Does the ownership of utilities matter for social outcomes? A survey of the evidence for developing countries

References

• Abramovsky, L. F., L. A. Andres, G. Joseph, J. P. Rud, G. E. Sember, and M. D. Thibert. 2020. “Study of the Distributional Performance of Piped Water Consumption Subsidies in 10 Developing Countries.” Policy Research Working Paper No. 9245, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Andres, L., J. L. Guasch, and S. Lopez Azumendi. 2008. “Regulatory Governance and Sector Performance: Methodology and Evaluation for Electricity Distribution in Latin America.” Policy Research Working Paper No. 4494, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Andres, L. A., M. Thibert, C. Lombana Cordoba, A. V. Danilenko, G. Joseph, and C. Borja-Vega. 2019. Doing More with Less: Smarter Subsidies for Water Supply and Sanitation. Washington, D.C: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Auriol, E., C. Crampes., and A. Estache. 2021. Regulating Public Services: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, R. 2018. “Taking Stock of the Impact of Power Utility Reform in Developing Countries: A Literature Review.” Policy Research Working Paper No. 8460, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Bagnoli, L., S. Bertomeu-Sanchez, and A. Estache. 2018. “Infrastructure Affordability in Developed and Developing Economies: Rules of Thumbs and Evidence.” Working Papers ECARES 2018-02, Université libre de Bruxelles.
   Google Scholar
• Bagnoli, L., S. Bertomeu-Sanchez, and A. Estache. 2020. “How Does the Ownership of a Distribution Operator Relate to Energy Poverty in Latin America and the Caribbean?” Working Papers ECARES 2020-37, Université libre de Bruxelles.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, K. 2014. “The Business of Water: Market Environmentalism in the Water Sector.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 39 (1): 469–494. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-070312-132730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S. G., and E. Morella. 2011. Africa’s Water and Sanitation Infrastructure: Access, Affordability, and Alternatives. Washington, D.C: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa, A., and I. Brusca. 2015. “Governance Structures and Their Impact on Tariff Levels of Brazilian Water and Sanitation Corporations.” Utilities Policy 34: 94–105. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2015.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer, P., R. Kennedy, J. Yang, and J. Urpelainen. 2019. “The Need for Impact Evaluation in Electricity Access Research.” Energy Policy 137: 111099. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayliss, K. 2003. “Utility Privatisation in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case Study of Water.” Journal of Modern African Studies 41 (4): 507–531. doi:10.1017/S0022278X03004415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensch, G. 2019. “The Effects of Market-based Reforms on Access to Electricity in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 11 (2): 165–188. doi:10.1080/19439342.2019.1629613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensch, G., A. Munyehirwe, J. Peters, and M. Sievert. 2015. The Effects of Market-Based Reforms on Access to Electricity in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review of the Evidence on Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness and Mechanisms. 3ie Systematic Review. New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Bensch, G., M. Sievert, J. Langbein, and N. Kneppel. 2016. Effects and Mechanisms of Market-Based Reforms on Access to Electricity in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review. 3ie Systematic Review. New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Bertomeu-Sanchez, S., and A. Estache. 2019. “A Dataset on the Relative Importance of Public and Private Operators in the Water and Sanitation Sector.” Mimeo, ECARES, Université libre de Bruxelles.
   Google Scholar
• Birdsall, N., and J. Nellis, eds. 2005. Reality Check: The Distributional Impact of Privatization in Developing Countries. Washington, D.C: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Boccanfuso, D., A. Estache, and L. Savard. 2009a. “A Macro–Micro Analysis of the Effects of Electricity Reform in Senegal on Poverty and Distribution.” The Journal of Development Studies 45 (3): 351–368. doi:10.1080/00220380802582361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccanfuso, D., A. Estache, and L. Savard. 2009b. “Electricity Reforms in Mali: A Macro-Micro Analysis of the Effects on Poverty and Distribution.” South African Journal of Economics 77 (1): 127–147. doi:10.1111/j.1813-6982.2009.01205.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borraz, F., N. González-Pampillón, and M. Olarreaga. 2013. “Water Nationalization and Service Quality.” The World Bank Economic Review 27 (3): 389–412. doi:10.1093/wber/lht001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, S., C. Knittel, I. Pérez-Arriaga, and I. Schneider. 2019. “The Efficiency and Distributional Effects of Alternative Residential Electricity Rate Designs.” NBER Working Papers 25570, National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Chisari, O., A. Estache, and C. Romero. 2007a. “Lessons from Computable General Equilibrium Models Applied to Regulatory Economics.” In Regulatory Economics and Quantitative Methods, edited by O. Chisari, 119–176, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Chisari, O., A. Estache, and C. Romero. 1999. “Winners and Losers from the Privatization and Regulation of Utilities: Lessons from a General Equilibrium Model of Argentina.” The World Bank Economic Review 13 (2): 357–378. doi:10.1093/wber/13.2.357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisari, O., G. Lambardi, and C. Romero. 2007b. “Choosing the Extent of Private Participation in Public Services: A Computable General Equilibrium Perspective.” MPRA Paper 15358, Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, G., K. Kosec, and S. Wallsten. 2009. “Has Private Participation in Water and Sewerage Improved Coverage? Empirical Evidence from Latin America?” Journal of International Development 21 (3): 327–361. doi:10.1002/jid.1458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coudouel, A., and S. Paternostro. 2005. Analyzing the Distributional Impact of Reforms: A Practioner’s Guide to Trade, Monetary and Exchange Rate Policy, Utility Provision, Agricultural Markets, Land Policy and Education. Vol. 1. Washington, D.C: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Culver, L. 2017. “Energy Poverty: What You Measure Matters.” In Pre-symposium White Paper for: Reducing Energy Poverty with Natural Gas: Changing Political, Business, and Technology Paradigms. Stanford, United States: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• De Halleux, M., A. Estache, and T. Serebrisky. 2020. “Governance Choices and Policy Outcomes in the Latin American and Caribbean Electricity Sector.” Utilities Policy 67: 101105. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2020.101105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doll, C. N. H., and S. Pachauri. 2010. “Estimating Rural Populations without Access to Electricity in Developing Countries through Night-Time Light Satellite Imagery.” Energy Policy 38 (10): 5661–5670. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogdu, E. 2014. “Investment, Security of Supply and Sustainability in the Aftermath of Three Decades of Power Sector Reform.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 31: 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estache, A., E. and E. Grifell-Tatje;. 2013. “How (Un)even Was the Distribution of the Impacts of Mali’s Water Privatisation across Stakeholders?” Journal of Development Studies 49 (4): 483–499. doi:10.1080/00220388.2012.729046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estache, A., and Q. Wodon. 2014. Infrastructure and Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa. New York, USA: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, V., and R. Anshul. 2020. Rethinking Power Sector Reform in the Developing World. Washington, D.C: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, V., and S. H. Witte. 2020. “Falling Short: A Global Survey of Electricity Tariff Design.” Policy Research Working Paper No. 9174, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Fuente, D. 2019. “The Design and Evaluation of Water Tariffs: A Systematic Review.” Utilities Policy 61: 100975. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2019.100975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galiani, S., P. Gertler, and E. Schargrodsky. 2005. “Water for Life: The Impact of the Privatization of Water Services on Child Mortality.” Journal of Political Economy 113 (1): 83–120. doi:10.1086/426041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassner, K., A. Popov, and N. Pushak. 2009. Does Private Sector Participation Improve Performance in Electricity and Water Distribution? Washington, D.C: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Granados, C., and F. Sanchez. 2014. “Water Reforms, Decentralization and Child Mortality in Colombia, 1990–2005.” World Development 53: 68–79. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grifell-Tatjé, E., C. A. Knox Lovell, and R. C. Sickles, eds. 2018. The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gugler, K., M. Rammerstorfer, and S. Schmitt. 2013. “Ownership Unbundling and Investment in Electricity Markets — A Cross Country Study.” Energy Economics 40: 702–713. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2013.08.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, V. 2019. “Reconciling Global Aspirations and Local Realities: Challenges Facing the Sustainable Development Goals for Water and Sanitation.” World Development 118: 106–117. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutton, G. 2012. Monitoring “Affordability” of Water and Sanitation Services after 2015: Review of Global Indicators Options. World Health Organization.Geneva, Switzerland. Available at https://washdata.org/sites/default/files/documents/reports/2017-07/Hutton-2012-monitoring-affordability-of-water-and-sanitation-services.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Imam, M. I., T. Jamasb, and M. Llorca. 2019. “Sector Reforms and Institutional Corruption: Evidence from Electricity Industry in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Energy Policy 129: 532–545. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamasb, T., R. Nepal, G. Timilsina, and M. Toman. 2014. “Energy Sector Reform, Economic Efficiency and Poverty Reduction.” University of Queensland, School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Jamasb, T., R. Nepal, and G. R. Tilmisina. 2017. “A Quarter Century Effort yet to Come of Age: A Survey of Electricity Sector Reforms in Developing Countries.” Energy Journal 38 (3): 195–234. doi:10.5547/01956574.38.3.tjam.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez, R., and A. Yépez-García. 2017. “Understanding the Drivers of Household Energy Spending: Micro Evidence for Latin America.” IDB Working Paper Series, IDB-WP-805.
   Google Scholar
• John, P., A. Mahalingam, A. Deep, and A. Thillairajan. 2015. “Impact of Private Sector Participation on Access and Quality of Services: Systematic Review of Evidence from the Electricity, Telecommunications and Water Supply Sectors.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 7 (1): 64–89. doi:10.1080/19439342.2014.955519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojima, M., and C. Trimble. 2016. Making Power Affordable for Africa and Viable for Its Utilities. Washington, D.C: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Kosec, K. 2014. “The Child Health Implications of Privatizing africa’s Urban Water Supply.” Journal of Health Economics 35: 1–19. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.01.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küfeoğlu, S., M. Pollitt, and K. Anaya. 2018. “Electric Power Distribution in the World: Today and Tomorrow.” EPRG Working Paper 1826, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Laffont, -J.-J. 2004. Regulation and Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. D., and Z. Usman. 2018. “Taking Stock of the Political Economy of Power Sector Reforms in Developing Countries: A Literature Review.” Policy Research Working Paper No. 8518, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. 2011. “Privatization, Water Access and Affordability: Evidence from Malaysian Household Expenditure Data.” Economic Modelling 28 (5): 2121–2128. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2011.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. 2018. “Affordability and Access in Focus: Metrics and Tools of Relative Energy Vulnerability.” The Electricity Journal 31 (6): 23–32. doi:10.1016/j.tej.2018.06.005.
   Google Scholar
• Marson, M., and I. Savin. 2015. “Ensuring Sustainable Access to Drinking Water in Sub Saharan Africa: Conflict between Financial and Social Objectives.” World Development 76: 26–39. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagayama, H. 2007. “Effects of Regulatory Reforms in the Electricity Supply Industry on Electricity Prices in Developing Countries.” Energy Policy 35 (6): 3440–3462. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagayama, H. 2009. “Electric Power Sector Reform Liberalization Models and Electric Power Prices in Developing Countries.” Energy Economics 31 (3): 463–472. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2008.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nauges, C., and D. Whittington. 2017. “Evaluating the Performance of Alternative Municipal Water Tariff Designs: Quantifying the Tradeoffs between Equity, Economic Efficiency, and Cost Recovery.” World Development 91: 125–143. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pargal, S., and S. Banerjee. 2014. “More Power to India: The Challenge of Electricity Distribution.” In Directions in Development. Energy and Mining. Washington, D.C: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A., R. Nepal, and T. Jamasb. 2018. “Have Model, Will Reform: Assessing the Outcomes of Electricity Reforms in Non-OECD Asia.” Energy Journal 39 (4): 181–210. doi:10.5547/01956574.39.4.asen.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solaymani, S., F. Kari, and R. Hazly Zakari. 2014. “Evaluating the Role of Subsidy Reform in Addressing Poverty Levels in Malaysia: A CGE Poverty Framework.” Journal of Development Studies 50 (4): 556–569. doi:10.1080/00220388.2013.841888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stutsman, C., K. Tzoumis, and S. Bennett. 2016. “Evaluating the Competing Claims on the Role of Ownership Regime Models on International Drinking Water Coverage.” Environment and Natural Resources Research 6 (2): 145–155. doi:10.5539/enrr.v6n2p145.
   Google Scholar
• Ugaz, C., and C. Waddams Price, eds. 2003. Utility Privatisation and Regulation: A Fair Deal for Consumers. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Urpelainen, J., and J. Yang. 2019. “Global Patterns of Power Sector Reform, 1982–2013.” Energy Strategy Reviews 23: 152–162. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2018.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagliasindi, M. 2011. “Public versus Private Governance and Performance: Evidence from Public Utility Service Provision.” In International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption II, edited by S. Rose-Ackerman and T. Soreide, 185–206, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Vagliasindi, M. 2012. “Power Market Structure and Performance.” Policy Research Working Paper No. 6123, World Bank, Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2019. Who Sponsors Infrastructure Projects? Disentangling Public and Private Contributions. Washington, D.C: World Bank.
   Google Scholar