Development of correlation between SPT-N value and shear wave velocity and estimation of non-linear seismic site effects for soft deposits in Kolkata city

References

• Abrahamson, N.A., Silva, W.J., and Kamai, R., 2013. Update of the AS08 ground-motion prediction equations based on the NGA-West2 data set. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Akin, M.K., Kramer, S.L., and Topal, T., 2011. Empirical correlations of shear wave velocity (vs) and penetration resistance (spt-n) for different soils in an earthquake-prone area (erbaa-turkey). Engineering Geology, 119 (1–2), 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hussaini, T.M., Chowdhury, I.N., and Noman, M.N., 2015. Seismic hazard assessment for Bangladesh – old and new perspectives. In: First International Conference on Advances in Civil Infrastructure and Construction Materials. Dhaka: Military Institute of Science & Technology, 841–856.
   Google Scholar
• Anbazhagan, P. and Sitharam, T., 2008. Seismic microzonation of Bangalore, India. Journal of Earth System Science, 117 (2), 833–852. doi:10.1007/s12040-008-0071-5
   Google Scholar
• ASCE, 2000. Seismic analysis of safety-related nuclear structures and commentary. New York, NY: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Athanasopoulos, G., 1970. Empirical correlations vso-nspt for soils of Greece: a comparative study of reliability. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment. 15. doi:10.2495/SD950031
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, G.M. and Boore, D.M., 2006. Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96 (6), 2181–2205. doi:10.1785/0120050245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barani, S. and Spallarossa, D., 2017. Soil amplification in probabilistic ground motion hazard analysis. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 15 (6), 2525–2545. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-9971-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashir, A. and Basu, D., 2018. Revisiting probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Gujarat: an assessment of Indian design spectra. Natural Hazards, 91 (3), 1127–1164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, D., Dey, A., and Kumar, S.S., 2017. One-dimensional effective stress non-masing nonlinear ground response analysis of IIT Guwahati. International Journal of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering (IJGEE), 8 (1), 1–27. doi:10.4018/IJGEE
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BIS, I., 2002. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. General Provisions and Buildings (fifth Revision) Pt, 1, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Boominathan, A., et al. 2007 Seismic hazard assessment considering local site effects for microzonation studies of Chennai city. In: Proceedings of Microzonation A workshop at Indian Institute of Science. Bangalore, pp 94–104.
   Google Scholar
• Boore, D.M., et al., 2014. Nga-west2 equations for predicting pga, pgv, and 5% damped psa for shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra, 30 (3), 1057–1085. doi:10.1193/070113EQS184M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, K.W. and Bozorgnia, Y., 2003. Updated near-source ground-motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93 (1), 314–331. doi:10.1785/0120020029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, K.W. and Bozorgnia, Y., 2013. NGA-West2 Campbell-Bozorgnia ground motion model for the horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped elastic pseudo-acceleration response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 sec. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, K. and Choudhury, D., 2013. Variations in shear wave velocity and soil site class in Kolkata city using regression and sensitivity analysis. Natural Hazards, 69 (3), 2057–2082. doi:10.1007/s11069-013-0795-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choiu, B., 2013 Update of the Choiu and Youngs nga ground motion model for average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Peer report 2013/07. p. 105, pacific earthquake engineering research center. University of California, Berkeley, CA
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, S.S., Deb, K., and Sengupta, A., 2015. Behavior of underground strutted retaining structure under seismic condition. Earthquakes and Structures, 8 (5), 1147–1170. doi:10.12989/eas.2015.8.5.1147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dammala, P.K., et al., 2017. Dynamic soil properties for seismic ground response studies in northeastern India. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 100, 357–370. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darendeli, M.B., 2001. Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. Dissertation (PhD). Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, S. and Acharyya, A., 2006. Seismic hazard assessment and microzonation: approach for greater kolkata urban agglomeration. In: Interactive Meet in Seismic Microzonation. Locknow
   Google Scholar
• Dikmen, Ü., 2009. Statistical correlations of shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for soils. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 6 (1), 61. doi:10.1088/1742-2132/6/1/007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobry, R., et al., 2000. New site coefficients and site classification system used in recent building seismic code provisions. Earthquake Spectra, 16 (1), 41–67. doi:10.1193/1.1586082
   Google Scholar
• EuroCode, P., 2005. Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance-part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Flores-Estrella, H., Yussim, S., and Lomnitz, C., 2007. Seismic response of the mexico city basin: a review of twenty years of research. Natural Hazards, 40 (2), 357–372. doi:10.1007/s11069-006-0034-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara, T., 1972. Estimation of ground movements in actual destructive earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the fourth European symposium on earthquake engineering. London, pp 125–132
   Google Scholar
• Govindaraju, L. and Bhattacharya, S., 2012. Site-specific earthquake response study for hazard assessment in Kolkata city, India. Natural Hazards, 61 (3), 943–965. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9940-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldar, A. and Mahadevan, S., 2000. Probability, reliability, and statistical methods in engineering design. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hanumantharao, C. and Ramana, G., 2008. Dynamic soil properties for microzonation of Delhi. India. Journal of Earth System Science, 117 (2), 719–730. doi:10.1007/s12040-008-0066-2
   Google Scholar
• Hartzell, S., Bonilla, L., and Williams, R.A., 2004. Prediction of nonlinear soil effects. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 94 (5), 1609–1629. doi:10.1785/012003256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasancebi, N. and Ulusay, R., 2007. Empirical correlations between shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for ground shaking assessments. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 66 (2), 203–213. doi:10.1007/s10064-006-0063-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashash, Y., et al. 2015 Deepsoil 6.1, user manual. Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Urbana Google Scholar
   Google Scholar
• Hashash, Y.M. and Park, D., 2001. Non-linear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the Mississippi embayment. Engineering Geology, 62 (1–3), 185–206. doi:10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00061-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idriss, I., 2013. NGA-West2 model for estimating average horizontal values of pseudo-absolute spectral accelerations generated by crustal earthquakes. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Imai, T., 1981. P-ans s-wave velocities of the ground in Japan. Proceedings 9th ISCMFE 2. Tokyo, 257–260
   Google Scholar
• Imai, T., 1982. Correlation of n value with s wave velocity and shear modulus. In: Proceedings 2nd ESOPT, Amsterdam, 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Imai, T. and Yoshimura, M., 1972. The relation of mechanical properties of soils to p and s wave velocities for soil ground in Japan. Japan: Urana Research Institute, OYO Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Imai, T. and Yoshimura, Y., 1970. Elastic wave velocity and soil properties in soft soil. Tsuchito-Kiso, 18 (1), 17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Iyisan, R., 1996. Correlations between shear wave velocity and in-situ penetration test results. Teknik Dergi-tmmob Insaat Muhendisleri Odasi, 7, 371–374.
   Google Scholar
• Jafari, M.K., Shafiee, A., and Razmkhah, A., 2002. Dynamic properties of fine grained soils in south of Tehran. Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 4 (1), 25.
   Google Scholar
• Kalteziotis, N., Sabatakakis, N., and Vassiliou, J., 1992. Evaluation of dynamic characteristics of Greek soil formations. In: Second Hellenic conference on geotechnical engineering, vol 2., 239–246. Greek.
   Google Scholar
• Karim, H.H., Fattah, M.Y., and Hasan, A.M., 2010. Evaluation of some geotechnical propertie and liquifaction potential from seismic parameters. Iraqi Journal of Civil Engineering, 6 (3), 30–45.
