Implementation of information and communication technology to facilitate participation in high school occupations for students with neurodevelopmental disorders

References

• UNICEF. Convention on the RIGHTS of the CHILD: New York: United Nations. A/Res/44/25; 1989 230610]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention.
   Google Scholar
• Göransson K, Nilholm C, Karlsson K. Inclusive education in Sweden? A critical analysis. Int J Inclusive Educ. 2011;15(5):541–555. doi: 10.1080/13603110903165141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt P. Inclusive education: the case for early identification and early intervention in assistive technology. Assist Technol. 2021;33(sup1):94–101. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2021.1974122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Vroey A, Struyf E, Petry K. Secondary schools included: a literature review. Int J Inclusive Educ. 2016;20(2):109–135. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2015.1075609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Model of human occupation: theory and application. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sikirica V, Flood E, Dietrich N, et al. Unmet needs associated with Attention-Deficit/hyperactivity disorder in eight european countries as reported by caregivers and adolescents: results from qualitative research. Patient. 2015;8(3):269–281. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0083-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WHO. International Classification of Diseases, ICD - 11: world Health Organization; 2018. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Yngve M, Lidström H, Ekbladh E, et al. Which students need accommodations the most, and to what extent are their needs met by regular upper secondary school? A cross-sectional study among students with special educational needs. Eur J Spec Needs Educ. 2019;34(3):327–341. Open access doi: 10.1080/08856257.2018.1501966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocher Stalder C, Kottorp A, Steinlin M, et al. Children’s and teachers’ perspectives on adjustments needed in school settings after acquired brain injury. Scand J Occup Ther. 2018;25(4):233–242. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2017.1325932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug P. Inclusion in norwegian schools: pupils’ experiences of their learning environment. Education. 2020;48(3):303–315. doi: 10.1080/03004279.2019.1664406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidström H, Hemmingsson H, Ekbladh E. Individual adjustment needs for students in regular upper secondary school. Scand J Educ Res. 2020;64(4):589–600. Open access doi: 10.1080/00313831.2019.1595714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coster W, Law M, Bedell G, et al. School participation, supports and barriers of students with and without disabilities. Child Care Health Dev. 2013;39(4):535–543. doi: 10.1111/cch.12046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mårtensson S, Lidström H, Ekbladh E. Students with difficulties managing vocational education in high school: identifying intervention areas related to Self-Reported Student-Environment fit and mental health. J Occup Ther Sch Early Interv. 2023. Open Access. doi: 10.1080/19411243.2023.2215763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şahin S, Kaya Kara Ö, Köse B, et al. Investigation on participation, supports and barriers of children with specific learning disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2020;101:103639. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budd J, Fichten C, Jorgensen M, et al. Postsecondary students with specific learning disabilities and with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Should not be considered as a unified group For research or practice. J Educ Train Stud. 2016;4(4):206–216. doi: 10.11114/jets.v4i4.1255.
   Google Scholar
• Bolic Baric V, Hellberg K, Kjellberg A, et al. Support for learning goes beyond academic support: voices of students with asperger’s disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Autism. 2016;20(2):183–195. doi: 10.1177/1362361315574582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuPaul G, Weyandt L, O'Dell S, et al. College students with ADHD: current status and future directions. J Atten Disord. 2009;13(3):234–250. doi: 10.1177/1087054709340650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egilson S, Hemmingsson H. School participation of pupils with physical and psychosocial limitations: a comparison. Br J Occup Ther. 2009;72(4):144–152. doi: 10.1177/030802260907200402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkmer M, Oehlers K, Granlund M, et al. Can you see it too? Observed and self-rated participation in mainstream schools in students with and without autism spectrum disorders. Dev Neurorehabil. 2015;18(6):365–374. doi: 10.3109/17518423.2013.850751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trampush J, Miller C, Newcorn J, et al. The impact of childhood ADHD on dropping out of high school in urban adolescents/young adults. J Atten Disord. 2009;13(2):127–136. doi: 10.1177/1087054708323040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: (DSM-5). Arlington, Va.: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. (5, editor.).
   Google Scholar
• Bosch R, Pagerols M, Rivas C, et al. Neurodevelopmental disorders among spanish school-age children: prevalence and sociodemographic correlates. Psychol Med. 2022;52(14):3062–3072. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720005115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaimaha N, Sriphetcharawut S, Lersilp S, et al. Effectiveness of therapeutic programs for students with ADHD with executive function deficits. J Occup Ther Sch Early Interv. 2017;10(4):436–456. doi: 10.1080/19411243.2017.1359131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramm H, Krupa T, Missiuna C, et al. Executive functioning: a scoping review of the occupational therapy literature. Can J Occup Ther. 2013;80(3):131–140. doi: 10.1177/0008417413496060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biederman J. Boys with ADHD are at increased risk of psychosocial, educational and functional impairment in adulthood. Evid Based Ment Health. 2013;16(1):5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wennberg B, Janeslätt G, Kjellberg A, et al. Effectiveness of time-related interventions in children with ADHD aged 9-15 years: a randomized controlled study. Eur Child Adoles Psy. 2017;9.
   Google Scholar
• Abikoff H, Gallagher R, Wells K, et al. Remediating organizational functioning in children with ADHD: immediate and long-term effects from a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013;81(1):113–128. doi: 10.1037/a0029648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myklebust J-O. The transition to adulthood for vulnerable youth. Scand J Disability Res. 2012;14(4):358–374. doi: 10.1080/15017419.2012.660703.
   Google Scholar
• Kvalsund R, Velsvik Bele I. Students with special educational needs—social inclusion or marginalisation? Factors of risk and resilience in the transition Between school and early adult life. SCAND J Educ Res. 2010;54(1):15–35. doi: 10.1080/00313830903488445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmers E, Jansen D, Petry K, et al. Functioning and participation of students with ADHD in higher education according to the ICF-framework. J Furth High Educ. 2017;41(4):435–447. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2015.1117600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidström H, Hemmingsson H. Benefits in use of ICT in school activities by students with motor, speech, visual and hearing impairment: a literature review. Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21(4):251–266. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2014.880940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghavifekr S, Athirah W, Rosdy W. Teaching and learning with technology: effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. IJRES. 2015;1(2):175–191. doi: 10.21890/ijres.23596.
   Google Scholar
• Bolic V, Lidström H, Thelin N, et al. Computer use in educational activities by students with ADHD. Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20(5):357–364. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2012.758777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight L. The case for mobile devices as assistive learning technologies: a literature review. Human-Computer interaction: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. IGI Global; 2016. p. 1102–1117.
   Google Scholar
• Lidström H, Almqvist L, Hemmingsson H. Computer-based assistive technology device for use by children with physical disabilities: a cross-sectional study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(4):287–293. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2011.635332.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dale Ø, Grut L. Mainstream ICT can support children and adolescents With ADHD and/or autism in their everyday activities. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;217:679–684.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perelmutter B, McGregor K, Gordon K. Assistive technology interventions for adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: an evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis. Comput Educ. 2017;114:139–163. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreou G, Riga A, Papayiannis N. Information and communication technologies and the impact of gender on the writing performance of students with ADHD. Themes Sci Technol Educ. 2016;9(1):25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Yngve M, Ekbladh E, Lidström H, et al. Information and communication technology to improve school participation among upper secondary school students with special educational needs. Scand J Occup Ther. 2023;30(3):311–321. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2021.1998610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie A, Best C, O'Neill B. Cognitive function and assistive technology for cognition: a systematic review. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012;18(1):1–19. doi: 10.1017/S1355617711001548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose D, Hasselbring T, Stahl S. Assistive technology and universal design for learning: two sides of the same coin. In: edyburn D, Higgins K, Boone R, editors. Handbook of special education technology research and practice. Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge By Design, Inc.; 2005. p. 507–518.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. Digital kompetens i förskola, skola och vuxenutbildning. [digital competence in preschool, school and adult education]. In: Skolverket. editor. Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Education, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Statens medieråd [Swedish Media Council]. Ungar & medier 2021. En statistisk undersökning av ungas medievanor och attityder till medieanvändning. [Young people and media 2021. A statistical survey of young people’s media habits and attitudes towards media use]. 2021. Availible at: https://www.statensmedierad.se/download/18.57e3b0a17a75fbf0654916e/1632377641632/Ungar%20och%20medier%202021_anpassad.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lidström H, Granlund M, Hemmingsson H. Use of ICT in school: a comparison between students with and without physical disabilities. Eur J Spec Needs Edu. 2012;27(1):21–34. doi: 10.1080/08856257.2011.613601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiman T, Fichten C, Olenik-Shemesh D, et al. Access and perceived ICT usability among students with disabilities attending higher education institutions. Educ Inf Technol. 2017;22(6):2727–2740. doi: 10.1007/s10639-017-9623-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcolm MP, Roll MC. The impact of assistive technology services in post-secondary education for students with disabilities: intervention outcomes, use-profiles, and user-experiences. Assist Technol. 2017;29(2):91–98. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2016.1214932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 8 ed. Vol. 10. Philadelphia: lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Yngve M. Participation and ICT - student with special educational needs i upper secondary school. Linköping: linköpings universitet; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Egilson S, Lidström H. School setting interview (SSI) version 3.1. Nacka: förbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter [The Swedish Association of Occupational Therapists]; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg R, Blomquist U-B, Richter A, et al. The service delivery system for assistive technology in Sweden: current situation and trends. TAD. 2015;26(4):191–197. doi: 10.3233/TAD-140416.
   Google Scholar
• Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London SAGE; 2016. (5).
   Google Scholar
• IBM. SPSS statistics for windows., Version 27.0. Armonk (NY) IBM Corp; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim U, Lindgren B-M, Lundman B. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: a discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;56:29–34. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagiota A, Panagiota A, Ntaountaki P, et al. ICTs in inclusive education for sensory and physical disabilities. CEI. 2021;2(1):1–6. doi: 10.31487/j.CEI.2021.01.01.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Batanero JM, Montenegro-Rueda M, Fernández-Cerero J, et al. Assistive technology for the inclusion of students with disabilities: a systematic review. Educ Tech Res Dev. 2022;70(5):1911–1930. doi: 10.1007/s11423-022-10127-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham S, Kiuhara S, MacKay M. The effect of writing on learning in science, social studies, and mathematics: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res. 2020;90(2):179–226. doi: 10.3102/0034654320914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley P, Schreckhise W. Evaluating social cognitive theory in action: an assessment of the youth development program’s impact on secondary student retention in selected Mississippi Delta communities. Youth Soc. 2016;48(3):383–401. doi: 10.1177/0044118X13493445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson Ranada Å, Lidström H. Satisfaction with assistive technology device in relation to the service delivery process—A systematic review. Assist Technol. 2019;31(2):82–97. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2017.1367737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer M. From people-centered to person-centered services, and back again. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9(1):1–2. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.870239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Widehammar C, Lidström H, Hermansson L-L. Environmental barriers to participation and facilitators for use of three types of assistive technology devices. Assist Technol. 2019;31(2):68–76. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2017.1363828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson M. Social inequalities in the allocation of learning support in a swedish upper secondary school. Educ Citizenship Soc. 2017;12(1):63–74. doi: 10.1177/1746197916683467.
   Google Scholar
• Simmeborn Fleischer A, Adolfsson M, Granlund M. Students with disabilities in higher education – perceptions of support need and received support: a pilot study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2013;36(4):330–338. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e328362491c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill S. Contributions made by occupational therapists in response to intervention: a pilot study. J Occup Ther Sch Early Interv. 2010;3(1):3–10. doi: 10.1080/19411241003683771.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt Å, Jensen MP, Søberg MS, et al. Information and communication technologybased assistive technology to compensate for impaired cognition in everyday life: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(7):810–824. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1765032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar