300
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Rethinking Sixteenth-Century ‘Lutheran Astronomy’

Bibliography

  • Almási, Gábor. ‘Tycho Brahe and the Separation of Astronomy from Astrology: The Making of a New Scientific Discourse’. Science in Context 26, no. 1 (2013): 3–30. doi: 10.1017/S0269889712000270
  • Almási, Gábor. The Uses of Humanism. Andreas Dudith (1533–1589), Johannes Sambucus (1531–1584), and the East Central European Republic of Letters. Leiden: Brill, 2009.
  • Apianus, Petrus, ed., Sphaera Iani de Sacrobusto astronomiae ac cosmographiae candidatis scitu apprime necessaria per Petrum Apianum accuratissima diligentia denuo recognita ac emendata. Ingolstadt: Apianus, 1526.
  • Barker, Peter. ‘Astronomy, Providence and the Lutheran Contribution to Science’. In Reading God's World: The Scientific Vocation, edited by Angus J. L. Menuge, 157–187. St. Louis: Concordia Press, 2004.
  • Barker, Peter. ‘Kepler's Epistemology’. In Method and Order in Renaissance Natural Philosophy, edited by C. Methuen, D. Di Liscia and E. Kessler, 355–368. New York: Kluwer, 1997.
  • Barker, Peter. ‘The Lutheran Contribution to the Astronomical Revolution’. In Religious Values and the Rise of Science in Europe, edited by John Brooke and Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu, 31–62. Istanbul: Research Centre for Islamic Art History and Culture, 2005.
  • Barker, Peter. ‘The Role of Religion in the Lutheran Response to Copernicus’. In Rethinking the Scientific Revolution, edited by Margaret J. Osler, 59–88. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000.
  • Barozzi, Francesco. Cosmographia. Venice: Grazioso Perchachino, 1585.
  • Bédouelle, Guy. ‘Attacks on the Biblical Humanism of Jacques Lefèvre d’Étaples’. In Biblical Humanism and Scholasticism in the Age of Erasmus, edited by Erika Rummel, 117–141. Leiden: Brill, 2008.
  • Bédouelle, Guy. Lefèvre d'Etaples et l'Intelligence des Ecritures. Genève: Droz, 1976.
  • Bellucci, Dino. ‘Gott als Mens. Die “aliqua physica definitio” Gottes bei Philipp Melanchthon’. In Melanchthon und die Naturwissenschaften seiner Zeit, edited by Günther Frank and Stefan Rhein, 59–72. Sigmaringen: Thorbecke, 1998.
  • Bellucci, Dino. Science de la nature et Réformation: la physique au service de la Réforme dans l'enseignement de Philippe Mélanchthon. Roma: Vivere in, 1998.
  • Beyer, Hartmann. Quaestiones novae in Libellum de Sphaera Iohannis de Sacro Busto. Paris: G. Cavellat, 1551.
  • Blair, Ann. The Theatre of Nature. Jean Bodin and Renaissance Science. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1997.
  • Bodin, Jean. Universae naturae theatrum. Lyon: Jacques Roussin, 1596.
  • Boner, Patrick J. ‘A Statesman and a Scholar. Herwart von Hohenburg as a Patron of Johannes Kepler’. History of Science (forthcoming).
  • Brahe, Tycho. De nova et nullius aevi memoria prius visa stella. Copenhagen: L. Benedictus, 1573.
  • Brooke, John Hedley. Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
  • Brosseder, Claudia. ‘The Writing in the Wittenberg Sky: Astrology in Sixteenth-Century Germany’. Journal of the History of Ideas 66, no. 4 (2005): 557–576. doi: 10.1353/jhi.2005.0049
  • Calvin, Jean. ‘Traité ou avertissement contre l'astrologie qu'on appelle judiciaire et autres curiosités’. In Oeuvres françoises, edited by P. L. Jacob. Paris: Charles Gosselin, 1842.
  • Canone, Eugenio. ‘Variazioni bruniane I. Giordano Bruno e Mauro Fiorentino’. Bruniana & Campanelliana 7 (2001): 547–556.
  • Cifoletti, Giovanna. ‘Kepler's De quantitatibus’. Annals of Science 43 (1986): 213–238. doi: 10.1080/00033798600200221
  • Ciruelo, Pedro, ed. Uberrimum Sphere mundi commentum intersertis questionibus Petri de Aliaco nuper castigatum. Paris: Jean Petit, 1508.
  • Clavius, Cristophorus. In sphaeram Ioannis de Sacro Bosco commentarius. Venice: Ioan. Baptista Ciotus, 1591.
  • Clichtove, Josse. ‘Eximio et insigni viro Petro Gorreo doctori medico in primis celebri: Iudocus Clichtoveus Neoportuensis S. D’. In Jacques d’Étaples Le Fèvre, In hoc libro continetur introductorium astronomicum..., 2–3. Paris: Henri Estienne, 1517.
  • Cozzoli, Daniele. ‘Alessandro Piccolomini and the Certitude of Mathematics’. History and Philosophy of Logic 28 (2007): 151–171. doi: 10.1080/01445340701230576
  • Crapulli, Giovanni. Mathesis universalis: genesi di un'idea nel 16. secolo. Roma: Edizioni dell'Ateneo, 1969.
  • Crowther-Heyck, Kathleen. ‘Wonderful Secrets of Nature. Natural Knowledge and Religious Piety in Reformation Germany’. Isis 94 (2003): 253–273. doi: 10.1086/379386
  • Daneau, Lambert. Physica Christiana. Geneva: P. Santandreanus, 1576.
  • De Pace, Anna. Le matematiche e il mondo: ricerche su un dibattito in Italia nella seconda metà del Cinquecento. Milano: Franco Angeli, 1993.
  • Di Pasquale, Giovanni. ‘Il concetto di machina mundi in Lucrezio’. In Lucrezio, la natura e la scienza, edited by Francesco Citti and Marco Beretta, 35–50. Firenze: Leo S. Olschki, 2008.
  • Elert, Werner. The Structure of Lutheranism, vol. 1. Translated by Walter E. Hansen. St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House, 1962.
  • Faber, Jacobus Stapulensis. Textus de sphera Johannis de Sacrobosco novo commentario nuper editus. Paris: Henri Estienne, 1511.
  • Fabri, Wenceslaus, ed. Opus sphaericum Johannis de Sacro Busto figuris et perutili commento illustratum. Strasburg, 1501.
  • Fatio, Olivier. Méthode et théologie: Lambert Daneau et les débuts de la scolastique réformée. Geneva: Droz, 1976.
  • Feldhay, Rivka. ‘Religion’. In The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 3: Early Modern Science, edited by Katharine Park and Lorraine Daston, 727–755. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  • Fineus, Orontius. De mundi sphaera, sive cosmographia: libri V. Paris: Michel de Vascosan, 1555.
  • Fiorentino, Mauro. Annotationi sopra la lettione della Spera del Sacro Bosco doue si dichiarano tutti e principii mathematici et naturali. Florence, 1550.
  • Florio, Emilia, and Luigi Maierù. ‘Le dimostrazioni di Francesco Barozzi nell'Admirandum illud geometricum problema (1586)’. Memorie scientifiche, giuridiche, letterarie 11 (2008): 17–52.
  • Frank, Günter, and Stefan Rhein, eds. Melanchthon und die Naturwissenschaften seiner Zeit. Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke Verlag, 1998.
  • Gallucci, Giovanni. Theatrum mundi et temporis. Venice: G. B. Somasco, 1589.
  • Gerber, Adolph. Niccolo Macchiavelli: Die Handschriften, Ausgaben und Übersetzungen seiner Werke im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert, 3. Teil. Gotha: F. A. Perthes, 1913.
  • Giacobbe, Giulio Cesare. ‘Francesco Barozzi e la “Quaestio de certitudine Mathematicarum”’. Physis 14 (1972): 357–394.
  • Gmelin, Johann Friedrich. Geschichte der Chemie: seit dem Wiederaufleben der Wissenschaften bis an das Ende des achtzehenden Jahrhunderts. 2 vols. Göttingen: J. G. Rosenbusch, 1797–98.
  • Gramineus, Theodorus. Mysticus aquilo, sive declaratio vaticinij Jeremie Prophetae: ab aquilone pandetur malum super omnes habitatores terrae...Cologne: L. Alectorius, 1576.
  • Gramineus, Theodorus. Uberior enarratio eorum quae a Joanne de Sacrobosco proponuntur. Cologne: Maternus Colinus, 1567.
  • Hammer, William. ‘Melanchthon, Inspirer of the Study of Astronomy with a Translation of His Oration in Praise of Astronomy (De Orione, 1553)’. Popular Astronomy 59 (1951): 308–319.
  • Hartfelder, Karl von. Philipp Melanchthon als Praeceptor Germaniae. Berlin: Hofmann, 1889.
  • Heerbrand, Jakob. Compendium theologiae. Tübingen: Gruppenbach, 1579.
  • Hellyer, Marcus. Catholic Physics: Jesuit Natural Philosophy in Early Modern Germany. Notre Dame: Univ. of Notre Dame Press, 2005.
  • Hemmingsen, Niels. Admonitio de superstitionibus magicis vitandis in gratiam sincerae religionis amantium. Copenhagen: Stockelman et Guterwitz, 1575.
  • Jardine, Nicholas. The Birth of History and Philosophy of Science: Kepler's A Defence of Tyche Against Ursus with Essays on Its Provenance and Significance. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1988.
  • Jardine, Nicholas. ‘The Places of Astronomy in Early Modern Culture’. Journal for the History of Astronomy 29 (1998): 49–62.
  • Kepler, Johannes. ‘Preface to the Rudolphine Tables’. Translated by Owen Gingerich and William Walderman. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 13 (1972): 360–373.
  • Kepler, Johannes. Prodromus dissertationum cosmographicum continens mysterium cosmographicum. Tübingen: G. Gruppenbachius, 1596.
  • Kusukawa, Sachiko. The Transformation of Natural Philosophy: The Case of Philip Melanchthon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  • Leijenhorst, Cees, and Christoph Lüthy. ‘The Erosion of Aristotelianism: Protestant Eucharistic Theology and Natural Philosophy in Early Modern Germany and the Dutch Republic’. In The Dynamics of Aristotelian Natural Philosophy, edited by C. Leijenhorst, C. Lüthy and H. Thijssen, 375–411. Leiden: Brill, 2002.
  • Maaser, Wolfgang. ‘Luther und die Naturwissenschaften – systematische Aspekte an ausgewählten Beispielen’. In Melanchthon und die Naturwissenschaften, edited by Günter Frank and Stefan Rein, 25–41. Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke Verlag, 1998.
  • Maestlin, Michaël. Observatio et demonstratio cometae aetherei. Tübingen: G. Gruppenbachius, 1578.
  • Marr, Alexander, ed. The Worlds of Oronce Fine. Mathematics, Instruments and Print in Renaissance France. Donington: Shaun Tyas, 2009.
  • Massaut, Jean-Pierre. Josse Clichtove, l'humanisme et la réforme du clergé. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1968.
  • Maurer, Wilhelm. ‘Melanchthon und die Naturwissenschaft seiner Zeit’. Archiv für Kirchengeschichte 44 (1962): 199–226.
  • Meijer, P. A. Stoic Theology: Proofs for the Existence of the Cosmic God and of the Traditional Gods: Including a Commentary on Cleanthes’ Hymn on Zeus. Delft: Eburon, 2007.
  • Merton, Robert K. Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England. Bruges: Saint Catharine Press, 1938.
  • Methuen, Charlotte. Kepler's Tübingen: Stimulus to a Theological Mathematics. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998.
  • Methuen, Charlotte. ‘On the Problem of Defining Lutheran Natural Philosophy’. In Science and Theology in the Reformation. Studies in Theological Interpretation and Astronomical Observation in Sixteenth-century Germany, 94–111. London: T & T Clark, 2008.
  • Methuen, Charlotte. ‘The Role of the Heavens in the Thought of Philip Melanchthon’. Journal of the History of Ideas 57 (1996): 385–403. doi: 10.1353/jhi.1996.0031
  • Methuen, Charlotte. ‘Special Providence and Sixteenth-century Astronomical Observation: Some Preliminary Reflections’. Early Science and Medicine 4, no. 2. (1999): 99–113. doi: 10.1163/157338299X00247
  • Montgomery, John Warwick. ‘Cross, Constellation, and Crucible: Lutheran Astrology and Alchemy in the Age of the Reformation’. Ambix 11 (1963): 65–86.
  • Moran, Bruce T. ‘The Universe of Philip Melanchthon: Criticism and Use of the Copernican Theory’. Comitatus 4 (1973): 1–23.
  • Nauert, Charles G. ‘Rethinking Christian Humanism’. In Interpretations of Renaissance Humanism, edited by A. Mazzocco, 155–180. Leiden: Brill, 2006.
  • Piccolomini, Alessandro. De sphaera libri quatuor.... Ioan. Nicol. Stupano Rheto interprete. Basel: Perna, 1568.
  • Pletzer, Karel. ‘Středověký astronom Dr. Václav Fabri z Budějovic’. Jihočeský sborník historický 37 (1968): 76–86.
  • Rose, Paul Lawrence. The Italian Renaissance of Mathematics: Studies on Humanists and Mathematicians from Petrarch to Galileo. Genève: Droz, 1975.
  • Rothman, Aviva. ‘From Cosmos to Confession: Kepler and the Connection Between Astronomical and Religious Truth’. In Change and Continuity in Early Modern Cosmology (= Archimedes 27, 2011), edited by Patrick J. Boner, 115–133. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.
  • Sasaki, Chikara. Descartes's Mathematical Thought. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003.
  • Stadius, Johannes. Tabulae Bergenses aquabilis et apparentis motus orbium coelestium. Cologne: Heirs of Arnold Birckmann, 1560.
  • Swerdlow, Noel M. ‘Science and Humanism in the Renaissance: Regiomontanus's “Oration on the Dignity and Utility of the Mathematical Sciences”’. In World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science, edited by P. Horwich, 131–168. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993.
  • Thoren, Victor E. The Lord of Uraniborg: A Biography of Tycho Brahe; with Contributions by John R. Christianson. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990.
  • Thorndike, Lynn. A History of Magic and Experimental Science. 8 vols. New York: Columbia University Press, 1923–1958.
  • Troeltsch, Ernst. Die Bedeutung des Protestantismus für die Entstechung der modern Welt. München: Oldenbourg, 1911.
  • Vanden Broecke, Steven. The Limits of Influence: Pico, Louvain, and the Crisis of Renaissance Astrology. Leiden: Brill, 2003.
  • Vespucci, Bartolommeo et al., eds. Nota eorum quae in hoc libro continentur... Venice, 1508.
  • Westman, Robert S. ‘The Astronomer's Role in the Sixteenth Century: A Preliminary Study’. History of Science 18 (1980): 105–47.
  • Westman, Robert S. The Copernican Question. Prognostication, Skepticism, and Celestial Order. Berkeley and Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press, 2011.
  • Westman, Robert S. ‘The Melanchthon Circle, Rheticus, and the Wittenberg Interpretation of the Copernican Theory’. Isis 66 (1975): 165–193.
  • Westman, Robert S. ‘Three Responses to the Copernican Theory: Johannes Praetorius, Tycho Brahe, and Michael Maestlin’. In The Copernican Achievement, edited by Robert S. Westman, 285–345. Berkeley and Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press, 1975.
  • White, Andrew Dickson. The History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom. 2 vols. London: MacMillan, 1896.
  • Wickersheimer, Ernest. ‘La Prenostication Nouvelle pour 1504 de Bernard de la Forest et la Grant Prenostication Nouvelle pour 1515 de Wenceslas Fabri’. Bibliothèque d'humanisme et renaissance 17 (1955): 395–404.
  • Wohlwill, Emil. ‘Melanchthon und Copernicus’. Mitteilungen zur Geschichte der Medizin und der Naturwissenschaften 3 (1904): 260–267.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.