Three dimensional analyses of geocell reinforced encased stone column supported embankments on lithomargic clay

References

• Abaqus., 2016. ABAQUS Analysis User's Manual. Dassault Systems Simulia Corp., Providence RI.
   Google Scholar
• Altalhe, E.B., Taha, M.R., and Abdrabbo, F.M., 2015. Behavior of strip footing on reinforced sand slope. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21 (3), 376–383. doi:10.3846/13923730.2014.890646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathrust, R.J., and Karpurapu, R., 1993. Large scale triaxial compression testing of geocell reinforced granular soils. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 16 (3), 296–303.
   Google Scholar
• Bergado, D.T., et al., 1996. Soft ground improvement in lowland and other environments. New York: ASCE Press, 186–232.
   Google Scholar
• Bhasi, A. and Rajagopal, K., 2015. Geosynthetic-Reinforced piled embankments, comparison of numerical and analytical methods. International Journal of Geomechanics, 15 (5), 04014074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biabani, M.M., Ngo, N.T., and Indraratna, B., 2016. Modelling of geocell reinforced subballast subjected to cyclic loading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 44 (4), 489–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biot, M.A., 1941. General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. Journal of Applied Physics, 12 (2), 155–164. doi:10.1063/1.1712886
   Google Scholar
• Castro, J., 2017. Groups of encased stone columns, influence of column length and arrangement. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 45 (2), 68–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin, J.G., Han, J., and Huang, J., 2005. Geosynthetic reinforced column support embankment design guidelines. In: Proceedings of the North America Geosynthetics Society Conference. Albany, NY: North American Geosynthetics Society, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Dash, S.K., Sireesh, S., and Sitharam, T.G., 2003. Behaviour of geocell-reinforced sand beds under the circular footing. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Ground Improvement, 7 (3), 111–115.
   Google Scholar
• Dash, S.K. and Bora, M.C., 2013. Improved performance of soft clay foundations using stone columns and geocell-sand mattress. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 41, 26–35. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, K., Chandra, S. and Basudhar, P. K., 2008. Response of multilayer geosynthetic-reinforced bed resting on soft soil with stone columns. Computers and Geotechnics, 35(3), 323–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debnath, P. and Dey, A.K., 2017. Bearing capacity of reinforced and unreinforced sand beds over stone columns in soft clay. Geosynthetics International, 24 (6), 575–589. doi:10.1680/jgein.17.00024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emersleben, A. and Meyer, N., 2010. Verification of the load transfer mechanism of geocell reinforced soil in large scale model tests and different in-situ test fields. Geotechnical Special Publication, 1670–1679 doi:10.1061/41095(365)169.
   Google Scholar
• Emersleben, A. and Meyer, N., 2011. Use of geocell reinforced load transfer platforms over vertical columns. Geotechnical Special Publication, 3255–3265 doi:10.1061/41165(397)333.
   Google Scholar
• Fattah, M.Y., Shlash, K.T., and Al-Waily, M.J., 2011. Stress concentration ratio of model stone columns in soft clays. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 34 (1). doi:10.1520/GTJ103060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fattah, M.Y. and Majeed, Q.G., 2012. A study on the behaviour of geogrid encased capped stone columns by the finite element method. International Journal of Geomate, 3 (1), 343–350.
   Google Scholar
• Fattah, M.Y., Shlash, K.T., and Al-Waily, M.J., 2013. Experimental evaluation of stress concentration ratio of model stone columns strengthened by additives. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 13 (3), 79–98. doi:10.1680/ijpmg.12.00006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fattah, M.Y., Zabar, B.S., and Hassan, H.A., 2015. Soil arching analysis in embankments on soft clays reinforced by stone columns. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 56 (4), 507–534. doi:10.12989/sem.2015.56.4.507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fattah, M.Y., Hassan, W.H., and Rasheed, S.E., 2018. Effect of geocell reinforcement above buried pipes on surface settlement”. International Review of Civil Engineering, 9 (2), 86–90.
   Google Scholar
• Fattah, M.Y., Zabar, B.S., and Hassan, H.A., 2016. Experimental analysis of embankment on ordinary and encased stone columns. International Journal of Geomechanics, 16 (4), 04015102. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J. and Gabr, M.A., 2002. Numerical analysis of geosynthetic reinforced and pile-supported earth platforms over soft soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 128 (1), 44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J., et al., 2008. Behaviour of geocell reinforced sand under a vertical load. Journal of Transport Research Board, 2045, 95–101.
   Google Scholar
• Hegde, A. and Sitharam, T.G., 2015a. 3-Dimensional numerical modelling of geocell reinforced sand beds. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 43 (2), 171–181. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegde, A. and Sitharam, T.G., 2015b. Effect of infill materials on the performance of geocell reinforced soft clay beds. Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 10 (3), 163–173. doi:10.1080/17486025.2014.921334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewlett, W.J., and Randolph, M.F., 1988. Analysis of piled embankments. Ground Engineering, 2 (3), 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Khabbazian, M., Kaliakin, V.N., and Meehan, C.L., 2010. Numerical study of the effect of geosynthetic encasement on the behavior of granular columns. Geosynthetics International, 17 (3), 132–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latha, G.M., 2000. Investigations on the behaviour of geocell supported embankments. Ph.D. thesis submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering. Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai.
   Google Scholar
• Latha, G.M., and Rajagopal, K., 2007. Parametric finite element analyses of geocell supported embankments. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 44 (8), 917–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latha, G.M., and Somwanshi, A., 2009. Effect of reinforcement form on the bearing capacity of square footing on the sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27 (4), 409–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshchinsky, B. and Ling, H., 2013. Effects of geocell confinement on strength and deformation behavior of gravel. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139 (2), 340–352. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazumder, T., Rolaniya, A.K., and Ayothiraman, R., 2018. Experimental study on behaviour of encased stone column with tyre chips as aggregates. Geosynthetics International, 25 (3), 259–270. doi:10.1680/jgein.18.00006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murugesan, S., and Rajagopal, K., 2007. Model tests on geosynthetics encased stone columns. Geosynthetics International, 14 (6), 346–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak, S., Vibhoosha, M.P., and Bhasi, A., 2019. Effect of column configuration on the performance of encased stone columns with basal geogrid installed in lithomargic clay. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 5 (4), 1–19. doi:10.1007/s40891-019-0181-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, K.S., and Tan, S.A., 2015. Stress transfer mechanism in 2D and 3D unit cell models for stone column improved ground. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 1 (3). doi:10.1007/s40891-014-0003-1
   Google Scholar
• Rajagopal, K., Krishnaswamy, N.R., and Latha, G.M., 1999. Behaviour of sand confined with single and multiple geocells. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 17 (3), 171–181. doi:10.1016/S0266-1144(98)00034-X
   Google Scholar
• Ramesh, H. N. and Nanda, H. S., 2007. Strength behaviour of shedi soil treated with fly ashes. 13th ARC, Kolkata, pp 893–896.
   Google Scholar
• Shivashankar, R., et al., 2011. Experimental studies on behaviour of stone columns in layered soil. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 29 (5), 749–757.
   Google Scholar
• Sanjei, C., and De Silva, L.I.N., 2016. Numerical modelling of the behaviour of model shallow foundations on geocell reinforced sand. In: Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon). Moratuwa-Sri Lanka, 5–6 April, 216–222.
   Google Scholar
• Saride, S., et al., 2009. Numerical simulations of sand and clay. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Ground Improvement, 161 (4), 185–198.
   Google Scholar
• Song, F., et al., 2019. Large-scale triaxial compression tests of geocell-reinforced sand. Geosynthetics International, 26 (4), 388–395. doi:10.1680/jgein.19.00019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeer, P.A., and Verruijt, A., 1981. An accuracy condition for consolidation by finite elements. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 5 (1), 1–14. doi:10.1002/nag.1610050103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, C., and Kim, S.B., 2009. Numerical modeling of the geosynthetic-encased stone column-reinforced ground. Geosynthetics International, 16 (3), 116–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., et al., 2010. Bearing capacity of geocell reinforcement in embankment engineering. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 28 (5), 475–482. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Li, T., and Wang, Y., 2011. Theoretical elastic solutions for foundations improved by geosynthetic-encased columns. Geosynthetics International, 18 (1), 12–20. doi:10.1680/gein.2011.18.1.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar