Shifting modes of service delivery in Dutch local government

References

• Bel, G., and A. Costas. 2006. “Do Public Sector Reforms Get Rusty? an Empirical Analysis on Privatization of Solid Waste Collection.” Journal of Policy Reform 9: 1–24. doi:10.1080/13841280500513084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and X. Fageda. 2011. “Big Guys Eat Big Cakes: Firm Size and Contracting in Urban and Rural Areas.” International Public Management Journal 14 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 4–26. doi:10.1080/10967494.2011.547746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., X. Fageda, and M. E. Warner. 2010. “Is Private Production of Public Services Cheaper than Public Production? A Meta-Regression Analysis of Solid Waste and Water Services.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 29 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 553–577. doi:10.1002/pam.v29:3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., and M. Potoksi. 2005. “Transaction Costs and Contracting: The Practitioner Perspective.” Public Performance and Management Review 28 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 326–351.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., and M. Potoski. 2003. “Transaction Costs and Institutional Explanations for Government Service Production Decisions.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 441–468. doi:10.1093/jopart/mug030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., M. Potoski, and D. M. van Slyke. 2008. “Changing Modes of Service Delivery: How past Choices Structure Future Choices.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 127–143. doi:10.1068/c0633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, J. B., K. LeRoux, and M. Shrestha. 2009. “Institutional Ties, Transaction Costs and External Service Production.” Urban Affairs Review 44 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 403–427. doi:10.1177/1078087408323939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demuth, J., H. W. Friederiszick, and S. Reinhold. 2018. “Reverse Privatization as a Reaction to the Competitive Environment: Evidence from Solid Waste Collection in Germany.” ESMT Working Paper 18–02 . doi:10.1142/S2424835518500029.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkgraaf, E., and R. H. J. M. Gradus. 2007. “Collusion in the Dutch Waste Market.” Local Government Studies 33 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 573–588. doi:10.1080/03003930701417601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gradus, R. H. J. M., and E. Dijkgraaf. 2019. “Poorer and Less Political Fragmented Dutch Municipalities Take Tighter Waste Reduction Decisions.” Waste Management 88 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 328–336. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.059.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gradus, R. H. J. M., E. Dijkgraaf, and M. Schoute. 2016. “Is There Still Collusion in the Dutch Waste Market?” Local Government Studies 42 (5Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 689–697. doi:10.1080/03003930.2016.1194267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gradus, R. H. J. M., E. Dijkgraaf, and M. W. Wassenaar. 2014. “Understanding Mixed Forms of Refuse Collection, Privatisation and Its Reverse in the Netherlands.” International Public Management Journal 17 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 328–343. doi:10.1080/10967494.2014.935237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gradus, R. H. J. M., and G. T. Budding. In Press. “Political and Institutional Explanations for Increasing Re-Municipalization.” Urban Affairs Review. will appear in. doi:10.1177/1078087418787907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groot, T. L. C. M., and G. T. Budding. 2004. “The Influence of New Public Management Practices on Product Costing and Service Pricing Decisions in Dutch Municipalities.” Financial Accountability & Management 20 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 421–443. doi:10.1111/fam.2004.20.issue-4.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D., E. Lobina, and P. Terhorst. 2013. “Re-Municipalisation in the Early Twenty-First Century: Water in France and Energy in Germany.” International Review of Applied Economics 27 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 193–214. doi:10.1080/02692171.2012.754844.
   Google Scholar
• Hefetz, A., and M. E. Warner. 2004. “Privatization and Its Reverse: Explaining the Dynamics of the Government Contracting Process.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 171–190. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefetz, A., and M. E. Warner. 2007. “Beyond the Market versus Planning Dichotomy: Understanding Privatisation and Its Reverse in US Cities.” Local Government Studies 33 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 555–572. doi:10.1080/03003930701417585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefetz, A., and M. E. Warner. 2012. “Contracting or Public Delivery? The Importance Of Service, Market, and Management Characteristics.” Journal Of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 289-317. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mur006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, J., and S. Tadelis. 2010. “Contracting for Government Services: Theory and Evidence for US Cities.” Journal of Industrial Economics 58 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 507–541. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6451.2010.00430.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoute, M., G. T. Budding, and R. H. J. M. Gradus. 2018. “Municipalities’ Choices of Service Delivery Modes: The Influence of Service, Political, Governance and Financial Characteristics.” International Public Management Journal 21 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 502–532. doi:10.1080/10967494.2017.1297337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, R. M. 1990. Urban Alternatives: Public and Private Markets in the Provision of Local Services. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tavares, A. 2017. “Ten Years After: Revisiting the Determinants of the Adoption of Municipal Corporations for Local Service Delivery.” Local Government Studies 43 (5Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 697–706. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017.1356723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorn, B., M. L. van Genugten, and S. van Thiel. 2017. “The Efficiency and Effectiveness of Municipally Owned Corporations: A Systematic Review.” Local Government Studies 43 (5Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 820–841. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017.1319360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E. 2016. “Pragmatic Publics in the Heartland of Capitalism: Local Services in the United States.” In Making Public in a Privatized World: The Struggle for Essential Services, edited by D. A. McDonald, 189–202. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., and A. Hefetz. 2012. “Insourcing and Outsourcing: The Dynamics of Privatization among U.S. Municipalities 2002-2007.” Journal of the American Planning Association 78 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 313–327. doi:10.1080/01944363.2012.715552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassenaar, M. W., T. L. C. M. Groot, and R. H. J. M. Gradus. 2013. “Municipalities’ Contracting Out Decisions: An Empirical Study on Motives.” Local Government Studies 39 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 414–434. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.778830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar