Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the wheelchair seating discomfort assessment tool (WcS-DAT) – section II: a revised two-dimensional structure of comfort and discomfort to improve inclusive design practice

References

• Bahrampour S, Nazari J, Dianat I, et al. Determining optimum seat depth using comfort and discomfort assessments. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019;26(3):429–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Looze MP, Kuijt-Evers LFM, van Dieën J. Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures. Ergonomics. 2003;46(10):985–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dianat I, Karimi MA, Asl Hashemi A, et al. Classroom furniture and anthropometric characteristics of Iranian high school students: proposed dimensions based on anthropometric data. Appl Ergon. 2013;44(1):101–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasulo L, Naddeo A, Cappetti N. A study of classroom seat (dis) comfort: relationships between body movements, center of pressure on the seat, and lower limbs’ sensations. Appl Ergon. 2019;74:233–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenesteijn L, Ellegast RP, Keller K, et al. Office task effects on comfort and body dynamics in five dynamic office chairs. Appl Ergon. 2012;43(2):320–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyung G, Nussbaum MA, Babski-Reeves K. Driver sitting comfort and discomfort (part I): use of subjective ratings in discriminating car seats and correspondence among ratings. Int J Ind Ergon. 2008;38(5-6):516–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso M, McKinnon C, Viggiani D, et al. Biomechanical investigation of prolonged driving in an ergonomically designed truck seat prototype. Ergonomics. 2018;61(3):367–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaderi E, Maleki A, Dianat I. Design of combine harvester seat based on anthropometric data of iranian operators. Int J Ind Ergon. 2014;44(6):810–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta C, Tewari V. Seating discomfort for tractor operators–a critical review. Int J Ind Ergon. 2000;25(6):661–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helander MG, Zhang L. Field studies of comfort and discomfort in sitting. Ergonomics. 1997;40(9):895–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Helander MG, Drury CG. Identifying factors of comfort and discomfort in sitting. Hum Factors. 1996;38(3):377–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kee D, Karwowski W. The boundaries for joint angles of isocomfort for sitting and standing males based on perceived comfort of static joint postures. Ergonomics. 2001;44(6):614–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bontrup C, Taylor WR, Fliesser M, et al. Low back pain and its relationship with sitting behaviour among sedentary office workers. Appl Ergon. 2019;81:102894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kett AR, Sichting F. Sedentary behaviour at work increases muscle stiffness of the back: why roller massage has potential as an active break intervention. Appl Ergon. 2020;82:102947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer M. User desires for wheelchairs. RERC-TET study shows manufacturers would do well to listen to consumers. Rehabilitation engineering research center on technology evaluation and transfer. Rehab Manag. 1996;9(4):121–123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss-Lambrou R, Tremblay C, LeBlanc R, et al. Wheelchair seating aids: how satisfied are consumers? Assistive Technol. 1999;11(1):43–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardsley G. The dundee seating programme. Physiotherapy. 1984;70(2):59–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaw G, Taylor SJ. A survey of wheelchair seating problems of the institutionalized elderly. Assist Technol. 1991;3(1):5–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crane BA, Holm MB, Hobson D, et al. Development of a consumer-driven wheelchair seating discomfort assessment tool (WcS-DAT). Int J Rehabil Res. 2004;27(1):85–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson PJ, Coleman R. History of inclusive design in the UK. Appl Ergon. 2015;46:235–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dianat I, Molenbroek J, Castellucci HI. A review of the methodology and applications of anthropometry in ergonomics and product design. Ergonomics. 2018;61(12):1696–1720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane BA, Holm MB, Hobson D, et al. Test-retest reliability, internal item consistency, and concurrent validity of the wheelchair seating discomfort assessment tool. Assist Technol. 2005;17(2):98–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemp R, Taylor WR, Lorenzetti S. Are pressure measurements effective in the assessment of office chair comfort/discomfort? A review. Appl Ergon. 2015;48:273–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genaidy AM, Karwowski W. The effects of neutral posture deviations on perceived joint discomfort ratings in sitting and standing postures. Ergonomics. 1993;36(7):785–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dianat I, Ghanbari Z, AsghariJafarabadi M. Psychometric properties of the persian language version of the system usability scale. Health Promot Perspect. 2014;4(1):82–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. Measurement in nursing and health research. 2010. New York: Springer publishing company.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant FB, Yarnold PR. Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. 1995. Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99–136). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Chou C-P, Bentler PM. Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. 1st ed. 1996. Chapter 3, Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling; London: Sage Publications Inc; p.37-55.
   Google Scholar
• Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2015. New York: Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4(4):293–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinsley HE, Brown SD. Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling. 2000. San Diego, California: Academic press.
   Google Scholar
• George D, Mallery P. IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: a simple guide and reference. 2019. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Browne MW, Cudeck R. Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behav Res. 1989;24(4):445–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods. 1996;1(2):130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Balla JR, Hau KT. Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques. 1st ed. 1996. Chapter 11, An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical properties; New York: Psychology Press; p. 315–353
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 1992;1(3):98–101.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes SN, Richard D, Kubany ES. Content validity in psychological assessment: a functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(3):238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozey JW, Das B. Determination of the normal and maximum reach measures of adult wheelchair users. Int J Ind Ergon. 2004;33(3):205–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar