Addressing public-value failure: remunicipalization as acts of public entrepreneurship

References

• Bel, G., and A. Costas. 2006. “Do Public Sector Reforms Get Rusty? Local Privatization in Spain.” Journal of Policy Reform 9 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 1–24. doi:10.1080/13841280500513084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and X. Fageda. 2007. “Why Do Local Governments Privatise Public Services? A Survey of Empirical Studies.” Local Government Studies 33 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 517–534. doi:10.1080/03003930701417528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., X. Fageda, and M. Mur. 2013. “Why Do Municipalities Cooperate to Provide Local Public Services? an Empirical Analysis.” Local Government Studies 39 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 435–454. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.781024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., R. Hebdon, and M. Warner. 2007. “Local Government Reform: Privatisation and Its Alternatives.” Local Government Studies 33 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 507–515. doi:10.1080/03003930701417460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., R. Hebdon, and M. Warner. 2018. “Beyond Privatisation and Cost Savings: Alternatives for Local Government Reform.” Local Government Studies 44 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 173–182. doi:10.1080/03003930.2018.1428190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belloc, F. 2014. “Innovation in State-Owned Enterprises: Reconsidering the Conventional Wisdom.” Journal of Economic Issues 48 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 821–848. doi:10.2753/JEI0021-3624480311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernier, L. 2014. “Public Enterprises as Policy Instruments: The Importance of Public Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 17 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 253–266. doi:10.1080/17487870.2014.909312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, R. C. 1999. “Running Government like a Business: Implications for Public Administration Theory and Practice.” The American Review of Public Administration 29 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 19–43. doi:10.1177/02750749922064256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. 2002. “Public-Value Failure: When Efficient Markets May Not Do.” Public Administration Review 62 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 145–161. doi:10.1111/puar.2002.62.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., M. Potoski, and D. M. Van Slyke. 2008. “Changing Modes of Service Delivery: How past Choices Structure Future Choices.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 127–143. doi:10.1068/c0633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, J., D. D. Fuentes, and M. Warner. 2016. “The Loss of Public Values When Public Shareholders Go Abroad.” Utilities Policy 40 (JuneRe-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 134–143. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2015.11.003.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, H., V. Bekkers, and L. Tummers. 2016. “Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda.” Public Administration 94 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 146–166. doi:10.1111/padm.2016.94.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehoog, R. 1990. “Competition, Negotiation, or Cooperation: Three Models for Service Contracting.” Administration and Society 22 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 317–340. doi:10.1177/009539979002200303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., H. Margetts, S. Bastow, and J. Tinkler. 2006. “New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 467–494. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, C., G. Jones, A. Lawton, and N. Llewellyn. 2002. “Public Entrepreneurship: Rhetoric, Reality, and Context.” International Journal of Public Administration 25 (12Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 1539–1554. doi:10.1081/PAD-120014260.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, I. 2016. “Welfare States and Environmental States: A Comparative Analysis.” Environmental Politics 25 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 24–47. doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1074382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gradus, R. H. J. M., E. Dijkgraaf, and M. Wassenaar. 2014. “Understanding Mixed Forms of Refuse Collection, Privatization and Its Reverse in the Netherlands.” International Public Management Journal 17 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 328–343. doi:10.1080/10967494.2014.935237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D., E. Lobina, and P. Terhorst. 2013. “Re-Municipalisation in the Early Twenty-First Century: Water in France and Energy in Germany.” International Review of Applied Economics 27 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 193–214. doi:10.1080/02692171.2012.754844.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, O., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1997. “The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and an Application to Prisons.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 1127–1161. doi:10.1162/003355300555448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. 2005. “Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present.” Public Money and Management 25 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 27–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebdon, R., and P. Jalette. 2008. “The Restructuring of Municipal Services: A Canada – United States Comparison.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 144–158. doi:10.1068/c0634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefetz, A., and M. E. Warner. 2004. “Privatization and Its Reverse: Explaining the Dynamics of the Government Contracting Process.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 171–190. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefetz, A., and M. E. Warner. 2012. “Contracting or Public Delivery? the Importance of Service, Market, and Management Characteristics.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 289–317. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration 69 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 3–19. doi:10.1111/padm.1991.69.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., and G. Peters. 2004. “The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 267–282. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, T. B., and B. Bozeman. 2002. “Public Values Lost? Comparing Cases on Contracting Out from Denmark and the United States.” Public Management Review 4 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 63–81. doi:10.1080/14616670110101681.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., and M. E. Warner. 2016. “Pragmatic Municipalism: Local Government Service Delivery after the Great Recession.” Public Administration 94 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 789–805. doi:10.1111/padm.2016.94.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirzner, I. M. 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kishimoto, S., and O. Petitjeaneds. 2017. Reclaiming Public Services: How Cities and Citizens are Turning Back Privatization. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, P. G., J. T. Mahoney, A. M. McGahan, and C. N. Pitelis. 2010. “Toward a Theory of Public Entrepreneurship.” European Management Review 7 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 1–15. doi:10.1057/emr.2010.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, M., and M. Fritz. 2014. “Building the Eco-Social State: Do Welfare Regimes Matter?” Journal of Social Policy 43 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 679–703. doi:10.1017/S004727941400035X.
   Google Scholar
• Lamothe, S., M. Lamothe, and R. C. Feiock. 2008. “Examining Local Government Service Delivery Arrangements over Time.” Urban Affairs Review 44 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 27–56. doi:10.1177/1078087408315801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A. 1999. “Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data.” Academy of Management Review 24 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 691–710. doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen, A. H., F. Gertsen, and J. O. Riis. 2006. “The Nexus of Corporate Entrepreneurship and Radical Innovation.” Creativity and Innovation Management 15 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 359–372.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, C., and M. E. Warner. 2019. “Power Asymmetries and Limits to Eminent Domain: The Case of Missoula Water’s Municipalization.” Water Alternatives 12 (2): 394–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marie, T. T. 2016. “Public Values as Essential Criteria for Public Entrepreneurship: Water Management in France.” Utilities Policy 40 (JuneRe-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 162–169. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2016.02.005.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S., and J. T. Scott. 2000. “The Nature of Innovation Market Failure and the Design of Public Support for Private Innovation.” Research Policy 29 (4–5Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 437–447. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00084-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, D. A. 2018. “Remunicipalization: The Future of Water Services?” Geoforum 91 (MayRe-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 47–56. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.027.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M. 2007. “Motivation of Politicians and Long-Term Policies.” Public Choice 132 (3–4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 47–56. doi:10.1007/s11127-007-9151-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., and T. Gaebler. 1993. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-López, G., D. Prior, and J. L. Zafra-Gómez. 2015. “Rethinking New Public Management Delivery Forms and Efficiency: Long-Term Effects in Spanish Local Government.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 1157–1183. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, O. H., V. Lember, W. Scherrer, and R. Ågren. 2016. “The Role of Private Actors in Public Sector Innovation.” In Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance, edited by J. Torfing and P. Triantafillou, 197–214. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, J. B. 1979. “Technological Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Strategy.” Sloan Management Review 20 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny. 1994. “Politicians and Firms.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 995–1025. doi:10.2307/2118354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2011. “Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector.” Administration and Society 43 (8Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 842–868. doi:10.1177/0095399711418768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining, A. R., and D. L. Weimer. 1999. “Inefficiency in Public Organizations.” International Public Management Journal 2 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 1–24. doi:10.1016/S1096-7494(00)87429-2.
   Google Scholar
• Voorn, B., M. Van Genugten, and S. Van Thiel. 2019. A Re-Municipalization Interpretation: Finding Equilibrium. Journal of Economic Policy Reform.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M., and R. Hebdon. 2001. “Local Government Restructuring: Privatization and Its Alternatives.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 315–336. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., and A. M. Aldag. 2019. Re-Municipalization in the US: A Pragmatic Response to Contracting. Journal of Economic Policy Reform. doi:10.1080/17487870.2019.1646133.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., and A. Hefetz. 2012. “Insourcing and Outsourcing.” Journal of the American Planning Association 78 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 313–327. doi:10.1080/01944363.2012.715552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollmann, H., H. Baldersheim, G. Citroni, G. Marcou, and J. McEldowney. 2010. “From Public Service to Commodity: The De-Municipalization (And Re-Municipalization?) of Energy Provision in Germany, Italy, France, the UK and Norway.” In The Provision of Public Services in Europe – Between State, Local Government and Market, edited by H. Wollmann and G. Marcau, 168–190. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar