New structural economics meets European transition

References

• Acemoglu, Daron. 2010. “Theory General Equilibrium and Political Economy in Development Economics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (3): 17–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, Daron, Philippe Aghion, and Fabrizio Zilibotti. 2006. “Distance to Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth.” Journal of the European Economic Association 4 (1): 37–74. 10.1162/jeea.2006.4.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, Daron, Tarek Hassan, and James Robinson. 2011. “Social Structure and Development: A Legacy of the Holocaust in Russia.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (2): 896–946.
   Google Scholar
• Aghion P., U. Akcigit, and P. Howitt. 2013. “What Do We Learn From Schumpeterian Growth Theory?” NBER Working Paper No. 188824. Cambridge, MA: The National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, Abhijit, and Esther Duflo. 2011. Poor Economics: A radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Sascha. 2011. “The Empire Is Dead, Long Live the Empire! Long-run Persistence of Trust and Corruption in the Bureaucracy.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 5584. Bonn: IZA.
   Google Scholar
• Berend, Ivan. 2003. History Derailed: Central and Eastern Europe in the Long Nineteenth Century. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berglof, Erik, and Patrick Bolton. 2002. “The Great Divide and Beyond – Financial Architecture in Transition.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (1): 77–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglof, Erik, and Gerard Roland, eds. 2007. Economics of Transition. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Berglof, Erik and Gerard Roland. 2000. “From Regatta to Big Bang: The Political Economy of EU Accession.” IMF Working Papers. Washington, DC: IMF.
   Google Scholar
• Berglof, Erik, Mike Burkart, Guido Friebel, and Elena Paltseva. 2012. “Clubs-in-the-club: Reform Under Unanimity.” Journal of Comparative Economics 40 (3): 492–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohle, D., and B. Greskovits. 2014. Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Studies in Political Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Campos, Nauro. 2015. Structural Change and Membership in the European Union. Journal of Economic Policy Reform.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, W., M. Schaffer, and P. Seabright. 2004. “A Minimum of Rivalry: Evidence from Transition Economies on the Importance of Competition for Innovation and Growth.” Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy 3 (1): 1–42, Article 17.
   Google Scholar
• Chenery, Hollis B. 1975. “The Structuralist Approach to Development Policy.” The American Economic Review 65 (2): 310–316. Papers and Proceedings.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djankov, Simeon, and Peter Murrell. 2002. “Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: A Quantitative Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association 40 (3): 739–792. 10.1257/jel.40.3.739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EBRD. 2011. Life in Transition - After the Crisis. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
   Google Scholar
• EBRD. 2013. Stuck in Transition, Transition Report. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
   Google Scholar
• EBRD. 2014. Transition Through Innovation, Transition Report. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Egorov, Georgy, Sergei Guriev, and Konstantin Sonin. 2009. “Why Resource-poor Dictators Allow Freer Media: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data.” American Political Science Review 103 (4): 645–668.10.1017/S0003055409990219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichengreen, Barry, Donghyun Park, and Kwanho Shin. 2013. “Growth Slowdowns Redux: New Evidence on the Middle-income Trap.” NBER Working Paper No. 18673. Cambridge, MA: The National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w18673
   Google Scholar
• Foray, Dominique. 2015. Smart Specialisation and Regional Innovation Policy: A EU experiment. Journal of Economic Policy Reform.
   Google Scholar
• Furtado, Carlos. 1964. Development and Underdevelopment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grosfeld, Irena, and Ekaterina Zhuravskaya. 2013. “Persistent and Non-persistent Effects of Empires: Evidence from the Partitions of Poland.” SSRN Working Paper. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Grosjean, Pauline. 2011. “The Institutional Legacy of the Ottoman Empire: Islamic Rule and Financial Development in South Eastern Europe.” Journal of Comparative Economics 39 (1): 1–16.10.1016/j.jce.2010.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosjean, Pauline. 2013. “Conflict and Social and Political Preferences: Evidence from World War II and Civil Conflict in 35 European countries.” Discussion Papers 2013–29. Sydney: School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Hausmann, R., and D. Rodrik. 2003. “Economic Development as Self-discovery.” Journal of Development Economics 72 (2): 603–633.10.1016/S0304-3878(03)00124-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, Albert. 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, Albert. 2013. The Essential Hirschman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekman, B., K. Maskus, and K. Saggi. 2005. “Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries: Unilateral and Multilateral Policy Options.” World Development 33 (10): 1587–1602.10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landesmann, Michael. forthcoming. Structural Dynamics of Europe’s Periphery – Which are the main issues? Journal of Economic Policy Reform.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Justin Yifu. 2012. New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development and Industrial Policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.10.1596/978-0-8213-8955-3
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Justin Yifu. 2015. “The Washington Consensus Revisited: A New Structural Economics Perspective.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 18 (2): 96–113. doi:10.1080/17487870.2014.936439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrdal, Gunnar. 1968. Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations. Allen Lane: The Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myrdal, Gunnar. 1969. Objectivity in Social Research. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Prebisch, Raúl. 1950. The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Prebisch, Raúl. 1959. “Commercial Policy in the Underdeveloped Countries.” American Economic Review 49: 251–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, Dani. 2004. “Industrial Policy for the Twenty-first Century.” KSG Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP04-047. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, Dani. 2008. “Normalizing Industrial Policy.” Working Paper No. 3. Washington, DC: Commission on Growth and Development, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, Dani. 2011. New Structural Economics. A Framework for Rethinking Development and Policy, 53–56. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Roland, Gerard. 2000. Transition and Economics – Politics, Markets and Firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shleifer, Andrei. 2012. Discussion of Acemoglu, at 50th Annivesrary of Institute of International Economic Studies at Stockholm University. http://www-2.iies.su.se/Nobel2012/Presentations/Shleifer.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, John. 1990. Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, John. 1997. “The Washington Consensus revisited.” In Economic and Social Development in the XXI Century, edited by Louis Emmerij, 48–61. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2008. Globalization and Technology Absorption in Europe and Central Asia: The Role of Trade, FDI, and Cross-border Knowledge Flows. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2012. China 2030: Building a Modern, Harmonious, and Creative High-income Society. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar