Evaluation of liquefaction potential by energy-based and stress-based methods and gene expressing programming (case study: Tabriz city)

References

• Baziar, M.H. and Sharafi, H., 2010. Assessment of silty sand liquefaction potential using hollow torsional tests—an energy approach. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31 (7), 857–865. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulanger, R.W. and Idriss, I.M., 2012. Probabilistic standard penetration test–based liquefaction– triggering procedure. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental, ASCE, 138 (10), 1185–1195. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bwambale, B. and Andrus, R.D., 2019. State of the art in the assessment of aging effects on soil liquefaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 125, 105658. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.04.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro, G., et al., 1982. Liquefaction induced by cyclic loading. Winchester, Mass: Geotechnical Engineers Inv, p. 79.
   Google Scholar
• Cetin, K.O., et al., 2004. Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential. Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 130 (12), 12. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:12(1314).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetin, K.O., et al., 2016. Summary of SPT based field case history data of cetin, database. Report No: METU/GTENG 08/16-01.
   Google Scholar
• Cetin, K., et al., 2018. SPT-Based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction triggering hazard. Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering, 115, 698–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetin, K.O., et al., 2018a. SPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction triggering hazard. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 115, 698–709. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetin, K.O., et al., 2018b. Examination of differences between three SPT-based seismic soil liquefaction triggering relationships. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 113, 75–86. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetin, K.O., et al., Ilga, M., Chowdhury, K., 2018c. The use of the SPT based seismic soil liquefaction triggering evaluation methodology in engineering hazard assessments. MethodsX, 5, 1556–1575. doi:10.1016/j.mex.2018.11.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, M., et al., 2011. Comparision of SPT-N-based analysis methods in evaluation of liquefaction potential during the 1999 Chi- chi earthquake in Taiwan. Computers and Geotechnics, 38 (3), 393–406. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., et al., 2015. Calibration of a CRR model based on an expanded SPT-based database for assessing soil liquefaction potential. Engineering Geology, 196, 305–312. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgamal, A., Yang, Z., and Parra, E., 2002. Computational modeling of cyclic mobility and post-liquefaction site response. Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering, 22 (4), 259–271. doi:10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00022-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, C., 2001. Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. Complex Systems, 13 (2), 87e129.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, C., 2006. Gene expression programming: mathematical modeling by an artificial intelligence. 2nd ed. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. and Mitchell, J.K., 2003. A closer look at Arias intensity-based liquefaction evaluation procedures, Pacific conference on earthquake engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Green, R.A., Mitchel, J.K., and Polito, K.P., 2000. An energy-based excess pore pressure generation model for cohesionless soils. Proc. John Booker Meml. Symp. Syd. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C.F., 1956. Magnitude and energy of Earthquakes. Annali di Geofisica, 9, 1–15. doi:10.4401/ag-5590
   Google Scholar
• Hu, J. and Liu, H., 2019. Identification of ground motion intensity measure and its application for predicting soil liquefaction potential based on the Bayesian network method. Engineering Geology, 248, 34–49. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idriss, I.M. and Boulanger, R.W., 2004. Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 26 (2–4), 115–130. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idriss, I.M. and Boulanger, R.W., 2006. Semi-Empirical Procedures for Evaluating Liquefaction Potential During Earthquakes. Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Elsevier, 26, 115–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishihara, K., 1996. Soil behavior in earthquake geotechnics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jafarian, Y., et al., 2011. On the efficiency and predictability of strain energy for the evaluation of liquefaction potential: a numerical study. Computers and Geotechnics, 38 (6), 800–808. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johari, A. and Khodaparast, A.R., 2013a. Modelling of probability liquefaction based on standard penetration tests using the jointly distributed random variables method. Engineering Geology, 158, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johari, A., Nakhaee, M., and Habibagahi, G., 2013b. Prediction of unsaturated soils effective stress parameter using gene expression programming. Scientia Iranica A, 20 (5), 1433–1444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johari, A., Javadi, A.A., and Najafi, H., 2016. A genetic-based model to predict maximum lateral displacement of retaining wall in granular soil. Scientia Iranica A, 23 (1), 54–65. doi:10.24200/sci.2016.2097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanagalingam, T. and Thevanayagam, S., 2006. Energy dissipation and liquefaction assessment in sands and silty soils. GeoCongress.
   Google Scholar
• Kokusho, T., 2013. Liquefaction potential evaluations: energy-based method versus stress-based method. The Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 50 (10), 1088–1099. doi:10.1139/cgj-2012-0456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokusho, T. and Kaneko, Y., 2018. Energy evaluation for liquefaction-induced strain of loose sands by harmonic and irregular loading tests. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 114, 362–377. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokusho, T. and Mimori, Y., 2015. Liquefaction potential evaluations by energy-based method and stress-based method for various ground motions. Soil Dynamic Sand Earthquake Engineering, 75, 130–146. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koza, J.R. and Poli, R., 2005. Genetic programming. In: E. Burke, G. Kendall, eds. Search Methodologies; Introductory Tutorialsin Optimization and Decision Support Techniques. Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 127–164.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, S.L., Sideras, S.S., and Greenfield, M.W., 2016. The timing of liquefaction and its utility in liquefaction hazard evaluation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 91, 133–146. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.07.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liam Finn, W.D., 2002. State of the art for the evaluation of seismic liquefaction potential. Computers and Geotechnics, 29 (5), 329–341. doi:10.1016/S0266-352X(01)00031-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez, H.S. and Weinert, W.R., 2004. An enhanced gene expression programming approach for symbolic regression problems. International Journal of Applied Mathematics in Computer Science, 14, 375–384.
   Google Scholar
• Mirzaei, N., 1997. Seismic zoning of Iran, Ph.D. Dissiration: Institute of Geophysics, State seismological Bureau, Beijing, P.R. Chaina, 134 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Muduli, P.K. and Das, S.K., 2015. Model uncertainty of SPT-based method for evaluation of seismic soil liquefaction potential using multi-gene genetic programming. Soils and Foundations, 55 (2), 258–275. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2015.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, R.S. and Koester, J.P., 1995. Prediction of liquefaction resistance using the CPT. International symposium on cone penetration testing, CPT 95. Linkoping, Sweden, 251–256.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, S.M., Green, R.A., and Obermeier, S., 2005. Geotechnical analysis of paleoseismic shaking using liquefaction features: a major updating. Engineering Geology, 76 (3–4), 235–261. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papathanassiou, G., 2008. LPI-Based approach for calibrating the severity of liquefaction-induced failures and for assessing the probability of liquefaction surface evidence. Engineering Geology 96 (1–2), 94–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahebkaram Alamdari, A., et al., 2021. Seismic zoning of Tabriz area by stochastic finite fault model considering site-specific soil effects. Soils and Rocks, 44 (1), 1–13. doi:10.28927/SR.2021.047220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahebkaram Alamdari, A. and Najafi, A., 2018. The study of the liquefaction probability and estimation of the relative importance of effective parameters using fuzzy clustering and genetic programming. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 47 (4), 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Sahebkaram Alamdari, A., et al., 2021. Seismic zoning of Tabriz area by stochastic finite fault model considering site-specific soil effects. Soils and Rocks, 44 (1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samui, P. and Hariharan, R., 2014. A unified classification model for modeling of seismic liquefaction potential of soil based on CPT. Journal of Advanced Research, 6, 587–592. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2014.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanjay, K. and Suzuki, K., 2008. Reliability analysis of soil liquefaction based on standard penetration test. Computers and Geotechnics, 36, 589–596. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2008.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seed, H.B., Idriss, I.M., and Arrango, 1983. Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field data. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 109, 458–484. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:3(458)
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H.B. and Idriss, I.M., 1971. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 97 (SM9), 1249–1273. doi:10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001662.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H.B., et al., 1985. The influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 111 (12), 1425–1445. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:12(1425).
   Google Scholar
• Shahir, H., et al., 2012. Evaluation of variation of permeability in liquefiable soil under earthquake loading. Computers and Geotechnics, 40, 74–88. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorovska, M.I. and Trifunac, M.D., 1999. Liquefaction opportunity mapping via seismic wave energy. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 125 (12), 1032–1042. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:12(1032).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trifunac, M.D., 1995. Empirical criteria for liquefaction in sands via standard penetration tests and seismic wave energy. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 14 (6), 419–426. doi:10.1016/0267-7261(95)00016-N.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trifunac, M.D. and Todorovska, M.I., 2004. Maximum distance and minimum energy to initiate liquefaction in water saturated sands. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 24 (2), 89–101. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2003.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaparli, V., et al., 2017. An energy-based interpretation of sand liquefaction due to vertical ground motion. Computers and Geotechnics, 90, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitman, R.V., 1971. Resistance of soil to liquefaction and settlement. Soils and Foundations, 11 (4), 59–68. doi:10.3208/sandf1960.11.4_59.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, C., et al., 2020. Study on liquefaction mechanism of saturated sand considering stress redistribution. Engineering Geology, 264, 105302. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., et al., 2017. A depth-consistent SPT-based empirical equation for evaluating sand liquefaction. Engineering Geology, 221, 41–49. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.02.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youd, T.L., et al., 2001. Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127 (4), 297–313. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:4(297).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., et al., 2016. Inter-Region variability of Robertson and Wride method for liquefaction hazard analysis. Engineering Geology, 203, 191–203. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.12.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar