Re-interpreting re-municipalization: finding equilibrium

References

• Aars, J., and H.-E. Ringkjøb. 2011. “Local Democracy Ltd: The Political Control of Local Government Enterprises in Norway.” Public Management Review 13 (6Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 825–844. doi:10.1080/14719037.2010.539110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albalate, D., and G. Bel. 2019. “Politicians, Bureaucrats and the Public-private Choice in Public Service Delivery: Anybody There Pushing for Remunicipalization?“ In Workshop Re-munipalization of municipal services in Europe and US: a trend or a hype? Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Alchian, A. A. 1965. “Some Economics of Property Rights.” Il Politico 30 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 816–829.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., L. Ferry, C. Skelcher, and P. Wegorowski. 2019. “Corporatization in the Public Sector: Explaining the Growth of Local Government Companies.” Public Administration Review. onlinefirst. doi:10.1111/puar.13052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, H. 2012. Rekommunalisierung Öffentlicher Daseinsvorsorge. Potsdam, Germany: Universität Potsdam.
   Google Scholar
• ____. 2015. “The City of Potsdam: Between Privatization and Remunicipalization: Local Experiences and General Aspects on the Road to Publicization.” European Public Law 21 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 723–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S., R. Beveridge, and M. Naumann. 2015. ““Remunicipalization in German Cities: Contesting Neo-liberalism and Reimagining Urban Governance?”.” Space and Polity 19 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 76–90. doi:10.1080/13562576.2014.991119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S., T. Blanchet, and C. Kunze. 2016. “Social Movements and Urban Energy Policy: Assessing Contexts, Agency and Outcomes of Remunicipalisation Processes in Hamburg and Berlin.” Utilities Policy 41: 228–236. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2016.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S., M. Naumann, and T. Moss. 2017. “Between Coproduction and Commons: Understanding Initiatives to Reclaim Urban Energy Provision in Berlin and Hamburg.” Urban Research & Practice 10 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 63–85. doi:10.1080/17535069.2016.1156735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and A. Costas. 2006. “Do Public Sector Reforms Get Rusty? Local Privatization in Spain.” The Journal of Policy Reform 9 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 1–24. doi:10.1080/13841280500513084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and X. Fageda. 2007. “Why Do Local Governments Privatise Public Services? A Survey of Empirical Studies.” Local Government Studies 33 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 517–534. doi:10.1080/03003930701417528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ____. 2009. “Factors Explaining Local Privatization: A Meta-regression Analysis.” Public Choice 139 (1–2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 105–119. doi:10.1007/s11127-008-9381-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., R. Hebdon, and M. E. Warner. 2018. “Beyond Privatisation and Cost Savings: Alternatives for Local Government Reform.” Local Government Studies 44 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 173–182. doi:10.1080/03003930.2018.1428190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and M. E. Warner. 2008. “Does Privatization of Solid Waste and Water Services Reduce Costs? A Review of Empirical Studies.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52 (12Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 1337–1348. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergh, A., G. Erlingsson, A. Gustafsson, and E. Wittberg. 2018. “Municipally Owned Enterprises as Danger Zones for Corruption? How Politicians Having Feet in Two Camps May Undermine Conditions for Accountability.” Public Integrity. onlinefirst. doi:10.1080/10999922.2018.1522182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beveridge, R., F. Hüesker, and M. Naumann. 2014. “From Post-politics to a Politics of Possibility? Unravelling the Privatization of the Berlin Water Company.” Geoforum 51 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 66–74. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.09.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beveridge, R., and M. Naumann. 2014. “Global Norms, Local Contestation: Privatisation and De/politicisation in Berlin.” Policy & Politics 42 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 275–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdeaux, C. 2008. “Politics versus Professionalism: The Effect of Institutional Structure on Democratic Decision Making in a Contested Policy Arena.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 349–373. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boycko, M., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1996. “A Theory of Privatisation.” The Economic Journal 106 (435Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 309–319. doi:10.2307/2235248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, E., S. Saussier, and B. S. Silverman. 2015. “Water under the Bridge: City Size, Bargaining Power, Price and Franchise Renewals in the Provision of Water.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 31 (1, suppl_1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 3–39. doi:10.1093/jleo/ewv010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citroni, G., A. Lippi, and S. Profeti. 2013. “Remapping the State: Inter-municipal Cooperation through Corporatisation and Public-private Governance Structures.” Local Government Studies 39 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 208–234. doi:10.1080/03003930.2012.707615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, J., and D.-F. Daniel. 2018. “The State and Public Corporations.” In Handbook of the International Political Economy of the Corporation, edited by A. Nölke and C. May, 106–119. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cumbers, A. 2012. Reclaiming Public Ownership: Making Space for Economic Democracy. London, UK: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Demuth, J., H. W. Friederiszick, and S. Reinhold. 2019. “Reverse Privatization as a Reaction to the Competitive Environment: Evidence from Solid Waste Collection in Germany.” In Workshop Re-munipalization of Municipal Services in Europe and US: A Trend or a Hype?. Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkgraaf, E., and R. H. J. M. Gradus. 2007. “Collusion in the Dutch Waste Collection Market.” Local Government Studies 33 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 573–588. doi:10.1080/03003930701417601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ____. 2011. “Efficiency Effects of Privatising Refuse Collection: Be Careful and Alternatives Present.” Tinbergen Discussion Paper 11-156/3.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkgraaf, E., R. H. J. M. Gradus, and B. Melenberg. 2003. “Contracting Out Refuse Collection.” Empirical Economics 28 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 553–570. doi:10.1007/s001810200145.
   Google Scholar
• Domberger, S., and P. Jensen. 1997. “Contracting Out by the Public Sector: Theory, Evidence, Prospects.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 13 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 67–78. doi:10.1093/oxrep/13.4.67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domberger, S., and S. Rimmer. 1994. “Competitive Tendering and Contracting in the Public Sector: A Survey.” International Journal of the Economics of Business 1 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 439–453. doi:10.1080/758536232.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., and C. Hood. 1994. “From Old Public Administration to New Public Management.” Public Money & Management 14 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 9–16. doi:10.1080/09540969409387823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estache, A., and E. Grifell-Tatjé. 2010. “Assessing the Impact of Mali’s Water Privatization across Stakeholders.” Working Papers. ECARES
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, L., R. Andrews, C. Skelcher, and P. Wegorowski. 2018. “New Development: Corporatization of Local Authorities in England in the Wake of Austerity 2010–2016.” Public Money & Management 38 (6Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 477–480. doi:10.1080/09540962.2018.1486629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florio, M., and F. Fecher. 2011. “The Future of Public Enterprises: Contributions to a New Discourse.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 82 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 361–373. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8292.2011.00445.x.
   Google Scholar
• González-Gómez, F., and M. A. García-Rubio. 2018. “Prices and Ownership in the Water Urban Supply: A Critical Review.” Urban Water Journal 15 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 259–268. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2018.1436187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Gómez, F., M. A. García-Rubio, and J. González-Martínez. 2014. “Beyond the Public–Private Controversy in Urban Water Management in Spain.” Utilities Policy 31 (CRe-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2014.07.004.
   Google Scholar
• Gradus, R. H. J. M., E. Dijkgraaf, and M. Wassenaar. 2014. “Understanding Mixed Forms of Refuse Collection, Privatization, and Its Reverse in the Netherlands.” International Public Management Journal 17 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 328–343. doi:10.1080/10967494.2014.935237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gradus, R. H. J. M., M. Schoute, and T. Budding. 2019. “Remunicipalisation and Cooperation in the Netherlands: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform. online first.
   Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., and C. Reichard. 2008. “Municipal Corporatization in Germany and Italy.” Public Management Review 10 (5Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 597–617. doi:10.1080/14719030802264275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D. 2012. “Re-municipalising municipal services in Europe.” Public Services International Research Unit. .
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D., and E. Lobina. 2012. “Water Companies and Trends in Europe 2012.” .
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D., E. Lobina, and V. Corral. 2010. “Replacing Failed Private Water Contracts.” PSIRU Report.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D., E. Lobina, and R. D. L. Motte. 2005. “Public Resistance to Privatisation in Water and Energy.” Development Practice 15 (3–4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 286–301. doi:10.1080/09614520500076126.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D., E. Lobina, and P. Terhorst. 2013. “Re-municipalisation in the Early Twenty-first Century: Water in France and Energy in Germany.” International Review of Applied Economics 27 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 193–214. doi:10.1080/02692171.2012.754844.
   Google Scholar
• Hefetz, A., and M. E. Warner. 2004. “Privatization and Its Reverse: Explaining the Dynamics of the Government Contracting Process.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 171–190. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ____. 2007. “Beyond the Market versus Planning Dichotomy: Understanding Privatisation and Its Reverse in US Cities.” Local Government Studies 33 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 555–572. doi:10.1080/03003930701417585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ____. 2019. “Contracting Dynamics and Unionization: Managing Labor, Political Interests and Markets.” Local Government Studies. onlinefirst. doi:10.1080/03003930.2019.1670167.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, C. J. 2009. “Third-party Governance under No Child Left Behind: Accountability and Performance Management Challenges.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (suppl_1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): i59–i80. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup035.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, W. Z. 1995a. “Contracting Out by Urban Governments: A Review.” Urban Affairs Quarterly 30 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 458–472. doi:10.1177/107808749503000307.
   Google Scholar
• ____. 1995b. “Factors Important in Local Governments’ Privatization Decisions.” Urban Affairs Review 31 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 226–243. doi:10.1177/107808749503100206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, G. A. 2000. Privatization: An International Review of Performance. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Höffler, F., C. Schaefer, M. T. Ulf Papenfuß, W. Rosenfeld, and G. Landsberg. 2013. ““Rekommunalisierung: Renaissance Öffentlicher Unternehmen?”.” Wirtschaftsdienst 93 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 71–86. doi:10.1007/s10273-013-1489-1.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 1995. “The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (2–3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 93–109. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., and M. E. Warner. 2016. “Pragmatic Municipalism: Local Government Service Delivery after the Great Recession.” Public Administration 94 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 789–805. doi:10.1111/padm.12267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishimoto, S., E. Lobina, and O. Petitjean. 2015. Our Public Water Future: The Global Experience with Remunicipalisation. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kishimoto, S., and O. Petitjean. 2017. Reclaiming Public Services: How Cities and Citizens are Turning Back Privatization. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, T., and S. Van Thiel. 2019. “Perceived Managerial Autonomy in Municipally Owned Corporations: Disentangling the Impact of Output Control, Process Control, and Policy-profession Conflict.” Public Management Review 21 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 187–211. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1473472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffont, J.-J., and J. Tirole. 1991. “The Politics of Government Decision-making: A Theory of Regulatory Capture.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 1089–1127. doi:10.2307/2937958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Strat, A. 2014. “Discussion – The Remunicipalization of Paris’s Water Supply Service: A Successful Reform.” Water Policy 16 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 197–204. doi:10.2166/wp.2013.085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibenstein, H. 1966. “Allocative Efficiency Vs. “ X-efficiency”.” American Economic Review 56 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 392–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholst, A. C., O. H. Petersen, and K. Houlberg. 2018. “Contracting Out Local Road and Park Services: Economic Effects and Their Strategic, Contractual and Competitive Conditions.” Local Government Studies 44 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 64–85. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017.1398647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowery, D. 1998. “Consumer Sovereignty and Quasi-market Failure.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 137–172. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024376.
   Google Scholar
• Magdahl, J. E. 2012. From Privatisation to Corporatisation: Exploring the Strategic Shift in Neoliberal Policy on Urban Water Services. Oslo, Norway: FIVAS, Association for International Water Studies.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, D. A. 2014. “Public Ambiguity and the Multiple Meanings of Corporatization.” In Rethinking Corporatization and Public Services in the Global South, edited by D. A. McDonald, 1–30. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• ____. 2016. Making Public in a Privatized World: The Struggle for Essential Services. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• ____. 2018. ““Remunicipalization: The Future of Water Services?”.” Geoforum 91 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 47–56. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.027.
   Google Scholar
• Migué, J.-L., G. Belanger, and W. A. Niskanen. 1974. “Toward a General Theory of Managerial Discretion.” Public Choice 17 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 27–47. doi:10.1007/BF01718995.
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W. A. 1968. “The Peculiar Economics of Bureaucracy.” The American Economic Review 58 (2): 293–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ____. 1975. “Bureaucrats and Politicians.” The Journal of Law and Economics 18 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 617–643. doi:10.1086/466829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohemeng, F. K., and J. K. Grant. 2008. “When Markets Fail to Deliver: An Examination of the Privatization and De‐privatization of Water and Wastewater Services Delivery in Hamilton, Canada.” Canadian Public Administration 51 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 475–499. doi:10.1111/j.1754-7121.2008.00034.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. 2006. ““The New Public Governance?”.” Public Management Review 8 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 377–388. doi:10.1080/14719030600853022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, F. C. 2018. “Deep Entanglements: History, Space and (Energy) Struggle in the German Energiewende.” Geoforum 91 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.017.
   Google Scholar
• Pérard, E. 2009. “Water Supply: Public or Private?: An Approach Based on Cost of Funds, Transaction Costs, Efficiency and Political Costs.” Political Society 27 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 193–219.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-López, G., D. Prior, and J. L. Zafra-Gómez. 2015. “Rethinking New Public Management Delivery Forms and Efficiency: Long-term Effects in Spanish Local Government.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 1157–1183. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigeon, M., D. A. McDonald, O. Hoedeman, and S. Kishimoto. 2012. Remunicipalisation: Putting Water Back into Public Hands. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 2003. The Essential Public Manager. Buckingham: Open University Press/McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Röber, M. 2018. “Rekommunalisierung.” In Voigt, R. (ed.), Handbuch Staat, 1193–1201. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Routledge, P., A. Cumbers, and K. D. Derickson. 2018. “States of Just Transition: Realising Climate Justice through and against the State.” Geoforum 88 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 78–86. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.015.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Villaverde, A., and M. A. García-Rubio. 2017. “Public Participation in European Water Management: From Theory to Practice.” Water Resource Management 31 (8Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 2479–2495. doi:10.1007/s11269-016-1355-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Villaverde, A., F. González-Gómez, and A. J. Picazo-Tadeo. 2015. “The Privatisation of Urban Water Services: Theory and Empirical Evidence in the Case of Spain.” Investigaciones Regionales 31 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 157–174.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Villaverde, A., A. J. Picazo-Tadeo, and F. González-Gómez. 2013. “The Social Choice of Privatising Urban Water Services: A Case Study of Madrid in Spain.” Working Paper. Valencia, Spain: Universidad de Valencia.
   Google Scholar
• Savas, E. S. 1987. Privatization: The Key to Better Government. Chatham: Chatham House Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Sclar, E. D. 2001. You Don’t Always Get What You Pay For: The Economics of Privatization. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny. 1994. “Politicians and Firms.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 995–1025. doi:10.2307/2118354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares, A. F. 2017. “Ten Years After: Revisiting the Determinants of the Adoption of Municipal Corporations for Local Service Delivery.” Local Government Studies 43 (5Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 697–706. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017.1356723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares, A. F., and P. J. Camões. 2007. “Local Service Delivery Choices in Portugal: A Political Transaction Costs Framework.” Local Government Studies 33 (4Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 535–553. doi:10.1080/03003930701417544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ____. 2010. “New Forms of Local Governance: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Municipal Corporations in Portugal.” Public Management Review 12 (5Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 587–608. doi:10.1080/14719031003633193.
   Google Scholar
• Valdovinos, J. 2012. “The Remunicipalization of Parisian Water Services: New Challenges for Local Authorities and Policy Implications.” Water International 37 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 107–120. doi:10.1080/02508060.2012.662733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Genugten, M., S. Van Thiel, and B. Voorn. 2019. “Local Governments and Their Relationship with Arm’s Length Bodies.” Local Government Studies 1–21. online first. doi:10.1080/03003930.2019.1667774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rooyen, C., and D. Hall. 2007. “Public Is as Private Does: The Confused Case of Rand Water in South Africa.” MSP Occasional Paper. Cape Town: Municipal Services Project.
   Google Scholar
• Voorn, B., M. Van Genugten, and S. Van Thiel. 2017. “The Efficiency and Effectiveness of Municipally Owned Corporations: A Systematic Review.” Local Government Studies 43 (5Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 820–841. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017.1319360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ____. 2018a. “Background, Autonomy, Steering, and Corporate Governance: Determinants of the Effectiveness of (Governance Of) Municipal Corporations.” In EGPA Conference. Lausanne, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Management Research. 2018b. “Respondentenrapport Verbonden Partijen in Nederland 2018.” In IMR Reports. Nijmegen: Institute for Management Research.
   Google Scholar
• ____. 2019. “Online Appendix: Literature on Remunicipalization: An Overview.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform. Online.
   Google Scholar
• Voorn, B., S. Van Thiel, and M. Van Genugten. 2018. “Debate: Corporatization as More than a Recent Crisis-driven Development.” Public Money & Management 38 (7Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 481–482. doi:10.1080/09540962.2018.1527533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, O., and K. Berlo. 2017. “Remunicipalisation and Foundation of Municipal Utilities in the German Energy Sector: Details about Newly Established Enterprises.” Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems 5 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 396–407. doi:10.13044/j.sdewes.d5.0152.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E. 2008. “Reversing Privatization, Rebalancing Government Reform: Markets, Deliberation and Planning.” Policy and Society 27 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 163–174. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2008.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ____. 2010. “Reversing Privatization, Rebalancing Government Reform: Markets, Deliberation and Planning.” In Reasserting the Public in Public Services: New Public Management Reforms, edited by M. Ramesh, E. Araral, and X. Wu, 30–48. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• ____ 2016. “Pragmatic Publics in the Heartland of Capitalism: Local Services in the United States.” In Making Public in a Privatized World: The Struggle for Essential Services, edited by D. A. McDonald, 175–196. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., and A. M. Aldag. 2019. “Re-municipalization in the US: A Pragmatic Response to Contracting.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 1–14. online first. doi:10.1080/17487870.2019.1646133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., and G. Bel. 2008. “Competition or Monopoly? Comparing Privatization of Local Public Services in the US and Spain.” Public Administration 86 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 723–735. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00700.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., and R. Hebdon. 2001. “Local Government Restructuring: Privatization and Its Alternatives.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: the Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management 20 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 315–336. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., and A. Hefetz. 2002. “Applying Market Solutions to Public Services: An Assessment of Efficiency, Equity, and Voice.” Urban Affairs Review 38 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 70. doi:10.1177/107808702401097808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ____. 2012. “In-sourcing and Outsourcing: The Dynamics of Privatization among US Municipalities 2002–2007.” Journal of the American Planning Association 78 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 313–327. doi:10.1080/01944363.2012.715552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. 1963. “Managerial Discretion and Business Behavior.” The American Economic Review 53 (5Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 1032–1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollmann, H., H. Baldersheim, G. Citroni, G. Marcou, and M. John. 2010. “From Public Service to Commodity: The Demunicipalization (Or Remunicipalization?) of Energy Provision in Germany, Italy, France, the UK and Norway.” In The Provision of Public Services in Europe: Between State, Local Government and Market, edited by H. Wollmann and G. Marcou, 168–190. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar