References
- Australian Bureau of Statistics. Disability, ageing and carers, Australia: summary of findings: ABS. 2019. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/disability/disability-ageing-and-carers-australia-summary-findings/latest-release
- World Health Organisation. Disability. WHO; 2021. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Specialised supports for people with disability. AIHW; 2021. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-welfare/supporting-people-with-disability
- Bierhoff I, van Beerlo A, Abascal J, et al. Impact and wider potential of information and communication technologies. In: Roe PRW, editor. Towards an inclusive future. Brussels, Belgium: East Sussex Press; 2007. p. 110–147.
- Haba CG, Breniuc L, David V. Developing embedded platforms for ambient assisted living. In: Dobre C, Mavromoustakis, C, Garcia N, Goleva R, George M, editors. Ambient assisted living and enhanced living. Environments: Elsevier; 2017. p. 211–246.
- Varriale L, Briganti P, Mele S. Disability and home automation: insights and challenges within organizational settings. Vol. 33. Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 47–66.
- Bridge C, Zmudzki F, Huang T, et al. Impacts of new and emerging assistive technologies for ageing and disabled housing, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited. AHURI Final Report. 2021.
- Administration for Community Living. Assistive technology. 2021. https://acl.gov/programs/assistive-technology/assistive-technology
- National Health Service. Home adaptions for older people and people with disabilities. 2018. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/social-care-and-support-guide/care-services-equipment-and-care-homes/home-adaptations/
- National Aged Care Alliance. Assistive technology for older Australians. NACA; 2018.
- Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473.
- Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Meth. 2018;18(1):143–143.
- Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Meth. 2005;8(1):19–32.
- Henley L. The assistive technology for all alliance Pre-Budget submission. AFTA; 2019.
- Covidence systematic review Software. Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation; 2022.
- Callaway L, Tregloan K, Williams G, et al. Evaluating access and mobility within a new model of supported housing for people with neurotrauma: a pilot study. Brain Impair. 2016;17(1):64–76.
- Landuran A, Sauzéon H, Consel C, et al. Evaluation of a smart home platform for adults with Down syndrome. Assist Technol. 2022;1-11.
- Maggio MG, Maresca G, Russo M, et al. Effects of domotics on cognitive, social and personal functioning in patients with chronic stroke: a pilot study. Disab Health J. 2020;13(1):100838.
- Ocepek J, Roberts AEK, Vidmar G. Evaluation of treatment in the smart home IRIS in terms of functional independence and occupational performance and satisfaction. Comput Math Meth Med. 2013;2013:926858.
- Squires LA, Rush F, Hopkinson A, et al. The physical and psychological impact of using a computer-based environmental control system: a case study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8(5):434–443.
- Wallock KE, Cerny SL. Benefits of smart home technology for individuals living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Assist Technol Outcomes Benef. 2021;15(1):132–138.
- Hooper B, Verdonck M, Amsters D, et al. Smart-device environmental control systems: experiences of people with cervical spinal cord injuries. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(8):724–730.
- Myburg M, Allan E, Nalder E, et al. Environmental control systems–the experiences of people with spinal cord injury and the implications for prescribers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(2):128–136.
- Verdonck M, Nolan M, Chard G. Taking back a little of what you have lost: the meaning of using an environmental control system (ECS) for people with high cervical spinal cord injury [article]. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(8):785–790.
- Verdonck M, Steggles E, Nolan M, et al. Experiences of using an environmental control system (ECS) for persons with high cervical spinal cord injury: the interplay between hassle and engagement [article]. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9(1):70–78.
- Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Osborne R. The assessment of quality of life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 1999;8(3):209–224.
- Parkinson S, Fisher G, Fisher J. The residential environment impact survey – short form (UK Version 2.2). 2011. www.moho.uic.edu/REISinformation.html
- Weymeyer ML. The arc’s self-determination scale: procedural guidelines. 1995.
- Lapierre S, Desrochers C. Translation and validation of the Psychological Well-Being Scales of Ryff. 1997.
- Ryff CD. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;57(6):1069–1081.
- Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, et al. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. J Am Med Assoc. 1963;185(12):914–919.
- Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-Maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179–186.
- Granger CV, Gresham GE. Functional assessment in rehabilitation medicine. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1984.
- Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.
- Schuling J, de Haan R, Limburg M, et al. The frenchay activities index. Assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke. 1993;24(8):1173–1177.
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Informal Carers: AIHW; 2021. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-welfare/informal-carers
- World Health Organisation. A glossary of terms for community health care and services for older persons. WHO; 2004. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/68896
- Jutai J, Day H. Psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS). Tech Disabil. 2002;14(3):107–111.
- Shelkey M, Wallace M. Katz index of independence in activities of daily living. Home Healthc Now. 2001;19(5)
- World Health Organisation. Mental health: strengthening our response. WHO; 2022.
- Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent Self-Image. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1965.
- World Health Organisation. WHOQOL-BREF 2004. https://www.who.int/tools/whoqol/whoqol-bref
- Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–233.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics. National study of mental health and wellbeing. ABS; 2022. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/mental-health/national-study-mental-health-and-wellbeing/latest-release
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health care safety and quality. AIHW; 2022. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/health-care-quality-performance/health-care-safety-and-quality
- Corbeil R, Marcotte A, Trépanier C. Inventaire des habiletés pour la vie en appartement. [inventory of skills for living in an apartment]. Groupe de recherche et d’étude en déficience du développement, French. 2009.
- Maslow AH. A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev. 1943;50(4):370–396.
- Tune D. Review of the national disability insurance scheme act 2013: Australian Department of Social Services. 2019. https://www.dss.gov.au/disability-and-carers-programs-services-for-people-with-disability-national-disability-insurance-scheme/review-of-the-ndis-act-report