Technologies for monitoring activities of daily living in older adults: a systematic review

References

• United Nations. World population ageing 2020 highlights; 2020. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/news/world-population-ageing-2020-highlights
   Google Scholar
• Liu P, Li G, Jiang S, et al. The effect of smart homes on older adults with chronic conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Geriatr Nurs. 2019;40(5):522–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheek P, Nikpour L, Nowlin HD. Aging well with smart technology. Nurs Adm Q. 2005;29(4):329–338.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonder B, Dal Bello-Haas V. Functional performance in older adults. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Co.; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Marek KD, Rantz MJ. Aging in place: a new model for long-term care. Nurs Adm Q. 2000;24(3):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lantz S, Fenn D. Re-shaping the housing market for aging in place and home modifications; 2017. https://caregiveromnimedia.com/wp-
   Google Scholar
• Law Insider. Monitoring technology; 2021. https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/monitoring-technology
   Google Scholar
• Camp N, Lewis M, Hunter K, et al. Technology used to recognize activities of daily living in community-dwelling older adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;18(1):163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debes C, Merentitis A, Sukhanov S, et al. Monitoring activities of daily living in smart homes: understanding human behavior. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2016;33(2):81–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulli P, Hyry J, Pouke M, et al. User interaction in smart ambient environment targeted for senior citizen. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2012;50(11):1119–1126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Redmond SJ, Lu W, et al. Selecting power-efficient signal features for a low-power fall detector. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017;64:2729–2736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nef T, Urwyler P, Büchler M, et al. Evaluation of three state-of-the-art classifiers for recognition of activities of daily living from smart home ambient data. Sensors. 2015;15(5):11725–11740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldib M, Deboeverie F, Philips W, et al. Behavior analysis for elderly care using a network of low-resolution visual sensors. J Electron Imaging. 2016;25(4):041003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu F, Khoshelham K, Valaee S, et al. Locomotion activity recognition using stacked denoising autoencoders. IEEE Internet Things J. 2018;5(3):2085–2093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye J, Reynolds C, Bowman M, et al. Methodology for establishing a community-wide life laboratory for capturing unobtrusive and continuous remote activity and health data. J Vis Exp. 2018;2018(137):56942.
   Google Scholar
• Chung J, Demiris G, Thompson HJ, et al. Feasibility testing of a home-based sensor system to monitor mobility and daily activities in Korean American older adults. Int J Older People Nurs. 2017;12(1).
   Google Scholar
• Pol M, Nes F, Hartingsveldt M, et al. Older people’s perspectives regarding the use of sensor monitoring in their home. Gerontologist. 2016;56(3):485–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haak M, Fänge A, Iwarsson S, et al. Home as a signification of independence and autonomy: experiences among very old Swedish people. Scand J Occup Ther. 2007;14(1):16–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyd CM, Landefeld CS, Counsell SR, et al. Recovery of activities of daily living in older adults after hospitalization for acute medical illness. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(12):2171–2179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokalp H, Clarke M. Monitoring activities of daily living of the elderly and the potential for its use in telecare and telehealth: a review. Telemed J E Health. 2013;19:910–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis RA, Johnson LE, Roberson PK, et al. Changes in activities of daily living, nutrient intake, and systemic inflammation in elderly adults receiving recuperative care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(12):2246–2253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Onofrio G, Sancarlo D, Ricciardi F, et al. Information and communication technologies for the activities of daily living in older patients with dementia: a systematic review. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;57(3):927–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn Z, Barker TH, Moola S, et al. Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18:2127–2133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 2012;22:276–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCImago G. SCImago journal & country rank: un nuevo porta, dos nuevos rankings. Inf Prof. 2007;16:645–646.
   Google Scholar
• Mankins JC. Technology readiness assessments: a retrospective. Acta Astronaut. 2009;65(9–10):1216–1223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pol MC, Poerbodipoero S, Robben S, et al. Sensor monitoring to measure and support daily functioning for independently living older people: a systematic review and road map for further development. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(12):2219–2227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higueras-Fresnillo S, Esteban-Cornejo I, Gasque P, et al. Criterion-related validity of self-reported stair climbing in older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018;30(2):199–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein A, Steen E-E, Thiel A, et al. Working with a domestic assessment system to estimate the need of support and care of elderly and disabled persons: results from field studies. Inform Health Soc Care. 2014;39(3–4):210–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenouvel E, Novak L, Nef T, et al. Advances in sensor monitoring effectiveness and applicability: a systematic review and update. Gerontologist. 2020;60:e299–e308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahmen J, Minor B, Cook D, et al. Smart home-driven digital memory notebook support of activity self-management for older adults. Gerontechnology. 2018;17(2):113–125.
   Google Scholar
• Lussier M, Couture M, Moreau M, et al. Integrating an ambient assisted living monitoring system into clinical decision-making in home care: an embedded case study. Gerontechnology. 2020;19(1):77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Coni A, Mellone S, Leach JM, et al. Association between smartphone-based activity monitoring and traditional clinical assessment tools in community-dwelling older people. In: 2016 IEEE 2nd International Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry Leveraging a better tomorrow (RTSI). IEEE; 2016. p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Pigini L, Bovi G, Panzarino C, et al. Pilot test of a new personal health system integrating environmental and wearable sensors for telemonitoring and care of elderly people at home (SMARTA project). Gerontology. 2017;63(3):281–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa N, Ogihara N. Estimation of foot trajectory during human walking by a wearable inertial measurement unit mounted to the foot. Gait Posture. 2016;45:110–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Guede JM, Moreno-Fernandez-de-Leceta A, Martinez-Garcia A, et al. Lynx: automatic elderly behavior prediction in home telecare. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awais M, Chiari L, Ihlen EAF, et al. Physical activity classification for elderly people in free-living conditions. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2019;23(1):197–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie MAD, Coppens MJM, Lord SR, et al. Wearable pendant device monitoring using new wavelet-based methods shows daily life and laboratory gaits are different. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2016;54(4):663–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cámara MÁ, Higueras-Fresnillo S, Martinez-Gomez D, et al. Interday reliability of the IDEEA activity monitor for measuring movement and nonmovement behaviors in older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2019;27(2):141–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone E, Skubic M, Rantz M, et al. Average in-home gait speed: investigation of a new metric for mobility and fall risk assessment of elders. Gait Posture. 2015;41(1):57–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Karunanithi M, Rana R, et al. Determination of activities of daily living of independent living older people using environmentally placed sensors. In: 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE; 2013. p. 7044–7047.
   Google Scholar
• Ejupi A, Brodie M, Lord SR, et al. Wavelet-based sit-to-stand detection and assessment of fall risk in older people using a wearable pendant device. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017;64(7):1602–1607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz D, Yee N, Daum C, et al. Activity classification in independent living environment with JINS MEME eyewear. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom). IEEE; 2018. p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Achkar C, Lenoble-Hoskovec C, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, et al. Instrumented shoes for activity classification in the elderly. Gait Posture. 2016;44:12–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonon G, editor. Qualitative studies in quality of life: methodology and practice. Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ding D, Cooper RA, Pasquina PF, et al. Sensor technology for smart homes. Maturitas. 2011;69(2):131–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dove E, Astell AJ. The use of motion-based technology for people living with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(1):e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demrozi F, Pravadelli G, Bihorac A, et al. Human activity recognition using inertial, physiological and environmental sensors: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Access Pract Innov Open Solut. 2020;8:210816–210836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gochoo M, Alnajjar F, Tan T-H, et al. Towards privacy-preserved aging in place: a systematic review. Sensors. 2021;21(9):3082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baig MM, Afifi S, GholamHosseini H, et al. A systematic review of wearable sensors and IoT-based monitoring applications for older adults – a focus on ageing population and independent living. J Med Syst. 2019;43(8):233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsertsidis A, Kolkowska E, Hedström K. Factors influencing seniors’ acceptance of technology for ageing in place in the post-implementation stage: a literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2019;129:324–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ienca M, Kressig RW, Jotterand F, et al. Proactive ethical design for neuroengineering, assistive and rehabilitation technologies: the Cybathlon lesson. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14(1):115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar