Effect size estimation for combined single-case experimental designs

References

• Baek, E., & Ferron, J. M. (2013). Multilevel models for multiple-baseline data: Modeling across participant variation in autocorrelation and residual variance. Behavior Research Methods, 45(1), 65–74. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0231-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H., & Hayes, S. C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12(2), 199–210. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H., Nock, M., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single case experimental designs : Strategies for studying behavior for change. Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Casella, G. (1985). An introduction to empirical Bayes analysis. The American Statistician, 39(2), 83–87. doi: 10.2307/2682801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, Y., & Cannella-Malone, H. I. (2010). The effects of profession manipulations on automatically maintained challenging behavior and task responding. Behavior Modification, 34(6), 479–502. doi: 10.1177/0145445510378380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferron, J., & Jones, P. K. (2006). Tests for the visual analysis of response-guided multiple-baseline data. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(1), 66–81. doi: 10.3200/JEXE.75.1.66-81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferron, J. M., & Levin, J. R. (2014). Single-case permutation and randomization statistical tests: Present status, promising new developments. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case intervention research: Methodological and statistical advances (pp. 153–183). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gast, D. L., Lloyd, B. P., & Ledford, J. R. (2018). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In J. R. Ledford & D. L. Gast (Eds.), Single case research methodology (3rd ed., pp. 239–281). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., Tipton, E., & Johnson, M. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta‐ regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(1), 39–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hembry, I., Bunuan, R., Beretvas, S. N., Ferron, J., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2015). Estimation of a nonlinear intervention phase trajectory for multiple-baseline design data. The Journal of Experimental Education, 83(4), 514–546. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2014.907231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyvaert, M., Saenen, L., Maes, B., & Onghena, P. (2014). Systematic review of restraint interventions for challenging behaviour among persons with intellectual disabilities: Focus on effectiveness in single-case experiments. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27(6), 493–590. doi: 10.1111/jar.12094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyvaert, M., Moeyaert, M., Verkempynck, P., Van den Noortgate, W., Vervloet, M., Ugille, M., & Onghena, P. (2017). Testing the intervention effect in single-case experiments: A Monte Carlo simulation study. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(2), 175–196. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2015.1123667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, R. H., & Odom, S. L. (2014). Constructing single-case research designs: Logic and options. In T. Kratochwill & J. Levin (Eds.), Single-case intervention research: Methodological and statistical advances (pp. 27–51). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Jason, L. A., & Frasure, S. (1979). Increasing peer-tutoring behaviors in the third grade classroom [Paper presentation]. Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, M. E., Lerman, D. C., & Van Camp, C. M. (2002). The effects of competing reinforcement schedules on the acquisition of functional communication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35(1), 59–63. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research (Vol. 1). Pearson/A & B.
   Google Scholar
• Kokina, A., & Kern, L. (2010). Social story™ interventions for students with autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(7), 812–826. doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0931-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. What Works Clearinghouse. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/ReferenceResources/wwc_scd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., & Levin, J. R. (2014). Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: Randomization to the rescue. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case intervention research: Statistical and methodological advances (pp. 53–91). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Levin, J. R., Horner, R. H., & Swoboda, C. M. (2014). Visual analysis of single- case intervention research: Conceptual and methodological issues. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case intervention research: Statistical and methodological advances (pp. 91–125). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ledford, J., & Gast, D. L. (2018). Combination and other designs. In J. R. Ledford & D. L. Gast (Eds.), Single case research methodology (3rd ed., pp. 239–281). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ledford, J., Lane, J., & Severini, K. (2018). Systematic use of visual analysis for assessing outcomes in single case design studies. Brain Impairment, 19(1), 4–17. doi: 10.1017/BrImp.2017.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledford, J. R., Lane, J. D., & Tate, R. (2018). Evaluating quality and rigor in single case research. In J. R. Ledford & D. L. Gast (Eds.), Single case research methodology (3rd ed., pp. 365–392). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz, A. S. (2013). Calculating effect size in single-case research: A comparison of nonoverlap methods. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 46(1), 64–73. doi: 10.1177/0748175612456401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, J. S., Iwata, B. A., & Kahang, S. W. (1999). On the relation between object manipulation and stereotypic self-injurious behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32(1), 51–62. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggin, D. M., Swaminathan, H., Rogers, H. J., O’Keeffe, B. V., Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2011). A generalized least squares regression approach for computing effect sizes in single-case research: Application examples. Journal of School Psychology, 49(3), 301–321. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manolov, R., & Solanas, A. (2013). A comparison of mean phase difference and generalized least squares for analyzing single-case data. Journal of School Psychology, 51(2), 201–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2012.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matson, J. L., & Keyes, J. B. (1990). A comparison of DRO to movement suppression time-out and DRO with two self-injurious and aggressive mentally retarded adults. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 11(1), 111–120. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(90)90008-V
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeyaert, M., Ugille, M., Ferron, J., Beretvas, S., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2013). Three-level analysis of single-case experimental data: Empirical validation. Journal of Experimental Education, 82(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2012.745470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeyaert, M., Ugille, M., Ferron, J., Beretvas, S., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2014). The influence of the design matrix on treatment effect estimates in the quantitative analyses of single-case experimental design research. Behavior Modification, 38(5), 665–704. doi: 10.1177/0145445514535243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeyaert, M., Ugille, M., Ferron, J., Onghena, P., Heyvaert, M., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2014). Estimating intervention effects across different types of single-subject experimental designs: Empirical illustration. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(1), 191–211. doi: 10.1037/spq0000068
   Google Scholar
• Moeyaert, M., Ferron, J., Beretvas, S. N., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2014). From a single-level analysis to a multilevel analysis of single-case experimental designs. Journal of School Psychology, 52(2), 191–211. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeyaert, M., Maggin, D. M., & Verkuilen, J. (2016). Reliability and validity of extracting data from image files in contexts of single-case experimental design studies. Behavior Modification, 40(6), 874–900. doi: 10.1177/0145445516645763
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moeyaert, M., Akhmedjanova, D., & Bogin, D. (2017). The power to test moderator effects in multilevel modeling of single-case data [Manuscript in preparation].
   Google Scholar
• Moeyaert, M., Zimmerman, K., & Ledford, J. (2018). Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case experimental data. In J. Ledford & D. Gast (Eds.), Single-case methodology: applications in special education and behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moeyaert, M. (2019). Quantitative synthesis of research evidence: Multilevel meta-analysis. Behavioral Disorders, 44(4), 241–256. doi: 10.1177/0198742918806926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeyaert, M., Klingbeil, D., Rodabaugh, E., & Turan, M. (2019). Multilevel meta-analysis of peer-tutoring interventions to increase academic performance and social interactions for people with special needs. Remedial and Special Education. doi: 10.1177/0741932519855079
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Davis, J. L. (2011). Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine nonoverlap techniques. Behavior Modification, 35(4), 303–322. doi: 10.1177/0145445511399147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Davis, J. L. (2014). A simple method to control positive baseline trend within data nonoverlap. The Journal of Special Education, 48(2), 79–91. doi: 10.1177/0022466912456430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rohatgi, A. (2011). WebPlotDigitizer. https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer 
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Lee, D. L., & Wendt, O. (2008). Application of the percentage of non-overlapping data in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A systematic review of reporting characteristics. Evidence-based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2(3), 163–187. doi: 10.1080/17489530802505412
   Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial & Special Education, 8(2), 24–33. doi: 10.1177/074193258700800206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seybert, S., Dunlap, G., & Ferro, J. (1996). The effects of choice-making on the problem behaviors of high-school students with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Behavior Education, 6(1), 49–65. doi: 10.1007/BF02110477
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Rindskopf, D. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2008). The state of the science in the meta-analysis of single-case experimental designs. Evidence-based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2(3), 188–196. doi: 10.1080/17489530802581603
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., & Sullivan, K. J. (2011). Characteristics of single-case designs used to assess intervention effects in 2008. Behavior Research Methods, 43(4), 971–980. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0111-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Kyse, E. N., & Rindskopf, D. M. (2013). Analyzing data from single-case designs using multilevel models: New applications and some agenda items for future research. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 385–405. doi: 10.1037/a0032964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Rindskopf, D. M., Hedges, L. V., & Sullivan, K. J. (2013). Bayesian estimates of autocorrelations in single-case designs. Behavior Research Methods, 45(3), 813–821. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0282-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Zuur, A. F., & Sullivan, K. J. (2014). Using generalized additive (mixed) models to analyze single case designs. Journal of School Psychology, 52(2), 149–178. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shogren, K. A., Faggella-Luby, M. N., Bae, S. J., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2004). The effect of choice-making as an intervention for problem behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6(4), 228–237. doi: 10.1177/10983007040060040401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, H., Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Smolkowski, K., Hedges, L., & Spaulding, S. A.(2010). Application of generalized least squares regression to measure effect size in single-case research: A technical report. Unpublished technical report, Institute for Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Trottier, N., Kamp, L., & Mirenda, P. (2011). Effects of peer-mediated instruction to teach use of speech-generating devices to students with autism in social game routines. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27(1), 26–39. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2010.546810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S. Y., Parrila, R., & Cui, Y. (2013). Meta-analysis of social skills interventions of single- case research for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: Results from three-level HLM. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(7), 1701–1716. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1726-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolery, M., Busick, M., Reichow, B., & Barton, E. E. (2010). Comparison of overlap methods for quantitatively synthesizing single-subject data. The Journal of Special Education, 44(1), 18–28. doi: 10.1177/0022466908328009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, K. N., Ledford, J. R., & Severini, K. E. (2019). Brief Report: The effects of a weighted blanket on engagement for a student with ASD. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 15–19. doi: 10.1177/1088357618794911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar