Public-private partnerships in the healthcare sector: limited policy guidelines, but active project development in Denmark

References

• Boardman, A. E., C. Greve and G.A. Hodge. 2015. “Comparative Analyses of Infrastructure Public-Private Partnerships.” Journal of Comparative Public Policy 17 (5): 441–447.
   Google Scholar
• Boardman, A. E., and A. Vining. 2010a. “Assessing the Economic Worth of Public–Private Partnerships.” In International Handbook on Public–Private Partnerships, edited by G. Hodge, C. Greve, and A. E. Boardman. 159–186. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Boardman, A. E., and A. Vining. 2010b. “P3s in North America: Renting the Money (Canada), Selling the Roads (In the USA).” In International Handbook on Public-Private Partnerships, edited by G. Hodge, C. Greve, and A. E. Boardman, 399–438. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Boardman, A. E., and A. Vining. 2012. “The Political Economy of Public-private Partnerships and Analysis of Their Social Value.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 83 (2): 117–141. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8292.2012.00457.x.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. T. 2016. “State-owned Enterprises as Institutional Market Actors in the Marketization of Public Service Provision: A Comparative Case Study of Danish and Swedish Passenger Rail 1990–2015.” PhD diss., Copenhagen Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. T., and C. Greve. 2018. “Choosing State Owned Enterprises over Public-Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Governance: Explaining Institutional Change with Evidence from Denmark’s Transport Sector.” International Public Management Review 18 (2): 137–161.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Competition and Consumer Authority. 2013. Barrierer for OPP Ved Kommuner Og Regioners Bygge- Og Anlægsprojekter (Barrieres for PPPs in Local and Regional Contruction Projects). København: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Productivity Commission. 2014. Offentlig- privat samarbejde [Public Private Partnerships]. Copenhagen: Produktivitetskommissionen.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Competition and Consumer Authority. 2018. nteractive PPP overview, https://www.kfst.dk/udbud/offentlig-privat-samarbejde/offentlig-private-partnerskaber-opp/opp-oversigt/
   Google Scholar
• Danish Government. 2009. Investeringer I En Moderne Sygehusstruktur (Investments in a Modern Hospital Structure). København: Ministry of Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Denta, S. M. 2017. “Kommunale Offentlige Partnerskaber. Regulering I Skyggen Af Farumsagen.” PhD diss., Copenhagen Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Eldrup, A., and P. Schütze. 2013. Organization and Financing of Public Infrastructure Projects. A Path to Economic Growth and Development of the Danish Welfare Model. Copenhagen. https://www.pka.dk/globalassets/aktuelt/nyheder/dokumenter/opp_main.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European PPP Expertise Center. 2019. Market Update. Review of the European PPP Market 2018. Luxembourg: European Investmentbank.
   Google Scholar
• Executive Order. 2013. “Executive Order on Quality, PPP and Total Costs in Public Construction [Bekendtgørelse Om Kvalitet, OPP Og Totaløkonomi I Offentligt Byggeri, BEK]. 1179.”
   Google Scholar
• Executive Order. 2013b. “Executive Order on Municipal Authority Borrowing [Lånebekendtgørelsen] 1580.”
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, R., and B. Wagner. 2013. “Why Do U.S. States Adopt Public Private Partnership Enabling Legislation?” Journal of Urban Economics 78: 30–41. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2013.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Report. 2008. Offentlige-Private-Partnerskaber (OPP) Og De Kommunale Låneregler Samt Visse Øvrige Spørgsmål I Relation Til Lånebekendtgørelsen [Ppps and the Borrowing Rules for Municipalities and Other Questions in Relation to the Executive Order on Borrowing]. Copenhagen: Økonomi- og Indenrigsministeriet.
   Google Scholar
• Government Report. 2013. Arbejdsgrupperapport Om Modernisering Af Kommunernes Og Regionernes Låne- Og Deponeringsregler [Report from the Working Group on the Modernization of the Borrowing and Deposite Rules for the Regions and Municipalities]. Copenhagen: Økonomi- og Idenrigsministeriet.
   Google Scholar
• Greve, C., and G. Hodge, Eds. 2013. Rethinking Public-private Partnerships, Strategies for Turbulent Times. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hellowell, M., and V. Vecchi. 2012. “An Evaluation of the Projected Returns to Investors on 10 PFI Projects Commissioned by the National Health Service.” Financial Accountability & Management 28 (1): 77–100. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2011.00537.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, G., and C. Greve. 2018. “PPPs: Towards a Global Research Agenda.” Financial Accountability & Management 34 (1): 3–16. doi:10.1111/faam.12132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, G., C. Greve, and A. Boardman, et al. 2017. “Public-Private Partnerships: They Way They Were and What They Can Become.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 76 (3): 273–282. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, G. A.,C. Greve and A.E. Boardman, Eds. 2010. International Handbook on Public-Private Partnerships. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, S., and M. Siemiatycki. 2018. “Rethinking the Role of Private Capital in Infrastructure PPPs: The Experience of Ontario, Canada.” Public Management Review 20 (8): 122–144. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1428412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITF. 2018. Private Investment in Transport Infrastructure: Dealing with Uncertainty in Contracts. Paris: I. T. Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Jordana, J. 2017. “Accountability Challenges in the Governance of Infrastructure.” In The Governance of Infrastructure, edited by K. Wegrich, G. Kostka, and G. Hammerschmid, 43–62. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.
