Development of synthetic soil mixture for experimental shaking table tests on building frames resting on soft soils

References

• AS1289.3.5.1-2006. Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes, determination of the soil particle density of a soil-standard method. Sydney: Australian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• AS5101.4-2008. Methods for preparation and testing of stabilised materials, method 4: unconfined compressive strength of compacted materials. Sydney: Australian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, H., 2000. Soil mechanics. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Fatahi, B., Tabatabaiefar, H.R., and Samali, B. 2011. Performance based assessment of dynamic soil-structure interaction effects on seismic response of building frame. In: Proceedings of Georisk 2011 - Geotechnical Risk Assessment & Management (Geotechnical Special Publication No. 224), 26–28 June 2011, Reston, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 344–351.
   Google Scholar
• Fatahi, B. and Tabatabaiefar, S.H.R., 2014. Fully nonlinear versus equivalent linear computation method for seismic analysis of mid-rise buildings on soft soils. International Journal of Geomechanics, 14 (4), 04014016. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, L., Fatahi, B., and Khabbaz, H., 2014. Analytical solution for one-dimensional consolidation of unsaturated soils using eigenfunction expansion method. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 38 (10), 1058–1077. doi:10.1002/nag.v38.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horpibulsuk, S., et al., 2010. Behaviour of cemented clay simulated via the theoretical framework of the structured Cam Clay model. Computers and Geotechnics, 37 (1–2), 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iai, S., 1989. Similitude for shaking table tests on soil-structure-fluid model in 1g gravitational field. Soils and Foundations, 29 (1), 105–118. doi:10.3208/sandf1972.29.105
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C.-J., Wei, Y., and Kuo, Y., 2012. Boundary effects of a laminar container in centrifuge shaking table tests. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 34 (1), 37–51. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, A. and Tabatabaiefar, H.R. 2007. Effects of soil-structure interaction on seismic behaviour of ductile reinforced concrete moment resisting frames. In: Proceedings of world housing congress on affordable quality housing (WHC2007), 1–5 July 2007, Putra, Malaysia: Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM).
   Google Scholar
• Meymand, P.J. 1998. Shaking table scale model tests of nonlinear soil-pile-superstructure interaction in soft clay. Thesis (PhD). Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Moncarz, P. and Krawinkler, H. 1981. Theory and Application of Experimental Model Analysis in Earthquake Engineering, Report No. 50. John Blume Earthquake Engineering Ctr., Stanford Univ.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, R.E.S., Crosariol, V., and Kuo, S., 2010. Shake table testing to quantify seismic soil-structure interaction of underground structures. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, 24–29 May, San Diego, Paper No. 1.27b.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, H.H., 1999. Applied clay mineralogy today and tomorrow. Clay Minerals, 34 (1), 39–39. doi:10.1180/000985599546055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, L.D., Fatahi, B., and Khabbaz, H., 2014. A constitutive model for cemented clays capturing cementation degradation. International Journal of Plasticity, 56, 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemer, M., et al., 1998. Using reflected waves to measure small strain dynamic properties. In: Proceedings of the 5th Caltrans seismic research workshop, July 1998, Sacramento:California Department of Transportation, 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Samali, B., Fatahi, B., and Tabatabaiefar, H.R., 2011. Seismic behaviour of concrete moment resisting buildings on soft soil considering soil-structure interaction. In: Proceedings of the 21st Australasian conference on the mechanics of structures and materials (ACMSM21), 7–10 December 2010, Melbourne, Australia: Taylor & Francis Group, 407–412.
   Google Scholar
• Siddique, R., 2003. Effect of fine aggregate replacement with class F fly ash on the mechanical properties of concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 33 (4), 539–547. doi:10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01000-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulaeman, A., 2010. The use of lightweight concrete piles for deep foundation on soft soils. Thesis (PhD). Civil Engineering, University of Tun Hussein Onn, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabaiefar, H.R., Fatahi, B., and Samali, B., 2012. Finite difference modelling of soil-structure interaction for seismic design of moment resisting building frames. Australian Geomechanis Journal, 47 (3), 113–120.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabaiefar, S., Fatahi, B., and Samali, B., 2013a. Seismic behavior of building frames considering dynamic soil-structure interaction. International Journal of Geomechanics, 13 (4), 409–420. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabaiefar, S.H., Fatahi, B., and Samali, B., 2013b. Lateral seismic response of building frames considering dynamic soil-structure interaction effects. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 45 (3), 311–321. doi:10.12989/sem.2013.45.3.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabaiefar, S., Fatahi, B., and Samali, B., 2014a. An empirical relationship to determine lateral seismic response of mid-rise building frames under influence of soil-structure interaction. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 23 (7), 526–548. doi:10.1002/tal.v23.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabaiefar, H.R., Fatahi, B., and Samali, B., 2014b. Idealisation of soil-structure system to determine inelastic seismic response of mid-rise building frames. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 66 (11), 339–351. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabaiefar, S., Fatahi, B., and Samali, B., 2014c. Numerical and experimental investigations on seismic response of building frames under influence of soil-structure interaction. Advances in Structural Engineering, 17 (1), 109–130. doi:10.1260/1369-4332.17.1.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turan, A., Hinchberger, S., and El Naggar, H., 2009. Mechanical characterization of an artificial clay. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135 (2), 280–290. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:2(280)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turan, A., Hinchberger, S., and El Naggar, H., 2013. Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings on stiff clay with embedded basement stories. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 50 (8), 858–873. doi:10.1139/cgj-2011-0083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wartman, J., 1996. A laboratory study of the effects of fly ash on the geotechnical properties of soft clay. MEng thesis. University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar