Effects of 3D-printed assistive device on daily life function in patients with neurological impairment: a pilot study

References

• Armour BS, Courtney-Long EA, Fox MH, et al. Prevalence and causes of paralysis—United States, 2013. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(10):1855–1857. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omar NH, Mohd Nordin N, Chai S, et al. Functionality among stroke survivors with upper limb impairment attending community-based rehabilitation. Med J Malaysia. 2020;75(2):147.
   Google Scholar
• Radomski MV, Latham CAT. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. 7th ed. Philly (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Amaral D, Duarte A, Barros S, et al. Assistive devices: an effective strategy in non-pharmacological treatment for hand osteoarthritis—randomized clinical trial. Rheumatol Int. 2018;38(3):343–351. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3892-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skymne C, Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Claesson L, et al. Getting used to assistive devices: ambivalent experiences by frail elderly persons. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19(2):194–203. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2011.569757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahrubudin N, Lee TC, Ramlan R. An overview on 3D printing technology: technological, materials, and applications. Procedia Manuf. 2019;35:1286–1296. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.089.
   Google Scholar
• Jumani M, Shaikh S, Shah S. Rapid manufacturing technique for fabrication of custom-made foot orthoses. Sci Intern. 2014;26(1):217–222.
   Google Scholar
• Chae D-S, Kim D-H, Kang K-Y, et al. The functional effect of 3D-printing individualized orthosis for patients with peripheral nerve injuries: three case reports. Medicine. 2020;99(16):e19791. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunzeker M, Ozelie R. A cost-effective analysis of 3D printing applications in occupational therapy practice. Open J Occup Ther. 2021;9(1):1–12. doi: 10.15453/2168-6408.1751.
   Google Scholar
• Meng Q, Hu J, Zhu Y. Properties of shape memory polyurethane used as a low-temperature thermoplastic biomedical orthotic material: influence of hard segment content. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2008;19(11):1437–1454. doi: 10.1163/156856208786140355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick AP, Mohanned MI, Collins PK, et al. Design of a patient specific, 3D printed arm cast. KnE Eng. 2017; 2(2):135–142.
   Google Scholar
• ACCESS FM-Helpsheet [cited 2023 Jan 24]. Available from: http://gcseproductdesign.weebly.com/product-analysis.html
   Google Scholar
• Writing aids in weighted form [cited 2023 Jan 24]. Available from: https://www.ourobligation.com.tw/product_d.php?lang=tw&tb=1&id=860
   Google Scholar
• Pencil holder [cited 2023 Jan 24]. Available from: https://www.ourobligation.com.tw/product_d.php?lang=tw&tb=1&id=872
   Google Scholar
• Six-Stage. Children’s assisted pencil holder [cited 2023 Jan 24]. Available from: https://www.momoshop.com.tw/goods/GoodsDetail.jsp?i_code=9167217
   Google Scholar
• Sponge Assist Spoon Grip [cited 2023 Jan 24]. Available from: https://www.momoshop.com.tw/goods/GoodsDetail.jsp?i_code=5600792
   Google Scholar
• Typing aid [cited 2023 Jan 24]. Available from: https://www.polyu.edu.hk/Ageing/tc/reslibrary.php?page=10&rid=473
   Google Scholar
• Maharaj C, Ragoo K, Sirjoosingh V, et al. Design and performance evaluation of 3D printed writing and typing assistive devices: a pragmatic single participant study. Technol Disabil. 2019;31(1–2):51–61. doi: 10.3233/TAD-180221.
   Google Scholar
• Takla MK, Mahmoud EA, Abd El-Latif N. Jebsen Taylor hand function test: gender, dominance, and age differences in healthy Egyptian population. Bull Fac Phys Ther. 2018;23(2):85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh Y-W, Lin K-C, Wu C-y, et al. Comparison of proximal versus distal upper-limb robotic rehabilitation on motor performance after stroke: a cluster controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):2091. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20330-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Ommeren AL, Smulders LC, Prange-Lasonder GB, et al. Assistive technology for the upper extremities after stroke: systematic review of users’ needs. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;5(2):e10510. doi: 10.2196/10510.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roda-Sales A, Vergara M, Sancho-Bru JL, et al. Effect on hand kinematics when using assistive devices during activities of daily living. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7806. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai T-H, Nash RJ, Tseng KC. A five-layer users’ need hierarchy of computer input device selection: a contextual observation survey of computer users with cervical spinal injuries (CSI). Disabil Rehabil Assistive Technol. 2009;4(3):158–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baldassin V, Shimizu HE, Fachin-Martins E. Computer assistive technology and associations with quality of life for individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(3):597–607. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1804-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya S, Cavuoto LA, Reilly B, et al. Usability, usefulness, and acceptance of a novel, portable rehabilitation system (mRehab) using smartphone and 3D printing technology: mixed methods study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2021;8(1):e21312. doi: 10.2196/21312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huhtela OS, Näpänkangas R, Suominen AL, et al. Association of psychological distress and widespread pain with symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and self‐reported bruxism in students. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021;7(6):1154–1166. doi: 10.1002/cre2.472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Yang HS, Han SH, et al. Application of a 3D-Printed writing–typing assistive device in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Applied Sciences. 2022;12(18):9037. doi: 10.3390/app12189037.
   Google Scholar
• Degerli YI, Dogu F, Oksuz C. Manufacturing an assistive device with 3D printing technology–a case report. Assistive Technol. 2022;34(1):121–125. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2020.1791278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar