Directional properties of small strain shear stiffness in soils

References

• Andrus, R.D., Mohanan, N.P., Piratheepan, P., Ellis, B.S. and Holzer, T.L. 2007, Predicting shear wave velocity from cone penetration resistance, in K.D. Pitilakes, ed., Proceedings, International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, 4th, June 25–28, 2007, (Thessaloniki, Greece), Springer, The Netherlands, Paper No. 1454. (12p).
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J.H. and Sallfors, G., 1991. Experimental determination of stress-strain-time characteristics in laboratory and in situ tests. Deformation of Soils and Displacements of Structures, Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Soil Mechanics & Foundation Engineering, vol. 3, Firenze, Rotterdam, Balkema, 915–956.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, C.R. and Phillips, D.R., 2000. Multi-component seismic surveying for near surface investigations: examples from central Wyoming and southern England. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 44 (2–3), 257–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz, T., 2007. Small-strain stiffness of soils and its numerical consequences. Thesis (PhD). Institut fur Geotechnik der Universitat Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Burland, J.B., 1989. The 9th Bjerrum Memorial Lecture: Small Is beautiful - the stiffness of soils at small strains. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 26 (4), 499–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, A.P. and Powell, J.J.M., 1995. The effects of geological history on the dynamic stiffness in soils. Measurement of soil/soft rock properties 11th European conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol. 1, Danish Geotechnical Society, Copenhagen, DGF BULLETIN; 1, 11; 27–36, https://getinfo.de/app/The-effects-of-geological-history-on-the-dynamic/id/BLCP%3ACN012070809
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, A.P. and Powell, J.J.M., 1996. Practical considerations for field geophysical techniques used to assess ground stiffness. London: Advances in Site Investigation Practice, Thomas Telford, 701–714.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, A.P. and Powell, J.J.M., 1997. Determining the modulus of the ground from in situ geophysical testing. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, vol. 1, (14th ICSMGE, Hamburg), Rotterdam: Balkema, 449–452.
   Google Scholar
• Campanella, R.G. 1994. Field methods for dynamic geotechnical testing. Dynamic Geotechnical Testing II (STP 1213). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C.S., Misra, A. and Sundaram, S., 1991. Properties of granular packings under low amplitude cyclic loading. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 10 (4), 201–211.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, I. and Cho, G.C., 2010. A new alternative for estimation of geotechnical engineering parameters in reclaimed clays by using shear wave velocity. Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, 33 (3), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Choo, J., Jung, Y.H. and Chung, C.K., 2011. Effect of directional stress history on anisotropy of initial stiffness of cohesive soils measured by bender element tests. Soils and Foundations, 51 (4), 737–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, C.R.I., 2011. Rankine Lecture: Stiffness at small strain: research and practice. Geotechnique, 61 (1), 5–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeGroot, D.J., Lunne, T. and Tjelta, T.J., 2011. Recommended best practice for geotechnical site characterisation of cohesive offshore sediments. In: Gourvenec and White (Eds). Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics II, Perth Western Australia. London: Taylor and Francis Group, 33–57.
   Google Scholar
• Dobry, R. and Vucetic, M., 1987. State-of-the-art report: Dynamic properties and response of soft clay deposits. International Symposium on Geotechnical Engineering of Soft Soils, Sociedad Mexicana de Ingenieria Geotècnica, Mexico City, 51–87.
   Google Scholar
• Fahey, M., 1998. Deformation and in situ stress measurement. Geotechnical Site Characterization, vol. 1 (Proc. ISC-4, Atlanta). Rotterdam: Balkema, 49–68.
   Google Scholar
• Fioravante, V., Jamiolkowski, M., Lo Presti, D.C.F., Manfredini, G. and Pedroni, S., 1998. Assessment of the coefficient of the earth pressure at rest from shear wave velocity measurements. Geotechnique, 48 (5), 657–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foti, S., Lancellotta, R., Marchetti, D., Monaco, P. and Totani, G., 2006. Interpretation of SDMT tests in a transversely isotropic medium. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Flat Dilatometer, Washington, DC, 275–280.
   Google Scholar
• Ghionna, V. and Jamiolkowski, M., 1991. A critical appraisal of calibration chamber testing of sands, Calibration Chamber Testing. Potsdam, NY: Elsevier, 13–39.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbens, R.M. and Briaud, J.-L., 1994. Data and prediction request for a spread footing prediction event. Predicted and Measured Behavior of Five Spread Footings on Sand, GSP 41. Reston, VA: ASCE, 11–85.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, B.O., 1978. The nature of stress-strain behaviour for soils, Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, vol. 1 (Pasadena). Reston, VA: ASCE, 3–90.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, B.O. and Black, W.L., 1968. Vibration modulus of normally consolidated clay. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 94 (2), 353–369.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, B.O. and Blandford, G.E., 1989. Elasticity of particulate materials. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering ASCE, 115 (6), 788–805.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, B.O. and Richart, F.E., Jr., 1963. Elastic wave velocities in granular soils. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 89 (1), 33–65.
   Google Scholar
• Henke, R. and Henke, W.K., 2002. In situ nonlinear inelastic shearing deformation characteristics of soil deposits inferred using the torsional cylindrical impulse shear test. Bulletin of the Seismological Society America, 92 (5), 1970–1983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hight, D.W., McMillan, F., Powell, J.J.M., Jardine, R.J. and Allenou, C.P., 2003. Some characteristics of London Clay, Characterization and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils, vol. 2. Rotterdam: Balkema, 851–907.
   Google Scholar
• Hiltunen, D.R., Griffin, L.M. and Woods, R.D., 2003. Liquefaction evaluation of Vincent Thomas Bridge sites via crosshole seismic shear wave measurements, Soil and Rock America 2003. Proceedings of the 12th Pan American Conference on Soil Mechanics & Geotechnical Engineering, Cambridge, MA, Essen: Verlag Glückauf GMBH, vol. 1, 253–260, http://www.worldcat.org/title/soil-and-rock-america-2003-12th-panamerican-conference-on-soil-mechanics-and-geotechnical-engineering-12-conferencia-panamericana-de-mecanica-de-suelos-e-ingenieria-geotecnica-39th-us-rock-mechanics-symposium-june-22-26th-2003-cambridge-massachusetts-usa/oclc/52611607
   Google Scholar
• Iwasaki, T., Tatsuoka, F. and Takagi, Y., 1978. Shear moduli of sands under cyclic torsional shear loading. Soils and Foundations, 18 (1), 39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Jamiolkowski, M. 2012. Role of geophysical testing in geotechnical site characterization. 3rd de Mello Lecture – Lisbon, Portuguese-Brazilian Geotechnical Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Jamiolkowski, M., Lancellotta, R. and Lo Presti, D.C.F., 1995. Remarks on the stiffness at small strains of six Italian clays. Pre-Failure Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, vol. 2 (IS-Hokkaido, Sapporo). Rotterdam: Balkema, 817–836.
   Google Scholar
• Jardine, R.J., Davies, M.C.R., Hight, D.W., Smith, A. and Stallebrass, S.E., eds., 1998. Pre-Failure Deformation Behavior of Geomaterials. London: Thomas Telford/ICE, 417.
   Google Scholar
• Jovicic, V. and Coop, M.R., 1998. The measurement of stiffness anisotropy in clays with bender element tests in the triaxial apparatus. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 21 (1), 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku, T. and Mayne, P.W., 2013. Evaluating the in situ lateral stress coefficient (K0) of soils via paired shear wave velocity modes. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 139 (5), 775–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku, T., Mayne, P.W., and Cargill, E., 2013. Continuous-interval shear wave velocity profiling by auto-source and seismic piezocone tests. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 50 (4), 382–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku, T., Mayne, P.W. and Gutierrez, B.J., 2011. Hierarchy of Vs modes and stress-dependency in geomaterials. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (Seoul), vol. 1. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 533–540.
   Google Scholar
• Leroueil, S. and Hight, D.W. 2003. Behaviour and properties of natural soils and soft rocks. Characterisation & Engineering Properties of Natural Soils, vol. 1, Proceedings of the Singapore Workshop. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 29–254.
   Google Scholar
• Lohani, T.N., Fujiwara, T., Iwasaki, Y., and Shibuya, S. 2008. Stiffness characteristics of quick clays in Osaka Bay. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, Atlanta. Amsterdam: Millpress/IOS Press, vol. 1, 153–157.
   Google Scholar
• Lohani, T.N., Imai, G. and Shibuya, S. 1999. Effect of sample disturbance on Gmax of Holocene clay deposits. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Pre-failure Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Torino 99). Rotterdam: Balkema, 115–122.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. and Donohue, S., 2007. In situ shear wave velocity from multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) tests at eight Norwegian research sites. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 44 (5), 533–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoPresti, D.C.F., Jamiolkowski, M. and Pepe, M., 2003. Geotechnical characterization of the subsoil of Pisa Tower. Characterization and Engineering Proprieties of Natural Soils (Singapore), vol. 2. Rotterdam: Balkema, 909–946.
   Google Scholar
• Mayne, P.W. and Brown, D.A., 2003. Site characterization of Piedmont residuum of North America. Characterization and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils, vol. 2. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1323–1339.
   Google Scholar
• Mayne, P.W. 2005. Invited Keynote: Integrated ground behaviour: in situ and lab tests. Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, vol. 2 ( Proc. IS Lyon’03). London: Taylor & Francis Group, 155–177.
   Google Scholar
• Mesri, G. and Choi, Y.K. 1983. Discussion—dynamic properties of soft clays for wide strain range. Soils and Foundations, 23 (1), 125–127.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J.K. and Soga, K., 2005. Fundamentals of Soil Behavior, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ni, S.-H., 1987. Dynamic properties of sand under true triaxial stress states from resonant column/torsion shear tests. Thesis (PhD). Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, M.W., 2000. The national geotechnical experimentation site: University of Houston, National Geotechnical Experimentation Sites, GSP 93. Reston, VA: ASCE, 72–101.
   Google Scholar
• Oda, M., 1977. Coordination number and its relation to shear strength of granular material. Soils and Foundations, 17 (2), 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, D.S., Nash, D.F.T. and Lings, M.L., 1997. Anisotropy of G0 shear stiffness in Gault Clay. Geotechnique, 47 (3), 391–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, J.J.M. and Butcher, A.P., 2003. Characterisation of a glacial clay till at Cowden, Humberside. Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils, vol. 2. Rotterdam: Balkema, 983–1020.
   Google Scholar
• Rampello, S., Viggiani, G.M.B. and Amorosi, A., 1997. Small-strain stiffness of reconstituted clay compressed along constant triaxial effective stress ratio paths. Geotechnique, 47 (3), 475–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roesler, S.K., 1979. Anisotropic shear modulus due to stress anisotropy. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 105 (7), 871–880.
   Google Scholar
• Santagata, M., 2008. Effects of stress history on the stiffness of a soft clay. Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, vol. 1 (Atlanta). Amsterdam: IOS Press, 95–123.
   Google Scholar
• Santagata, M., Germaine, J.T. and Ladd, C.C., 2005. Factors affecting the initial stiffness of cohesive soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131 (4), 430–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santagata, M. and Kang, Y.I., 2007. Effects of geologic time on the initial stiffness clays. Engineering Geology, 89, 98–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santamarina, J.C. and Cascante, G., 1996. Stress anisotropy and wave propagation: A micromechanical view. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 33 (5), 770–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santamarina, J.C., Klein, K.A. and Fam, M.A., 2001. Soils and Waves – particular materials behaviour, characterization and process monitoring. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H.B. and Idriss, I.M. 1970. Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis. Report 70-10. Berkeley, CA: EERC.
   Google Scholar
• Shibuya, S., Hwang, S.C. and Mitachi, T., 1997. Elastic shear modulus of soft clays from shear wave velocity measurement. Geotechnique, 47 (3), 593–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibuya, S., Mitachi, T., Yamashita, S. and Tanaka, H., 1995. Effects of sample disturbance on Gmax of soils - A case study. Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 1. Rotterdam: Balkema, 77–82.
   Google Scholar
• Shibuya, S., Park, C.-S., Tatsuoka, F., Abe, F., Teachavorasinskun, S., Kohatam, Y. and Sato, T., 1992. The significance of local lateral strain measurement of soil specimen for a wide range of strain. Soils and Foundations, 34 (2), 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Shibuya, S. and Tanaka, H., 1996. Estimate of elastic shear modulus of Holocene soil deposits. Soils and Foundations, 36 (4), 45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Simonini, P., 2004. Characterization of the Venice lagoon silts from in situ tests and the performance of a test embankment. Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization, vol. 1 (ISC-2, Porto). Rotterdam: Millpress, 187–207.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, K.H., Hwang, S.K., Darendeli, M. and Lee, N.J. 1995. Correlation study of nonlinear dynamic soil properties. US: Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, University of Texas at Austin Final Report for Westinghouse-Savannah River Site.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, K.H., Lee, J.N.K. and Lee, S.H.H., 1991. Characterization of soil in calibration chambers with seismic waves, calibration chamber testing, Proceedings of the ISOCCT, Clarkson University. New York: Elsevier, 363–376.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, K.H. and Santamarina, J.C. 2000. Keynote: Seismic wave-based testing in geotechnical engineering. Proceedings of GeoEng 2000, Australian Geomechanics Society, Melbourne, Australia, 1490–1536. Technomic Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sully, J.P., 1991. Measurement of in situ lateral stress during full-displacement penetration tests. Thesis (PhD). Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Sully, J.P. and Campanella, R.G., 1995. Evaluation of in situ anisotropy from crosshole and downhole shear wave velocity measurements. Geotechnique, 45 (2), 267–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, M. and Möller, B., 2001. Geophysics in soil mechanics – in situ shear moduli determined by SASW technique and more traditional geotechnical methods, report 508. Linköping: Swedish Geotechnical Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, F. and Shibuya, S., 1992. Deformation characteristics of soils and rocks from field and laboratory tests. Proceedings of the 9th Asian Regional Conference on SMFE, Bangkok, Rotterdam, A.A. Balkema, 2, 101–190.
   Google Scholar
• Tumay, M.T., 1997. In situ testing at the national geotechnical experimentation sites. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana Transportation Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Viana da Fonseca, A., Ferreira, C. and Carvalho, J.M., 2005. The use of shear wave velocities determined in down-hole (VsVH) and cross-hole (VsHV) tests for the evaluation of K0 in soils. Revista Latino-Americana de Geotecnia, 28 (3), 271–281.
   Google Scholar
• Viggiani, G. and Atkinson, J.H., 1995. Stiffness of fine-grained soil at very small strains. Geotechnique, 45 (2), 249–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vucetic, M. and Dobry, R., 1991. Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 117 (1), 89–107.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, W.A.J., 1988. Small-strain shear modulus of clay. Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II – Recent Advances in Ground-Motion Evaluation. Reston, VA: ASCE, 331–345.
   Google Scholar
• Wightman, W.E., Jalinoos, F., Sirles, P. and Hanna, K., 2003. Application of Geophysical Methods to Highway Related Problems. Contract No. DTFH68-02-P-00083. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, R.D., 1978. Measurement of dynamic soil properties. Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, vol. 1 (Pasadena). Reston, VA: ASCE, 91–178.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, P. and Richart, F.E., 1984. Stress ratio effects on shear modulus of dry sands. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 110 (3), 331–345.
   Google Scholar