Stroke survivors’ experiences and meaning of digital technology in daily life: a phenomenological study

References

• Bergström A, von Koch L, Andersson M, et al. Participation in everyday life and life satisfaction in persons with stroke and their caregivers 3-6 months after onset. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47(6):508–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekstam L, Johansson U, Guidetti S, et al. The combined perceptions of people with stroke and their carers regarding rehabilitation needs 1 year after stroke: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(2):e006784–e006784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saywell N, Taylor D. Focus group insights assist trial design for stroke telerehabilitation: a qualitative study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31(3):160–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischl C, Asaba E, Nilsson I. Exploring potential in participation mediated by digital technology among older adults. J Occup Sci. 2017;24(3):314–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson M, Ytterberg C, Marwaa MN, et al. Experiences of using information and communication technology within the first year after stroke – a grounded theory study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(5):561–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamwesiga JT, Tham K, Guidetti S. Experiences of using mobile phone in everyday life among persons with stroke and their families in Uganda – a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(5):438–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White J, Janssen H, Jordan L, et al. Tablet technology during stroke recovery: a survivor’s perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(13):1186–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwaa MN, Ytterberg C, Guidetti S. Significant others’ perspectives on person-centered information and communication technology in stroke rehabilitation – a grounded theory study. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(15):2115–2122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermann VH, Herzog M, Jordan R, et al. Telerehabilitation ad electrical stimulation: an occupation-based, client-centered stroke intervention. Am J Occup Ther. 2010;64(1):73–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske A, Buyx A, Prainsack B. The double-edged sword of digital self-care: physician perspectives from Northern Germany. Soc Sci Med. 2020;260:113174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucivero F. Lessons about so-called “difficult” patients from the UK controversy over patient access to electronic health records. AMA J Ethics. 2017;19:374–380.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kizony R, Zeilig G, Dudkiewicz I, et al. Tablet Apps and dexterity: comparison between 3 age groups and proof of concept for stroke rehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2016;40(1):31–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouns B, Meesters JJL, Wentink MM, et al. Why the uptake of eRehabilitation programs in stroke care is so difficult – a focus group study in The Netherlands. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):133–133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bertilsson AS, Ranner M, von KL, et al. A client-centred ADL intervention: three-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21(5):377–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Berg M, Crotty M, Liu E, et al. Early supported discharge by caregiver-mediated exercises and e-health support after stroke: a proof-of-concept trial. Stroke. 2016;47(7):1885–1892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischl C, Lindelöf N, Lindgren H, et al. Older adults’ perceptions of contexts surrounding their social participation in a digitalized society–an exploration in rural communities in Northern Sweden. Eur J Ageing. 2020;17(3):281–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. Individuals who have basic or above basic overall digital skills by sex; 2021. [cited 2021 Oct 30] Available from: https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/ynapscpsv4vbkygqwrva?locale=en.
   Google Scholar
• Moustakas C. Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publishing; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman IE. Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide to researchers in education and the social sciences. 3rd ed. New York and London: Columbia University, Teachers College Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Morse JM. Drowning in data. Qual Health Res. 1993;3(3):267–269.
   Google Scholar
• Behi R, Nolan M. Ethical issues in research. Br J Nurs. 1995;4(12):712–716.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee M, Schuele CM. Demographics. In: Salkind NJ, editor. Encyclopedia of research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Moran D. Introduction to phenomenology. London, England: Routledge; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publishing; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Hungler BP. Nursing research: principles and methods. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Lam MY, Tatla SK, Lohse KR, et al. Perceptions of technology and its use for therapeutic application for individuals with hemiparesis: findings from adult and pediatric focus groups. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;2(1):e1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dorey B, Reid D, Chiu T. Stroke survivors’ experiences of computer use at home. Technol Disabil. 2007;19:179–188.
   Google Scholar
• Nasr N, Leon B, Mountain G, et al. The experience of living with stroke and using technology: opportunities to engage and co-design with end users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(8):653–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardré PL. When, how, and why do we trust technology too much? In: Tettegah SY, Espelage DL, editors. Emotions, technology, and behaviors. Elsevier Inc; 2016. p. 85–106.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer RM, Carnavale PJ. Close relationships. In: Hendrick C, editor. Trust in close relationships. London: SAGE Publishing; 2001. p. 431–450.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson JA. Psychological foundations of trust. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007;16(5):264–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkle S. Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Xu J, Kim L, Deitermann A, et al. How different types of users develop trust in technology: a qualitative analysis of the antecedents of active and passive user trust in a shared technology. Appl Ergon. 2014;45:1495–1503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Velsen L, Wildevuur S, Flierman I, et al. Trust in telemedicine portals for rehabilitation care: an exploratory focus group study with patients and healthcare professionals. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016;16(1):11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riper H, Spek V, Boon B, et al. Effectiveness of E-self-help interventions for curbing adult problem drinking: a meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(2):e42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fledderus M, Bohlmeijer ET, Pieterse ME, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy as guided self-help for psychological distress and positive mental health: a randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med. 2012;42(3):485–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koufaris M, Hampton-Sosa W. The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers. Inf Manag. 2004;41(3):377–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seckler M, Heinz S, Forde S, et al. Trust and distrust on the web: user experiences and website characteristics. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;45:39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug S, Castro RP, Kwon M, et al. Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. J Behav Addict. 2015;4(4):299–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong SH, Tan YR. Internet addiction in young people. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2014;43(7):378–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remondi C, Compare A, Tasca GA, et al. Insecure Attachment and technology addiction among young adults: the mediating role of impulsivity, alexithymia, and general psychological distress. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020;23(11):761–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erhag HF, Ahlner F, Rydberg ST, et al. Internet use and self-rated health among Swedish 70-year-olds: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalaila R, Vitman-Schorr A. Internet use, social networks, loneliness, and quality of life among adults aged 50 and older: mediating and moderating effects. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(2):479–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coget JF, Yamauchi Y, Suman M. The internet, social networks and loneliness. Soc. 2002;1(1):80–201.
   Google Scholar
• Kraut R, Patterson M, Lundmark V, et al. Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? Am Psychol. 1998;53(9):1017–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M’hiri K, Costanza A, Khazaal Y, et al. Problematic internet use in older adults: a critical review of the literature. J Addict Res Ther. 2015;6(4):253.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Bala H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. J Decis Sci Inst. 2008;39:273–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci. 1989;35(8):982–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ba S, Pavlou P. Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic market: price premium and buyer behaviour. Mis Q. 2002;26(3):243–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalseng EJ, Andreassen TW. Electronic healthcare: a study of people’s readiness and attitude toward performing self-diagnosis. Int S Serv Ind Manag. 2007;18(4):394–417.
   Google Scholar
• Honein-AbouHaider GN, Antoun J, Badr K, et al. User’s acceptance of electronic patient portals in Lebanon. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020;20(1):31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayskja BK, Steinsbekk KS. Personalized medicine, digital technology and trust: a kantian account. Med Health Care Philos. 2020;23:577–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copley J, Turpin M, Brosnan J, et al. Understanding and negotiating: reasoning processes used by an occupational therapist to individualize intervention decisions for people with upper limb hypertonicity. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(19):1486–1498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison H, Strong J. Verbal strategies used by occupational therapists in direct client encounters. OTJR. 1994;14(2):112–129.
   Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Hallberg IR. Psychiatric occupational therapists’ verbal interaction with their clients. Occup Ther Int. 2001;8(1):1–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor RR. The intentional relationship. Occupational therapy and the use of self. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kn GH, Fong KN. Effects of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice: a systematic review. Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2019;32(1):3–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehm N, Muehlberg H, Stube JE. Managing poststroke fatigue using telehealth: a case report. Am J Occup Ther. 2015;96(6):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson S, Tang Z, Feng J. Supporting stroke motor recovery through a mobile application: a pilot study. Am J Occup Ther. 2017;71(3):1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder SM, Rosenfeldt AB, Bay RC, et al. Improving quality of life and depression after stroke through telerehabilitation. Am J Occup Ther. 2015;69(2):6902290020p1–690229002010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang CL, Waterson S, Eng JJ. Implementation and evaluation of the virtual graded repetitive arm supplementary program (GRASP) for individuals with stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic and Beyond. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci. 2021;101(6):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mountain G, Wilson S, Eccleston C, et al. Developing and testing a telerehabilitation system for people following stroke: issues of usability. J Eng Des. 2010;21(2):223–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cason J. Telehealth: a rapidly developing service delivery model for occupational therapy. Int J Telerehabilitation. 2014;6(1):29–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischl C, Blusi M, Lindgren H, et al. Tailoring to support digital technology-mediated occupational engagement for older adults - a multiple case study. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(8):577–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frechette J, Bitzas V, Aubry M, et al. Capturing Lived experience: methodological considerations for interpretive phenomenological inquiry. Int J Qual Methods. 2020;19:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin M, Fossey E. Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: guidelines for occupational therapists. Aust Occup Ther J. 2007;54(2):88–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar