385
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Bayesian Methods for Mediators in Sceds

Using Bayesian methods to test mediators of intervention outcomes in single-case experimental designs

, , , &

References

  • Babik, I., Cunha, A., Moeyaert, M., Hall, M., & Lobo, M. (2019). Feasibility and effectiveness of intervention with the Playskin LiftTM exoskeletal garment for infants at risk. Physical Therapy, 99(6), 666–676.
  • Barlow, D. H., Nock, M., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single case experimental designs : Strategies for studying behavior for change. New York, NY: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
  • Béland, S., Klugkist, I., Raîche, G., & Magis, D. (2012). A short introduction into Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses as an alternative to exploratory comparisons of multiple group means. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(2), 122–126.
  • Brooks, S. P., & Gelman, A. (1998). General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7, 434–455.
  • Cattell, R. B. (1952). The three basic factor-analytic research designs—their interrelations and derivatives. Psychological Bulletin, 49(5), 499–520.
  • Center, B. A., Skiba, R. J., & Casey, A. (1985). A methodology for the quantitative synthesis of intra-subject design research. The Journal of Special Education, 19(4), 387–400.
  • Core Team, R. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
  • Craig, C. C. (1936). On the frequency function of xy. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 7, 1–15.
  • Darnieder, W. F. (2011). Bayesian methods for data-dependent priors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
  • Gaynor, S. T., & Harris, A. (2008). Single-participant assessment of treatment mediators: Strategy description and examples from a behavioral activation intervention for depressed adolescents. Behavior Modification, 32, 372–402.
  • Geuke, G., Maric, M., Miočević, M., Wolters, L. H., & de Haan, E. (2019). Testing mediators of youth intervention outcomes using single-case experimental designs (SCEDs). New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 167, 39–64.
  • Gu, X., Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., & van Lissa, C. (2019). bain: Bayes Factors for Informative Hypotheses ( R package version 0.2.0).
  • Hedges, L. V., Pustejovsky, J. E., & Shadish, W. R. (2012). A standardized mean difference effect size for single case designs. Research Synthesis Methods, 3(3), 224–239.
  • Hedges, L. V., Pustejovsky, J. E., & Shadish, W. R. (2013). A standardized mean difference effect size for multiple baseline designs across individuals. Research Synthesis Methods, 4(4), 324–341.
  • Hoijtink, H. (2012). Informative hypotheses: Theory and practice for behavioral and social scientists. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24, 539–556. Advance online publication.
  • Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179.
  • Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis. Evaluation Review, 5(5), 602–619.
  • Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773–795.
  • Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Klugkist, I., Laudy, O., & Hoijtink, H. (2005). Inequality constrained analysis of variance: A Bayesian approach. Psychological Methods, 10(4), 477–493.
  • Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. What Works Clearinghouse. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/ReferenceResources/wwc_scd.pdf
  • Lobo, M. A., Koshy, J., Hall, M. L., Erol, O., Cao, H., Buckley, J. M., … Higginson, J. (2016). Playskin Lift: Development and initial testing of an exoskeletal garment to assist upper extremity mobility and function. Physical Therapy, 96(3), 390–399.
  • Lomnicki, Z. A. (1967). On the distribution of products of random variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 29, 513–524.
  • MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30(1), 41–62.
  • Manolov, R., & Moeyaert, M. (2017). How can single-case data be analyzed? Software resources, tutorial, and reflections on analysis. Behavior Modification, 41(2), 179–228.
  • Maric, M., Heyne, D. A., MacKinnon, D. P., Van Widenfelt, B. M., & Westenberg, P. M. (2013). Cognitive mediation of cognitive-behavioural therapy outcomes for anxiety-based school refusal. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 41(5), 549–564.
  • Maric, M., Prins, P. J. M., & Ollendick, T. H. (Eds.). (2015). Moderators and mediators of youth treatment outcomes. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Maric, M., Wiers, R. W., & Prins, P. J. M. (2012). Ten ways to improve the use of statistical mediation analysis in the practice of child and adolescent treatment research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 15, 177–191.
  • McNeish, D. M. (2016). Using data-dependent priors to mitigate small sample bias in latent growth models: A discussion and illustration using Mplus. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 41(1), 27–56.
  • Miočević, M., Gonzalez, O., Valente, M. J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2018). A tutorial in Bayesian potential outcomes mediation analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(1), 121–136.
  • Miočević, M., MacKinnon, D. P., & Levy, R. (2017). Power in Bayesian mediation analysis for small sample research. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(5), 666–683.
  • Miočević, M., & Van de Schoot, R. (2019). Gentle introduction to Bayesian statistics. In J. Edlund & A. L. Nichols (Eds.), Advanced research methods and statistics for the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 289–308). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Moeyaert, M., Ugille, M., Ferron, J., Beretvas, S., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2014). The influence of the design matrix on treatment effect estimates in the quantitative analyses of single-case experimental design research. Behavior Modification, 38(5), 665–704.
  • Moeyaert, M., Ugille, M., Ferron, J. M., Beretvas, S. N., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2013a). The three-level synthesis of standardized single-subject experimental data: A monte carlo simulation study. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48(5), 719–748.
  • Moeyaert, M., Ugille, M., Ferron, J. M., Beretvas, S. N., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2013b). Three-level analysis of single-case experimental data: Empirical validation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 82(1), 1–21.
  • Ng, M. Y., & Weisz, J. R. (2016). Annual research review: Building a science of personalized intervention for youth mental health. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57, 216−236.
  • Parker, R. I., & Vannest, K. (2009). An improved effect size for single-case research: Nonoverlap of all pairs. Behavior Therapy, 40(4), 357–367.
  • Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Brown, L. (2009). The improvement rate difference for single case research. Exceptional Children, 75(2), 135–150.
  • Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-u. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299.
  • Plummer, M. (2003). JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling (version 4.3.0). Retrieved from http://mcmc-jags.sourceforge.net/
  • Plummer, M. (2018). rjags: Bayesian Graphical Models using MCMC ( R package version 4-8).
  • Plummer, M., Best, N., Cowles, K., Vines, K., Sarkar, D., Bates, D., … Magnusson, A. (2018). coda: Output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC ( R package version 0.19-2).
  • Schlosser, R. W., Lee, D. L., & Wendt, O. (2008). Application of the Percentage of Non-overlapping Data in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A systematic review of reporting characteristics. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2, 163–187.
  • Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8(2), 24–33.
  • Shadish, W. R., Hedges, L. V., & Pustejovsky, J. E. (2014). Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs with a standardized mean difference statistic: A primer and applications. Journal of School Psychology, 52(2), 123–147.
  • Shadish, W. R., Rindskopf, D. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2008). The state of the science in the meta- analysis of single-case experimental designs. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2(3), 188–196.
  • Sinharay, S. (2004). Experiences with Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence assessment in two psychometric examples. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(4), 461–488.
  • Smith, J. D. (2012). Single-case experimental designs: A systematic review of published research and current standards. Psychological Methods, 17(4), 510–550.
  • Tarlow, K. R. (2017). An improved rank correlation effect size statistic for single-case designs: Baseline corrected tau. Behavior Modification, 41(4), 427–467.
  • van den Noortgate, W., & Onghena, P. (2003a). Combining single-case experimental data using hierarchical linear models. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(3), 325–346.
  • van den Noortgate, W., & Onghena, P. (2003b). Hierarchical linear models for the quantitative integration of effect sizes in single-case research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(1), 1–10.
  • van den Noortgate, W., & Onghena, P. (2007). The aggregations of single-case research using hierarchical linear models. The Behavior Analyst Today, 8(2), 196–209.
  • Vannest, K. J., Peltier, C., & Haas, A. (2018). Results reporting in single case experiments and single case meta-analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 79, 10–18.
  • Wiessenekker, M. (2019). Efficacy of child and adolescent therapies: A meta-analysis of single-case studies ( Master thesis). University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Wolery, M., Busick, M., Reichow, B., & Barton, E. E. (2010). Comparison of overlap methods for quantitatively synthesizing single-subject data. The Journal of Special Education, 44(1), 18–28.
  • Yuan, Y., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2009). Bayesian mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 14(4), 301–322.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.