Consultations and the ECB as prudential regulator: enhancing legitimacy?

References

• Alemanno, A. 2015. “Stakeholder Engagement in Regulatory Policy.” In OECD: Regulatory Outlook www.ssrn.com.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A. 2010. “Restraining Regulatory Capture? Anglo-America, Crisis Politics and Trajectories of Change in Global Financial Governance.” International Affairs 86: 647–663. doi:10.1111/inta.2010.86.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R. 2006. “Still in Deficit: Rights, Regulation and Democracy in the EU.” European Law Journal 6: 725–742. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00344.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bieling, H.-J. 2015. “Shattered Expectations: The Defeat of European Ambitions of Global Financial Reform.” In Europe’s Place in Global Financial Governance after the Crisis, edited by D. Mügge, 31–51. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blinder, A., M. Ehrmann, M. Fratzscher, J. de Haan, and D.-J. Jansen. 2008. “Central Bank Communication and Monetary Policy: A Survey of Theory and Evidence.” ECB Working Paper Series 898, 74.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. W. 2015. “Financial Industry Mobilisation and Securities Markets Regulation in Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 54: 482–501. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2015.54.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase, P., and A. Schlosser. 2015. “Better Regulation – An Ongoing Journal.” European Journal of Risk Regulation 3: 378–379. doi:10.1017/S1867299X00004803.
   Google Scholar
• Culpepper, P. 2011. Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, D. 2003. “Private Interest Representation or Civil Society Deliberation. A Contemporary Dilemma for European Union Governance.” Social & Legal Studies 55–75. doi:10.1177/096466390301200103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. 2006. On Political Equality. Yale: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Larosière Group. February 25, 2009. The High Level Group on Financial Supervision in the EU. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsche Börse Group. 2017. “Public Consultation on Harmonising the Exercise of Options and Discretions by NCAs in Relation to Less Significant Institutions,” January 3. https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/legalframework/publiccons/pdf/ond_lsi/ond_lsi_comment_3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ECB. October, 2014. Analysis of costs and benefits. Feedback statement. Responses to the public consultation on the draft Regulation of the European Central Bank on supervisory fees.
   Google Scholar
• ECB. March, 2015. Banking supervision: ECB annual report on supervisory activities 2014. https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/ecb/pub/pdf/ssmar2014.en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ECB. 2016a. “Public Consultation on the Draft ECB Guidance on Leveraged Transactions”. www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/legalframework/publiccons/html/leveraged_transactions.en.html
   Google Scholar
• ECB. 2016b. “Public Consultation on the Draft Guidance on Leveraged Transactions. Questions and Answers”. https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/legalframework/publiccons/pdf/leveraged_transactions/leveraged_transactions_qa.en.pdf?cadbf3a64ccf59e7c06ab7878e23f43c
   Google Scholar
• ECB. March, 2017. Overview and analysis of responses. Feedback statement. Responses to the public consultation on the draft ECB guidance to banks on non-performing loans.
   Google Scholar
• European Association of Co-operative Banks. 2014. “EACB Position Paper on ECB Draft SSM Framework Regulation,” March 7. https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/legalframework/publiccons/pdf/framework/CP1-FrameworkRegulationConsultation-025.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2001. “European Governance – A White Paper”, COM(2001) 428 final, (12 October 2001) OJ C 287.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. “Chapter Vii Guidelines on Stakeholder Consultation,” SWD(2015) 111. http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/guidelines/ug_chap7_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• Fazi, E., and J. Smith. 2006. “Civil Dialogue: Making It Work Better.” Civil Society Group. 96 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrarini, G. 2015. “Single Supervision and the Governance of Banking Markets.” European Business Organization Law Review 3: 513–537. doi:10.1007/s40804-015-0018-7.
   Google Scholar
• Ferri, D. 2013. “European Citizens… Mind the Gap! Some Reflections on Participatory Democracy in the EU.” Perspectives on Federalism 3: 56–87.
   Google Scholar
• Finance Watch. 2016. “Representation of the Public Interest in Banking,” December. http://www.finance-watch.org/our-work/events/1284-public-interest-banking
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., and D. Thompson. 2003. “Democracy and Disagreement.” In The Democracy Sourcebook, edited by R. A. Dahl, I. Shapiro, and J. A. Cheibub, 18–24. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helleiner, E. 2012. “The Limits of Incrementalism: The G20, FSB and the International Regulatory Agenda.” Journal of Globalization and Development 2: 1–19. doi:10.1515/1948-1837.1242.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S. 2008. What’s Wrong with the EU and How to Fix It. Cornwall: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houben, R., and W. Vandenbruwaene, eds. 2016. Het nieuwe bankentoezicht – The New Banking Supervision. Antwerp: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B. 2009. “The Three Worlds of European Civil Society —— What Role for Civil Society for What Kind of Europe?” Policy and Society 1: 47–57. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.02.005.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B. 2012. “Post-Maastricht Civil Society and Participatory Democracy.” Journal of European Integration 7: 809–824. doi:10.1080/07036337.2012.726016.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B., and B. Finke. 2007. “The Institutional Shaming of EU-Society Relations: A Contribution to Democracy via Participation?” Journal of Civil Society 3: 205–221. doi:10.1080/17448680701775630.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B., C. Humrich, and B. Finke. July 9–13, 2006. ”Enhancing Multi-Level Democracy by Organizing Civil Society Input.” Paper presented at the 20th IMSA Worl Congress, Fukuoka.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B., C. Quittkat, V. Buth, and C. Altides, eds. 2013. De-Mystification of Participatory Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Labitzke, J. 2012. “Consultation Processes as a Practice of Legitimacy in the EU Legislative Process.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 3: 323–336. doi:10.1080/14782804.2012.711157.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, T. 2016 “Lobbying on Regulatory Enforcement Actions: Evidence from Banking.” CEB Working Paper, 17. https://s.ssrn.com/sol3/s.cfm?abstract_id=2517235
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. 1998. “Europe’s ‘Democratic Deficit’: The Question of Standards.” European Law Journal 1: 5–28. doi:10.1111/1468-0386.00040.
   Google Scholar
• Marxsen, C. 2015. “Open Stakeholder Consultations at the European Level – Voice of the Citizens?” European Law Journal 21 (2): 257–280. doi:10.1111/eulj.2015.21.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes, C. H. 2013. Constitutional Courts and Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, J. 2011. “Participation and the Role of after Lisbon: A Legal View on Article 11TEU.” Common Market Law Review 6: 1849–1877.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance of Finland. 2014. “Framework Regulation Consultation – Comments by Ministry of Finance of Finland,” March 7. https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/legalframework/publiccons/pdf/framework/CP1-FrameworkRegulationConsultation-037.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moschella, M. 2011. “Searching for a Fix for International Financial Markets: The European Union and Domestic Politico-Economic Changes.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 1: 97–112. doi:10.1080/14782804.2011.554198.
   Google Scholar
• Pachl, U. 2015. “Repercussions of the European Commission’s Better Regulation Agenda on Consumer Interest and Policy.” European Journal of Risk Regulation 3: 375–377. doi:10.1017/S1867299X00004797.
   Google Scholar
• Pagliari, S., and K. Young. 2014. “Leveraged Interests: Financial Industry Power and the Role of Private Sector Coalitions.” Review of International Political Economy 3: 575–610. doi:10.1080/09692290.2013.819811.
   Google Scholar
• Pesendorfer, D. 2015. “Capital Markets Union and Ending Short-Termism: Lessons from the European Commission’s Public Consultation.” Law and Financial Markets Review 3: 202–209. doi:10.1080/17521440.2015.1084562.
   Google Scholar
• Popelier, P., R. Van Gestel, R. Van Aeken, V. Verlinden, and P. Van Humbeeck. 2008. Consultaties in de wetgevingspraktijk. Een zoektocht naar internationale best practices: SIGMA-Reeks voor social en public management. Brussels: Politeia.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, E. 2010. “Is a European Approach to Financial Regulation Emerging from the Crisis?” In Global Finance in Crisis. The Politics of International Regulatory Change, edited by E. Helleiner, S. Pagliari, and H. Zimmermann, 108–120. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Quaglia, L. 2010. “Completing the Single Market in Financial Services: The Politics of Competing Advocacy Coalitions.” Journal of European Public Policy 7: 1007–1022. doi:10.1080/13501763.2010.499239.
   Google Scholar
• Quittkat, C. 2011. “The European Commission’s Online Consultations: A Success Story?” Journal of Common Market Studies 3: 653–674. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02147.x.
   Google Scholar
• Quittkat, C. 2013. “New Instruments Serving Democracy: Do Online Consultations Benefit Civil Society?” In De-Mystification of Participatory Democracy, edited by B. Kohler-Koch, C. Quittkat, V. Buth, and C. Altides, 85–113. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., and M. Kleine. 2007. “Assessing the Legitimacy of the EU’s Treaty Revision Methods.” Journal of Common Market Studies 1: 69–80. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00703.x.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2013. “Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput.” Political Studies 2–22. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thirkell-White, B. 2009. “Dealing with Banks: Populism and the Public Interest in the Global Financial Crisis.” International Affairs 85: 689–711. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2009.00823.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissink, L., T. Duijkersloot, and R. Widdershoven. 2014. “Shifts in Competences between Member States and The Eu in The New Supervisory System for Credit Institutions and Their Consequences for Judicial Protection.” Utrecht Law Review 10: 92-115. doi.10.18352/ulr.303.
   Google Scholar
• Wymeersch, E. 2007. “The Structure of Financial Supervision in Europe: About Single, Twin Peaks and Multiple Financial Supervisors.” European Business Organization Law Review 2: 237–306. doi:10.1017/S1566752907002376.
   Google Scholar
• Young, K. 2013. “Financial Industry Groups’ Adaption to the Post-Crisis Regulatory Environment: Changing Approaches to the Policy Cycle.” Regulation & Governance 7: 460–480. doi:10.1111/rego.12025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar