Exploring perspectives on assistive technology use: barriers, facilitators, and access

References

• Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance [Internet]. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center; 2022; [cited 2022 Oct 13]. Available from: https://msktc.org/sites/default/files/SCI-Facts-Figs-2022-Eng-508.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Feigin VL, Nichols E, Alam T, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):459–480. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30499-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause JS, Saunders LL. Health, secondary conditions, and life expectancy after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(11):1770–1775. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.05.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton G, Unsworth C, Murphy G. The experience of attempting to return to work following spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the qualitative literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(15):1745–1753. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1312566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmlund L, Hultling C, Asaba E. Mapping out one’s own paths toward work: focus on experiences of return to work after spinal cord injury. Qual Health Res. 2018;28(13):2020–2032. doi: 10.1177/1049732318782706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturm C, Bökel A, Korallus C, et al. Promoting factors and barriers to participation in working life for people with spinal cord injury. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2020;15(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12995-020-00288-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Li C, Gregory A, et al. Depressive symptomatology after spinal cord injury: a multi-center investigation of multiple racial-ethnic groups. J Spinal Cord Med. 2017;40(1):85–92. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2016.1244314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fann JR, Bombardier CH, Richards JS, et al. Depression after spinal cord injury: comorbidities, mental health service use, and adequacy of treatment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(3):352–360. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.05.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman JM, Bombardier CH, Graves DE, et al. A longitudinal study of depression from 1 to 5 years after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(3):411–418. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.10.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft R, Dorstyn D. Psychosocial correlates of depression following spinal injury: a systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38(5):571–583. doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald SD, Mickens MN, Goldberg-Looney LD, et al. Mental disorder prevalence among U.S. Department of veterans affairs outpatients with spinal cord injuries. J Spinal Cord Med. 2018;41(6):691–702. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1293868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post MW, van Leeuwen CM. Psychosocial issues in spinal cord injury: a review. Spinal Cord. 2012;50(5):382–389. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate DG, Forchheimer MB, Karana-Zebari D, et al. Depression and pain among inpatients with spinal cord injury and spinal cord disease: differences in symptoms and neurological function. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(14):1204–1212. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.726692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams R, Murray A. Prevalence of depression after spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(1):133–140. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.08.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jörgensen S, Costa Andersson MV, Lexell J. Changes in health-related quality of life among older adults aging with long-term spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2021;59(7):769–776. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-00579-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaVela SL, Etingen B, Miskevics S, et al. What determines low satisfaction with life in individuals with spinal cord injury? J Spinal Cord Med. 2019;42(2):236–244. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1466480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silveira SL, Ledoux TA, Johnston CA, et al. Well on wheels intervention: satisfaction with life and health for adults with spinal cord injuries. J Spinal Cord Med. 2020;43(1):60–68. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1554333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalley Hammell K. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord. 2007;45(2):124–139. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinger JL, Boninger ML, Bruns TM, et al. Functional priorities, assistive technology, and brain-computer interfaces after spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(2):145–160. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2011.11.0213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day H, Jutai J, Campbell KA. Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(1–3):31–37. doi: 10.1080/09638280110066343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertig-Godeschalk A, Gemperli A, Arnet U, et al. Availability and need of home adaptations for personal mobility among individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2018;41(1):91–101. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1308995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layton N. Barriers and facilitators to community mobility for assistive technology users. Rehabil Res Pract. 2012;2012:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2012/454195.
   Google Scholar
• Text – H.R.4278 – 108th Congress (2003–2004): Assistive Technology Act of 2004 [Internet]. 2004; [cited 2022 Sep 28]. Available from: http://www.congress.gov/.
   Google Scholar
• Monden KR, Sevigny M, Ketchum JM, et al. Associations between insurance provider and assistive technology use for computer and electronic devices 1 year after tetraplegia: findings from the spinal cord injury model systems national database. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(12):2260–2266. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.06.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicianno BE, Joseph J, Eckstein S, et al. The voice of the consumer: a survey of veterans and other users of assistive technology. Mil Med. 2018;183:518–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill JN, Balbale S, Lones K, et al. Starting a new conversation: engaging veterans with spinal cord injury in discussions of what function means to them, the barriers/facilitators they encounter, and the adaptations they use to optimize function. Disabil Health J. 2017;10(1):114–122. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.05.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post MWM, Leenders JMP, Tepper M, et al. Computer and internet use among people with long-standing spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional survey in The Netherlands. Spinal Cord. 2019;57(5):396–403. doi: 10.1038/s41393-018-0237-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wäckerlin S, Gemperli A, Sigrist-Nix D, et al. Need and availability of assistive devices to compensate for impaired hand function of individuals with tetraplegia. J Spinal Cord Med. 2020;43(1):77–87. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1479054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldassin V, Shimizu HE, Fachin-Martins E. Computer assistive technology and associations with quality of life for individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(3):597–607. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1804-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattar AA, Hitzig SL, McGillivray CF. A qualitative study on the use of personal information technology by persons with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(15):1362–1371. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.963708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folan A, Barclay L, Cooper C, et al. Exploring the experience of clients with tetraplegia utilizing assistive technology for computer access. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(1):46–52. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.836686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson CJ, Vogel LC. Employment outcomes of adults who sustained spinal cord injuries as children or adolescents. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(6):791–801. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.32742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade M, Reed K, Saunders L, et al. It’s all of the above: benefits of working for individuals with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015;21(1):1–9. doi: 10.1310/sci2101-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ottomanelli L, Goetz LL, Barnett SD, et al. Factors associated with past and current employment of veterans with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2022;45(1):137–147. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2020.1769950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripat JD, Woodgate RL. The role of assistive technology in self-perceived participation. Int J Rehabil Res. 2012;35(2):170–177. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3283531806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinley W, Tewksbury MA, Sitter P, et al. Assistive technology and computer adaptations for individuals with spinal cord injury. NRE. 2004;19(2):141–146. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2004-19208.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada SC. Workplace accommodations for employees with disabilities in Canada, 2017. 2019; [cited 2022 Oct 17]. Available from: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/89-654-x/89-654-x2019001-eng.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Noreau L, Noonan V, Cobb J, et al. Spinal cord injury community survey: a national, comprehensive study to portray the lives of Canadians with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014;20(4):249–264. doi: 10.1310/sci2004-249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Dedoose Version 9.0.62, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data [Internet]. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultant, LLC; 2021. Available from: www.dedoose.com.
   Google Scholar
• Burr V. Social constructionism. In: Wright JD, editor. International encyclopedia of social & behavioral sciences, Second edition. Oxford: Elsevier; 2015. p. 222–227. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978008097086824049X.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2021;13(2):201–216. doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodridge D, Rogers M, Klassen L, et al. Access to health and support services: perspectives of people living with a long-term traumatic spinal cord injury in rural and urban areas. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(16):1401–1410. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.972593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman SD, Gillenwater G, Toatley S, et al. A community-based participatory research approach to the development of a peer navigator health promotion intervention for people with spinal cord injury. Disabil Health J. 2014;7(4):478–484. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.04.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassaway J, Jones ML, Sweatman WM, et al. Effects of peer mentoring on self-efficacy and hospital readmission after inpatient rehabilitation of individuals with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(8):1526–1534.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.02.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divanoglou A, Georgiou M. Perceived effectiveness and mechanisms of community peer-based programmes for spinal cord injuries—a systematic review of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord. 2017;55(3):225–234. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar