Mechanical properties and time-dependent behaviour of sand-granulated rubber mixtures

References

• Abdelhaleem, A.M., et al., 2013. Evaluation of rubber/sand mixtures as replacement soils to mitigate earthquake induced ground motions. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Paris: CFMS, 3163–3166.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, I., 1993. Laboratory study on properties of rubber soils. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University, Report No. FHWA/IN/JHRP-93/4.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, I. and Lovell, C.W., 1993. Rubber soils as lightweight geomaterials. Transportation Research Record, 1422, 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Anbazhagan, P., Manohar, D.R., and Rohit, D., 2017. Influence of size of granulated rubber and tyre chips on the shear strength characteristics of sand–rubber mix. Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 12 (4), 266–278. doi:10.1080/17486025.2016.1222454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyroudis, S., et al., 2016. Use of rubberized backfills for improving the seismic response of integral abutment bridges. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 14 (12), 3573–3590. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-0018-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM D Standard D 4253, 2000. Standard test method for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using vibratory table. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D Standard D 4254, 2000. Standard test method for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D Standard D2435/D2435M, 2004. Standard test methods for one-dimensional consolidation properties of soils using incremental loading. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D Standard D6270, 2017. Standard practice for use of scrap tires in civil engineering applications. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D Standard D7181, 2011. Method for consolidated drained triaxial compression test for soils. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D Standard D854, 2014. Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Attom, M.F., 2006. The use of shredded waste tires to improve the geotechnical engineering properties of sand. Environmental Geology, 49, 497–503. doi:10.1007/s00254-005-0003-5
   Google Scholar
• Bosscher, P.J., Edil, T.B., and Eldin, N., 1992. Construction and performance of shredded waste tire test embankment. Transportation Research Record, 1345, 44–52.
   Google Scholar
• Bosscher, P.J., Edil, T.B., and Kuraoka, S., 1997. Design of highway embankments using tire chips. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 123 (4), 295–304. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:4(295)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, T.H., Dwyer, D.F., and Humphrey, D.N., 2001. Prototype tire shred embankment construction. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1755, 160–167. doi:10.3141/1755-17
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, J.M. and Wright, S.G., 2005. Soil strength and slope stability. Manhattan, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Edil, T.B. and Bosscher, P.J., 1994. Engineering properties of tire chips and soil mixtures. Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, 14 (4), 453–464.
   Google Scholar
• El-Sherbiny, R., Youssef, A., and Lotfi, H., 2013. Triaxial testing on saturated mixtures of sand and granulated rubber. In: Proceeding of the 2013 Geo-Congress, Stability and Performance of Slopes and Embankments III. San Diego, CA: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Foose, G.J., Benson, C.H., and Bosscher, P.J., 1996. Sand reinforced with shredded waste tires. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 122 (9), 760–767. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:9(760)
   Google Scholar
• Garga, V.K. and O’Shaughnessy, V., 2000. Tire Reinforced earthfill. Part I: construction of a test fill. Performance, and Retaining Wall Design. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 37 (1), 75–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhardt, M.A., 1997. “Shear strength of shredded tires as applied to the design and construction of a shredded tire stream crossing”, MS thesis, Iowa State University
   Google Scholar
• Ghaaowd, I., et al., 2017. Shearing behavior of tire-derived aggregate with large particle size. I: internal and concrete interface direct shear. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 143 (10), 1–11, 04017078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazavi, M., 2004. Shear strength characteristics of sand-mixed with granular rubber. Journal of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 22, 401–416. doi:10.1023/B:GEGE.0000025035.74092.6c
   Google Scholar
• Ghazavi, M. and AmelSakhi, M., 2005. Influence of optimized tire shreds on shear strength parameters of sand. International Journal Of Geomechanics, ASCE, 5, 58–65. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:1(58)
   Google Scholar
• Gotteland, P., Lambert, S., and Bałachowski, L., 2005. Strength characteristics of tyre chips – sand mixtures. Studia Geotechnica Et Mechanica, 27 (1–2), 55–66.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, D. and Manion, W., 1992. Properties of tire chips for lightweight fill. In: Grouting, soil improvement and geosynthetics. New York, NY: ASCE, Vol. 2, 1344–1355.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, D.N., et al., 1993. Shear strength and compressibility of tire chips for use as retaining wall backfill. Transportation Research Record 1422, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, D.N., et al., 1998. Tire shreds as lightweight fill for embankments and retaining walls. In: Recycled materials in geotechnical applications. Reston, VA: ASCE, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, D.N., 2007. November. Tire derived aggregate as lightweight fill for embankments and retaining walls. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Scrap Tire Derived Geomaterials–Opportunities and Challenges, IW-TDGM. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, 59–81.
   Google Scholar
• Indraratna, B., Ionescu, D., and Christie, H.D., 1998. Shear behavior of railway ballast based on large-scale triaxial tests. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 124 (5), 439–449. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:5(439)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H.K. and Santamarina, J.C., 2008. Sand–rubber mixtures (large rubber chips). Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 45 (10), 1457–1466. doi:10.1139/T08-070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, R.S., 1978. Preparing test specimens using undercompaction. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 1 (1), 16–23. doi:10.1520/GTJ10364J
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Shin, H., and Lee, J., 2014. Behavior of sand-rubber particle mixtures: experimental observation and numerical simulations. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 38, 1651–1663. doi:10.1002/nag.2264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.H., et al., 1999. Shredded tires and rubber-sand as lightweight backfill. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering ASCE, 125 (2), 132–141. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:2(132)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhusudhan, B.R., Boominathan, A., and Banerjee, S., 2017. Static and large-strain dynamic properties of sand–rubber tire shred mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 29 (10), 04017165. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, M. and Gray, D., 1990. Static response of sands reinforced with randomly distributed fiber. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 116 (11), 1661–1677. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:11(1661)
   Google Scholar
• Mashiri, M.S., et al., 2015. Shear strength and dilatancy behaviour of sand–tyre chip mixtures. Soils and Foundations, 55 (3), 517–528. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo, A.T. and Valdes, J.R., 2007. Creep of sand–rubber mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 19 (12), 1101–1105. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:12(1101)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorzad, R. and Raveshi, M., 2017. Mechanical behavior of waste tire crumbs–sand mixtures determined by triaxial tests. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 35 (4), 1793–1802. doi:10.1007/s10706-017-0209-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, K.R. and Marella, A. (2001) Properties of different size scrap tire shreds: implications on using as drainage material in landfill cover systems. In: The Seventeenth International Conference on Solid Waste Technology and Management. Philadelphia, PA, USA
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, S.B. and Krishna, A.M., 2015. Recycled tire chips mixed with sand as lightweight backfill material in retaining wall applications: an experimental investigation. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 1 (4), 31. doi:10.1007/s40891-015-0036-0
   Google Scholar
• Shiekh, M.N., et al., 2013. Shear and compressibility behaviors of sand-tyre crumb mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandon, V., et al., 2007. Performance monitoring of embankments containing tire chips: case study. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 21 (3), 207–214. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:3(207)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatlisoz, N., Edil, T.B., and Benson, C.H., 1998. Interaction between reinforcing geosynthetics and soil-tire chip mixtures. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 124 (11), 1109–1119. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:11(1109)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang, H.H., et al., 2012. Seismic isolation for low-to –medium rise buildings using granulated rubber-soil mixtures: numerical study. Earthquake Engineering Structureal Dynamics, 41 (14), 2009–2024. doi:10.1002/eqe.2171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tweedie, J., Humphrey, D., and Sandford, T., 1998. Full-scale field trials of tire shreds as lightweight retaining wall backfill under at-rest conditions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1619, 64–71. doi:10.3141/1619-08
   Google Scholar
• Valdes, J.R. and Evans, M.T., 2008. Sand-rubber mixtures: experiments and numerical simulations. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 45 (4), 588–595. doi:10.1139/T08-002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, W., Benda, C., and Cauley, R., 1997. Triaxial determination of shear strength of tire chips. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 123 (5), 479–482. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:5(479)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, M., et al., 2012. Comparison of seismic responses of geosynthetically reinforced walls with tire-derived aggregates and granular backfills. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 1368–1377. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, X., et al., 2009. Earthquake protection by tire-soil mixtures: numerical study. In: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Conference Proceedings; April. Christchurch, New Zealand: New Zealand society for Earthquake Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S., Lohnes, R.A., and Kjartanson, B.H., 2002. Mechanical properties of shredded tires. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 25 (1), 44–52. doi:10.1520/GTJ11078J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S., et al., 2006. Construction of a test embankment using a sand–tire shred mixture as fill material. Waste Management, 26 (9), 1033–1044. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2005.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youwai, S. and Bergado, D.T., 2003. Strength and deformation characteristics of shredded rubber tire-sand mixtures. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 40 (1), 254–264. doi:10.1139/t02-104
   Google Scholar
• Zornberg, J.G., Alexandre, R.C., and Viratjandr, C., 2004. Behavior of tire shred–sand mixtures. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 41 (2), 227–241. doi:10.1139/t03-086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar