Assistive technology in Korea: Findings from the 2017 National Disability Survey

References

• Population ages 65 and above (% of total population). Data; 2022 [Internet] [cited 2022 Sep 22]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.65UP.TO.ZS
   Google Scholar
• World population ageing highlights. New York: United Nations; 2020 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WorldPopulationAgeing2019-Highlights.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Khasnabis C, Holloway C, MacLachlan M. The digital and assistive technologies for ageing initiative: learning from the GATE initiative. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2020;1(3):e94–e95. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(20)30049-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudnicka E, Napierała P, Podfigurna A, et al. The World Health Organization (WHO) approach to healthy ageing. Maturitas. 2020;139:6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.05.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel J-P. Transitions from health to disease in older populations. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022;3(2):e79–e80. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00011-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. Assistive technology. WHO fact sheet on assistive technology; 2018 [Internet] [cited 2022 Apr 11]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology
   Google Scholar
• Danemayer J, Boggs D, Ramos VD, et al. Estimating need and coverage for five priority assistive products: a systematic review of global population-based research. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(1):e007662. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loveys K, Prina M, Axford C, et al. Artificial intelligence for older people receiving long-term care: a systematic review of acceptability and effectiveness studies. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022;3(4):e286–e297. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00034-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. United Nations Children’s Fund. Global Report on Assistive Technology. Geneva, Switzerland; 2022 [Internet] [cited 2022 May 30]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240049451
   Google Scholar
• Agree EM, Freedman VA. A quality-of-life scale for assistive technology: results of a pilot study of aging and technology. Phys Ther. 2011;91(12):1780–1788. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman VA, Kasper JD, Spillman BC. Successful aging through successful accommodation with assistive products. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017;72(2):300–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman VA, Kasper JD, Spillman BC, et al. Behavioral adaptation and late-life disability: a new spectrum for assessing public health impacts. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(2):e88–e94. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSweeney-Feld MH. Assistive technology and older adults in disasters: implications for emergency management. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017;11(1):135–139. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2016.160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frochen S, Mehdizadeh S. Functional status and adaptation: measuring activities of daily living and product use in the national health and aging trends study. J Aging Health. 2018;30(7):1136–1155. doi: 10.1177/0898264317707299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez F, Zunzunegui MV, Alvarado B, et al. Cohort profile: the International Mobility in Aging Study (IMIAS). Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47:1393–1393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pousada Garcia T, Scherer M, Jimenez E, et al. Improving assistive technology services through outcome measures and global knowledge sharing in order to make the best match of person and technology global perspectives on assistive technology: proceedings of the GReAT Consultation 2019. World Health Organization; 2019. p. 52–78 [Internet]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/330371/9789241516853-eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smith EM, Battistella LR, Contepomi S, et al. Measuring met and unmet assistive technology needs at the national level: comparing national database collection tools across eight case countries. In: Layton N, Borg J, editors. Global perspectives on assistive technology: proceedings of the GReAT consultation. World Health Organization; 2019. p. 24–35 [Internet]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/330371/9789241516853-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Decade of healthy ageing (2021–2030); 2022 [Internet] [cited 2022 Apr 8]. Available from: https://www.who.int/initiatives/decade-of-healthy-ageing
   Google Scholar
• Cook AM, Polgar JM, Encarnacao P. Assistive technologies: principles and practice. 5th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2019 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/books/assistive-technologies/cook/978-0-323-52338-7
   Google Scholar
• Assistive technology: definition and safe use. GOV.UK; 2022 [Internet] [cited 2022 Oct 13]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/assistive-technology-definition-and-safe-use/assistive-technology-definition-and-safe-use
   Google Scholar
• The Korean Law Information Center. Enforcement decree of the act on the support for assistive devices for persons with disabilities, older persons, etc. and promotion of use thereof; 2022 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/engLsSc.do?menuId=1&subMenuId=21&tabMenuId=117&query=%EC%9E%A5%EC%95%A0%EC%9D%B8%EB%B3%B4%EC%A1%B0%EA%B8%B0%EA%B8%B0#
   Google Scholar
• ISO 9999. ISO; 2016 [Internet] [cited 2022 May 30]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/cms/render/live/en/sites/isoorg/contents/data/standard/06/05/60547.html
   Google Scholar
• Kim S. Findings and implications of disability survey 2017. Korean Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2018 [Internet] [cited 2022 May 30]. Available from: https://repository.kihasa.re.kr/handle/201002/30509
   Google Scholar
• Rios A, Miguel Cruz A, Guarín MR, et al. What factors are associated with the provision of assistive technologies: the Bogotá D.C. case. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9(5):432–444. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.936053.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Groah SL, Ljungberg I, Lichy A, et al. Disparities in wheelchair procurement by payer among people with spinal cord injury. PM R. 2014;6(5):412–417. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.11.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berardi A, Smith EM, Miller WC. Assistive technology use and unmet need in Canada. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;16(8):851–856. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1741703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Review of datasets and their disability questions: method and results. Disability data initiative; 2022 [Internet] [cited 2022 May 18]. Available from: https://disabilitydata.ace.fordham.edu/reports/disability-data-initiative-2021-report/review-of-datasets-and-their-disability-questions-method-and-results/
   Google Scholar
• Rapid Assistive Technology Assessment tool (rATA); 2022 [Internet] [cited 2022 May 18]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/WHO-MHP-HPS-ATM-2021.1
   Google Scholar
• Boggs D, Kuper H, Mactaggart I, et al. Estimating assistive technology need through population-based surveys: an analysis of data from Cameroon and India. In: Layton N, Borg J, editors. Global perspectives on assistive technology: proceedings of the GReAT consultation. World Health Organization; 2019. p. 52–78 [Internet]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/330371/9789241516853-eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. Prevalence of coverage of assistive technology in the WHO European Region: a scoping review; 2021. Available from: http://apps.who.int/bookorders
   Google Scholar
• Matter R, Harniss M, Oderud T, et al. Assistive technology in resource-limited environments: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(2):105–114. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2016.1188170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Armonk (NY): IBM Corp.; 2017 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ibm.com/uk-en/products/spss-statistics
   Google Scholar
• IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Armonk (NY): IBM Corp.; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• ATscale, AT2030. Product narrative: wheelchairs; 2019 [Internet] [cited 2020 May 19]. Available from: https://atscale2030.org/product-narratives
   Google Scholar
• Verza R, Carvalho M, Battaglia M, et al. An interdisciplinary approach to evaluating the need for assistive technology reduces equipment abandonment. Mult Scler. 2006;12(1):88–93. doi: 10.1191/1352458506ms1233oa.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Cooperation on Assistive Technology (GATE); 2022 [Internet] [cited 2022 Oct 13]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/global-cooperation-on-assistive-technology-(gate)
   Google Scholar