Overview of current approaches for treating word retrieval deficits demonstrates need for focused research questions and appraisal of the methodological quality of evidence

Elizabeth RochonDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada;Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada;Heart and Stroke Foundation Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, ON, Canada;Research Department, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, CanadaCorrespondence[email protected]

Tijana SimicRehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada;Heart and Stroke Foundation Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, ON, Canada;Research Department, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada

Bruna Seixas Lima (Commentary authors)Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada;Research Department, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada

References

Best, W., Grassly, J., Greenwood, A., Herbert, R., Hickin, J., & Howard, D. (2011). A controlled study of changes in conversation following aphasia therapy for anomia. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33, 229–242. doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.534230.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Bhogal, S. K., Teasell, R. W., Foley, N. C., & Speechley, M. R. (2003). Rehabilitation of aphasia: More is better. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 10, 66–76. doi:10.1310/RCM8-5TUL-NC5D-BX58.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Brady, M. C., Kelly, H., Godwin, J., & Enderby, P. (2012). Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Review (Online), 5, 1–237. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub3.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Leonard, C., Rochon, E., & Laird, L. (2008). Treating naming impairments in aphasia: Findings from a phonological components analysis treatment. Aphasiology, 22, 923–947. doi:10.1080/02687030701831474.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Lorenz, A., & Ziegler, W. (2009). Semantic vs. word-form specific techniques in anomia treatment: A multiple single-case study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 515–537. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.05.003.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Wisenburn, B., & Mahoney, K. (2009). A meta-analysis of word-finding treatments for aphasia. Aphasiology, 23, 1338–1352. doi:10.1080/02687030902732745.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Overview of current approaches for treating word retrieval deficits demonstrates need for focused research questions and appraisal of the methodological quality of evidence

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Overview of current approaches for treating word retrieval deficits demonstrates need for focused research questions and appraisal of the methodological quality of evidence

References

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date