BCI-controlled wheelchairs: end-users’ perceptions, needs, and expectations, an interview-based study

References

• McDaid D, Park A-L, Gall A, et al. Understanding and modelling the economic impact of spinal cord injuries in the United Kingdom. Spinal Cord. 2019;57(9):778–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schicktanz S, Amelung T, Rieger JW. Qualitative assessment of patients’ attitudes and expectations toward BCIs and implications for future technology development. Front Syst Neurosci. 2015;9:1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kübler A, Holz E, Kaufmann T, et al. A user centred approach for bringing BCI controlled applications to end-users. In: Fazel-Rezai R, editor. Brain-computer interface systems-recent progress and future prospects. London: Intech; 2013. p. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn J, Armstrong E, Martin S. User centred design and validation during the development of domestic brain computer interface applications for people with acquired brain injury and therapists: a multi-stakeholder approach. J Assist Technol. 2016;10(2):67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Zickler C, Di Donna V, Kaiser V, et al. BCI applications for people with disabilities: defining user needs and user requirements. Assistive technology from adapted equipment to inclusive environments. AAATE. 2009;25:185–189.
   Google Scholar
• Desai S, Mantha S, Phalle V, Comprehensive needs assessment study and deployment of QFD targeted at new wheelchair design. IRJ. 2017;15(4):377–388.
   Google Scholar
• Swee SK, Desmond K, Kiang T, et al. EEG controlled wheelchair. MATEC Web Conf. 2011;51:02011.
   Google Scholar
• Aziz F, Arof H, Mokhtar N, et al. HMM based automated wheelchair navigation using EOG traces in EEG. J. Neural Eng. 2014;11(5):056018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi N, Nakagawa M. BCI-based control of electric wheelchair using fractal characteristics of EEG. IEEJ Trans Elec Electron Eng. 2018;13(12):1795–1803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banach K, Małecki M, Rosół M, et al. Brain-computer interface for electric wheelchair based on alpha waves of EEG signal. Bio-Algorithms Med Syst. 2021;17(3):165–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Qaysi ZT, Zaidan BB, Zaidan AA, et al. A review of disability EEG based wheelchair control system: coherent taxonomy, open challenges and recommendations. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018;164:221–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Liu Y, Jiang J, et al. An asynchronous control paradigm based on sequential motor imagery and its application in wheelchair navigation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2018;26(12):2367–2375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na R, Hu C, Sun Y, et al. An embedded lightweight SSVEP-BCI electric wheelchair with hybrid stimulator. Digit Signal Process. 2021;116:103101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz A, Pires G, Lopes A, et al. A self-paced BCI with a collaborative controller for highly reliable wheelchair driving: experimental tests with physically disabled individuals. IEEE Trans. Human-Mach. Syst. 2021;51(2):109–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benda M, Stawicki P, Gembler F, et al. SSVEP-based BCI performance and objective fatigue under different background conditions. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). IEEE; 2018. p. 1116–1121.
   Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Gramigna V, Calabrese B, et al. Motor-imagery EEG-based BCIs in wheelchair movement and control: a systematic literature review. Sensors. MDPI. 2021;21(18):6285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padfield N, Camilleri K, Camilleri T, et al. A comprehensive review of endogenous EEG-based BCIs for dynamic device control. Sensors. 2022;22(15):5802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junwei L, Ramkumar S, Emayavaramban G, et al. Brain computer interface for neurodegenerative person using electroencephalogram. IEEE Access. 2019;7:2439–2452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonin L, Bauer FC, Millán J, et al. The role of the control framework for continuous teleoperation of a brain–machine interface-driven mobile robot. IEEE Trans. Robot. 2020;36(1):78–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeb R, Tonin L, Rohm M, et al. Towards independence: a BCI telepresence robot for people with severe motor disabilities. Proc. IEEE. 2015;103(6):969–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batres-Mendoza P, Guerra-Hernandez EI, Espinal A, et al. Biologically-inspired legged robot locomotion controlled with a BCI by means of cognitive monitoring. IEEE Access. 2021;9:35766–35777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chholak P, Niso G, Maksimenko VA, et al. Visual and kinesthetic modes affect motor imagery classification in untrained subjects. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhuang J, Geng K, Yin G. Ensemble learning based brain-computer interface system for ground vehicle control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2021;51(9):5392–5404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YJ, Nam HS, Lee WH, et al. Vision-aided brain-machine interface training system for robotic arm control and clinical application on two patients with cervical spinal cord injury. BioMed Eng OnLine. 2019;18(1):14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang R, Li Y, Yan Y, et al. Control of a wheelchair in an indoor environment based on a brain-computer interface and automated navigation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2016;24(1):128–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucukyildiz G, Ocak H, Karakaya S, et al. Design and implementation of a multi sensor based brain computer interface for a robotic wheelchair. J Intell Robot Syst. 2017;87(2):247–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millán J del R, Mouriño J. Asynchronous BCI and local neural classifiers: an overview of the adaptive brain interface project. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2003;11:159–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuman H, Presser S. Questions and answers in attitude surveys. London: Sage; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• NHS. National Spinal Cord Injuries Centre [Internet]. NHS Buckinghamshire Healthcare. 2022. [cited 2022 Jul 1]. Available from: https://www.buckshealthcare.nhs.uk/visiting-your-hospitals/visiting/national-spinal-injuries-centre-2/#:∼:text=The%20National%20Spinal%20Injuries%20Centre,children%20from%20across%20the%20world.
   Google Scholar
• Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34(6):535–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald JW, Sadowsky C. Spinal-cord injury. Lancet. 2002;359(9304):417–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters RL, Adkins RH, Yakura JS, et al. Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(3):306–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Adler C, Blackburn S, et al. Expected outcomes: what you should know, a guide for people with C5 spinal cord injury [Internet]. Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. 2002. Available from: https://pva.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/consumer-guide_outcomes_oc5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Adler C, Blackburn S, et al. Expected outcomes: what you should know, a guide for people with C4 spinal cord injury [Internet]. Consortuim for Spinal Cord Medicine. 2002. Available from: https://pva.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/consumer-guide_outcomes_oc4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Spinal cord injury [Internet]. World Health Organization. 2013. [cited 2022 Jul 7]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/spinal-cord-injury.
   Google Scholar
• Ravankar A, Ravankar A, Kobayashi Y, et al. Path smoothing techniques in robot navigation: state-of-the-Art, current and future challenges. Sensors. 2018;18(9):3170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Li Z, Feng Y, et al. Development of a human-robot hybrid intelligent system based on brain teleoperation and deep learning SLAM. IEEE Trans. Automat. Sci. Eng. 2019;16(4):1664–1674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamek R, Bugeja MK, Fabri SG, et al. Enhancing the obstacle avoidance capabilities of a smart wheelchair. 2022 20th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika (ME). IEEE; 2022. p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Iwane F, Halvagal MS, Iturrate I, et al. Inferring subjective preferences on robot trajectories using EEG signals. International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, NER. 2019. p. 255–258.
   Google Scholar
• Sereshkeh AR, Trott R, Bricout A, et al. Online EEG classification of covert speech for brain-computer interfacing. Int J Neural Syst. 2017;27(8):1750033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Ding W, Shan J, et al. A review of research on brain-computer interface based on imagined speech. In: Sun F, Liu H, Hu D, editors. Cognitive systems and signal processing, communications in computer and information science [Internet]. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2021. Available from:
   Google Scholar
• Tøttrup L, Leerskov K, Hadsund JT, et al. Decoding covert speech for intuitive control of brain-computer interfaces based on single-trial EEG: a feasibility study. 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). 2019. p. 689–693.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan SMS, Marquez JS, Siddiquee MR, et al. Preliminary study on real-time prediction of gait acceleration intention from volition-associated EEG patterns. IEEE Access. 2021;9:62676–62686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Chen W, Pei Z, et al. A brain-controlled lower-limb exoskeleton for human gait training. Rev Sci Instrum. 2017;88(10):104302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong JH, Kwak NS, Guan C, et al. Decoding movement-related cortical potentials based on subject-dependent and section-wise spectral filtering. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2020;28(3):687–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi L, Fan XA, Liu Y. EEG-based brain-controlled mobile robots: a survey. IEEE Trans. Human-Mach. Syst. 2013;43(2):161–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebsamen B, Guan C, Zhang H, et al. A brain controlled wheelchair to navigate in familiar environments. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2010;18(6):590–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abiri R, Borhani S, Sellers EW, et al. A comprehensive review of EEG-based brain-computer interface paradigms. J. Neural Eng. 2019;16(1):011001. Institute of Physics Publishing;
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Zhang C, Zhu Y, et al. Dissociable effects of reward on P300 and EEG spectra under conditions of high vs. low vigilance during a selective visual attention task. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14:207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdikis S, Millan JdR Brain-machine interfaces: a tale of two learners. IEEE Syst Man Cybern Mag. 2020;6(3):12–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko L-W, Lin S-C, Song M-S, et al. Developing a few-channel hybrid BCI system by using motor imagery with SSVEP assist 2014 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE; 2014. p. 4114–4120.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Li W, Li M. Comparative study of SSVEP- and P300-Based models for the telepresence control of humanoid robots. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seth N, Freitas RCD, Chaulk M, et al. EMG pattern recognition for persons with cervical spinal cord injury. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. 2019. p. 1055–1060.
   Google Scholar
• Vissers C, Tomas E, Law J. The emergence of inner speech and its measurement in atypically developing children. Front Psychol. 2020;11:279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalborczyk L, Grandchamp R, Koster EHW, et al. Can we decode phonetic features in inner speech using surface electromyography? PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0233282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian M, Songur N, Adjei D, et al. Eye drive: gaze-based semi-autonomous wheelchair interface. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS. 2019. p. 5967–5970.
   Google Scholar
• Baig MZ, Aslam N, Shum HPH. Filtering techniques for channel selection in motor imagery EEG applications: a survey. Artif Intell Rev. 2020;53(2):1207–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerafa R, Camilleri T, Falzon O, et al. A comparison of a broad range of EEG acquisition devices–is there any difference for SSVEP BCIs? Brain-Computer Interfaces. 2018;5(4):121–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang X, Li W, Li X, et al. Motor imagery EEG recognition based on conditional optimization empirical mode decomposition and multi-scale convolutional neural network. Expert Syst Appl. 2020;149:113285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu B, Li W, He X, et al. Motor imagery based continuous teleoperation robot control with tactile feedback. Electronics. 2020;9(1):174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao H, Luo L, Pi M, et al. EEG-based volitional control of prosthetic legs for walking in different terrains. IEEE Trans Automat Sci Eng. 2021;18(2):530–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Yan F, Xu T, et al. Brain-controlled wheelchair review: from wet electrode to dry electrode, from single modal to hybrid modal, from synchronous to asynchronous. IEEE Access. 2021;9:55920–55938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BioSemi. Labview: acquisition with ActiView [Internet]. BioSemi Website. 2023. [cited 2023 Apr 25]. Available from: https://www.biosemi.com/software_biosemi_acquisition.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Padfield N, Zabalza J, Zhao H, et al. EEG-based brain-computer interfaces using motor-imagery: techniques and challenges. Sensors. 2019;19(6):1423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini MP, Hosseini A, Ahi K. A review on machine learning for EEG signal processing in bioengineering. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2021;14:204–218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ai Q, Chen A, Chen K, et al. Feature extraction of four-class motor imagery EEG signals based on functional brain network. J. Neural Eng. 2019;16(2):026032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukdar U, Hazarika SM, Gan JQ. Motor imagery and mental fatigue: inter-relationship and EEG based estimation. J Comput Neurosci. 2019;46(1):55–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Chen P, Zhao S, et al. Adaptive asynchronous control system of robotic arm based on augmented reality-assisted brain–computer interface. J. Neural Eng. 2021;18(6):066005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kögel J, Jox RJ, Friedrich O. What is it like to use a BCI? – insights from an interview study with brain-computer interface users. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21(1):2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kögel J, Wolbring G. What it takes to be a pioneer: ability expectations from Brain-Computer interface users. Nanoethics. 2020;14(3):227–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genari CM, Bellini BS, Fernandes PT, et al. Perception of BCI assistive technology by post-ischemic stroke patients. 2013 ISSNIP Biosignals and Biorobotics Conference: Biosignals and Robotics for Better and Safer Living (BRC). IEEE; 2013. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar