Identity change of late-deafened adults after receiving cochlear implants

References

• Gfeller K. Aural rehabilitation of music listening for adult cochlear implant recipients: addressing learner characteristics. Mus Ther Perspect. 2001;19(2):88–95.
   Google Scholar
• Kobosko J, Jedrzejczak WW, Gos E, et al. Self-esteem in the deaf who have become cochlear implant users as adults. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(9):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffernan E, Withanachchi C, Ferguson MA. The worse my hearing got, the less sociable I got: a qualitative study of patient and professional views of the management of social isolation and hearing loss. Age Ageing. 2022;51:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapport F, Lo CY, Elks B, et al. Cochlear implant aesthetics and its impact on stigma, social interaction and quality of life: a mixed-methods study protocol. BMJ Open. 2022;12(3):1–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferndale D, Munro L, Watson B. A discourse of "abnormality": exploring discussions of people living in Australia with deafness or hearing loss. Am Ann Deaf. 2016;160(5):483–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler JM. Bringing the (disabled) body to personality psychology: a case study of Samantha. J Pers. 2018;86(5):803–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization [WHO]. World report on hearing 2021. [cited 2021 10 September]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/world-report-on-hearing.
   Google Scholar
• Krentz CB. The hearing line: Literary encounters with deafness in nineteenth-century America. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing: Virginia University; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Baldridge DC, Kulkarni M. The shaping of sustainable careers post hearing loss: toward greater understanding of adult onset disability, disability identity, and career transitions. Hum Relat. 2017;70(10):1217–1236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berke J. The meaning and practice of audism: Verywell Health; 2020. [cited 2021 October 15]. Available from https://www.verywellhealth.com/deaf-culture-audism-1046267.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert RC, Rowley AJ. Audism: a theory and practice of audiocentric privilege. Hum Soc. 2013;37(2):101–130.
   Google Scholar
• Malesevic S. Ethnic and national identity: the conceptual critique. Identity as ideology: understanding ethnicity and nationalism. 1 ed. London: Palgrave MacMillan; 2006. p. X–253.
   Google Scholar
• Kuiper K. Communication theory of identity: a fifth frame. Int Com Assoc. 2021;45(3):175–187.
   Google Scholar
• Chan C, Berger J, Van Boven L. Identifiable but not identical: combining social identity and uniqueness motives in choice. J Consum Res. 2012;39(3):561–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckner BN, Helme DW. Deaf or hearing: a hard of hearing individual’s navigation between two worlds. Am Ann Deaf. 2018;163(3):394–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz D. M. Cochlear implants: the best option for severe hearing loss in adults. Med Today. 2021;22(9):30–40.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman M, Dammeyer J. The relationship between cochlear implants and deaf identity. Am Ann Deaf. 2017;162(4):319–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisvert I, Reis M, Cowan R, et al. Cochlear implantation outcomes in adults: a scoping review. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(5):1–26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng F-G. Celebrating the one millionth cochlear implant. JASA Express Letters. 2022;2(7):077201, 1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grand View Research. Cochlear implant market size, share & trends analysis report by type of fitting (unilateral implants, bi-lateral implants) by end-use (adult, pediatric) by region and segment forecasts 2021. [cited 2021 August 20]. Available from: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/cochlear-implants-industry.
   Google Scholar
• Cherney JL. Deaf culture and the cochlear implant debate: cyborg politics and the identity of people with disabilities. Argument Advoc. 1999;36(1):22–34.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler SL, Calhoun H, Warner-Czyz AD. Music perception and speech-in-noise skills of typical hearing and cochlear implant listeners. Am J Audiol. 2021;30(1):170–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drouin JR, Theodore RM. Leveraging interdisciplinary perspectives to optimize auditory training for cochlear implant users. Lang Linguist Compass. 2020; 14(9):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauldin L. Lessons learned: how studying cochlear implantation reveals the context in which d/Deaf identities are formed. In: Leigh IW, O'Brien CA, editors. Deaf identities: exploring New Frontiers: Gallaudet University; 2020. p. 96–119.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi-Madiseh A, Eikelboom RH, Bennett RJ, et al. What influences decision-making for cochlear implantation in adults? Exploring barriers and drivers from a multistakeholder perspective. Ear Hear. 2020;41(6):1752–1763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierbaum M, McMahon CM, Hughes S, et al. Barriers and facilitators to cochlear implant uptake in Australia and the United Kingdom. Ear Hear. 2019;41(2):374–385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leigh IW, Andrews JF, Harris RL. Deaf community: past and present. Deaf culture: exploring Deaf communities in the United States. USA: Plural Publishing, Incorporated; 2020. p. 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kobosko J, Jedrzejczak WW, Pilka E, et al. Satisfaction with cochlear implants in postlingually deaf adults and its nonaudiological predictors: psychological distress, coping strategies, and self-esteem. Ear Hear. 2015;36(5):605–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dammeyer J, Chapman M, Marschark M. Experience of hearing loss, communication, social participation, and psychological well-being among adolescents with cochlear implants. Am Ann Deaf. 2018;163(4):424–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West JS, Low JC, Stankovic KM. Revealing hearing loss: a survey of how people verbally disclose their hearing loss. Ear Hear. 2016; 37(2):194–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelton T, Valentine G. ‘It feels like beingDeaf is normal’: an exploration into the complexities of defining D/deafness and young D/deaf people’s identities. Canadian Geo. 2003;47(4):451–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Free Library. Meeting the needs of late-deafened adults: the Free Library; 2014. [cited 1 May 2022]. Available from: https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Meeting+the+needs+ of+late-deafened+adults.-a015538206.
   Google Scholar
• Shikowitz MJ. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Med Clin North Am. 1991;75(6):1239–1250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashubeck-West S, Meyer J. The well-being of women who are late deafened. J Couns Psychol. 2008;55(4):463–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothschild MA, Kampfe CM. Isssues associated with late onset deafness. JADARA. 1997;31:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hearing Care Industry Association. Hearing for life - The value of hearing services for vulnerable Australians. Report prepared with assistance from Deloitte Access Economics, Canberra. In: Economics Deloitte Access, editor. Canberra, Australia 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K, Bryant A. Grounded theory. In: Peterson P, Baker E, McGaw B, editors. International Encyclopedia of Education. (Third Edition). Oxford: Elsevier; 2010. p. 406–412.
   Google Scholar
• Davidsen AS. Phenomenological approaches in psychology and health sciences. Qual Res Psychol. 2013;10(3):318–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis LJ Constructing normalcy: the bell curve, the novel, and the invention of the disabled body in the nineteenth century. In: Obasogie OK, Darnovsky M, editors. Beyond bioethics: toward a new bipolitics: University of California Press; California, USA 2018. p. 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• LimeSurvey. Knowing how to build knowledge: Lime Survey GmbH; 2021. [cited 2021, 10 August 2022]; Software]. Available from: https://www.limesurvey.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Manchaiah V, Bellon-Harn ML, Kelly-Campbell RJ, et al. Media use by older adults with hearing loss: an exploratory survey. Am J Audiol. 2020;29(2):218–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International. NVivo 12 2022. [cited 2022]. Available from: https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home.
   Google Scholar
• Baker SE, Edwards R. How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert choices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research. Southampton UK: NCRM, National Centre for Research Methods; 2017. p. 42.
   Google Scholar
• Snell L. Documenting the lived experiences of young adult cochlear implant users: ‘feeling’ sound, fluidity and blurring boundaries. Disabil Soc. 2015;30(3):340–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamsen B. Nurses’ choice of clinical field in early career. J Adv Nurs. 2015; 71(2):304–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David D, Zoizner G, Werner P. Self-stigma and age-related hearing loss: a qualitative study of stigma formation and dimensions. Am J Audiol. 2018;27(1):126–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domagała-Zyśk E. Older persons with subjectively assessed hearing problems in Poland: quality of life and coping strategies. Am Ann Deaf. 2019;164(3):381–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley D. Disability studies: Theorising disablism and ableism. 1st ed. London, New York: Routledge; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Moser I. Disability and the promises of technology: technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal. Inform Commun Soc. 2006;9(3):373–395.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki-Torkko EM, Vestergren S, Harder H, et al. From isolation and dependence to autonomy - expectations before and experiences after cochlear implantation in adult cochlear implant users and their significant others. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(6):541–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefe JL, Hartwig P. Social security benefits some with cochlear implants: Evaluating continuing disability review (CDR) claims for beneficiaries with cochlear implants Boston, USA: Keefe Disability Law; 2022. cited 2022 March 16. Available from: https://www.keefelaw.com/library/a-cochlear-implant-may-affect-social-security-benefits.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Treloar C. Accessing the NDIS: signing deaf people’s experiences. Disabil Soc. 2021; On-line:1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar