Requirements for home-based upper extremity rehabilitation using wearable motion sensors for stroke patients: a user-centred approach

References

• Feigin VL, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders during 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(11):877–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(8):741–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Veerbeek JM, van Wegen EE, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(2):224–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Winters C, van Wegen EE, EXPLICIT-Stroke Consortium, et al. Effects of unilateral upper limb training in two distinct prognostic groups early after stroke: the EXPLICIT-Stroke randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016;30(9):804–816. Oct
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1693–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedlow K, Lennon S, Wilson C. Application of constraint-induced movement therapy in clinical practice: an online survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(2):276–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viana R, Teasell R. Barriers to the implementation of Constraint-Induced movement therapy into practice. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2012;19(2):104–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward KS, Brauer SG. Dose of arm activity training during acute and subacute rehabilitation post stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(12):1234–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang CE, MacDonald JR, Gnip C. Counting repetitions: an observational study of outpatient therapy for people with hemiparesis post-stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31(1):3–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lang CE, Macdonald JR, Reisman DS, et al. Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(10):1692–1698. Oct
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disability Rehabil. 2006;28(13-14):823–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleet A, Che M, Mackay-Lyons M, et al. Examining the use of constraint-induced movement therapy in canadian neurological occupational and physical therapy. Physiother Can. 2014;66(1):60–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alarcón-Aldana AC, Callejas-Cuervo M, Bo APL. Upper limb physical rehabilitation using serious videogames and motion capture systems: a systematic review. Sensors. 2020;20(21):5989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Débora Pacheco B, Guimaraes Caetano LC, Amorim Samora G, et al. Perceived barriers to exercise reported by individuals with stroke, who are able to walk in the community. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(3):331–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72(4):473–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck JA, Smeets R, Seelen HAM. Changes in arm-hand function and arm-hand skill performance in patients after stroke during and after rehabilitation. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(6):e0179453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrowska PM, Śliwiński M, Studnicki R, et al. Telerehabilitation of Post-Stroke patients as a therapeutic solution in the era of the covid-19 pandemic. Healthcare. 2021;9(6):654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver KE, Adey-Wakeling Z, Crotty M, et al. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;1(1):Cd010255. Jan 31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tchero H, Tabue Teguo M, Lannuzel A, et al. Telerehabilitation for stroke survivors: systematic review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(10):e10867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Abel KT, Janecek JT, et al. Home-based technologies for stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2019;123:11–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porciuncula F, Roto AV, Kumar D, et al. Wearable movement sensors for rehabilitation: a focused review of technological and clinical advances. Pm R. 2018;10(9 Suppl 2):S220–S232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Markets Ra. Motion sensor market - growth, trends, COVID-19 impact, and forecasts (2022–2027). 2022. https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5239646/motion-sensor-market-growth-trends-covid-19#product
   Google Scholar
• Huis In 't Veld RM, Widya IA, Bults RG, et al. A scenario guideline for designing new teletreatments: a multidisciplinary approach. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(6):302–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayasree-Krishnan V, Ghosh S, Palumbo A, et al. Developing a framework for designing and deploying Technology-Assisted rehabilitation after stroke: a qualitative study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;100(8):774–779. Aug 1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughlin S, Mehta S, Corriveau H, et al. Implementing telerehabilitation after stroke: lessons learned from Canadian trials. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26(6):710–719. Jun
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy T, Jc L, Killington M, et al. Just that four letter word, hope": stroke survivors’ perspectives of participation in an intensive upper limb exercise program; a qualitative exploration. Physiother Theory Pract. 2021;12:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Elnady A, Mortenson WB, Menon C. Perceptions of existing wearable robotic devices for upper extremity and suggestions for their development: findings from therapists and people with stroke. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;5(1):e12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li L, Fu Q, Tyson S, et al. A scoping review of design requirements for a home-based upper limb rehabilitation robot for stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2022;29(6):449–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiweis B, Pobiruchin M, Strotbaum V, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of eHealth services: systematic literature analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(11):e14197. Nov 22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kip H, Keizer J, da Silva MC, et al. Methods for Human-Centered eHealth development: narrative scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(1):e31858. Jan 27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasr N, Leon B, Mountain G, et al. The experience of living with stroke and using technology: opportunities to engage and co-design with end users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(8):653–660. Nov
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentink M, van Bodegom-Vos L, Brouns B, et al. How to improve eRehabilitation programs in stroke care? A focus group study to identify requirements of end-users. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19(1):145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wentink MM, VAN Bodegom-Vos L, Brouns B, et al. What is important in E-health interventions for stroke rehabilitation? A survey study among patients, informal caregivers and health professionals. Int J Telerehabil. 2018;10(1):15–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuseibeh B, Easterbrook S, editors. Requirements engineering: a roadmap. Proceedings of the conference on the future of software engineering, New York, United States. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G, et al. Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable taskforce. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31(9):793–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmens RJM, Janssen-Potten YJM, Timmermans AAA, et al. Arm hand skilled performance in cerebral palsy: activity preferences and their movement components. BMC Neurol. 2014;14:52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foundation ID. User Scenarios [cited 2021 14-Oct]. Available from: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/user-scenarios
   Google Scholar
• Berander P, Andrews A. Requirements prioritization. Eng Manag Softw Requir. 2005;69–94.
   Google Scholar
• Van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what’s the evidence? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(8):833–862. Dec
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne R, Rea PM. A game changer: 'The use of digital technologies in the management of upper limb rehabilitation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1205:117–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church G, Ali A, Smith CL, et al. Examining clinical practice guidelines for exercise and physical activity as part of rehabilitation for people with stroke: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(3):1707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans AA, Seelen HA, Willmann RD, et al. Arm and hand skills: training preferences after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(16):1344–1352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmer M, Held JPO, Wittmann F, et al. Reward during arm training improves impairment and activity after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022;36(2):140–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held JP, Klaassen B, van Beijnum BF, et al. Usability evaluation of a VibroTactile feedback system in stroke subjects. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2016;4:98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held JPO, Luft AR, Veerbeek JM. Encouragement-Induced Real-World upper limb use after stroke by a tracking and feedback device: a study protocol for a Multi-Center, Assessor-Blinded, randomized controlled trial. Front Neurol. 2018;9:13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore SA, Da Silva R, Balaam M, et al. Wristband accelerometers to motiVate arm exercise after stroke (WAVES): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier M, Ballester BR, Verschure P. Principles of neurorehabilitation after stroke based on motor learning and brain plasticity mechanisms. Front Syst Neurosci. 2019;13:74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida T, Otaka Y, Osu R, et al. Motivation for rehabilitation in patients with subacute stroke: a qualitative study [original research]. Front Rehabil Sci. 2021;2:664758.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Kordelaar J, van Wegen E, Kwakkel G. Impact of time on quality of motor control of the paretic upper limb after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(2):338–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kordelaar J, van Wegen EE, Kwakkel G. Unraveling the interaction between pathological upper limb synergies and compensatory trunk movements during reach-to-grasp after stroke: a cross-sectional study. Exp Brain Res. 2012;221(3):251–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavuoto LA, Subryan H, Stafford M, et al. Understanding user requirements for the design of a Home-Based stroke rehabilitation system. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2018;62(1):1037–1041.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Meulen FB, Klaassen B, Held J, et al. Objective evaluation of the quality of movement in daily life after stroke. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015;3:210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmann F, Held JP, Lambercy O, et al. Self-directed arm therapy at home after stroke with a sensor-based virtual reality training system. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2016;13(1):75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Administration DgtftUSGS. User-Centered Design Basics. 2021. https://www.usability.gov/what-and-why/user-centered-design.html
   Google Scholar