation: implications for occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther. 2017;80(2):89–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myburg M, Allan E, Nalder E, et al. Environmental control systems - the experiences of people with spinal cord injury and the implications for prescribers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(2):128–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper B, Verdonck M, Amsters D, et al. Smart-device environmental control systems: experiences of people with cervical spinal cord injuries. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(8):724–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdonck M, Nolan M, Chard G. Taking back a little of what you have lost: the meaning of using an environmental control system (ECS) for people with high cervical spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(8):785–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wästlund E, Sponseller K, Pettersson O, et al. Evaluating gaze-driven power wheelchair with navigation support for persons with disabilities. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(7):815–826.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bona S, Donvito G, Cozza F, et al. The development of an augmented reality device for the autonomous management of the electric bed and the electric wheelchair for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;16(5):513–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Ven L, Post M, De Witte L, et al. Strategies for autonomy used by people with cervical spinal cord injury: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(4):249–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun JX, Li LF, Zhao YL, et al. CONSORT-Assistive technology-180 degrees rotating eating spoon improves the ability of eating of self-care patients with upper extremity dyskinesia: rotating eating spoon improves eating ability. Medicine. 2019;98(9):e14597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajani OS, Assal SF. Development of an autonomous robotic system for beard shaving assistance of disabled people based on an adaptive force tracking impedance control. J Mech Eng Sci. 2021;235(21):5758–5775.
   Google Scholar
• Kronhardt K, Rübner S, Pascher M, et al. Adapt or perish? Exploring the effectiveness of adaptive DoF control interaction methods for assistive robot arms. Technologies. 2022;10(1):30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang BB, Choi H, Lee H, et al. Exo-Glove poly II: a Polymer-Based soft wearable robot for the hand with a Tendon-Driven actuation system. Soft Robot. 2019;6(2):214–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieleman JL, Squires E, Bui AL, et al. Factors associated with increases in US health care spending, 1996-2013. J Am Med Assoc. 2017;318(17):1668–1678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albala SA, Kasteng F, Eide AH, et al. Scoping review of economic evaluations of assistive technology globally. Assist Technol. 2021;33(sup1):50–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar