Two decades of assistive technologies to empower people with disability: a systematic mapping study

References

• Webster F. Theories of the information society. New York: Routledge; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon D. The information society: issues and illusions. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks R. Do information and communication technologies (ICTs) contribute to development? J. Int. Dev. 2010;22(5):625–640. doi: 10.1002/jid.1716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernbumroong S, Cang S, Atkins A, et al. Elderly activities recognition and classification for applications in assisted living. Expert Syst Appl. 2013;40(5):1662–1674. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer AL, Parks A, Heyn PC. Assistive technology effects on the employment outcomes for people with cognitive disabilities: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(6):377–391.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goggin G, Newell C. Digital disability: the social construction of disability in new media. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis K, Kent M. Disability and new media. London: Routledge; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Foley A, Ferri BA. Technology for people, not disabilities: ensuring access and inclusion. J Res Spec Educ Needs. 2012;12(4):192–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01230.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett CL, Brady E, Branham SM. Interdependence as a frame for assistive technology research and design. In Proceedings of. the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 2018. p. 161–173. doi: 10.1145/3234695.3236348.
   Google Scholar
• Cook AM, Polgar JM. Assistive technologies-e-book: principles and practice. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bausch ME, Mittler JE, Hasselbring TS, et al. The assistive technology act of 2004: what does it say and what does it mean? Phys Disabil Educ Relat Serv. 2005;23(2):59–67.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. World report on disability 2011. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• SIGACCESS. Sigaccess accessible writing guide. 2023. https://www.sigaccess.org/
   Google Scholar
• Hanson VL, Cavender A, Trewin S. Writing about accessibility. Interactions. 2015;22(6):62–65. doi: 10.1145/2828432.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn DS, Andrews EE. Person-first and identity-first language: developing psychologists’ cultural competence using disability language. Am Psychol. 2015;70(3):255–264. doi: 10.1037/a0038636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flink P. Person-first & identity-first language: supporting students with disabilities on campus. Community Coll J Res Pract. 2021;45(2):79–85. doi: 10.1080/10668926.2019.1640147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivanti G. Ask the editor: what is the most appropriate way to talk about individuals with a diagnosis of autism? J Autism Dev Disord. 2020;50(2):691–693. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-04280-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher MA. The use of person-first language in scholarly writing may accentuate. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017;58(7):859–861. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broyles LM, Binswanger IA, Jenkins JA, et al. Confronting inadvertent stigma and pejorative language in addiction scholarship: a recognition and response. Subst Abus. 2014;35(3):217–221. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2014.930372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes PT, De Barros NF, Li LM. Stop saying epileptic. Epilepsia. 2009;50(5):1280–1283. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01899.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford RD, Brown A, Curtis B. Expanding language choices to reduce stigma: a Delphi study of positive and negative terms in substance use and recovery. Health Educ. 2019;119(1):51–62. doi: 10.1108/HE-03-2018-0017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botticelli MP, Koh HK. Changing the language of addiction. JAMA. 2016;316(13):1361–1362. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble AJ, Marson AG. Should we stop saying epileptic? A comparison of the effect of the terms epileptic and person with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2016;59(0):21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.03.016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petersen K, Vakkalanka S, Kuzniarz L. Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: an update. Inf Softw Technol. 2015;64:1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchenham BA, Budgen D, Brereton OP. Using mapping studies as the basis for further research–a participant-observer case study. Inf Softw Technol. 2011;53(6):638–651. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchenham B, Brereton OP, Budgen D, et al. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–a systematic literature review. Inf Softw Technol. 2009;51(1):7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Cunha RD, Neiva FW, da Silva RLDS. Virtual reality as a support tool for the treatment of people with intellectual and multiple disabilities: a systematic literature review. RITA. 2018;25(1):67–81. doi: 10.22456/2175-2745.77994.
   Google Scholar
• Climent-Pérez P, Spinsante S, Mihailidis A, et al. A review on video-based active and assisted living technologies for automated lifelogging. Expert Syst Appl. 2020;139:112847. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspo A, Wersényi G, Jeon M. A survey on hardware and software solutions for multimodal wearable assistive devices targeting the visually impaired. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica. 2016;13(5):39–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Cang S, Yu H. A survey on wearable sensor modality centred human activity recognition in health care. Expert Syst Appl. 2019;137:167–190. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.04.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaman J, La HM. A comprehensive review of smart wheelchairs: past, present, and future. IEEE Trans Human-Mach Syst. 2017;47(4):486–499. doi: 10.1109/THMS.2017.2706727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahr J, Schwartz C, Heimbach B, et al. Invasive brain–machine interfaces: a survey of paralyzed patients’ attitudes, knowledge and methods of information retrieval. J Neural Eng. 2015;12(4):043001. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/4/043001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldassin V, Shimizu HE, Fachin-Martins E. Computer assistive technology and associations with quality of life for individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(3):597–607. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1804-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ienca M, Fabrice J, Elger B, et al. Intelligent assistive technology for alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: a systematic review. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;56(4):1301–1340. doi: 10.3233/JAD-161037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly Lynn J, Rondón-Sulbarán J, Quinn E, et al. A systematic review of electronic assistive technology within supporting living environments for people with dementia. Dementia. 2019;18(7-8):2371–2435. doi: 10.1177/1471301217733649.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kotteritzsch A, Weyers B. Assistive technologies for older adults in urban areas: a literature review. Cogn Comput. 2016;8(2):299–317. doi: 10.1007/s12559-015-9355-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelmutter B, McGregor KK, Gordon KR. Assistive technology interventions for adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: an evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis. Comput Educ. 2017;114:139–163. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACM. ACM digital library. 2023. https://dl.acm.org/
   Google Scholar
• IEEE. IEEE explore. 2023. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/
   Google Scholar
• ScienceDirect. Science direct library. 2023. https://www.sciencedirect.com/
   Google Scholar
• Scopus. Scopus library. 2023. https://www.scopus.com/
   Google Scholar
• PubMed. Pubmed library. 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Clarivate. Jcr – journal citation reports. 2023. https://jcr.clarivate.com
   Google Scholar
• SCIE. GII-GRIN-SCIE (GGS) conference rating. 2023. http://gii-grin-scie-rating.scie.es/
   Google Scholar
• Haddaway NR, Page MJ, Pritchard CC, et al. Prisma2020: an r package and shiny app for producing prisma 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and open synthesis. Campbell Syst Rev. 2022;18(2):e1230. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICD 10-International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. WHO; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Maercker A, Brewin CR, Bryant RA, others., et al. Proposals for mental disorders specifically associated with stress in the international classification of diseases-11. Lancet. 2013;381(9878):1683–1685. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62191-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treede R-D, Rief W, Barke A, others., et al. A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. Pain. 2015;156(6):1003–1007. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. World health organization (who); international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (ICD). 2023. https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/classification-of-diseases.
   Google Scholar
• USA. United States classification system for assistive technology devices and service. 2023. https://www.britannica.com/topic/National-Classification-System-for-Assistive-Technology-Devices-and-Services
   Google Scholar
• ISO. ISO 9999 assistive products for persons with disability—classification and terminology. International Organization for Standardization; 2016;
   Google Scholar
• Bauer SM, Elsaesser L-J, Arthanat S. Assistive technology device classification based upon the World Health Organization’s, international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(3):243–259.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lenker JA, Shoemaker LL, Fuhrer MJ, et al. Classification of assistive technology services: Implications for outcomes research. Technol Disabil. 2012;24(1):59–70. doi: 10.3233/TAD-2012-0334.
   Google Scholar
• Leo M, Furnari A, Medioni GG, et al. Deep learning for assistive computer vision In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava S, Soman S, Rai A, et al. Deep learning for health informatics: recent trends and future directions. In 2017 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI); IEEE; 2017. p. 1665–1670. doi: 10.1109/ICACCI.2017.8126082.
   Google Scholar
• Dieste O, Juristo N, Martínez MD. Software industry experiments: a systematic literature review. In: 2013 1st International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry (CESI); IEEE; 2013. p. 2–8. doi: 10.1109/CESI.2013.6618462.
   Google Scholar
• Jedlitschka A, Pfahl D. Reporting guidelines for controlled experiments in software engineering. In: 2005 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, IEEE; 2005. p. 10–pp. doi: 10.1109/ISESE.2005.1541818.
   Google Scholar
• Juristo N, Moreno AM. Basics of software engineering experimentation. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchenham B, Brereton P. A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Inf Softw Technol. 2013;55(12):2049–2075. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCIE. The GII-GRIN-SCIE (GGS) conference rating. 2023. http://scie.lcc.uma.es/gii-grin-scie-rating/conferenceRating.jsf
   Google Scholar
• CORE. The core 2018 conference rating. 2018. https://www.core.edu.au/conference-portal
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft. Microsoft academic. 2023. https://academic.microsoft.com/home
   Google Scholar
• Google. Shine google-scholar-based conference ranking. 2023. http://shine.icomp.ufam.edu.br
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Neurological disorders: public health challenges. World Health Organization; 2006. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241563369
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Blindness and vision impairment. 2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Dementia. 2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia
   Google Scholar
• Riener R. The cybathlon promotes the development of assistive technology for people with physical disabilities. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2016;13(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0157-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. Decision 742/2008/EC of the European Commission. Ageing well in the information society. The Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) Programme; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. App store (IOS). 2023. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/App_Store_(iOS)
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. Google play. 2023. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Play.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Health technology assessment (HTA). 2011.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Deafness and hearing loss. 2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss.
   Google Scholar