The study of configuration effect of helical anchor group on retaining wall displacement

References

• Albusoda, B.S. and Abbase, H.O., 2017. Performance assessment of single and group of helical piles embedded in expansive soil. International Journal of Geo-Engineering, 8 (1), 25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-017-0063-x
   Google Scholar
• Blessen, J., et al., 2017. Helical piles and anchors- hydraulically driven push piers- polyurethane injection- supplemental support systems. Supportworks, ed. Third.
   Google Scholar
• Deardorff, D., Moeller, M., and Walt, E., 2010. Results of an instrumented helical soil nail wall. In Earth Retention Conference 3. Washington, United States, 262–269
   Google Scholar
• Dong, T.W. and Zheng, Y.R., 2014. Limit analysis of vertical anti-pulling screw pile group under inclined loading on 3D elastic-plastic finite element strength reduction method. Journal of Central South University, 21 (3), 1165–1175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-014-2050-0
   Google Scholar
• Elsherbiny, Z. and El Naggar, M., 2013. The performance of helical pile groups under compressive loads: a numerical investigation. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Paris, France, Paper No. 2427.
   Google Scholar
• George, B.E., Banerjee, S., and Gandhi, S.R., 2017. Numerical analysis of helical piles in cohesionless soil. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 14 (4), 361–375.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaly, A. and Hanna, A., 1994. Model investigation of the performance of single anchors and groups of anchors. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 31 (2), 273–284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/t94-032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, P. and Samal, S., 2017. interaction effect of group of helical anchors in cohesive soil using finite element analysis. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 35 (4), 1475–1490. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0188-x
   Google Scholar
• ICC-Evaluation Services. 2007. AC358 acceptance criteria for helical pile foundations and devices.  International Code Council Evaluation Service (ICC-ES). www.icc-es.org.
   Google Scholar
• Junaideen, S., et al., 2004. Laboratory study of soil nail interaction in loose, completely decomposed granite. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 41 (2), 274–286. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khazaei, J. and Eslami, A., 2017. Postgrouted helical piles behavior through physical modeling by FCV. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 35 (4), 528–537. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2016.1213339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanyi-Bennett, S.A. and Deng, L., 2018. Axial load testing of helical pile groups in a glaciolacustrine clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 999, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarte, C.A., et al., 2015. Soil Nail Walls Reference Manual. No. FHWA-NHI-14-007.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerhof, G.G., 1976. Bearing capacity and settlement of pile foundations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 102(ASCE# 11962).
   Google Scholar
• Mittal, S. and Mukherjee, S., 2013. Vertical uplift capacity of a group of helical screw anchors in sand. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 43 (3), 238–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-013-0055-5
   Google Scholar
• Mittal, S. and Mukherjee, S., 2014. vertical pullout capacity of a group of helical screw anchors in sand: an empirical approach. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 44 (4), 480–488. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-014-0099-1
   Google Scholar
• Mittal, S. and Mukherjee, S., 2015. Behaviour of group of helical screw anchors under compressive loads. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 33 (3), 575–592. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9841-4
   Google Scholar
• Moghadam, M.J., et al., 2018a. Experimental evaluation of mechanically stabilized earth walls with recycled crumb rubbers. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 10 (5), 947–957. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghadam, M.J., et al., 2018b. Experimental study on the performance of plate anchor retaining walls. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 19 (3), 128–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.17.00040
   Google Scholar
• Muthukumar, M. and Shukla, S.K., 2017. Comparative study on the behaviour of granular pile anchors and helical pile anchors in expansive soils subjected to swelling. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 14 (1), 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Nabizadeh, F. and Janalizadeh Choobbasti, A., 2017. The performance of grouted and un-grouted helical piles in sand. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 13 (6), 516–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pack, J.S., 2000. Design of helical piles for heavily loaded structures. New technological and design developments in deep foundations. Denver, colorado: American Society of Civil Engineers. 353–367.
   Google Scholar
• Perko, H., 1999. Summary of earth retaining methods utilizing helical anchors. Magnum piering technical reference guide, engineering analysis, section 3. Cincinnati, OH: Magnum Piering, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Perko, H.A., 2009. Helical piles: a practical guide to design and installation. London, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatini, P., Pass, D., and Bachus, R.C., 1999. Ground anchors and anchored systems. No. FHWA-IF-99-015. United States: Federal Highway Administration. Office of Bridge Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Sakr, M., et al., 2017. Uplift capacity of group screw piles with grouted shafts in sand. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Seoul, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Salgado, R., Yoon, S., and Siddiki, N.Z., 2003. Construction of tire shreds test embankment. Joint transportation research program. Technical Report Nº: FHWA/IN/JTRP-2002/35. http://docs. lib. purdue. edu/jtrp/42/ [Accessed 11 Feb 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Shaheen, W.A. and Demars, K.R., 1995. Interaction of multiple helical earth anchors embedded in granular soil. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 13 (4), 357–374. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10641199509388293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, M., Samanta, M., and Sarkar, S., 2017. Laboratory study on pullout capacity of helical soil nail in cohesionless soil. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 54 (10), 1482–1495. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0243
   Google Scholar
• Spagnoli, G., et al., 2018. Parametric analysis for the estimation of the installation power for large helical piles in dry cohesionless soils. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2018.1484603
   Google Scholar
• Stuedlein, A.W. and Uzielli, M., 2014. Serviceability limit state design for uplift of helical anchors in clay. Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 9 (3), 173–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2013.857049
   Google Scholar
• Tognon, A.R., Rowe, R.K., and Brachman, R.W., 1999. Evaluation of side wall friction for a buried pipe testing facility. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 17 (4), 193–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(99)00004-7
   Google Scholar
• Tokhi, H., Ren, G., and Li, J., 2016. Laboratory study of a new screw nail and its interaction in sand. Computers and Geotechnics, 78, 144–154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.05.009
   Google Scholar
• Tokhi, H., Ren, G., and Li, J., 2017. Laboratory pullout resistance of a new screw soil nail in residual soil. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 55 (5), 609–619. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0048
   Google Scholar
• White, D., Take, W., and Bolton, M., 2003. Soil deformation measurement using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and photogrammetry. Geotechnique, 53 (7), 619–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, D.M., 2014. Geotechnical modelling. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J.J.M., 2012. Uplift capacity and displacement of helical anchors in cohesive soil. A Thesis Submitted to Oregon State University.
   Google Scholar