Can a previously co-designed device be used by others? A service evaluation of the use of the Sativex spray holder for individuals with multiple sclerosis

References

• Department of Health. Long term conditions compendium of information. 3rd ed. 2012. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/long-term-conditions-compendium-of-information-third-edition
   Google Scholar
• Holman HR. The relation of the chronic disease epidemic to the health care crisis. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020;2(3):167–173. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health and economic costs of chronic diseases. 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/about/costs/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hutt R, Rosen R. A chronic case of mismanagement?: SAGE publications sage UK: london, England. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(4):194–195. doi: 10.1258/135581905774414286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organisation. Assistive technology: world Health Organisation. 2018. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology
   Google Scholar
• Mitzner TL, Boron JB, Fausset CB, et al. Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Comput Human Behav. 2010;26(6):1710–1721. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madara Marasinghe K. Assistive technologies in reducing caregiver burden among informal caregivers of older adults: a systematic review. Disab Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(5):353–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ommeren AL, Smulders LC, Prange-Lasonder GB, et al. Assistive technology for the upper extremities after stroke: systematic review of users’ needs. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;5(2):e10510. doi: 10.2196/10510.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lansley P, McCreadie C, Tinker A. Can adapting the homes of older people and providing assistive technology pay its way? Age Ageing. 2004;33(6):571–576. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afh190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard J, Fisher Z, Kemp AH, et al. Exploring the barriers to using assistive technology for individuals with chronic conditions: a meta-synthesis review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022;17(4):390–408. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1788181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol. 1993;5(1):36–45. doi: 10.1080/10400435.1993.10132205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanders EBN, Stappers PJ. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign. 2008;4(1):5–18. doi: 10.1080/15710880701875068.
   Google Scholar
• Federici S, Borsci S, Kurosu M, et al. Computer Systems Experiences of Users with and without Disabilities: an Evaluation Guide for Professionals. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• De Couvreur L, Goossens R. Design for (every)one: co-creation as a bridge between universal design and rehabilitation engineering. CoDesign. 2011;7(2):107–121. doi: 10.1080/15710882.2011.609890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos AVF, Silveira ZC. At-d8sign: methodology to support development of assistive devices focused on user-centered design and 3D technologies. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2020;42(5):260. doi: 10.1007/s40430-020-02347-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day SJ, Riley SP. Utilising three-dimensional printing techniques when providing unique assistive devices: a case report. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018;42(1):45–49. doi: 10.1177/0309364617741776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz JK, Fermin A, Fine K, et al. Methodology and feasibility of a 3D printed assistive technology intervention. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(2):141–147. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1539877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KH, Kim DK, Cha YH, et al. Personalized assistive device manufactured by 3D modelling and printing techniques. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(5):526–531. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1494217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragoo K, Sirjoosingh V, Sahadeo S, et al. Design and development of a Pool and billiards assistive device for the physically challenged. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(6):628–634. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1467974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsen R, Bortot F, Caracciolo A. From patient to maker - a case study of co-designing an assistive device using 3D printing. Assistive Technol. 2021;33(6):306–312. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2019.1634660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aflatoony L, Lee SJ, Sanford J. Collective making: co-designing 3D printed assistive technologies with occupational therapists, designers, and end-users. Assistive Technol. 2023;35(2):153–162. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2021.1983070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard J, Tasker LH, FisherZ, et al. Assessing the use of co-design to produce bespoke assistive technology solutions within a current healthcare service: a service evaluation. Disab Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022;1–9. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2060355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherardini F, Mascia MT, Bettelli V, et al. A Co-Design method for the additive manufacturing of customised assistive devices for hand pathologies. JID. 2019;22(1):21–37. doi: 10.3233/jid-2018-0002.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Cannabis-based medicinal products 2021 2022. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng144
   Google Scholar
• Multiple Sclerosis Trust. Sativex (nabiximols). 2021. https://mstrust.org.uk/a-z/sativex-nabiximols
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Monette M, Lapierre Y, et al. Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(1-3):21–30. doi: 10.1080/09638280110066352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. The Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 20): an overview of recent progress. TAD. 2002;14(3):101–105. doi: 10.3233/TAD-2002-14304.
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Item analysis of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). Assist Technol. 2000;12(2):96–105. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2000.10132015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day H, Jutai J, Campbell KA. Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(1-3):31–37. doi: 10.1080/09638280110066343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jutai J, Day H. Psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS). TAD. 2002;14(3):107–111. doi: 10.3233/TAD-2002-14305.
   Google Scholar