   Google Scholar
• Kayen, R.E. and Mitchell, J.K., 1997. Assessment of liquefaction potential during earthquakes by arias intensity. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 123 (12), 1162–1174. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:12(1162)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiku, H., 2001. In-situ penetration tests and soil profiling in adapazari, turkey. In: Proceedings 15th ICSMGE TC4 Satellite Conference on Lessons Learned from Recent Strong Earthquakes. August 25, 2001, Istanbul, Turkey, pp 259–265
   Google Scholar
• Kondner, R.L., 1963. A hyperbolic stressstrain formulation for sands. Proceedings of the 2nd Pan-American Conference on SMFE, 1, 289–324.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S.S., Krishna, A.M., and Dey, A., 2014. Nonlinear site-specific ground response analysis: case study of Amingaon, Guwahati. In: 15th Symposium of Earthquake Engineering (15SEE-2014). India: Roorkee.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S.S., Krishna, A.M., and Dey, A., 2018. Dynamic properties and liquefaction behaviour of cohesive soil in northeast India under staged cyclic loading. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 10 (5), 958–967.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.H.H., 1990. Regression models of shear wave velocities in Taipei basin. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 13 (5), 519–532. doi:10.1080/02533839.1990.9677284
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.H.H., 1992. Analysis of the multicollinearity of regression equations of shear wave velocities. Soils and Foundations, 32 (1), 205–214. doi:10.3208/sandf1972.32.205
   Google Scholar
• Maheswari, R.U., Boominathan, A., and Dodagoudar, G., 2010. Use of surface waves in statistical correlations of shear wave velocity and penetration resistance of Chennai soils. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 28 (2), 119–137. doi:10.1007/s10706-009-9285-9
   Google Scholar
• Matasović, N. and Vucetic, M., 1993. Cyclic characterization of liquefiable sands. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 119 (11), 1805–1822. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:11(1805)
   Google Scholar
• Mhaske, S.Y. and Choudhury, D., 2010. Gis-based soil liquefaction susceptibility map of Mumbai city for earthquake events. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 70 (3), 216–225. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mhaske, S.Y. and Choudhury, D., 2011. Geospatial contour mapping of shear wave velocity for Mumbai city. Natural Hazards, 59 (1), 317–327. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9758-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty, W.K. and Walling, M.Y., 2008. Seismic hazard in mega city Kolkata, India. Natural Hazards, 47 (1), 39–54. doi:10.1007/s11069-007-9195-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandy, D., 2007. Need for seismic microzonation of Kolkata megacity. In: Proceedings of workshop on microzonation.Bangalore, India: Indian Institute of science, vol 2627
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, J., 2005. Study of basin-edge effects on the ground motion characteristics using 2.5-d modelling. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 162 (2), 273–289. doi:10.1007/s00024-004-2600-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, J., 2010. Effects of impedance contrast and soil thickness on basin-transduced rayleigh waves and associated differential ground motion. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 167 (12), 1485–1510. doi:10.1007/s00024-010-0131-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, J., 2012. Effects of p-wave and s-wave impedance contrast on the characteristics of basin transduced rayleigh waves. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 169 (4), 693–709. doi:10.1007/s00024-011-0338-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath, S., et al., 2014. Earthquake scenario in West Bengal with emphasis on seismic hazard microzonation of the city of Kolkata, India. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 14 (9), 2549. doi:10.5194/nhess-14-2549-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEHRP FEMA. 2003. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures:-part 1: provisions. FEMA. Vol. 302. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Ohba, S. and Toriumi, I., 1970. Dynamic response characteristics of Osaka plain. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting AIJ (in Japanese), Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Ohsaki, Y. and Iwasaki, R., 1973. On dynamic shear moduli and poisson’s ratios of soil deposits. Soils and Foundations, 13 (4), 61–73. doi:10.3208/sandf1972.13.4_61
   Google Scholar
• Ohta, Y. and Goto, N., 1978. Empirical shear wave velocity equations in terms of characteristic soil indexes. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 6 (2), 167–187. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290060205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okur, D. and Ansal, A., 2007. Stiffness degradation of natural fine grained soils during cyclic loading. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 27 (9), 843–854. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oprsal, I., et al. 2005 Deterministic earthquake scenario for the basel area: simulating strong motion and site effects for basel. Prep. Available from http://geomff cunicz/-> people->IvoOprsal [Accessed 03 Feb 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, C. and Hashash, Y.M., 2009. Damping formulation for nonlinear 1d site response analyses. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29 (7), 1143–1158. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitilakis, K., Anastasiadis, A., and Raptakis, D., 1992. Field and laboratory determination of dynamic properties of natural soil deposits. In: Proceeding 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol 3, Spain, 1275–1280.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, M.Z., Kamal, A.M., and Siddiqua, S., 2018. Near-surface shear wave velocity estimation and vs 30 mapping for Dhaka city, Bangladesh. Natural Hazards 92 (3), 1687–1715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, K.S. and Rathod, G.W., 2014. Seismic microzonation of indian megacities: a case study of NCR Delhi. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 44 (2), 132–148. doi:10.1007/s40098-013-0084-0
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, P., Prasad, A., and Sarkar, D., 1998. Velocity modelling of Bengal basin refraction data-refinement using multiples. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 39 (2), 109–120. doi:10.1016/S0926-9851(98)00006-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollins, K.M., et al., 1998. Shear modulus and damping relationships for gravels. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 124 (5), 396–405. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:5(396)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, N. and Sahu, R., 2012. Site specific ground motion simulation and seismic response analysis for microzonation of Kolkata. Geomechanics and Engineering, 4 (1), 1–18. doi:10.12989/gae.2012.4.1.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salt, C., Alam, M., and Hosssain, M., 1986. Current exploration of the hinge zone area of southwest Bangladesh. In: Proceeding 6th Offshore SE Asia Conference, Singapore, 20–31.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H. and Idriss, I., 1981. Evaluation of liquefaction potential sand deposits based on observation of performance in previous earthquakes. In: ASCE National Convention (MO), St. Louis, MO, 481–544.
   Google Scholar
• Shiuly, A. and Narayan, J., 2012. Deterministic seismic microzonation of Kolkata city. Natural Hazards, 60 (2), 223–240. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-0004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitharam, T. and Anbazhagan, P., 2008. Site characterization using geotechnical and geophysical techniques for seismic microzonation of urban areas. In: Proceedings of international geotechnical conference on development of urban areas and geotechnical engineering vol 131147. Russia I: Saint Petersburg.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, J.I., Golesorkhi, R., and Seed, H.B., 1988. Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for cohesive soils. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Sykora, D. and Stokoe, K., 1983 Correlations of in situ measurements in sands of shear wave velocity, soil characteristics, and site conditions. Report gr 83–33. Civil Engineering Department, University of Texas at Austin
   Google Scholar
• Toro GR, 2002. Modification of the toro et al.(1997) attenuation equations for large magnitudes and short distances. Risk Engineering Technical Report
   Google Scholar
• Trianni, S.C.T., Lai, C.G., and Pasqualini, E., 2014. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis at a strategic site in the Bay of Bengal. Natural Hazards, 74 (3), 1683–1705. doi:10.1007/s11069-014-1268-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuda, K., et al., 2006. Site-response estimation for the 2003 miyagi-oki earthquake sequence considering nonlinear site response. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96 (4A), 1474–1482. doi:10.1785/0120050160
   Google Scholar
• Ulugergerli, E.U. and Uyanik, O., 2006. Statistical correlations between seismic wave velocities and spt blow counts and the relative density of soils. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 35 (2), 187–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vucetic, M. and Dobry, R., 1991. Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 117 (1), 89–107. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89)
   Google Scholar
• Yang, L., et al. 2006. A study on the dynamic properties of soft soil in Shanghai. In: Soil and Rock Behavior and Modeling, China, 466–473.
   Google Scholar
• Yokota, K., Imai, T., and Konno, M., 1981. Dynamic deformation characteristics of soils determined by laboratory tests. OYO Tec Rep, 3, 13–37.
   Google Scholar
• Youngs, R., et al., 1997. Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters, 68 (1), 58–73. doi:10.1785/gssrl.68.1.58
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, X., 1996. A simple procedure to calculate the fundamental frequency of horizontal soil layers. Geotechnique, 46 (4), 757–760. doi:10.1680/geot.1996.46.4.757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, P., et al. 1999 Global seismic hazard assessment program (gshap) in continental asia
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, J.X., et al. 2006. Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96 (3), 898–913. doi:10.1785/0120050122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, J., 1987. Correlation between seismic wave velocity and the number of blow of spt and depths. In: Selected Papers from the Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering-1985, China. ASCE, p. 92–100.
   Google Scholar