   Google Scholar
• KPMG. 2005. OPP-markedet i Danmark 2005–2015. [The PPP Market in Denmark 2005–2015]. Copenhagen: KPMG.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. 2018. Public-Private Partnerships: What Local Government Managers Need to To Know. A Policy Issue White Paper Prepared on Behalf of the ICMA Governmental Affairs and Policy Committee. Washington D.C.: I. C. M. A.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance,Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Transport, Ministry of Climate and Energy and Ministry of Business Affairs, 2015. Økonomisk Fordelagtighed Ved Offentlige-private Partnerskaber [Economic Advantages with Public-private Partnerships]. Copenhagen: Finansministeriet.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Interior and Health and Ministry of Finance. 2010. Regionernes Investerings- Og Sygehusplaner - Screening Og Vurdering II (Regions’ Investment and Hospital Plans - Screening and Assessment II). København: Ministry of Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Mouraviev, N., and N. K. Kakabadse. 2014. “Public-Private Partnerhsips in Russia: Dynamics Contributing to an Emergent Policy Paradigm.” Policy Studies 35 (1): 79–96. doi:10.1080/01442872.2013.875140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2008. Public-Private Partnerships: In Pursuit of Value for Money and Risk Sharing. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2010. Dedicated Public-Private Partnership Units. A Survey of Governance and Institutional Structures. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2012. Recommendations of the Council on Principles for Public Governance of Public-Private Partnerships. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. Getting Infrastructure Right. A Framework for Better Governance. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, O. H. 2010. “Regulation of Public–Private Partnerships: The Danish Case.” Public Money & Management 30 (3): 175–182. doi:10.1080/09540961003794345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, E., D. Palcic, and D. Flannery. 2015. “PPP Procurement in Ireland: An Analysis of Tendering Periods.” Local Government Studies 41 (3): 379–400. doi:10.1080/03003930.2014.982108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, E., and D. Palsci. 2017. “Getting Back on Track: The Expanded Use of PPPs in Ireland since the Global Financial Crise.” Policy Studies 38 (4): 339–355. doi:10.1080/01442872.2017.1314456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, E., and J. Ryan. 2017. “Piloting Public-Private Partnerships: Expensive Lessons from Ireland’s School Sector.” Public Money & Management 27 (5): 331–338. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9302.2007.00604.x.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, T., and J. Yan. 2015. “Comparing Public-Private Partnerships and Traditional Procurement: Efficiency Vs. Flexibility?” Ournal of Comparative Policy Analysis 18 (5): 448–466.
   Google Scholar
• Roumboutsos, A., Ed. 2016. Public Private Partnerships in Transport. Trends and Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P., and C. Weible, Eds. 2014. Theories of the Policy Process. 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sclar, E. D. 2015. “The Political Economics of Investment Utopia: Public–Private Partnerships for Urban Infrastructure Finance.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 18 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/17487870.2014.950857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemiatycki, M. 2013. “Public-Private Partnerships in Mega-projects: Successes and Tentions.” In International Handbook on Mega-projects, edited by H. Priemus and B. Van Wee, 133–157. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Siemiatycki, M. 2015. “Public-Private Partnerships in Canada. Reflections on Twenty Years of Practice.” Canadian Public Administration 58 (3): 343–352. doi:10.1111/capa.12119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, A., and P. Stapleton. 2017. “Examining the Use of Corporate Governance Mechanisms in Public-Private Partnerships: Why Do They Not Delivery Public Accountability?” Australian Journal of Public Administration 76 (3): 378–391. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tvarnø, C. D. 2015. “The Problems for PPPs of Budget Restrictions on Municipal Authorities in Denmark.” Public Procurement Law Review 2015 (4): NA118–NA123.
   Google Scholar
• Tvarnø, C. D. 2016. “Optimizing Public Private Partnerships through Legal and Governmental Initiatives.” In Liber Amicorum Peter Møgelvang-Hansen, edited by B. Dahl, T. R. Riis, and J. Trzaskowski, 523–545. Copenhagen: Ex Tuto Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tvarnø, C. D., and R. Nielsen. 2017. Restkilder Og Retsteorier. Copenhagen: DJØF.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoest, K. M. van den Hurk, N. Carbonara, V. Lember, O.H. Petersen , W. Scherrer and R. M Soecipto. 2016. “Introducing the National Contexts for PPPs – Elements and Dimensions.” In Public-Private Partnerships in Transport. Trends and Theory, edited by A. Roumboutsos, 9–18. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoest, K., O. H. Petersen, W. Scherrer, R. M. Soecipto. 2015. “How Do Governments Support the Development of Public Private Partnerships? Measuring and Comparing PPP Governmental Support in 20 European Countries.” Transport Review 35 (2): 118–139. doi:10.1080/01441647.2014.993746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, C. 2014. “Introducing the Scope and Focus of Policy Process Research and Theory.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by P. Sabatier and C. Weible, 3–21. 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westwiew Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2019. Accessed 28 January 2019. www.pppknowledgelab.org
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research, Design and Methods. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar