From scientia operativa to scientia intuitiva: Producing particulars in Bacon and Spinoza

Bibliography

• Anstey, Peter R. The Philosophy of Robert Boyle. London: Routledge, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Anstey, Peter R. “Robert Boyle and the Heuristic Value of Mechanism”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33, no. 1 (2002): 161–174. doi: 10.1016/S0039-3681(01)00034-6
   Google Scholar
• Aquinas, Thomas. Summa theologiae. Translated by Thomas Gilby et al. 60 vols. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964–1973.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Edited by Jonathan Barnes. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, Francis. The ‘Instauratio magna’ Part II: ‘Novum organum’ and Associated Texts. Vol. 11 of The Oxford Francis Bacon. Translated and edited by Graham Rees with Maria Wakely. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, Francis. The Works of Francis Bacon. Edited by James Spedding, Robert L. Ellis and Douglas D. Heath. 14 vols. London: Longman, 1857–1874.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, Robert. Tentamina quaedam physiologica diversis temporibus & occasionibus. London: H. Herringman, 1661. Accessed 3 April 2012. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2003&res_id=xri:eebo&rft_id=xri:eebo:citation:26738734
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, Robert. The Works of Robert Boyle. Edited by Michael Hunter and Edward B. Davis. 14 vols. London: Pickering & Chatto, 1999–2000.
   Google Scholar
• Buyse, Filip. “Spinoza, Boyle, Galileo: Was Spinoza a Strict Mechanical Philosopher?” Intellectual History Review 23, no. 1 (2013): 45–64. doi: 10.1080/17496977.2012.737990
   Google Scholar
• Carr, Spencer. “Spinoza's Distinction between Rational and Intuitive Knowledge”. The Philosophical Review 87, no. 2 (1978): 241–252. doi: 10.2307/2184754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, Alan. “Experiment Versus Mechanical Philosophy in the Work of Robert Boyle: A Reply to Anstey and Pyle”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33, no. 1 (2002): 191–197. doi: 10.1016/S0039-3681(01)00036-X
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, Alan. “The Lack of Excellency of Boyle's Mechanical Philosophy”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 24, no. 4 (1993): 541–564. doi: 10.1016/0039-3681(93)90052-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corneanu, Sorana, and Koen Vermeir. “Idols of the Imagination: Francis Bacon on the Imagination and the Medicine of the Mind”. Perspectives on Science 20 (2012): 183–206. doi: 10.1162/POSC_a_00062
   Google Scholar
• Craig, Patrick. “The Axiomatic Politics of Thomas Hobbes”. PhD diss., Duquesne University, Department of Philosophy, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Daudin, Henri. “Spinoza et la science expérimentale: Sa discussion de l'expérience de Boyle”. Revue d'Histoire des Sciences et de leurs applications 2, no. 2 (1949): 179–190. doi: 10.3406/rhs.1949.2695
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, Simon. “The Difference Between Science and Philosophy: The Spinoza-Boyle Controversy Revisited”. Paragraph 29, no. 2 (2006): 115–138. doi: 10.3366/prg.2006.0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funkenstein, Amos. Theology and the Scientific Imagination: From the Middle Ages to the Seventeenth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbey, Alan. “Spinoza's Natural Science and Methodology”. In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, edited by Don Garrett, 142–191. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Garber, Daniel. “Philosophia, Historia, Mathematica: Shifting Sands in the Disciplinary Geography of the Seventeenth Century”. In Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy: Seventeenth-Century Thinkers on Demonstrative Knowledge from First Principles, edited by Tom Sorrell, G.A.J. Rogers and Jill Kraye, 1–18. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, Aaron. Meaning in Spinoza’s Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, Don. “Spinoza's Theory of Scientia Intuitiva”. In Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy: Seventeenth-Century Thinkers on Demonstrative Knowledge from First Principles, edited by Tom Sorrell, G.A.J. Rogers and Jill Kraye, 99–115. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Gaukroger, Stephen. Francis Bacon and the Transformation of Early-Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gaukroger, Stephen. “The Unity of Natural Philosophy and the End of Scientia”. In Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy: Seventeenth-Century Thinkers on Demonstrative Knowledge from First Principles, edited by Tom Sorrell, G.A.J. Rogers and Jill Kraye, 19–33. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Gaukroger, Stephen. “Vico and the Maker's Knowledge Principle” History of Philosophy Quarterly 3, no. 1 (1986): 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Giglioni, Guido. “Mastering the Appetites of Matter: Francis Bacon's Sylva Sylvarum”. In The Body as Object and Instrument of Knowledge: Embodied Empiricism in Early Modern Science, edited by Charles T. Wolfe and Ofer Gal, 149–168. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Gueroult, Martial. Spinoza, 2 vols. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne, 1968–1974.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemeau, Évelyne. “Le retour au naturalisme dans le débat philosophique contemporain et l'actualité du spinozisme”. In Spinoza: Nature, Naturalisme, Naturation, edited by Charles Ramond, 69–91. Pessac: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemeau, Évelyne, and Charles Ramond. “Conception de l'expérience et méthodologie expérimentale selon Boyle et Spinoza”. In La philosophie naturelle de Robert Boyle, edited by Myriam Dennehy and Charles Ramond, 295–310. Paris: Vrin, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A. Rupert, and Marie Boas Hall. “Philosophy and Natural Philosophy: Boyle and Spinoza”. In Mélanges Alexandre Koyré, edited by Fernand Braudel, vol. 2, 241–256. Paris: Herman, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, John. “Metaphysics and the Origins of Modern Science: Descartes and the Importance of Laws of Nature”. Early Science and Medicine 9, no. 2 (2004): 73–114. doi: 10.1163/1573382041154051
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. Opera philosophica quae latine scripsit. Edited by William Molesworth. 5 vols. London: Bohn: 1839–1845.
   Google Scholar
• Jalobeanu, Dana. “Core Experiments, Natural Histories and the Art of Experientia Literata: The Meaning of Baconian Experimentation”. Society and Politics 2 (2011): 88–103.
   Google Scholar
• Jalobeanu, Dana. “Francis Bacon, Early Modern Baconians, and the Idols of Baconian Scholarship”. Society and Politics 7, no. 1 (2013): 5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Jaquet, Chantel. Les expressions de la puissance d'agir chez Spinoza. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Jaquet, Chantal. “Le problème du jugement théorique chez Bacon”. In Les facultés de l’âme à l’âge classique, edited by Chantal Jaquet and Tamás Pavlovits, 245–256. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.
   Google Scholar
• Jaquet, Chantal. “Le rôle de l'imagination dans la constitution du savoir chez Bacon”. In Les facultés de l’âme à l’âge classique, edited by Chantal Jaquet and Tamás Pavlovits, 37–53. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.
   Google Scholar
• Jaquet, Chantal. Sub Specie Aeternitatis: Étude de concepts de temps, durée et éternité chez Spinoza. Paris: Éditions Kimé, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Joy, Lynn S. “Scientific Explanation from Formal Causes to Laws of Nature”. In Early Modern Science, edited by Katherine Park and Lorraine Daston, 70–105. Vol. 3 of The Cambridge History of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kennington, Richard. Review of Francis Bacon's Idea of Science and the Maker's Knowledge Tradition, by Antonio Pérez-Ramos. Review of Metaphysics, 43, no. 2 (1989), 414–417.
   Google Scholar
• Kusukawa, Sachiko. “Bacon's Classification of Knowledge.” In The Cambridge Companion to Bacon, edited by Markku Peltonen, 47–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Macherey, Pierre. “Spinoza, la fin de l'histoire, et la ruse de la raison”. In Spinoza: Issues and Directions. The Proceedings of the Chicago Spinoza Conference, edited by Edwin Curley and Pierre-François Moreau, 327–346. Leiden: Brill, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Macherey, Pierre. “Spinoza, lecteur et critique de Boyle”. Revue du Nord 77 (1995): 733–774.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, Richard. “Spinoza's Physical Theory”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, spring 2012 edition. Accessed 15 February 2013. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/spinoza-physics/.
   Google Scholar
• Matheron, Alexandre. Individu et communauté chez Spinoza. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Moreau, Pierre-François, and Charles Ramond. “Brèves remarques sur le ‘naturalisme’ de Spinoza”. In Spinoza: Nature, Naturalisme, Naturation, edited by Charles Ramond, 7–10. Pessac: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Morfino, Vittorio. “Spinoza: An Ontology of Relations?” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 27, no. 1 (2006): 103–127. doi: 10.5840/gfpj200627115
   Google Scholar
• Nourisson, Jean Félix. Spinoza et le naturalisme contemporain. Paris: Didier et Cie, 1886.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, G.H.R. “Definition, Essence, and Understanding in Spinoza”. In Central Themes in Early Modern Thought, edited by J.A. Cover and Mark Kulstad, 49–67. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Ramos, Antonio. “Bacon's Forms and the Maker's Knowledge Tradition”. In The Cambridge Companion to Bacon, edited by Markku Peltonen, 99–120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Ramos, Antonio. Francis Bacon's Idea of Science and the Maker's Knowledge Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Polansky, Ronald. Aristotle’s ‘De anima’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Pyle, Andrew. “Boyle on Science and the Mechanical Philosophy: A Reply to Chalmers”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33, no. 1 (2002): 175–190. doi: 10.1016/S0039-3681(01)00035-8
   Google Scholar
• Ramond, Charles. “Nature Naturante, Nature Naturée: Sur quelques énigmes posées par une distinction archi-fameuse”. In Spinoza: Nature, Naturalisme, Naturation, edited by Charles Ramond, 92–119. Pessac: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ramond, Charles. Spinoza et la pensée moderne: Constitutions de l'Objectivité. Paris: L'Harmattan, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, Paolo. “Bacon's Idea of Science”. In The Cambridge Companion to Bacon, edited by Markku Peltonen, 25–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, Paolo. Francis Bacon: From Magic to Science. Translated by Sacha Rabinovitch. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, Paolo. Philosophy, Technology and the Arts in the Early Modern Era. Translated by Benjamin Nelson. Edited by Salvator Attanasio. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Sargent, Rose-Mary. The Diffident Naturalist: Robert Boyle and the Philosophy of Experiment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, Stephen, and Simon Schaffer. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Spinoza, Baruch. The Collected Works of Spinoza. Translated and edited by Edwin Curley. 2 vols. (only vol. 1 extant). Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Spinoza, Baruch. Complete Works. Translated by Samuel Shirley, edited by Michael L. Morgan. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing: 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Spinoza, Baruch. Nagelate schriften van B.D.S. (digital text and scans of the original work). Digitale Bibliotheek voor de Nederlandse Letteren (DBNL). Accessed 11 April 2013. http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/spin003nage01_01/
   Google Scholar
• Spinoza, Baruch. Opera, im auftrag der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften. Edited by Carl Gebhardt. 4 vols. Heidelberg: Carl Winters, 1925.
   Google Scholar
• Spinoza, Baruch. The Vatican Manuscript of Spinoza’s ‘Ethica’. Edited by Leen Spruit and Pina Totaro. Leiden: Brill, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Tosel, André. “Transitions éthiques et fluctuations de l'esprit dans la pensée de Spinoza”. In Architectures de la raison: Mélanges offerts à Alexandre Matheron, edited by Pierre François Moreau, 285–298. Fontenay/Saint-Cloud: ENS Éditions, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rooijen, A.J. Servaas. Inventaire des livres formant la bibliothèque de Benedict Spinoza. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1889.
   Google Scholar
• Vico, Giambattista. Opere. Edited by Fausto Nicolini. 8 vols. in 11. Bari: Laterza, 1911–1941.
   Google Scholar
• Von Duuglas-Ittu, Kevin. ‘Spinoza's Foci: Articles on Spinoza's Optics and Lens Grinding’ at Frames/sing. Accessed 2 July 2013. http://kvond.wordpress.com/spinozas-foci-articles-spinoza-optics-lens-grinding/.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, Sophie. “The Role of Mechanics in Francis Bacon's Great Instauration”. In Philosophies of Technology: Francis Bacon and his Contemporaries, edited by Claus Zittel, Gisela Engel, Romano Nani and Nicole C. Karafyllis, vol. 1, 133–195. Leiden: Brill, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Witmore, Michael. Culture of Accidents : Unexpected Knowledges in Early Modern England. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Yakira, Elkhanan. “Boyle et Spinoza”. Archives de Philosophie 51, no. 1 (1988): 107–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagorin, Perez. Francis Bacon. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar