Development of a therblig-based evaluation methodology for accessible product: a case study of spinal-cord impaired users

References

• Lee JH, You N, Lee J, et al. Investigation of accessibility issues for visually impaired people when using washing machines. Congress of the International Ergonomics Association: Springer. 2018;824:1456–1464.
   Google Scholar
• American Spinal Injury Association. Standards for neurological classification of spinal injury patients. Chicago: American Spinal Injury Association 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard FM, Bracken MB, Creasey G, et al. International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1997;35(5):266–274. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Kim YM, Rhiu I, et al. A persona-based approach for identifying accessibility issues in elderly and disabled users’ interaction with home appliances. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(1):368. doi: 10.3390/app11010368.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy. “Easier use of home appliances for elderly people and people with disabilities - Promotion of international standardization of 'accessibility of home appliance products’ led by Korea”. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• van Dam K, Gielissen M, Bles R, et al. The impact of assistive living technology on perceived independence of people with a physical disability in executing daily activities: a systematic literature review. Disab Rehab. 2023;:1–10. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2162614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browder DM, Lim L, Lin C-H, et al. Applying therbligs to task analytic instruction: a technology to pursue? Educ Train Ment Retard. 1993;:242–251.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman J, Dong H, Langdon P, et al. Increasing the uptake of inclusive design in industry. Gerontechnology. 2006;5(3):140–149. doi: 10.4017/gt.2006.05.03.003.00.
   Google Scholar
• World Wide Web Consortium. Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso C, Keates S, Clarkson P. Design for inclusivity: assessing the accessibility of everyday products: citeseer; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Petrie H, Bevan N. The evaluation of accessibility, usability, and user experience. The Universal Access Handbook. 2009;1:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hartson HR, Andre TS, Williges RC. Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods. Int J Hum.-Comput Interact.. 2003;15(1):145–181. doi: 10.1207/S15327590IJHC1501_13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persad U, Langdon P, Clarkson PJ. A framework for analytical inclusive design evaluation. DS 42 Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design, Paris, France, 28.-31.07. 2007; 2007. p 817–8. exec. Summ.), full paper no. DS42_P_536.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbreth FB, Kent RT. Motion study: a method for increasing the efficiency of the workman. D. Van Nostrand Company. Kessinger Publishing, LLC; 1911.
   Google Scholar
• Carver J, Ganus A, Ivey JM, et al. The impact of mobility assistive technology devices on participation for individuals with disabilities. Disab Rehab. 2016;11:468–477.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes RM. Motion and time study1949.
   Google Scholar
• Niebel BW. Motion and time study. 7th ed. RD Irwin; 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Salvendy G. Classification of human motions. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 2004;5(2):169–178. doi: 10.1080/1463922021000025238.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson D. Therbligs: the keys to simplifying work. The Gilbreth. 2000. https://gilbrethnetwork.tripod.com/therbligs.html
   Google Scholar
• Oyekan J, Hutabarat W, Turner C, et al. Using therbligs to embed intelligence in workpieces for digital assistive assembly. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. 2020;11:2489–2503. doi: 10.1007/s12652-019-01294-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Justice. ADA standards for accessible design. American disability Association., Washington, DC: Department of Justice 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Diaper D, Stanton N. The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction. CRC Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton NA. Hierarchical task analysis: developments, applications, and extensions. Appl Ergon. 2006;37(1):55–79. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afacan Y, Erbug C. An interdisciplinary heuristic evaluation method for universal building design. Appl Ergon. 2009;40(4):731–744. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosca EI, Capolongo S. Towards a universal design evaluation for assessing the performance of the built environment. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. 2018;256:771–779.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brajnik G. Comparing accessibility evaluation tools: a method for tool effectiveness. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2004;3(3-4):252–263. doi: 10.1007/s10209-004-0105-y.
   Google Scholar
• Broberg O, Andersen V, Seim R. Participatory ergonomics in design processes: the role of boundary objects. Appl Ergon. 2011;42(3):464–472. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belfiore PJ, Toro-Zambrana W. Programming for efficiency: the effects of motion economy on vocational tasks for adults with severe and profound mental retardation. Res Dev Disabil. 1995;16(3):205–220. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(95)00009-c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey C, Pearson E. An educational tool to support the accessibility evaluation process. Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A); 2010. p 1–4. doi: 10.1145/1805986.1806003.
   Google Scholar
• Yesilada Y, Brajnik G, Harper S. How much does expertise matter? A barrier walkthrough study with experts and non-experts Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility; 2009. pp. 203–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kaklanis N, Moschonas P, Moustakas K, et al. A framework for automatic simulated accessibility assessment in virtual environments International Conference on Digital Human Modeling: Springer; 2011. p. 302–11.
   Google Scholar
• Li K, Duffy VG, Zheng L. Universal accessibility assessments through virtual interactive design. IJHFMS. 2006;1(1):52–68. doi: 10.1504/IJHFMS.2006.011682.
   Google Scholar
• Verma A, Shrivastava S, Ramkumar J. Mapping wheelchair functions and their associated functional elements for stair climbing accessibility: a systematic review. Disab Rehab 2022;:1–22. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2075476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigo M, Brown J, Conway V. Benchmarking web accessibility evaluation tools: measuring the harm of sole reliance on automated tests Proceedings of the 10th international cross-disciplinary conference on web accessibility; 2013. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong-Wood R, Messiou C, Kite A, et al. Smartphone accessibility: understanding the lived experience of users with cervical spinal cord injuries. Disability and Rehabilitation: assistive Technology. 2023;:1–12. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2192246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar