Social and functional inclusion of an undergraduate student with unilateral upper limb agenesis: a case study

References

• Marcelo S, Salvia S. Ad Hoc committee on a comprehensive and integral international convention on the protection and promotion of the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities. UN. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Pillet J, Didierjean-Pillet A. Aesthetic hand prosthesis: gadget or therapy? Presentation of a new classification. J Hand Surg Br. 2001;26(6):523–528.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta R. I solemnly share. JAMA. 2018;319(6):549–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adashek J. Invisibly disabled. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(10):1265–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeks LM, Poullos P, Swenor BK. Creative approaches to the inclusion of medical students with disabilities. AEM Educ Train. 2020;4(3):292–297.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pettigrew TF. Intergroup contact theory. Annu Rev Psychol. 1998;49(1):65–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport GW, Clark K, Pettigrew T. The nature of prejudice. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Reading; 1954.
   Google Scholar
• World Federation of Occupational Therapists and others. Occupational therapy and assistive technology. London, United Kingdom: WFOT; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Jones KL, Smith DW. Smith’s recognizable patterns of human malformation. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1997. 857 p.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend E, Polatajko HJ. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being justice through occupation; official practice guidelines for the Canadian association of occupational therapists. Ottawa (ON): CAOT Publ; 2007. 418 p.
   Google Scholar
• Bohoslavsky R. (In portuguese) orientação vocacional: a estrategia clinica. São Paulo (SP): m. Fontes; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kozin SH. Congenital disorders: Classification and diagnosis. In: Berger RA, Weiss AP, editors. Hand surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams Williams; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Chung MS. Congenital differences of the upper extremity: classification and treatment principles. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011;3(3):172–177.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldfarb CA, Shaw N, Steffen JA, et al. The prevalence of congenital hand and upper extremity anomalies based upon the New York congenital malformations registry. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017;37(2):144–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin YH, Baek GH, Kim YJ, et al. Epidemiology of congenital upper limb anomalies in korea: a nationwide population-based study. Harhaus L, editor. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0248105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskimies E, Lindfors N, Gissler M, et al. Congenital upper limb deficiencies and associated malformations in Finland: a Population-Based study. J Hand Surg. 2011;36(6):1058–1065.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• (a) França Bisneto EN. (In portuguese) deformidades congênitas dos membros superiores: parte I: falhas de formação. Rev Bras Ortop. 2012;47(5):545–552.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
  (b) Sivathasan N, Chatterjee SS, Jain A. The krukenberg procedure revisited. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2011;36(6):514–515.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chao EY, editor. Biomechanics of the hand: a basic research study. Singapore, Teaneck (NJ): World Scientific; 1989. 191 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ueki S, Kawasaki H, Ito S, et al. Development of a Hand-Assist robot with Multi-Degrees-of-Freedom for rehabilitation therapy. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2012;17(1):136–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godon C. (In French) L’evolution de l’art dentaire: l’ ́ecole dentaire, son histoire, son action, son avenir. Paris; Baillìere Fils; 1901. 190366 p.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidtler J, Bengler K, Dimeas F, et al. A questionnaire for the evaluation of physical assistive devices (QUEAD): testing usability and acceptance in physical human-robot interaction. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC) [internet]. Banff, AB: IEEE; 2017. p 876–881.
   Google Scholar
• Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. The upper extremity collaborative group (UECG): development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:602–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeks LM, Jain N. Accessibility, inclusion, and action in medical education: lived experiences of learners and physicians with disabilities. Washington (DC): Association of American Medical Colleges, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform; 2018. 102 P.
   Google Scholar
• Stopa SR, Szwarcwald CL, Oliveira MMD, et al. Pesquisa nacional de saúde 2019: histórico, métodos e perspectivas. Epidemiol e Serviços de Saúde. 2020;29(5).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brasil L. n. 13.146. Lei Brasileira de Inclusão da Pessoa com Deficiência. 2017. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2015-2018/2015/Lei/L13146.htm
   Google Scholar