Numerical investigation on impact of excavations in influence zone of existing MRT tunnels

References

• Addenbrooke, T.I., and Potts, D.M., 2001. Twin tunnel interaction – surface and subsurface effects. International Journal of Geomechanics, 1 (2), 249–271. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2001)1:2(249).
   Google Scholar
• Addenbrooke, T.I., Potts, D.M., and Puzrin, A.M., 1997. The influence of pre-failure soil stiffness on the numerical analysis of tunnel construction. Géotechnique, 47 (3), 693–712. doi:10.1680/geot.1997.47.3.693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkgreve, R.B.J., et al., 2015. Plaxis 2015. The Netherlands:PLAXIS bv.
   Google Scholar
• Burland, J.B., Standing, J.R., and Jardine, R.M. 2001. Building response to tunnelling – case studies from construction of the jubilee line extensionVol. 1. London CIRIA SP200: Projects and Methods.
   Google Scholar
• Chheng, C. and Likitlersuang, S., 2018. Underground excavation behaviour in Bangkok using three-dimensional finite element method. Computers and Geotechnics, 95, 68–81. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani, H. and Ajalloeian, R., 2019. A method for selection of optimum distance between twin tunnels under static and pseudo-static conditions, case study: pooneh tunnel. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 37 (5), 4435–4446. doi:10.1007/s10706-019-00919-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindasamy, D., et al., 2020. Assessment of the twin-tunnel interaction mechanism in Kenny Hill formation using contraction ratio method. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 50 (5), 825–837. doi:10.1007/s40098-020-00411-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiung, B.C.B., et al., 2021. Impacts of the plane strain ratio on excavations in soft alluvium deposits. Acta Geotechnica, 16 (6), 1923–1938. doi:10.1007/s11440-020-01115-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerman, J. and Mašín, D., 2021. Evaluation of hypoplastic model for soft clays by modelling of Nicoll highway case history. Computers and Geotechnics, 134, 104053. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongpradist, P., et al., 2013. Development of tunneling influence zones for adjacent pile foundations by numerical analyses. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 34, 96–109. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2012.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolymbas, D., 1991. Hauptzüge der Hypoplastizität. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 61 (3), 143–151. doi:10.1007/BF00788048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komu, M.P., et al., 2020. Using 3D numerical analysis for the assessment of tunnel–landslide relationship: Bahce–Nurdag Tunnel (South of Turkey). Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 38 (2), 1237–1254. doi:10.1007/s10706-019-01084-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.J. and Bassett, R.H., 2007. Influence zones for 2D pile–soil-tunnelling interaction based on model test and numerical analysis. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 22 (3), 325–342. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2006.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likitlersuang, S., Chheng, C., and Keawsawasvong, S., 2019. Structural modelling in finite element analysis of deep excavation. Journal of GeoEngineering, 14 (3), 121–128.
   Google Scholar
• Likitlersuang, S., et al., 2018. Numerical modelling of railway embankments for high-speed train constructed on soft soil. Journal of GeoEngineering, 13 (3), 149–159.
   Google Scholar
• Likitlersuang, S., Surarak, C., and Balasubramaniam, A., 2015. Long-term behaviour prediction of the Bangkok MRT tunnels using simplified finite-element modelling. 15th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, ARC 2015: New Innovations and Sustainability Fukuoka, Japan, pp. 1507–1512.
   Google Scholar
• Likitlersuang, S., et al., 2014. Simplified finite-element modelling for tunnelling-induced settlements. Geotechnical Research, 1 (4), 133–152. doi:10.1680/gr.14.00016.
   Google Scholar
• Likitlersuang, S., et al., 2013a. Geotechnical parameters from pressuremeter tests for MRT Blue Line extension in Bangkok. Geomechanics & Engineering, 5 (2), 99–118. doi:10.12989/gae.2013.5.2.099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likitlersuang, S., et al., 2013b. Finite element analysis of a deep excavation: a case study from the Bangkok MRT. Soils and Foundations, 53 (5), 756–773. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2013.08.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likitlersuang, S., et al., 2013c. Small strain stiffness and stiffness degradation curve of Bangkok clays. Soils and Foundations, 53 (4), 498–509. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2013.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lueprasert, P., et al., 2015. Three dimensional finite element analysis for preliminary establishment of tunnel influence zone subject to pile loading. Maejo International Journal of Science & Technology, 9 (2), 209–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lueprasert, P., et al., 2017. Numerical investigation of tunnel deformation due to adjacent loaded pile and pile-soil-tunnel interaction. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 70, 166–181. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2017.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mašín, D., 2005. A hypoplastic constitutive model for clays. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 29 (4), 311–336. doi:10.1002/nag.416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitew-Czajewska, M., 2016. Evaluation of hypoplastic clay model for deep excavation modelling. Archives of Civil Engineering, 62 (4), 73–86. doi:10.1515/ace-2015-0098.
   Google Scholar
• MRT, 1998. Technical requirements for engineering works within the protection zone, Technical Report of MRT Authority for Chaloem Ratchamongkhon Line.
   Google Scholar
• Nawel, B. and Salah, M., 2015. Numerical modeling of two parallel tunnels interaction using three-dimensional finite elements method. Geomechanics & Engineering, 9 (6), 775–791. doi:10.12989/gae.2015.9.6.775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T.S. and Likitlersuang, S., 2021. Influence of the spatial variability of shear strength parameters on deep excavation analysis: a case study of a Bangkok underground MRT station. International Journal of Geomechanics, 21 (2), 04020248. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T.S., Ngamcharoen, K., and Likitlersuang, S., 2023. Statistical characterisation of the geotechnical properties of Bangkok Subsoil. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 41 (3), 2043–2063. doi:10.1007/s10706-023-02390-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, D.M., 2003. Numerical analysis: a virtual dream or practical reality? (42nd Rankine Lecture). Géotechnique, 53 (6), 535–573. doi:10.1680/geot.2003.53.6.535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surarak, C., et al., 2012. Stiffness and strength parameters for hardening soil model of soft and stiff Bangkok clays. Soils and Foundations, 52 (4), 682–697. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2012.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeer, P.A. and Brinkgreve, R., 1993. PLAXIS version 5 manual. Rotterdam, A.A. Balkema: Plaxis.
   Google Scholar
• Wongsaroj, J., Soga, K., and Mair, R.J., 2007. Modelling of long-term ground response to tunnelling under St Jame’s Park London. Géotechnique, 57 (1), 75–90. doi:10.1680/geot.2007.57.1.75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, W., Bauer, E., and Kolymbas, D., 1996. Hypoplastic constitutive model with critical state for granular materials. Mechanics of Materials, 23 (1), 45–69. doi:10.1016/0167-6636(96)00006-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar