The BLV App Arcade: a new curated repository and evaluation rubric for mobile applications supporting blindness and low vision

References

• Peter Ackland SR, Rupert B. World blindness and visual impairment: despite many successes, the problem is growing: Community Eye Health. 2017. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5820628/
   Google Scholar
• ProfBourne RRA. Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Glob Health. 2020;5(9):e888–e897.
   Google Scholar
• Varma R, Vajaranant TS, Burkemper B, et al. Visual impairment and blindness in adults in the United States: demographic and geographic variations from 2015 to 2050. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(7):802–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. World report on vision 2019. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241516570
   Google Scholar
• Jennifer LY, Yip RL, Paul JF. Area deprivation, individual socioeconomic status and low vision in the EPIC-Norfolk eye study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(3):204–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John P, Whitcher MS, Madan PU. Corneal blindness: a global perspective. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;79(3):214–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heruye SH, Nkenyi LNM, Singh NU, et al. Current trends in the pharmacotherapy of cataracts [review]. Pharmaceuticals. 2020;13(1):15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. Mobile fact sheet 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/
   Google Scholar
• Ohn-Bar E, Guerreiro J, Kitani K, et al. Variability in reactions to instructional guidance during Smartphone-Based assisted navigation of blind users. Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2018;2(3):1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Hakobyan L, Lumsden J, O'Sullivan D, et al. Mobile assistive technologies for the visually impaired. Surv Ophthalmol. 2013;58(6):513–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HK, Han SH, Park J, et al. The interaction experiences of visually impaired people with assistive technology: a case study of smartphones. Int J Ind Ergon. 2016;55:22–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manduchi R, Kurniawan S. Assistive technology for blindness and low vision. New York, NY: CRC Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Pal J, Viswanathan A, Chandra P, et al. editors. Agency in assistive technology adoption: visual impairment and smartphone use in bangalore. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Zurich, Switzerland. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sankhi P, Sandnes FE. A glimpse into smartphone screen reader use among blind teenagers in rural Nepal. Disab Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022;17(8):875–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton DA, Dell AG. Mobile devices and students with disabilities: what do best practices tell us? J Spec Educ Technol. 2011;26(3):47–49.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin-Shirley N, Banda DR, Ajuwon Pm, et al. A survey on the use of mobile applications for people who are visually impaired. 2017. https://doiorg/101177/0145482X1711100402
   Google Scholar
• Wong S. Traveling with blindness: a qualitative space-time approach to understanding visual impairment and urban mobility. Health and Place. 2018;49:85–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodorou P, Meliones A. Towards a training framework for improved assistive mobile app acceptance and use rates by blind and visually impaired people [article]. Educ Sci. 2020;10(3):58.
   Google Scholar
• Dockery D, Krzystolik MGMD. The use of mobile applications as Low-Vision aids: a pilot Study - ProQuest. Rhode Island Med J. 2020;103(8):69–72.
   Google Scholar
• Matusiak K, Skulimowski P, Strurniłło P. Object recognition in a mobile phone application for visually impaired users. IN: 2013 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI), IEEE. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Awad M, Haddad JE, Khneisser E, et al. Intelligent eye: a mobile application for assisting blind people. In: 2018 IEEE Middle East and North Africa Communications Conference (MENACOMM), IEEE. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bagwan SMR, Sankpal LJ. VisualPal: a mobile app for object recognition for the visually impaired. In: 2015 International Conference on Computer, Communication and Control (IC4), IEEE. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Pundlik S, Yi H, Liu R, et al. Magnifying smartphone screen using google glass for Low-Vision users. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017;25(1):52–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrice E, Johnson AP, Marinier JA, et al. Assessment of the apple iPad as a low-vision reading aid [OriginalPaper]. Eye. 2017;31(6):865–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceolini E, Taverni G, Khacef L. Sensor fusion using EMG and vision for hand gesture classification in mobile applications. In: 2019 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS), IEEE. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Landazabal NP, Rivera OAM, Herrera M. Design and implementation of a mobile app for public transportation services of persons with visual impairment (TransmiGuia). In: 2019 XXII Symposium on Image, Signal Processing and Artificial Vision (STSIVA) IEEE. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Walch O, Mathematics U, Jacobs M, et al. An inexpensive smartphone-based eyewear for low-vision individuals. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2016;57(12):5164–5164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Cutrell E, Holz C, et al. Seeing VR | Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association of Computing Machinery, New York, NY. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• F, Lang, AS, Tonja M. Augmented reality for people with low vision: symbolic and alphanumeric representation of information. In: Computers helping people with special needs. Munich, Germany: SpringerLink. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Schueller SM, Neary M, O'Loughlin K, et al. Discovery of and interest in health apps among those with mental health needs: survey and focus group study. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(6):e10141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbar S, Coiera E, Magrabi F. Safety concerns with consumer-facing mobile health applications and their consequences: a scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(2):330–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labs R. Open-Source Resources: the BVI App Arcade 2022. https://rizzolab.org/open-source-resources/
   Google Scholar
• ASHP. Evaluating mobile medical applications. 2014. https://www.ashp.org/-/media/store%20files/mobile-medical-apps.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lagan S, Aquino P, Emerson MR, et al. Actionable health app evaluation: translating expert frameworks into objective metrics. Npj Digit Med. 2020;3(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee B, Son C. Improving evaluation metric of mobile application service with user review data. J Korea Acad Industrial Cooperation Soc. 2020;21(1):380–386.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain A, Ferneley E, editors. Usability metric for mobile application: a goal question metric (GQM) approach. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on information integration and Web-Based applications & services, Linz, Austria. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain A, Kutar M. Usability metric framework for mobile phone application. PGNet. 2009;2099:978–971.
   Google Scholar
• Nayebi F, Abran A, Desharnais J-M editors. The state of the art of mobile application usability evaluation. In: 25th IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), IEEE. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y-M, Yeh Y-S. Increasing trust in mobile commerce through design aesthetics. Comp Human Behav. 2010;26(4):673–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardus M, van Beurden SB, Smith JR, et al. A review and content analysis of engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information quality, and change techniques in the most popular commercial apps for weight management. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Cañete F, López Rodríguez J, Galdón P, et al. Improvements in the learnability of smartphone haptic interfaces for visually impaired users. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0225053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y-H, Chen S-Y, Lin P-H, et al. Assessing user retention of a mobile app: survival analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(11):e16309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tison GH, Hsu K, Hsieh JT, et al. Achieving high retention in mobile health research using design principles adopted from widely popular consumer mobile apps. Circulation. 2017;136(suppl_1):A21029–A21029.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo JR, Thai P, Li EJ, et al. Structured wii protocol for rehabilitation of shoulder impingement syndrome: a pilot study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;60(6):363–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law FL, Kasirun ZM, GanCK, editors. Gamification towards sustainable mobile application. In: 2011 Malaysian Conference in Software Engineering, IEEE, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lowman GH. Moving beyond identification: using gamification to attract and retain talent. Ind Organ Psychol. 2016;9(3):677–682.
   Google Scholar
• Smith K, Abrams SS. Gamification and accessibility. IJILT. 2019;36(2):104–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente O, Vicente S, Martin D. Health gamification Proceedings of the 2014 Summer Simulation Multiconference; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Miller DW, Marks LJ. Mental imagery and sound effects in radio commercials. Journal of Advertising. 1992;21(4):83–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob Poushter CB, Hanyu CHWE. Smartphone ownership on the rise in emerging economies. 2018. Pew Research Center https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2018/06/19/2-smartphone-ownership-on-the-rise-in-emerging-economies/
   Google Scholar
• Silver L. In emerging economies, smartphone adoption has grown more quickly among younger generations. Pew Research Center. 2019.
   Google Scholar